Re: Who Should Own Scientific Papers?

From: James Rogers <jetan[_at_]IONET.NET>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 16:37:46 -0500 (CDT)

On 9/24/98, Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, James Rogers <jetan[_at_]ionet.net> wrote:
> >
> > This idea seems so obvious and so excellent, from the standpoint
> > of the academic institution, that one I am a bit surprised that it
> > has not been attempted in the past. One caveat, does anyone else
> > see a potential antitrust problem in the article along the lines of
> > "concerted refusal to deal"?
>
> I don't see a refusal to deal. I see a refusal to accept a particular
> term.

     I see your objection. In another post responding to a similar objection made by Mr. Arnold-Moore, I have attempted to clarify the aspect of the scheme that struck me as questionable. Or perhaps I am just a crackpot... a definite posibility there.

                                       James

James Michael Rogers
jetan[_at_]ionet.net
Mundus Vult Decipi Received on Sat Sep 26 1998 - 05:57:06 GMT