On Thu, Oct 21, 1999, Carol Simpson <csimpson[_at_]lis.admin.unt.edu> wrote:
>
> On 10/20/99, Ari Kahan <akahan[_at_]netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > To the extent there was any implied license granted by the act
> > of posting to Usenet, Deja is substantially exceeding its contours.
>
> This may be naive (since I'm not an attorney) but if no one is willing
> to challenge Deja News, don't they have a license by default? How can
> a precedent be set if no one is willing to call them to task?
I don't think so. You get a license by someone's implying that you CAN use the work, NOT by their failure to say you can't.
Bob
Robert C. Cumbow
> Graham & Dunn, P.C.
> 1420 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor
> Seattle, Washington 98101-2390
> Phone: 206-340-9619
> Fax: 206-340-9599
> E-mail: rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com
> Website: http://www.grahamdunn.com/
Received on Fri Oct 22 1999 - 17:01:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:37 GMT