Re: Lame "dilution" assertion by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.

From: Juhre, Michael <Michael.Juhre[_at_]AIG.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:18:31 -0400

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Adrienne Meddock <ameddock[_at_]bambi.acc.nccu.edu> wrote:
>
> Profound Banal? That sounds like the Jeff Koons territory in the
> Ushering in Banality cases.

     As I wrote in another message, I did mean 'profoundly' banal (no less haughty, but at least gramatically correct). I've never been a fan of Jeff Koons' work (or lack thereof, as it were) but the Koons decision DID disturb me. I have not reviewed the case since entering the IP field two years ago, but I will. I feel obligated to defend the right of mockery which, in my opinion, was exactly what Koons' piece was.

Michael Juhre
<michael.juhre[_at_]aig.com> Received on Fri Apr 23 1999 - 15:20:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:35 GMT