CNI-COPYRIGHT by date

SubjectAuthorDate
IMPORTANT: New home at American U. PIJIP for cni-copyright listservJoan K. LippincottFriday, 23 February
RE: Copyright protection for geographic codesWilliam T. McGrathWednesday, 21 February
Copyright protection for geographic codesJoy ButlerTuesday, 20 February
Re: Re: use of musicVance R. KovenTuesday, 20 February
Re: Re: InquiryEdward BarrowTuesday, 20 February
PIJIP March EventsSean FlynnTuesday, 20 February
Re: Re: InquiryTerry CarrollFriday, 16 February
Re: use of musicSteven JamarFriday, 16 February
Re: Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Steven JamarFriday, 16 February
Re: Re: Inquiryjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 16 February
Re: Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Edward BarrowFriday, 16 February
RE: [Disarmed] Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not? (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 16 February
Re: use of musicVance R. KovenFriday, 16 February
Re: use of musicIvan HoffmanFriday, 16 February
Inquiry AND Online class projects on commercial siteTheodora MichaelsFriday, 16 February
Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Wendy ChristensenFriday, 16 February
use of musicSusan PayneFriday, 16 February
Re: InquiryEdward BarrowFriday, 16 February
Re: InquiryMichael SeadleThursday, 15 February
Re: InquiryAmalyah KeshetThursday, 15 February
RE: InquiryDailey, David P.Thursday, 15 February
InquiryHerring, MarkThursday, 15 February
RE: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Raymond DowdMonday, 12 February
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and MultimediaEducation fDodi SchultzMonday, 12 February
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Edward BarrowMonday, 12 February
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and MultimediaEducation for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleFriday, 9 February
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Rob TiessenFriday, 9 February
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Carol SimpsonFriday, 9 February
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleThursday, 8 February
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Terry CarrollThursday, 8 February
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Rob TiessenWednesday, 7 February
New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleWednesday, 7 February
Collectanea!: Collected Perspectives On CopyrightDavid P. DillardMonday, 5 February
Re: Source for copyright statistics?AlanKabat[_at_]aol.comMonday, 5 February
Re: Source for copyright statistics?David DaileyMonday, 5 February
IP Counsel in India (Please reply off list)CMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMonday, 5 February
Source for copyright statistics?Joy ButlerFriday, 2 February
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasRich StimFriday, 2 February
Re: Re: Protecting Ideasjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 2 February
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasFreya AndersonFriday, 2 February
Re: Re: Protecting Ideas. This sentence is uncopyrightable (period).Brian LucasFriday, 2 February
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasTerry CarrollThursday, 1 February
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasSteven JamarThursday, 1 February
Re: Re: Protecting Ideasjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comWednesday, 31 January
Re: Re: Protecting Ideas. This sentence is uncopyrightable (period).David DaileyWednesday, 31 January
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasLawrence RosenWednesday, 31 January
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasTerry CarrollTuesday, 30 January
CopyOwner » Right to Rent AudiobooksJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 30 January
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasLawrence RosenTuesday, 30 January
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasSteven JamarMonday, 29 January
Re: Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"Carol ShepherdMonday, 29 January
Re: Archive/Oral History questionCarol ShepherdMonday, 29 January
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasRoland ColeMonday, 29 January
RE: Re: Protecting Ideasakeshet[_at_]imj.org.ilMonday, 29 January
RE: Protecting IdeasMichael GrahamSaturday, 27 January
Re: Protecting IdeasAlain MinodierSaturday, 27 January
Protecting IdeasLarry JenksWednesday, 24 January
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerRaymond DowdTuesday, 23 January
Re: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerJohn T. MitchellMonday, 22 January
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerEvan BrownMonday, 22 January
SV: Re: Scandinavia and copyright issuesKatarina Renman ClaessonMonday, 22 January
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Anne StevensSaturday, 20 January
Re: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerMichael DodsonSaturday, 20 January
Re: Scandinavia and copyright issuesAnne StevensSaturday, 20 January
Archive/Oral History questionLaura Young BostSaturday, 20 January
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerRaymond DowdThursday, 18 January
Re: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThursday, 18 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThursday, 18 January
RE: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Roland ColeThursday, 18 January
Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThursday, 18 January
RE: Re: Copyright of lists (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 18 January
Re: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Vance R. KovenThursday, 18 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarThursday, 18 January
Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"John T. MitchellWednesday, 17 January
Re: Copyright of listsMark ReinmillerWednesday, 17 January
Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Mike OliverWednesday, 17 January
Yale ISP's Open Standards International Symposium (OSIS)Eddan KatzWednesday, 17 January
"State trooper lays claim to software he developed"Terry CarrollTuesday, 16 January
RE: Re: Copyright of listsRaymond DowdTuesday, 16 January
FW: Re: Copyright of liststritt002Tuesday, 16 January
RE: Re: Copyright of listsRoland ColeTuesday, 16 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarTuesday, 16 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsEdward BarrowTuesday, 16 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsVance R. KovenTuesday, 16 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTuesday, 16 January
RE: Re: Copyright of lists (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 16 January
RE: Re: Copyright of listsWebb, JereTuesday, 16 January
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarFriday, 12 January
RE: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Jan Carmikle DwyerFriday, 12 January
Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 12 January
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 12 January
Re: Copyright of listsAndrew SkinnerLopataThursday, 11 January
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Anne StevensThursday, 11 January
RE: Non contracted intelectual property. (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 10 January
Re: Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.jrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comTuesday, 9 January
Re: Copyright of listsRandal NieuwsmaTuesday, 9 January
Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Ethan AckermanTuesday, 9 January
Copyright of listsHGSTuesday, 9 January
Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Steven JamarTuesday, 9 January
Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Vance R. KovenTuesday, 9 January
RE: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Elizabeth T RussellTuesday, 9 January
Re: Non contracted intelectual property.jrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comMonday, 8 January
Non contracted intelectual property.Brian LucasMonday, 8 January
Library Related ConferencesMarian DworaczekFriday, 5 January
Re: Re: Title 17 updateJanet NepkieWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateVance R. KovenWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateJohn LevineWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateMichael Landau-GSUWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updatejfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comWednesday, 3 January
jfnbl@earthlink.com has sent you a file.droploadWednesday, 3 January
Title 17 updateDodi SchultzWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateStephen FishmanWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateG Norona JrWednesday, 3 January
RE: Title 17 updateDuhaime, DianeWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 3 January
RE: Russian artists copyright collective?Kevin HawkinsWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updatewsimmons[_at_]TheWorld.comWednesday, 3 January
Re: Title 17 updateChristopher GwynWednesday, 3 January
Title 17 updateJanet NepkieTuesday, 2 January
Happy Public Domain Day!Wallace J.McLeanTuesday, 2 January
RE: Russian artists copyright collective?Robert PanzerThursday, 28 December
Russian artists copyright collective?Amalyah KeshetWednesday, 27 December
Version 66, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Monday, 18 December
Re: Re: video games -- public performance?David DaileyWednesday, 13 December
Re: Re: video games -- public performance?John T. MitchellMonday, 11 December
Re: Copyright Educational MaterialsRandal NieuwsmaMonday, 11 December
RE: video games -- public performance?Judy J. DehleMonday, 11 December
video games -- public performance?Laura JewellThursday, 7 December
Copyright Educational MaterialsJulie RustadThursday, 7 December
Nominations for L. Ray Patterson Copyright AwardJanice PilchSunday, 3 December
RE: Re: please help - case law for mult copies?Robert KasunicMonday, 27 November
Re: Distance Education, Intellectual Property, and The TEACH ActDenisTuesday, 21 November
Re: International Copyright & Disclaimer infoJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 15 November
