On Wed, 03 Feb 1999, Patrice A. Lyons <plyons/0003432266[_at_]mcimail.com> wrote:
>
> After State Street Bank patent case, it may be that a "fact" is not
> protectible as such, but the process that produced it is?
The process that manages money to produce a 10.5% return may be patentable, if it meets all of the statutory requirements. I am not sure about the process that computes a number, like 10.5% -- how useful is the process??
-- Thomas E. Workman Jr. <tworkman[_at_]erols.com>Received on Thu Feb 04 1999 - 23:00:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:34 GMT