http://www.opencontent.org/faq.shtml
"Computer software can already be made free for public consumption
and improvement by distribution under one of several Free Software
licenses as mentioned above. If you're developing executable code
with instructional potential, please consider licensing it as "Free
Software" so that it can both be a part of the Bazaar development
cycle and freely accessible to everyone. Other Content (Learning
Objects) such as graphics, images, sound bytes, video clips, models,
lecture notes, tutorials, HOW-TO's and anything else that can be
"referenced during technology supported learning" can not be released
under these licenses because they are written specifically for
computer software. The OpenContent License has been created to
provide instructional designers and content specialists the same
benefits, protections and assurances programmers gain from Free
Software licenses. The OPL (pronounced "opal") is always open for
comment. This version draws inspiration (and some verbiage) from
the GPL and Debian's Social Contract."
Maurizio
Maurizio Oliva, Director - Multimedia Language Learning Center - Fellows 302 - Denison University - Granville, OH 43023, Office P (740) 587-6684, F 587-6417, Home P/F (614) 421-0897, oliva[_at_]denison.edu http://www.denison.edu/~oliva/ = flow of ideas = Received on Tue Jun 22 1999 - 12:44:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:35 GMT