Robert Cumbow <cumbr[_at_]perkinscoie.com> wrote:
<Discussing instances of rejected copyright registrations>
>
> The rejected applicant's recourse is to write a letter of appeal.
> There is no formal review process, and there is no set form required
> for the appeal. A simple letter setting forth reasons why copyright
> registration should be granted is sufficient. Sometimes a well-pleaded
> letter is successful.
But why appeal? Don't you get the same benefits by filing and being rejected as you would get if you filed and the registration was accepted (at least for statutory damages and attys fees)?
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's. Original portions Copyright 1998 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Phoenix, Arizona bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.com ***Currently use the following: bhayden[_at_]uswest.netReceived on Thu Aug 20 1998 - 11:01:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:31 GMT