RE: International Copyright & Disclaimer infoAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 15 November
SEC Filings and Company Annual and Quarterly reportsTimothy NichollsWednesday, 15 November
International Copyright & Disclaimer infoWald, Joanne \(ESC\)Tuesday, 14 November
Distance Education, Intellectual Property, and The TEACH ActKatherine McDanielTuesday, 14 November
Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography ChangesCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 3 November
Re: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorSteven JamarWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorAndrew SkinnerLopataWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorVance R. KovenWednesday, 1 November
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorJessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 1 November
RE: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorMichael GrahamWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorSteven JamarWednesday, 1 November
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRaymond DowdWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: fourth fair use factor - burden of proofJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 1 November
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRoland ColeWednesday, 1 November
Library Related ConferencesMarian DworaczekWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorVance R. KovenWednesday, 1 November
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorEthan AckermanTuesday, 31 October
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorjrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comTuesday, 31 October
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRaymond DowdMonday, 30 October
RE: fourth fair use factorRoland ColeFriday, 27 October
Re: fourth fair use factorjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 27 October
(no subject)Varvel, VirgilFriday, 27 October
fourth fair use factorJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 26 October
Regarding Copyright ....Srinivas.Manda [laksinu.com]Tuesday, 24 October
RE: music copyright and fair useMichael GrahamMonday, 23 October
Re: Re: please help - case law for mult copies?Andrew SkinnerLopataMonday, 23 October
music copyright and fair useJud BurkettMonday, 23 October
10th Anniversary Version of Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 18 October
re: please help - case law for mult copies?Belvadi, MelissaWednesday, 18 October
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitSeso DigitalMonday, 16 October
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use,non-profitLaura Young BostMonday, 16 October
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitSteven JamarMonday, 16 October
please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitBelvadi, MelissaMonday, 16 October
RE: Nondramatic music performance: Section 110 (4)Brewer, MichaelWednesday, 11 October
Re: Question from a StudentJohn ThomsonWednesday, 11 October
Re: Question from a StudentRaymond DowdWednesday, 11 October
RE: Re: Question from a StudentJeffrey S. AnkromWednesday, 11 October
Logo Usage - Copyrights & TrademarksScott ButcherWednesday, 11 October
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Wednesday, 11 October
Nondramatic music performance: Section 110 (4)Randal NieuwsmaWednesday, 11 October
Re: Question from a StudentSteven JamarTuesday, 10 October
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 10 October
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSteven JamarTuesday, 10 October
Question from a StudentHalbert, Debora Tuesday, 10 October
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionTerry CarrollTuesday, 10 October
"Strong Copyright + DRM + Weak Net Neutrality = Digital Dystopia?" PostprintCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tuesday, 10 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Friday, 6 October
RE: Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Friday, 6 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Friday, 6 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Friday, 6 October
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'License By Default' Will Doom the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickFriday, 6 October
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionS. Martin KeletiFriday, 6 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionJohn LevineWednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionAndrew SkinnerLopataWednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 4 October
IP Conference, October 26-28, at the Cornell Club, New York CitySheldon HalpernWednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSteven JamarWednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionAlain MinodierWednesday, 4 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Wednesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 4 October
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionKenneth LiuTuesday, 3 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTuesday, 3 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRichard WigginsMonday, 2 October
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionKenneth LiuMonday, 2 October
Re: Re: Translation copyrightJohn T. MitchellMonday, 2 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Monday, 2 October
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJohn LevineMonday, 2 October
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionShawn N. SullivanMonday, 2 October
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRandal NieuwsmaMonday, 2 October
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWallace J.McLeanFriday, 29 September
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRich StimFriday, 29 September
RE: [Maybe Spam] Translation copyrightMichael GrahamFriday, 29 September
Re: Translation copyrightSteven JamarFriday, 29 September
RE: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWebb, JereFriday, 29 September
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJohn LevineFriday, 29 September
Re: Translation copyrightjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 29 September
Re: Translation copyrightSamuel MurrayFriday, 29 September
Re: Translation copyrightVance R. KovenFriday, 29 September
Translation copyrightKathy TadlockThursday, 28 September
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Thursday, 28 September
Loss of deposit materials by Copyright OfficeEvan BrownTuesday, 26 September
Re: Re: Power of Attorney in Employment Agreementjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTuesday, 26 September
RE: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementJulian A. HaffnerTuesday, 26 September
RE: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementElizabeth T RussellMonday, 25 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMonday, 25 September
Re: Power of Attorney in Employment Agreementjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMonday, 25 September
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMonday, 25 September
Re: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementCarl OppedahlMonday, 25 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMonday, 25 September
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Terry CarrollMonday, 25 September
Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementHeather VargasMonday, 25 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanFriday, 22 September
RE: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Klein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OFriday, 22 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesKarl-Erik TallmoFriday, 22 September
Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Karen CoyleFriday, 22 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFriday, 22 September
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)David DaileyFriday, 22 September
RE: Acknowledging SamplesVarvel, VirgilFriday, 22 September
Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Terry CarrollThursday, 21 September
False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)John T. MitchellWednesday, 20 September
Re: Dylan and Timrod and the creative processWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 20 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarWednesday, 20 September
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 20 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 September
Judge Kozinski to Address Fair UseSean FlynnWednesday, 20 September
Dylan and Timrod and the creative processSteven JamarWednesday, 20 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarTuesday, 19 September
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarTuesday, 19 September
conference announcementAmalyah KeshetTuesday, 19 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMonday, 18 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatDavid DaileyMonday, 18 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanMonday, 18 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanMonday, 18 September
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMonday, 18 September
Re: FW: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2789Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 18 September
FW: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2789Varvel, VirgilFriday, 15 September
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 15 September
RE: Re: Acknowledging samplesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 15 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarFriday, 15 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatKarl-Erik TallmoFriday, 15 September
Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 15 September
Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 15 September
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesVance R. KovenFriday, 15 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarThursday, 14 September
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarThursday, 14 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanThursday, 14 September
Acknowledging samplesVarvel, VirgilThursday, 14 September
Copyright status of AOL search logs?Richard WigginsWednesday, 13 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWednesday, 13 September
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 13 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 12 September
Re: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Steven JamarTuesday, 12 September
AW: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Dominik P. RubliTuesday, 12 September
RE: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 12 September
Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?J. NobleMonday, 11 September
Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?John T. MitchellMonday, 11 September
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 11 September
Re: Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanFriday, 8 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarFriday, 8 September
Re: Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatRob TiessenFriday, 8 September
e: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineFriday, 8 September
DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Dominik P. RubliFriday, 8 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatMike HoldernessThursday, 7 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatNicole DavignonThursday, 7 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJ. NobleThursday, 7 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayThursday, 7 September
Fwd: The WIPO casting treaty -- why decisions about the new technologies are importantJames LoveThursday, 7 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSeso DigitalWednesday, 6 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 6 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWednesday, 6 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineWednesday, 6 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatCarl OppedahlWednesday, 6 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineWednesday, 6 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWednesday, 6 September
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatRoland ColeWednesday, 6 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatjohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netTuesday, 5 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayTuesday, 5 September
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAlain MinodierTuesday, 5 September
Online copyright courseslesley[_at_]copyrightlaws.comTuesday, 5 September
Re: Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongDavid P. DillardTuesday, 5 September
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 5 September
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarFriday, 1 September
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 1 September
Autumn 2006 Online Workshops from the Center for Intellectual PropertyJack BoeveFriday, 1 September
RE: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 1 September
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThursday, 31 August
Judge Kozinski Sept. 21, 2006 WCL-Finnegan, Henderson Disginuished Lecture on Intellectual PropertyJoshua SarnoffThursday, 31 August
Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 31 August
Re: Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongTerry CarrollThursday, 31 August
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThursday, 31 August
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThursday, 31 August
Re: Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementSteven JamarWednesday, 30 August
Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongSteven JamarWednesday, 30 August
40 to testify at USPTO on WIPO broadcast/netcasting treaty on September 5, 2006James LoveWednesday, 30 August
RE : Re: Derivative InquiryI.R.MaturanaWednesday, 30 August
Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayWednesday, 30 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryDavid DaileyWednesday, 30 August
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekWednesday, 30 August
Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongMarcia KeyserWednesday, 30 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryBarbara RuhmannTuesday, 29 August
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementKlein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarTuesday, 29 August
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 29 August
Re: Derivative InquiryJan Carmikle DwyerTuesday, 29 August
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryJason sheperdTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarTuesday, 29 August
Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementSteven JamarTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 29 August
Odd (and misleading) copyright statementDodi SchultzTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesJ. NobleTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksAlain MinodierTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAlain MinodierTuesday, 29 August
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksSamuel MurrayTuesday, 29 August
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 29 August
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 29 August
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAngela MottMonday, 28 August
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesSteven JamarMonday, 28 August
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanMonday, 28 August
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanMonday, 28 August
RE: Re: Filming of sculpturesMichael GrahamMonday, 28 August
Re: Derivative InquiryTerry CarrollMonday, 28 August
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksTerry CarrollMonday, 28 August
Odd (and misleading) copyright statementBrewer, MichaelMonday, 28 August
Re: Derivative InquiryJohn T. MitchellMonday, 28 August
RE: Derivative InquiryDenis N. MagnussonMonday, 28 August
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesJ. NobleMonday, 28 August
Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarMonday, 28 August
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesSteven JamarMonday, 28 August
Re: Derivative InquirySamuel MurrayMonday, 28 August
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksSamuel MurrayMonday, 28 August
RE: Derivative InquiryAngela MottMonday, 28 August
RE: Filming of sculpturesBob PanzerThursday, 24 August
Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanThursday, 24 August
Derivative InquiryJason sheperdThursday, 24 August
Filming of sculpturesKathy TadlockWednesday, 23 August
2006-2007 IPA Online Workshop Series from the CIP -- Corrected URLsJack BoeveThursday, 17 August
Demetriades v KaufmannacohenThursday, 17 August
London Conference: Connecting Culture and CommerceAmalyah KeshetThursday, 17 August
RE: Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActBrewer, MichaelThursday, 10 August
RE: Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActJeffrey S. AnkromThursday, 10 August
Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActJan Carmikle DwyerThursday, 10 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objectors File Motion to Strike 'Corrected' Briefs; 'Miscarriage of Justice' FearedIrvin MuchnickThursday, 3 August
Version 63, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tuesday, 1 August
Copyright news from ALA (and a request for help)M. Claire StewartMonday, 24 July
RE: Fair use?Elizabeth Townsend GardMonday, 24 July
Re: Pre-electronic publicationsSteven JamarMonday, 24 July
RE: Pre-electronic publicationsDailey, David P.Monday, 24 July
RE: Pre-electronic publicationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 24 July
Fair use?Michele AppletonMonday, 24 July
Pre-electronic publicationsMarcia KeyserFriday, 21 July
RE: RE : Terminology issues IIIJohn P. McNeillFriday, 21 July
Re: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesJohn T. MitchellFriday, 21 July
RE: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 21 July
Re: RE : Terminology issues IIICNI CGP List ManagerFriday, 21 July
RE : Terminology issues IIII.R.MaturanaThursday, 20 July
Re: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesAndrew SkinnerLopataThursday, 20 July
Fair use in a small hospital settingPaulaWednesday, 19 July
RE: Clean Flicks and derivative worksAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 14 July
Re: Clean Flicks and derivative worksJohn MitchellFriday, 14 July
Clean Flicks and derivative worksKevin L SmithThursday, 13 July
RE: Editing out offensive language from moviesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 12 July
Copyright PolicyEric Von VorysWednesday, 12 July
Editing out offensive language from moviesSteven JamarWednesday, 12 July
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingKAPLAN, MenachemWednesday, 5 July
RE: Re: Briefs for SaleJohn P. McNeillThursday, 29 June
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarThursday, 29 June
RE: duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatRehbach, JeffThursday, 29 June
RE: Re: Briefs for SaleDoug IsenbergWednesday, 28 June
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarTuesday, 27 June
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleNick ZalesTuesday, 27 June
duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatG Norona JrTuesday, 27 June
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarTuesday, 27 June
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleNick ZalesTuesday, 27 June
duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatG Norona JrTuesday, 27 June
Re: Briefs for SaleJ. NobleMonday, 26 June
RE: Briefs for SaleAngela MottMonday, 26 June
Briefs for SaleNick ZalesFriday, 23 June
RE: Re: Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?Roland ColeThursday, 22 June
Re: Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsJ. NobleThursday, 22 June
Re: Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?S. Martin KeletiThursday, 22 June
Re: Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsSteven JamarWednesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWednesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWednesday, 21 June
Re: Terminology issues IIKaren CoyleWednesday, 21 June
Re: Music CDs and "listening program"John T. MitchellWednesday, 21 June
Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Chad CWednesday, 21 June
Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsVance R. KovenWednesday, 21 June
Re: Terminology issues IIIGregory AharonianWednesday, 21 June
Re: Re: arbitrating license agreements - verging OTEthan AckermanWednesday, 21 June
Re: arbitrating license agreementsSteven JamarWednesday, 21 June
Terminology issues ISamuel MurrayWednesday, 21 June
Terminology issues IISamuel MurrayWednesday, 21 June
Terminology issues IIISamuel MurrayWednesday, 21 June
Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?Jeannie RennieWednesday, 21 June
Claim LimitMcMullen, AnthonyWednesday, 21 June
Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWednesday, 21 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Claims Info ManipulationIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 21 June
arbitrating license agreementsJ. NobleMonday, 19 June
Re: Re: Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareJohn T. MitchellThursday, 15 June
RE: Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareAngela MottThursday, 15 June
James Boyle in FT on WIPO Treaty: Constitutional circumventionJames LoveTuesday, 13 June
The Journal of World Intellectual PropertyJoan K. LippincottMonday, 12 June
Developing a Copyright PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisFriday, 9 June
dLIST Information Sciences Digital Archive Announces New Editorsmarija dalbelloFriday, 9 June
Institute for Computer Policy and Law (ICPL), June 27-30Peter HirtleWednesday, 7 June
Library Copyright Program at ALA Annual ConferenceJanice PilchTuesday, 6 June
Join the Live Webcast for "Copyright at a Crossroads"Jack BoeveTuesday, 6 June
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingMike HoldernessMonday, 5 June
Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareChad CFriday, 2 June
RE: The erroneous publisher copyright registrationAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 31 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingDodi SchultzWednesday, 31 May
The erroneous publisher copyright registrationDodi SchultzWednesday, 31 May
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proJan Carmikle DwyerWednesday, 31 May
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzWednesday, 31 May
The erroneous publisher copyright registrationCarol BusbyWednesday, 31 May
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingMike HoldernessWednesday, 31 May
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proKlein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OTuesday, 30 May
RE: Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 30 May
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzTuesday, 30 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingDodi SchultzTuesday, 30 May
Music Copyright Infringement by RestaurantsChris GuastelleTuesday, 30 May
RE: Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 30 May
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proBrewer, MichaelTuesday, 30 May
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightRichard WigginsMonday, 29 May
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzMonday, 29 May
RE: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proLarry StellerMonday, 29 May
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionAmalyah KeshetMonday, 29 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proAmalyah KeshetMonday, 29 May
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionJ. NobleSaturday, 27 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightCarol BusbySaturday, 27 May
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightJohn T. MitchellFriday, 26 May
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proDodi SchultzFriday, 26 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightDodi SchultzFriday, 26 May
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionJohn T. MitchellThursday, 25 May
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionBrewer, MichaelThursday, 25 May
Re: FAQ on Rights in the Works of JoyceBernard KatzThursday, 25 May
FAQ on Rights in the Works of JoyceKaren CoyleWednesday, 24 May
Recent U.S. Appeals Court Cases on Fair UseCory HojkaMonday, 22 May
Re: WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)Denis Borges BarbosaFriday, 19 May
RE: Creative Commons - "Non-Commercial" use?Lawrence RosenFriday, 19 May
Re: Re: Copyright free images-clipartjohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netWednesday, 17 May
Re: Copyright free images-clipartSteven JamarWednesday, 17 May
Re: Copyright free images-clipartDavid DaileyWednesday, 17 May
Creative Commons - "Non-Commercial" use?Davidson, Matthew T.Wednesday, 17 May
Copyright free images-clipartLarry StellerTuesday, 16 May
Re: Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorMike HoldernessMonday, 15 May
Last Chance for Early Registration DiscountJack BoeveMonday, 15 May
Update on Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Jon NoringSaturday, 13 May
RE: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorKAPLAN, MenachemSaturday, 13 May
Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorSteven JamarSaturday, 13 May
Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorJ. NobleSaturday, 13 May
INTERNET: LAW LEGAL POLITICAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ISSUES: ICANN Board Votes Against .XXX Sponsored Top-Level Domain AgreementDavid P. DillardSaturday, 13 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThursday, 11 May
Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorMike HoldernessThursday, 11 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn ThomsonThursday, 11 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThursday, 11 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThursday, 11 May
Has the USG been candid about the status of the broadcasters/webcasters treaty?James LoveWednesday, 10 May
RE: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn P. McNeillWednesday, 10 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn LevineWednesday, 10 May
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserTuesday, 9 May
RE: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn P. McNeillTuesday, 9 May
Re: Printing educator books for Art CampSteven JamarTuesday, 9 May
RE: Printing educator books for Art CampJan Carmikle DwyerTuesday, 9 May
"60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserMonday, 8 May
Printing educator books for Art Campmiki higuchiMonday, 8 May
Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleMonday, 8 May
New at FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Regarding Lawrence Lessig, Tasini Campaign Contributor'Irvin MuchnickMonday, 8 May
WIPO discussions on xCasting Treaty, notes from ThursdayJames LoveFriday, 5 May
RE: WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)Alain MinodierFriday, 5 May
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleThursday, 4 May
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueThursday, 4 May
WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)James LoveThursday, 4 May
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Steven JamarWednesday, 3 May
Intellectual Property Symposium -- Early Registration Deadline May 19!Jack BoeveWednesday, 3 May
International Sound recording issueRich FrankelWednesday, 3 May
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueWednesday, 3 May
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleWednesday, 3 May
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDavid PostWednesday, 3 May
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Steven JamarTuesday, 2 May
COPYRIGHT LAWS : LIBRARY: COLLECTIONS : LIBRARIES: ELECTRONIC DIGITIZATION PROJECTS: Homes for Copyright OrphansDavid P. DillardTuesday, 2 May
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueTuesday, 2 May
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekTuesday, 2 May
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksMike PhillipsMonday, 1 May
Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleMonday, 1 May
Re: Copright on a music transcriptionJ. NobleMonday, 1 May
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandMonday, 1 May
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDavid PostMonday, 1 May
Copright on a music transcriptionRichard FitzHughMonday, 1 May
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksVance R. KovenFriday, 28 April
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandFriday, 28 April
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandFriday, 28 April
Version 62, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 28 April
RE: Copyright Vs TrademarksMichael GrahamFriday, 28 April
Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueFriday, 28 April
Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandThursday, 27 April
Re: : Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoAmalyah KeshetThursday, 27 April
ReferralAndrew SkinnerLopataWednesday, 26 April
Re: SV: Re: TV ads break copyright lawMike HoldernessWednesday, 26 April
Re: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on aMike HoldernessWednesday, 26 April
Canned rhythms etcMike HoldernessWednesday, 26 April
Re: Re: Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoVance R. KovenWednesday, 26 April
Re: Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoSamuel MurrayTuesday, 25 April
Re: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteOnur PolatTuesday, 25 April
Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoDoug IsenbergTuesday, 25 April
SV: Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawJan RosenTuesday, 25 April
RE: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 24 April
RE: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web sitetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auMonday, 24 April
Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteSteven JamarMonday, 24 April
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Steven JamarMonday, 24 April
RE: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 24 April
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?David DaileyMonday, 24 April
Re: Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Rich StimMonday, 24 April
Re: Web site CopyingJohn T. MitchellMonday, 24 April
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Howard SchulzeMonday, 24 April
