In his article "The Failure of the American Copyright System: Protecting the Idle Rich", professor patry remarked that
United States copyright law has failed of its essential purpose--to benefit authors--and is being shaped largely by powerful distributors and their lobbyists with the dual goals of extending a monopoly (in order to extract high prices from the public) while simultaneously depriving authors of as much money as possible (though thye push authors forward, puppet-like, as the intended beneficiaries). _Notre Dame Law Review_ 72(4), May 1997, p. 907, at 909.
Professor Patry's observation is not new. Similar remarks were made by Attorney-General Thurlow in his remarks at the start of proceedings in the case of Donaldson v. Becket in 1774:
The booksellers [Attorney-General Thurlow] observed... had not, till lately, ever concerned themselves about authors, but had generally confined the substance of their prayers to the legislature, to the security of their own property; nor would they probably have, of late years, introduced the authors as parties in their claims to the common law right of exclusively multiplying copies, had not they found it necessary to give a colourable face to their monopoly. Donaldson v. Becket, _Parlimentary History of England_, Vol. 17, p. 953 (14 George III), at 954.
Tim Phillips
<hrothgar[_at_]telepath.com>
Received on Fri Aug 27 1999 - 02:52:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:36 GMT