On 10/27/98, Mark Lemley <mlemley[_at_]mail.law.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
> On 10/26/98, Bob Stock <bstock[_at_]ucla.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I got into a tussle with an attorney in another forum about fair use
> > and whether it is decided by a judge or a jury. He appeared to be
>
> I would think that the Supreme Court's decision in Feltner this year put
> the "equitable" argument to rest.
Although I appreciate your input, I would rather you be a little less terse.
Feltner decided that despite the statutory language in section 504(c), a party is constitutionally entitled to have a jury decide the amount of statutory damages. Feltner contains emphatic language about the issue of damages being traditionally the province of a jury. There is even broader language about copyright cases being normally decided by juries. Fair use is *never* mentioned in the case. So, although perhaps you can read into Feltner the implication that in any copyright case where damages are demanded, all issues must be decided by a jury (if requested), I'm not sure that a case *not* about fair use puts any procedural dispute about fair use "to rest."
I'm not experienced in this yet, so bear with me while I pose a couple of practical hypos that announce my ignorance.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:33 GMT