It is becoming increasingly common for the organisers of academic conferences to insist on the authors of submitted papers signing a form to transfer their copyright to the organiser or the organising institution or publisher.
Can anyone suggest what the organiser would lose by not bothering with such a stipulation? It does not seem to protect against submission of the same material to several conferences, if some of the words are changed. The advantage of being able to re-publish in a further publication without further permission seems insignificant.
I am organising a conference, and I warned authors that they will be asked to sign a copyright transfer form (since I am generally following normal practice for all the arrangements). So far one author has objected, which has made me wonder whether it is worthwhile to make this stipulation. I was prepared to provide a clause which would make it clear that the author could still publish extracts from a paper. The objection seems to be along the lines that copyright transfer is pointless anyway.
I would be grateful for list members' views on this matter. Everyone asks for transfer of copyright - nobody seems to know exactly why they do it!
Final details - it is an international conference, to be held in the UK, proceedings to be edited by me and published by the University.
Many thanks
Steve Childe
Dr Steve Childe, University of Plymouth, UK
s.childe[_at_]plymouth.ac.uk
http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/soc/staff/schilde/home.html
SMESME99: Second International Conference on
Stimulating Manufacturing Excellence
in Small and Medium Enterprises
Plymouth, 29-31 March 1999
http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/smesme/smesme99.htm
Received on Mon Jul 27 1998 - 15:36:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:31 GMT