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?James BrennanMonday, 24 April
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoMonday, 24 April
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Richard WigginsMonday, 24 April
Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteOnur PolatMonday, 24 April
RE: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Michael GrahamSaturday, 22 April
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Terry CarrollSaturday, 22 April
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?S. Martin KeletiSaturday, 22 April
RE: Are patent drawings public domain?Jeffrey S. AnkromSaturday, 22 April
SV: Re: TV ads break copyright lawJan RosenSaturday, 22 April
Web site CopyingMike PhillipsSaturday, 22 April
Re: "Superman" Termination rulings?DancelandSaturday, 22 April
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Carl OppedahlThursday, 20 April
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoThursday, 20 April
"Superman" Termination rulings?Terry CarrollThursday, 20 April
Are patent drawings public domain?Richards, EdThursday, 20 April
Re: Infringements per yearDavid PostWednesday, 19 April
RE: Re: TV ads break copyright lawAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 19 April
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoTuesday, 18 April
Re: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusJ. NobleTuesday, 18 April
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawMike HoldernessTuesday, 18 April
Corporate Copyright PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisTuesday, 18 April
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleMonday, 17 April
Re: TV ads break copyright lawJohn T. MitchellMonday, 17 April
RE: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusLawrence RosenMonday, 17 April
RE: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 14 April
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Steven JamarFriday, 14 April
TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoFriday, 14 April
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsHoward SchulzeFriday, 14 April
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJohn LevineFriday, 14 April
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleFriday, 14 April
RE: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusLawrence RosenThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Wallace J.McLeanThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJ. NobleThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsSamuel MurrayThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenThursday, 13 April
[CNI- (C)] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 13 April
re: IETF/source code copyright statusGregory AharonianThursday, 13 April
RE: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementVarvel, VirgilThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 13 April
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsKaren CoyleWednesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleWednesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenWednesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleWednesday, 12 April
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Steven JamarTuesday, 11 April
RE: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn P. McNeillTuesday, 11 April
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenTuesday, 11 April
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersJ. NobleTuesday, 11 April
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJ. NobleTuesday, 11 April
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleTuesday, 11 April
Re: Infringements per yearJ. NobleTuesday, 11 April
Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Jon NoringTuesday, 11 April
Craig Parks review of Canadian copyright collectivesWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 11 April
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersSteven JamarTuesday, 11 April
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 11 April
Copyright at a Crossroads -- Register Today for This 3-Day SymposiumJack BoeveTuesday, 11 April
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersMike HoldernessTuesday, 11 April
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsLawrence RosenMonday, 10 April
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsRichard WigginsMonday, 10 April
Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementSteven JamarMonday, 10 April
Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementTerry CarrollMonday, 10 April
Copyright and production of simplified readersBenedetta BassettiMonday, 10 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Jan VelteropMonday, 10 April
NFL Football League Bans Sideline Photography by Local Television StationsDavid P. DillardMonday, 10 April
smithsonian/showtime dealJ. NobleMonday, 10 April
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsKaren CoyleSaturday, 8 April
Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 8 April
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJoseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 8 April
RE: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Saturday, 8 April
Re: Infringements per yearDavid DaileySaturday, 8 April
abandonment of copyright [was] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?David DaileySaturday, 8 April
"Holy Blood Holy Grail" / "Da Vinci Code" opinionTerry CarrollSaturday, 8 April
Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJoseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 8 April
RE: Advice sought for display of images on museum websiteAlain MinodierFriday, 7 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 7 April
Infringements per yearVarvel, VirgilFriday, 7 April
Re: Re: Re: problems with Berne Convention languageGregory AharonianFriday, 7 April
Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Samuel MurrayFriday, 7 April
Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJohn LevineFriday, 7 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Jan VelteropThursday, 6 April
Re: Re: problems with Berne Convention languageVance R. KovenThursday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Vance R. KovenThursday, 6 April
Advice sought for display of images on museum websiteReal, WillThursday, 6 April
FREELANCE RIGHTS: National Law Journal -- 'Copyright Bomb Quietly Ticking'Irvin MuchnickThursday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarThursday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarThursday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Wallace J.McLeanTuesday, 4 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 4 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 4 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarMonday, 3 April
re: problems with Berne Convention languageGregory AharonianMonday, 3 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Karl-Erik TallmoMonday, 3 April
Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Terry CarrollSaturday, 1 April
Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 1 April
Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Vance R. KovenFriday, 31 March
Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarFriday, 31 March
Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Samuel MurrayThursday, 30 March
Re: International protection for non USA authorsJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 March
Re: Re: International protection for non USA authorsDancelandMonday, 27 March
Re: Re: International protection for non USA authorsTerry CarrollMonday, 27 March
Re: International protection for non USA authorsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 27 March
International protection for non USA authorsDancelandFriday, 24 March
Job at University of Michigan LibraryMaria BonnThursday, 23 March
Re: 50/50 book ownership disputeS. Martin KeletiTuesday, 21 March
RE: 50/50 book ownership disputeKAPLAN, MenachemTuesday, 21 March
Re: 50/50 book ownership disputejohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netTuesday, 21 March
RE: 50/50 book ownership disputeLawrence RosenTuesday, 21 March
50/50 book ownership disputeDavid EckardtTuesday, 21 March
Free Copyright Permissions from Major PublishersMike ODonnellThursday, 16 March
Re: Fair use of eBay?J. NobleWednesday, 15 March
[Net-Gold] Online Disputes Expose Publishers' Copyright VulnerabilityDavid P. DillardTuesday, 14 March
CPTech on Evaluation of EU Database DirectiveJames LoveMonday, 13 March
Re: classroom use of feature length filmBernard KatzMonday, 13 March
Fair use of eBay?Bruce RuskMonday, 13 March
Access to Knowledge conference, April 21-23Yale Information Society ProjectFriday, 10 March
"in this binding" case?Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 10 March
RE: classroom use of feature length filmGibbons, LlewFriday, 10 March
Re: classroom use of feature length filmRob TiessenFriday, 10 March
Re: classroom use of feature length filmS. Martin KeletiFriday, 10 March
Re: classroom use of feature length filmChad CFriday, 10 March
Re: classroom use of feature length filmSamuel MurrayFriday, 10 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandThursday, 9 March
classroom use of feature length filmMcMullen, AnthonyThursday, 9 March
RE: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?GROVES PeterWednesday, 8 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanWednesday, 8 March
Re: Re: Canadian Unlocateable Owner clauseWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 8 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandWednesday, 8 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandWednesday, 8 March
Re: Canadian Unlocateable Owner clauseBernard KatzTuesday, 7 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Mike HoldernessTuesday, 7 March
Work for hire and public domain please helpDancelandMonday, 6 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 6 March
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 6 March
SLS Conference: Cultural Environmentalism at 10Jennifer JenkinsMonday, 6 March
Re: Re: Fair useJohn T. MitchellMonday, 6 March
Re: Fair useBernard KatzFriday, 3 March
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Bernard KatzFriday, 3 March
