This sounds like what we have as a result of the EC directive on the legal protection of databases (and acording to my understanding what the US is now about to get). However:
English law also protects tables and compilations (like databases, species of literary works). I can't easily distinguish between a compilation and a database, except that a higher standard of originality is required if you call it a database, but you do get the rights described in 2 above. It would be interesting to hear if anyone can distinguishbetween the two concepts.
Incidentally, the compilation in the example would appear to fall squarely within the judgment in Grehound Raconf Association v Challis [1923-28] McG CC 370, where copyright protection was refused to lists of runners in greyhound races compiled by pulling their numbers out of a hat.
Peter Groves
Davis & Co (Solicitors) Limited
The Gate House
Clifford's Inn Passage
LONDON EC4A 1DN
UNITED KINGDOM
E-mail petergroves[_at_]compuserve.com
P Groves' direct tel +44 (0) 1235 832346
P Groves' mobile +44 (0) 7970 175097
Fax +44 (0) 1235 832878
Switchboard +44 (0) 171 328-7904
website http://davisco.net/
Registered in England no. 2812664 at the above address. Regulated by The Law Society in the conduct of investment business.
The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it is addressed. No-one else may copy or forward all or any of it in any form. If you receive this message in error, please e-mail the writer or call our office.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT