On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Carol Cricow <carol[_at_]yujean.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Greg Ikonen <gikonen[_at_]venlaw.com> wrote:
> >
> > With the exception of the copyleft folks, most people acknowledge that
> > a copyright protection regime encourages creative efforts, and that
> > the promotion of these efforts is a good thing for society.
>
> That's the second time this week I've seen the word "copyleft." The
> other was in a publishing contract where "copyleft" rights were reserved
> by the publisher to allow people to make copies for distribution within
> their offices of a copyrighted work (the contract was between author and
> publisher).
>
> Is this really a word? Does it have any legal meaning?
6 replies
196 lines, 7893 bytes
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[1]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 06:33:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar[_at_]free-expression.org>
Subject: Re: Copyleft?
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907270631490.18250-100000[_at_]se232.math.indiana.edu>
It's often used to describe a particular type of copyright license, usually used for free software.
Check http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html
Lynn
[2]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:55:52 -0400
From: David Bozak <dab[_at_]cs.oswego.edu>
Subject: Re: Copyleft?
Message-Id: <379D9E48.1B7C95[_at_]cs.oswego.edu>
copyleft is a fairly old (in computing terms) concept first used by Richard Stallman in protecting the work of the Free Software Foundation. see http://www.gnu.org/fsf/fsf.html to learn about the FSF and related page on the GNU project.
-dab
-- David Alan Bozak Associate Dean, Art & Sciences ________|________ dab[_at_]cs.oswego.edu SUNY Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126 ___\__(*)__/___ 315.341.2156 http://www.cs.oswego.edu/~dab o/ \o "When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl." [3] Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:47:56 -0400 From: Diane Cabell <cabell[_at_]mama-tech.com> Subject: Re: Copyleft? Message-Id: <379D9C6B.28CD681C[_at_]mama-tech.com> Copyleft is a concept popularized by MacArthur award winner, Richard Stallman, among others. The problem is finding a method that ensures that works will remain freely available to the public. If one simply puts software in the public domain (a difficult enough task as it is), a derivative can then be created which is proprietary. The proprietary derivative might then become the defacto standard or be bundled with other proprietary programs. To avoid having a work co-opted in this fashion, copyleft regimes assert rights in the original work and issue GNU licenses that permit free reproduction and distribution but forbid creating restricted derivatives. See <http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html> See Copyleft: Licensing Collaborative Works in the Digital Age, by Ira V. Heffan, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 6, July 1997 for a legal analysis which argues in favor of enforceability. Diane Cabell http://www.mama-tech.com/ Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP Boston, MA <cabell[_at_]mama-tech.com> [4] Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:31:59 -0500 From: "Stephen J. Hyland" <shyland[_at_]computer-lawyer.com> Subject: Re: Copyleft? Message-Id: <379DA6BE.E3A516E3[_at_]computer-lawyer.com> Copyleft was the term introduced by Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation. It is an attempt to prevent free software from being turned into proprietary software. All Gnu software (compilers, UNIX tools, etc.) in the Gnu software project carries this designation. For more information, see http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html As far as whether it has any legal meaning, there is no statutory support for the term. I am not aware of any cases, either, in which the term has come up. Too bad Bob Stock doesn't have Westlaw access anymore. ;-) However, the FSF/Gnu software license is certainly enforceable. Stephen J. Hyland <shyland[_at_]computer-lawyer.com> [5] Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:17:37 -0700 From: Bruce Hayden <bhayden[_at_]ieee.org> Subject: Re: Copyleft? Message-Id: <379DBF81.B62799A8[_at_]ieee.org> Yes it is a word, probably coined by Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation (fsf.org). Copyleft is a clever attempt by them (FSF/Stallman) to essentially reverse copyright using copyright law. A copy of the GNU General Public License can be found at http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html The way it works is somewhat slick. You start with the premise that copyright on code is infringed by modifying it (it is the creation of a derivative work, plus potentially reproduction and public distribution). Then someone (FSF/Stallman, et al.) releases software that comes with a copyleft license. It grants a developer a license to modify the code, as long as you license the modified code the same way. The license provides that among other things that you won't make money on the software, and that you will provide source code. The result, for a great extent, is freely modifiable, freely available software. You will notice if you go the the above FSF web site, that the license has a 1989 copyright date on it. During most of the last ten or so years, copyleft/GNU was somewat nichy, covering the EMACS word processor and some GNU compilers, but not that much stuff in the mainstream. But recently, it has gone mainstream with Linux. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's. Original portions Copyright 1999 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Phoenix, Arizona bhayden[_at_]ieee.org bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.com [6] Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael R <mlr909[_at_]yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Copyleft? Message-Id: <19990727145815.19982.rocketmail[_at_]web601.yahoomail.com> The entire following passage is from: http://whatis.com/copyleft.htm "Copyleft is the idea and the specific stipulation when distributing software that the user will be able to copy it freely, examine and modify the source code, and redistribute the software to others (free or priced) as long as the redistributed software is also passed along with the copyleft stipulation. The term was originated by Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation (FSF). Copyleft favors the software user's rights and convenience over the commercial interests of the software makers. It also reflects the belief that freer redistribution and modification of software would encourage users to make improvements to it. ("Free software" is not the same as freeware, which is usually distributed with copyright restrictions.) Stallman and his adherents do not object to the price or profit aspects of creation and redistribution of software -- only to the current restrictions placed on who can use how many copies of the software and how and whether the software can be modified and redistributed The de facto collaboration that developed and refined UNIX and other collegially-developed programs led the FSF to the idea of "free" software and copyleft. In 1983, the FSF began developing a "free software" project that would both demonstrate the concept while providing value to users. The project was called GNU, an operating system similar to a UNIX system. GNU and its various components are currently available and are distributed with copyleft stipulations. New software is being developed. More information on copyleft can be found on the Free Software Foundation's home page." Michael Reedy <mlr909[_at_]yahoo.com> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com/Received on Tue Jul 27 1999 - 11:35:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:36 GMT