Re: Copyright Extension Bill Passes Congress

On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Karsten M. Self <kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.com> writes:
>
> This is precisely the issue. I've been trying to answer why this is?
> What is the nature of this contract that makes it non-revokable, as in
> your hypo below?

Lack of statement that it is irrevocable, lack of coupling with an interest, lack of consideration for the license, lack of reasonable reliance in the general cases.

Most licenses are revocable unless something is done to render it irrevocable.

Andrew C. Greenberg
<werdna[_at_]gate.net> Received on Fri Oct 30 1998 - 12:22:20 GMT