On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Timothy Phillips <hrothgar[_at_]telepath.com> wrote:
>
> When the copyright extension bill passed the House, Mary Bono
> expressed sentiments similar to Mary Rodgers':
>
> Actually, Sonny wanted the term of copyright protection
> to last forever. I am informed by staff that such a
> change would violate the Constitution.
Does it bother anyone else that a member of Congress is so unfamiliar with the portion of the Constitution that sets out the powers of Congress that she has to be informed of basic limitations by "staff"?
-- Terry Carroll | "Report of the Committee On Governmental Affairs, Santa Clara, CA | United States Senate, To Accompany S. 1364, An Act To carroll[_at_]tjc.com | Eliminate Unnecessary and Wasteful Federal Reports." Modell delendus est | - Title of U.S. Senate Report 105-187, May 11, 1998Received on Wed Oct 28 1998 - 20:22:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:33 GMT