Re: Florida Pre-paid v. College Savings Bank

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Alan Kabat <alankabat[_at_]aol.com> wrote:
>
> The relevance of this is that if a copyright owner claims that a state
> government entity, such as a state university or a state tourism bureau,
> has infringed her copyright, she may be out of luck...

There is still a glimmer of hope for copyright suits in that, as Steven's dissent notes, the majority relied heavily on the sparse record of abuse in rejecting the 14th Amendment argument, whereas the record is apparently much stronger with respect to the Copyright abrogation resolution.

Sheldon W. Halpern
The Ohio State University College of Law <shalpern[_at_]pop.service.ohio-state.edu> Received on Sun Jun 27 1999 - 18:48:57 GMT