Re: Databases, creativity, and copyright -- what's missing is wrong?

From: Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 11:31:30 -0700 (PDT)

On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Karsten M. Self <kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> I'm suggesting that it's the missing data, and the lack of errors, in
> a strict compilation, which both provide value,

I'll buy that.

> constitute the unique attribute,

I'll buy that.

> and are the originality of a database.

Nope. Quite simply, the facts, including the correctness of the facts, are not original to the compiler of the database. The facts existed prior to the act of compilation.

--
Terry Carroll       | "Duke Nukem's world is made up of aliens, radio-
Santa Clara, CA     | active slime and freezer weapons--clearly fantasies,
carroll[_at_]tjc.com     | even by Los Angeles standards." - Micro Star v.
Modell delendus est | Formgen, Inc., no. 96-56433 (9th Cir. Sep 11, 1998)
Received on Mon Sep 28 1998 - 18:31:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:32 GMT