On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Robert Cumbow <rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com> wrote:
>
> Companies that use a lot of contracts, and have over time developed
> boilerplate contracts that they rely on, are increasingly coming to
> regard those "form" agreements as proprietary to them and protectable
> as original works. To the best of my knowledge, their protectability
> has not yet been tested in a court of law. Some years ago certain
> insurance companies began putting copyright notices on their policies,
> as well; and their protectability HAS been affirmed in court.
I see no reason though why such contracts should not be protected by copyright, to the extent that they contain original expression. (Obviously, there would have to be some sort of filtering to eliminate nonoriginal stuff, stuff that could only be expressed in a limited number of ways, etc.)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's.
Original portions Copyright 1999 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved
My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution,
as long as the copying is not for commercial gain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org
Phoenix, Arizona bhayden[_at_]ieee.org
bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.com
Received on Thu Aug 26 1999 - 17:12:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:36 GMT