Re: Work for Hire

From: Jayne Sebby <jsebby[_at_]unlinfo.unl.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 12:00:30 -0500 (CDT)

Re: California Work-For-Hire. Do both parties have to reside in California for the statute covering employee benefits to apply? Or does just one party have to reside there? Does it matter which one?

Jayne Sebby
Nebraska ETV
jsebby[_at_]unlinfo.unl.edu Received on Mon Sep 28 1998 - 17:04:33 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Terry Carroll: "Re: Databases, creativity, and copyright -- what's missing is wrong?"
Previous message: Michael Scarpitti: "Re: copyright expiration as a spur to creativity"
Maybe in reply to: Grant Herndon: "Work for Hire"
Next in thread: Mike Bradley: "Re: Work for Hire"
Reply: Mike Bradley: "Re: Work for Hire"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: PIJIP-COPYRIGHT List Archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:32 GMT