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandFriday, 3 March
RE: rights for defunct newspaper?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 3 March
RE: Re: Re: Fair useAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 3 March
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Rob TiessenFriday, 3 March
RE: Re: Fair useHoward ZaharoffFriday, 3 March
rights for defunct newspaper?Millward, Debbie (VAN_Exchange)Friday, 3 March
Symposium: Copyright at a CrossroadsJack BoeveWednesday, 1 March
Re: Re: Notice on unpublished excerptJ. NobleTuesday, 28 February
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzTuesday, 28 February
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzTuesday, 28 February
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTuesday, 28 February
Re: Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTuesday, 28 February
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTuesday, 28 February
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTuesday, 28 February
RE: Re: song lyrics, quotations and arttja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 28 February
Copyright NewsLesley Ellen HarrisTuesday, 28 February
RE: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?John P. McNeillMonday, 27 February
RE: Notice on unpublished excerptElizabeth Townsend GardMonday, 27 February
RE: Notice on unpublished excerptJohn P. McNeillMonday, 27 February
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptSteven JamarMonday, 27 February
RE: Fair useElizabeth Townsend GardMonday, 27 February
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptJ. NobleMonday, 27 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?David DaileyMonday, 27 February
Re: Fair useChad CMonday, 27 February
RE: Fair useAngela MottMonday, 27 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?J. NobleMonday, 27 February
Re: Fair useSteven JamarMonday, 27 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Terry CarrollMonday, 27 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?John LevineMonday, 27 February
Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzMonday, 27 February
Fair useBernie CampbellMonday, 27 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Terry CarrollFriday, 24 February
Re: song lyrics, quotations and artBernard KatzFriday, 24 February
RE: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Michael JungFriday, 24 February
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?James BrennanFriday, 24 February
Re: Fair UseRich StimThursday, 23 February
Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?David DaileyThursday, 23 February
RE: Re: song lyrics, quotations and arttja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auThursday, 23 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleWednesday, 22 February
Fair UseJohn P. McNeillWednesday, 22 February
more trouble with thumbnail images?David BozakWednesday, 22 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarTuesday, 21 February
Version 61, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tuesday, 21 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleMonday, 20 February
Re: Re: song lyrics, quotations and artAmalyah KeshetMonday, 20 February
Re: song lyrics, quotations and artCarol BusbyFriday, 17 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarThursday, 16 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseTerry CarrollThursday, 16 February
Re: Fw: Song Lyrics, quotations, and artVance R. KovenThursday, 16 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleThursday, 16 February
Fw: Song Lyrics, quotations, and artAmalyah KeshetThursday, 16 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarWednesday, 15 February
Re: DMCA Title IIJ. NobleWednesday, 15 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 15 February
Re: Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleWednesday, 15 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleTuesday, 14 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarTuesday, 14 February
DMCA Title IIElizabeth T RussellTuesday, 14 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseKaren CoyleTuesday, 14 February
National Academies on proposed WIPO webcasting treatyManon RessTuesday, 14 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseVance R. KovenTuesday, 14 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleTuesday, 14 February
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 13 February
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataMonday, 13 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJohn T. MitchellMonday, 13 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationHoward SchulzeFriday, 10 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 February
Re: Song LyricsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 February
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleFriday, 10 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleFriday, 10 February
Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataThursday, 9 February
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseBernard KatzThursday, 9 February
Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarWednesday, 8 February
Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 8 February
Law mentioning public domain softwareJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auWednesday, 8 February
Fair Dealing / Fair UseBernard KatzWednesday, 8 February
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTeresa DulbergTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationSteven JamarTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarTuesday, 7 February
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTerry CarrollTuesday, 7 February
Song LyricsCarol BusbyTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementHoward SchulzeTuesday, 7 February
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJohn P. McNeillTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsbrussell[_at_]supranet.netTuesday, 7 February
RE: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenTuesday, 7 February
RE: Re: painting of a photographtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 7 February
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleTuesday, 7 February
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideJ. NobleTuesday, 7 February
Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 7 February
RE: donation to the public domain.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 7 February
Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataTuesday, 7 February
Re: Software Licensing AgreementMaureen Cohen HarringtonTuesday, 7 February
Re: Distribution of personal study guideBernard KatzTuesday, 7 February
Re: Software Licensing AgreementSteven JamarMonday, 6 February
Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTerry CarrollMonday, 6 February
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agr eementMcKie, JohnMonday, 6 February
Re: Software Licensing AgreementSteven JamarMonday, 6 February
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarMonday, 6 February
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMonday, 6 February
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJohn T. MitchellMonday, 6 February
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideTerry CarrollMonday, 6 February
Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTeresa DulbergMonday, 6 February
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 6 February
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 6 February
Re: painting of a photographJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 6 February
RE: painting of a photographAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 3 February
U.S. Copyright Office's Final Report on Orphan WorksJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 3 February
painting of a photographMillward, Debbie (VAN_Exchange)Thursday, 2 February
KnowRight06 Conference Vienna 16/17. Feb. 2006Peter Paul SintThursday, 2 February
Re: Status of the University of California San Diego copyright infringement (e-reserve) caseJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 1 February
Re: Re: Night LightingSteven JamarTuesday, 31 January
RE: Re: Night Lightingtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 31 January
RE: Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?Doug IsenbergTuesday, 31 January
RE: Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?Roland ColeMonday, 30 January
Re: Night LightingSteven JamarMonday, 30 January
Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?John T. MitchellMonday, 30 January
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleMonday, 30 January
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJ. NobleMonday, 30 January
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleMonday, 30 January
RE: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMonday, 30 January
Re: more than "fair use" needed?John LevineMonday, 30 January
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMonday, 30 January
Re: Breadth of the DMCA? Publisher decompiling a digital format?John LevineMonday, 30 January
Re: Re: Google Cache as Fair UseJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 30 January
Night LightingRobert A. BaronMonday, 30 January
RE: more than "fair use" needed?Neil SmithFriday, 27 January
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 27 January
Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarFriday, 27 January
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guidetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auFriday, 27 January
Breadth of the DMCA? Publisher decompiling a digital format?crb4949[_at_]fastmail.fmFriday, 27 January
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 27 January
Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 27 January
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 27 January
Permission of an Author or Copyright Owner is NOT always requiredRoland ColeFriday, 27 January
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guideRoland ColeFriday, 27 January
more than "fair use" needed?David BozakFriday, 27 January
