Re: Abandoning property (Was: Copyright Extension Bill Passes Congress)

From: Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:39:23 -0800 (PST)

On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Timothy Phillips <hrothgar[_at_]telepath.com> wrote:
>
> Under U.S. law copyright holders have always been considered to have
> public obligations. The 1976 law obscures this principle by applying
> copyright from the moment of fixation, to unpublished and published
> works alike.

That's kind of misleading. Unpublished works were protected by copyring in the U.S prior to the 1976 Act -- it's just that they were protected by state law rather than federal law.

-- 
Terry Carroll       | "Report of the Committee On Governmental Affairs,
Santa Clara, CA     | United States Senate, To Accompany S. 1364, An Act To
carroll[_at_]tjc.com     | Eliminate Unnecessary and Wasteful Federal Reports."
Modell delendus est |  - Title of U.S. Senate Report 105-187, May 11, 1998
Received on Mon Nov 23 1998 - 18:42:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:33 GMT