On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Bob Stock <bstock[_at_]ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> (court order kindly supplied by Bob has been severely edited)
>
> > 4. That the defendant, its agents, officers, attorneys and
> > employees and all acting in concert or participation with them, be and
> > hereby are permanently restrained and enjoined from offering for sale
> > or selling heat transfers containing expressions identical or
> > substantially similar to plaintiff's epigrams set forth above.
>
> Obviously, these are bare conclusions with no analysis as to the
> threshold question of copyrightability, but what the hell is a heat
> transfer, and why would defendant use those kinds of sayings on such
> a product?
It's a method of, for example, applying a design to a T-shirt.
-- Terry Carroll | Santa Clara, CA | carroll[_at_]tjc.com | Modell delendus est |Received on Mon Aug 17 1998 - 17:23:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:31 GMT