On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Bob Cumbow <rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com> mentioned:
>
> ... the Seinfeld 'transformative use' case ...
>
> I grant that the Seinfeld case was wrongly decided.
Never heard of it. Hasn't everybody heard of Wisconsin's "Seinfeld" case? An abomination were a miscreant worker used Seinfeld's low-brow humour and sophomoric innuendo to harass women, was fired by Miller Brewing and then won a $27 million judgment in a dog-and-pony show trial?
What are the facts of your "Seinfeld" case Bob? What's the rule of law it spawned?
Nick Zales
Zales Law Office
Milwaukee, WI
<zales[_at_]execpc.com>
Received on Tue Aug 24 1999 - 13:28:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:36 GMT