On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Robert Cumbow <cumbr[_at_]perkinscoie.com> wrote:
>
> As one of the dissenters in MDS insightfully pointed out, this is
> circular reasoning. It makes no sense to regard licensing revenue as
> part of the market for or value of the copyrighted work for the purpose
> of applying fair use factor #4, since if the use is fair, the owner
> would not be entitled to a license fee. Thus the majority view
> maintains that the copyright owner's entitlement to a license fee
> should be considered in determining whether or not the copyright owner
> is entitled to a license fee!
It may or may not be circular, but it certainly is conflating two different "products," namely the copyrighted work and licenses to reproduce the copyrighted work.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT