On 98-08-04, Dan L. Burk <burkdanl[_at_]shu.edu> write:
>
> On 7/31/98, Pat Sloane <patsloane[_at_]aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 98-07-31, Dan L. Burk <burkdanl[_at_]shu.edu> writes:
> > >
> > > It would be, but probably isn't. Setting aside the merits of the
> > > suit (Raphael long ago fell into the public domain)
> >
> > It doesn't work this way. Museums have a right to control
> > activiities on their premises.
>
> Yes, but how is that relevant to the question that was posed? Once the
> image is off the premises, there is very little that the museum can do
> to control third party usage of the public domain elements in the image.
Recall that in many or most cases, the only way to get "the image... off the premises" is to buy a photograph from the museum that the museum photography department has taken, and in which they hold a copyright.
Why does little old me comply with the law, when you seem to be implying it's unenforceable?
Pat Sloane
<patsloane[_at_]aol.com>
Received on Tue Aug 04 1998 - 16:10:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:31 GMT