Re: Work for Hire and Copyright Assignment.

On 2/3/99, Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Kaye Caldwell <kaye[_at_]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > In California the work-for-hire might be sufficient since under
> > California law it makes them an employee in which case the employer
> > owns the copyright anyway.
>
> In California, a work-made-for-hire agreement does not make the hired
> party an employee, except for purposes of assessing unemployment
> insurance and worker's compensation contribution.

Please enlighten me as to which case has this as its holding.

Wendy

Wendy Nemeroff
<wendy_nemeroff[_at_]geoworks.com> Received on Fri Mar 26 1999 - 01:25:03 GMT