Status of the University of California San Diego copyright infringement (e-reserve) caseCarl JohnsonThursday, 26 January
Re: Re: Google Cache as Fair UseMaureen Cohen HarringtonThursday, 26 January
Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleThursday, 26 January
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guideDoug IsenbergThursday, 26 January
Re: Google Cache as Fair Usealankabat[_at_]aol.comThursday, 26 January
Deadline for Online Copyright Workshop with Siva VaidhyanathanJack BoeveThursday, 26 January
Re: Google Cache as Fair UseDavid BozakThursday, 26 January
Distribution of personal study guideDodi SchultzThursday, 26 January
Google Cache as Fair UseJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 26 January
Software Licensing AgreementFred J. DirkseThursday, 26 January
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideDavid BozakThursday, 26 January
RE: Distribution of personal study guideMichael GrahamWednesday, 25 January
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJohn LevineWednesday, 25 January
Re: Distribution of personal study guideteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seWednesday, 25 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingS. Martin KeletiWednesday, 25 January
Distribution of personal study guideadibble1[_at_]corning-cc.eduWednesday, 25 January
RE: OSI supported CFP - IJCLP special issue A2K - error correctionRotenberg, BorisTuesday, 24 January
Academic Integrity Symposium in MarchJanet NepkieMonday, 23 January
RE: Re: Air as public spaceElizabeth T RussellFriday, 20 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingAlain MinodierFriday, 20 January
Re: Air as public spaceSteven JamarFriday, 20 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingTerry CarrollThursday, 19 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingDavid DaileyThursday, 19 January
RE: Is "Air" a Public Space?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 19 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingTerry CarrollThursday, 19 January
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingVance R. KovenThursday, 19 January
Is "Air" a Public Space?Roland ColeThursday, 19 January
RE: Re: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationTrademarksThursday, 19 January
OSI supported CFP - IJCLP special issue A2KRotenberg, BorisThursday, 19 January
RE: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 19 January
RE: Re: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationScott ButcherWednesday, 18 January
RE: copyrghts in famous paintingWebb, JereWednesday, 18 January
RE: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationJason sheperdWednesday, 18 January
RE: Architectural Copyright RegistrationMichael GrahamTuesday, 17 January
Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationVance R. KovenTuesday, 17 January
online copyright coursesAmrithaTuesday, 17 January
Architectural Copyright RegistrationJason sheperdTuesday, 17 January
Ball State University Copyright Conference, April 12, 2006Dolak, FritzThursday, 12 January
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandMonday, 9 January
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.Lalpdx1[_at_]aol.comMonday, 9 January
RE: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelS. Martin KeletiMonday, 9 January
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandMonday, 9 January
RE: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.Garhart, NateFriday, 6 January
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandFriday, 6 January
Re: HTML document into PDF : legal?J. NobleFriday, 6 January
Re: Need expert to determine value of copyrightsJ. NobleFriday, 6 January
Re: HTML document into PDF : legal?John LevineFriday, 6 January
Re: Need expert to determine value of copyrightsTheodora MichaelsFriday, 6 January
RE: Copyright relating to trademarks.David StewartThursday, 5 January
HTML document into PDF : legal?Nicole DavignonThursday, 5 January
Need expert to determine value of copyrightsTheodora MichaelsThursday, 5 January
Re: Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanWednesday, 4 January
TEACH Act and Hybrid LearningLaliberte, Matthew DanaWednesday, 4 January
Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandWednesday, 4 January
Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Vance R. KovenWednesday, 4 January
Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanTuesday, 3 January
RE: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Michael GrahamTuesday, 3 January
Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanTuesday, 3 January
Jan. 6 Early Registration Deadline for Online WorkshopJack BoeveTuesday, 3 January
Use of Company Trademark, etc.Mark ReinmillerTuesday, 3 January
RE: Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebSmith, Robert E.Tuesday, 27 December
The Creative Commons Needs Urgent HelpCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Monday, 26 December
Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebEric GoldmanMonday, 26 December
RE: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebRoland ColeWednesday, 21 December
ERCIM News - special European theme - Open AccessStevan HarnadWednesday, 21 December
Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the Webteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seWednesday, 21 December
RE: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebWebb, JereWednesday, 21 December
RE: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebDr Jean T. KreamerWednesday, 21 December
Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 21 December
Linking to Infringing Works on the WebSmith, Robert E.Tuesday, 20 December
3 April OA Conferences: 2 at Lund and 1 at YaleStevan HarnadMonday, 19 December
Hymn appraiser?Welch, John L.Friday, 16 December
Save the Date: Annual Intellectual Property SymposiumJack BoeveTuesday, 13 December
Screen CapturesMike PhillipsFriday, 9 December
Re: Re: Indigenous musicS. Martin KeletiFriday, 9 December
CONFERENCE ON THE POLITICS AND IDEOLOGY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYJames LoveFriday, 9 December
Version 60, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 9 December
FYI: RFC / Internet Scope Modifier (refused) (Was: Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaTuesday, 6 December
Nominations--L. Ray Patterson Copyright AwardJanice PilchTuesday, 6 December
Re: IP trusts (fwd)Terry CarrollSaturday, 3 December
Yale ISP A2K Conference -- IJCLP Writing CompetitionRotenberg, BorisThursday, 1 December
HuffPo: A UN/WIPO plan to regulate distribution of information on the Internet -- every transmitter to become an ownerJames LoveThursday, 1 December
Re: Guide juridique CNRSStevan HarnadTuesday, 29 November
RE: Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 28 November
Some advice requested for a minorSteven JamarMonday, 28 November
Re: Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleMonday, 28 November
Date of copyrightMic PorterMonday, 28 November
Re: [CNI-(C) Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleMonday, 28 November
Re: Guide juridique CNRSStevan HarnadMonday, 28 November
RE: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterMike ODonnellWednesday, 23 November
RE: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterPamela McLeanWednesday, 23 November
Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorVance R. KovenWednesday, 23 November
At WIPO: Civil Society Coalition (CSC) on Limitations and Exceptions to CopyrightJames LoveWednesday, 23 November
At WIPO webcasting debate: Civil Society Coalition Statement to the WIPO SCCR on opposition to the Inclusion of Webcasting/Simulcasting in proposed treaty for the protection of Broadcasting OrganizationsJames LoveWednesday, 23 November
CI Statement on Broadcast/Webcast Treaty proposalsJames LoveWednesday, 23 November
Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleTuesday, 22 November
Re: When does a summary infringe on copyright?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 22 November
Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorVance R. KovenTuesday, 22 November
Re: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterarshi suhailTuesday, 22 November
When does a summary infringe on copyright?Chad CTuesday, 22 November
Intellectual Property in Academia Online Workshops--Winter 2006 CoursesJack BoeveTuesday, 22 November
Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleTuesday, 22 November
Short practical articles for copyright newsletterLesley Ellen HarrisTuesday, 22 November
Re: Some advice requested for a minorMike BradleyTuesday, 22 November
RE: Re: Some advice requested for a minorAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 21 November
RE: Re: Some advice requested for a minorBob PanzerSaturday, 19 November
Re: Some advice requested for a minorBert KragesFriday, 18 November
RE: Some advice requested for a minorJohn P. McNeillFriday, 18 November
Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleFriday, 18 November
Joint statement on broadcasting and cablecasting protectionManon RessFriday, 18 November
RE: Some advice requested for a minorKAPLAN, MenachemFriday, 18 November
Re: Some advice requested for a minorJohn T. MitchellFriday, 18 November
Re: QuestionJerilynn DonaldsonThursday, 17 November
Some advice requested for a minorMarissaThursday, 17 November
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Talkin' Appeal FAQIrvin MuchnickThursday, 17 November
Re: QuestionJohn LevineWednesday, 16 November
RE: QuestionGrierson, KevinWednesday, 16 November
RE: QuestionMichael GrahamWednesday, 16 November
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Klein, BonnieWednesday, 16 November
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 16 November
QuestionJerilynn DonaldsonWednesday, 16 November
RE: Re: Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Elizabeth T RussellWednesday, 16 November
RE: Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 15 November
Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Richard WigginsMonday, 14 November
Announcement: Yale ISP "Regulating Search?" Symposium - Dec. 3Eddan KatzThursday, 10 November
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Mike BradleyWednesday, 9 November
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Freya AndersonWednesday, 9 November
