On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Tyler Ochoa <tochoa[_at_]law.whittier.edu> wrote:
>
> I happen to agree with Judge Easterbrook in this particular case; but
> before joining the chorus of effusive praise, you might want to consider
> that he also wrote the opinion in ProCD v. Zeidenberg, a decision that
> many (including myself) consider to be even more pernicious than Mirage
> (at least in practical effect).
>
Not to mention Hill v. Gateway 2000 (making ProCD look downright balanced), and American Dental Association (making Feist look downright overruled -- or should that be underruled?).
Mark Lemley
<mlemley[_at_]mail.law.utexas.edu>
Received on Fri Feb 19 1999 - 17:07:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:34 GMT