On 6/20/98, Steven Melamut <melas[_at_]ils.unc.edu> wrote:
>
> The Court in Michigan Document Services clearly said that if the
> publisher is currently receiving income for these types of uses and
> the means of paying for your use is readily available, then the
> publisher is entitled to collect for the use. Giving the students
> copies of the articles to photocopy is still a deprivation of
> income. I don't think that the fact that the use is not-for-profit
> will shift the analysis away from that issue.
You may be right, but this is almost exactly opposite what I came away fron the case with. It seemed to me that this was a staight profit/non-profit and market impact case. Under MDS (and maybe *only* that case) it seemed to me that the scheme described would be OK no matter how many terms an instructor employed it.
James
James Michael Rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT