On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, C.E. Petit <cepetit[_at_]usa.net> wrote:
>
> That said, it's still inexcusable. Since there's no compensation
> (other than the dubious courtesy of contributors' copies) for
> publishing a law review article, is there adequate consideration
> for transfer of copyright? As a matter of fairness, etc., I don't
> believe so. But, since adequacy of consideration is seldom inquired
> into, that argument won't fly. It is still, however, unethical for
> an academic publisher to demand copyright in a law review article.
> Then again, these are the trustees who look the other way at NCAA
> violations, so long as the team is winning...
I certainly support the position of writers when we are up against the interests of publishers, but I must disagree that the assignment of copyright has anything to do with ethical considerations on either side.
-- Rod Dixon rod[_at_]cyberspaces.org http://www.cyberspaces.org/ 202-270-9422Received on Thu Apr 01 1999 - 00:11:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:35 GMT