B. Richardson <clovisite[_at_]hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Recently I was searching for midis to download. I always review
> webpages and look for remarks such as "public domain" or "free to
> download and use for noncommercial use". One particular sight had
> something like this:
>
> "Music recordings at this sight have been altered slightly
> (occasional note changes, etc.) so as not to infringe on the artist's
> copyright." Is this legal? Isn't that the same as saying "I changed a
> few words in the book by Nicholas Negroponte's, Being Digital;
> therefore, it's an original work and not subject to prior copyright."
I think that there is a basic misunderstanding of copyright here. What they are doing is creating a derivative work - which is one of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder. So, no, what they are doing in all probability does not get them around the copyright laws.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's. Original portions Copyright 1998 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Phoenix, Arizona bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.com ***Currently use the following: bhayden[_at_]uswest.netReceived on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 07:45:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT