On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bruce E. Hayden <bhayden[_at_]ieee.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Mark Lemley <mlemley[_at_]mail.law.utexas.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/24/1999, Dana Bostrom <bostrom[_at_]u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > I received a contract to review that had a copyright notice. None
> > > of my colleagues had ever seen this before. Any ideas on why it
> > > would be included?
> >
> > Perhaps you should send them a completely different draft, along
> > with a note saying you would have liked to adopt their terms, but
> > were afraid of infringing the copyright if you did so ... :~)
>
> I would think that there would be an implied license to create
> a derivative work when a copyright marked contract is submitted
> for negotiations.
Would that also apply if the firm that submitted the form of contract had a patent on it?
-- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu/ NOTE: junger[_at_]pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer existsReceived on Fri Aug 27 1999 - 11:48:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:36 GMT