On 10/21/99, Michael do Rozario <mdr[_at_]abkj.com.au> wrote:
>
> More to the point -- what is "transmongled?" (The word certainly doesn't
> appear in the Oxford Australian... maybe I need a Funk & Wagnells???) --
> Is this more "lawyerly doublespeak??"
My guess is that he was making a stab at "transmogrified."
John Allison
<allisonj[_at_]mail.utexas.edu>
Received on Thu Oct 21 1999 - 12:45:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:37 GMT