Re: Latest draft of 2B

From: Dan L Burk <BURKDANL[_at_]shu.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:17:46 -0400

On 07/22/98, Bruce Hayden <bhayden[_at_]uswest.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks to you and to Dan Burk for your prompt responses. I was
> especially struck by the fact that in the list of participants, IBM
> and HP are listed as licensees, presumably out there in the forefront
> of protecting the consumer.
>
> Which with my reading and understanding so far is really one of the big
> problems with the proposed laws - that there is little balance with the
> needs of the individual consumer.

There is a very sizeable literature on how the UCC "private legislature" drafting process is subject to special interest capture -- perhaps to an even greater extent than the public legislature, if such a thing can be imagined -- together with many bitter complaints about the results of previous article revisions.

But no one seems to have paid much attention to it, so Santayana is right again.



Dan L. Burk
Seton Hall University
burkdanl[_at_]shu.edu
Received on Thu Jul 23 1998 - 14:11:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:31 GMT