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Mike BradleyMonday, 7 November
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 7 November
Re: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Karen CoyleMonday, 7 November
RE: Re: Case referralMike BradleyThursday, 3 November
Jonathan Krim in WP: Weighing Webcasters' Rights to ContentJames LoveThursday, 3 November
Re: Case referralJ. NobleWednesday, 2 November
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)David PostWednesday, 2 November
Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Karen CoyleTuesday, 1 November
Case referralDan BallardTuesday, 1 November
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Notice of Appeal Filed October 21Irvin MuchnickTuesday, 1 November
Re: The Google Print Controversy: A BibliographyDavid P. DillardMonday, 31 October
Framing Other WebsitesJoy ButlerThursday, 27 October
Re: Framing Other WebsitesGPoe[_at_]aol.comThursday, 27 October
Re: Re: Framing Other WebsitesJohn T. MitchellThursday, 27 October
Films on CampusJudy J. DehleThursday, 27 October
RE: Framing Other WebsitesGrierson, KevinWednesday, 26 October
Re: Framing Other Websitesdavid daileyWednesday, 26 October
RE: Framing Other WebsitesFreya AndersonWednesday, 26 October
RE: Framing Other WebsitesMike ODonnellWednesday, 26 October
Re: Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Mike OliverWednesday, 26 October
Framing Other WebsitesGay GilmoreWednesday, 26 October
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Terry CarrollTuesday, 25 October
Re: Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Terry CarrollTuesday, 25 October
RE: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?John P. McNeillTuesday, 25 October
Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Klein, BonnieTuesday, 25 October
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Carl OppedahlTuesday, 25 October
DMCA and the University Campus--10/28 early registration deadline for online workshopJack BoeveTuesday, 25 October
RE: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Eric Von VorysTuesday, 25 October
Call for Papers: KnowRight 2006 Feb16/17Peter Paul SintTuesday, 25 October
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?JFNTuesday, 25 October
The Google Print Controversy: A BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tuesday, 25 October
Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Lalpdx1[_at_]aol.comMonday, 24 October
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Keith TaberFriday, 21 October
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 19 October
RE: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 19 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Terry CarrollTuesday, 18 October
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 18 October
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 18 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 18 October
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadTuesday, 18 October
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 18 October
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadTuesday, 18 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleyTuesday, 18 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Monday, 17 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Monday, 17 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?JFNMonday, 17 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineMonday, 17 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineMonday, 17 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadMonday, 17 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Re: UK Creative Economy conferenceJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Re: Libraries & cartoon charactersJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Another Example of How Long Copyright Term Can Harm PublicJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 October
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadMonday, 17 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleySaturday, 15 October
RE: UK Creative Economy conferencea.wiseSaturday, 15 October
RE: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John P. McNeillSaturday, 15 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineThursday, 13 October
October 18 DC Bar IP Fall ReceptionJoy ButlerThursday, 13 October
17 NGOs, 7 law professors, and 31 musicians and technology experts ask US Congress for formal public comment on proposals at WIPO to create new IP right for broadcasting and webcasting organizationsJames LoveThursday, 13 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Vance R. KovenWednesday, 12 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?S. Martin KeletiWednesday, 12 October
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Terry CarrollWednesday, 12 October
RE: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Stephen FillerWednesday, 12 October
Michelle Childs on UK Creative Economy conferenceJames LoveWednesday, 12 October
University of Zurich: 4th Institution with Self-Archiving MandateStevan HarnadWednesday, 12 October
RE: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Grierson, KevinTuesday, 11 October
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 11 October
RE: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?William T. McGrathTuesday, 11 October
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleyTuesday, 11 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?John LevineTuesday, 11 October
Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?JFNTuesday, 11 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - to control nonexclusive rightsJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 11 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Janet NepkieFriday, 7 October
RE: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Freya AndersonFriday, 7 October
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 7 October
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 7 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike OliverFriday, 7 October
Re: Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Webb, JereThursday, 6 October
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyThursday, 6 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Robert LabossiereThursday, 6 October
RE: Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Roland ColeThursday, 6 October
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?GROVES PeterThursday, 6 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Andrew SkinnerLopataThursday, 6 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Terry CarrollWednesday, 5 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 5 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Howard SchulzeWednesday, 5 October
Copyright sessions at Museum Computer Network MCN 2005amalyah keshetWednesday, 5 October
Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Christopher GwynWednesday, 5 October
Rights for TV showsMarcia KeyserWednesday, 5 October
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?JFNTuesday, 4 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyTuesday, 4 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Michael TrittipoTuesday, 4 October
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekTuesday, 4 October
Libraries & cartoon charactersMary-Carol LindbloomTuesday, 4 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'John T. MitchellTuesday, 4 October
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 3 October
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?S. Martin KeletiMonday, 3 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 3 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyMonday, 3 October
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickMonday, 3 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
Re: Re: Authors GuildJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
BNetd DecisionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 3 October
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyFriday, 30 September
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Grierson, KevinFriday, 30 September
Re: Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNFriday, 30 September
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'teste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seFriday, 30 September
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyFriday, 30 September
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Grierson, KevinFriday, 30 September
Re: Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNFriday, 30 September
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'teste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seFriday, 30 September
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingKaren CoyleThursday, 29 September
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Karen CoyleThursday, 29 September
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNThursday, 29 September
RE: Harvard Business School PublishingLaliberte, Matthew DanaThursday, 29 September
Re: Re: Authors Guildteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seThursday, 29 September
WIPO's war against consumer interestsJames LoveThursday, 29 September
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Vance R. KovenThursday, 29 September
RE: Harvard Business School PublishingAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 29 September
Re: Re: Authors GuildKeith TaberThursday, 29 September
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyri ght Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impos e a 'License By Default'Klein, BonnieThursday, 29 September
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJohn EyeThursday, 29 September
Re: Re: Authors GuildWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 28 September
Re: Re: Authors GuildWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 28 September
Harvard Business School PublishingCarol RescoWednesday, 28 September
Re: Authors GuildMike BradleyWednesday, 28 September
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Karen CoyleWednesday, 28 September
RE: referral for Florida lawyerNeil SmithTuesday, 27 September
Re: Re: Authors GuildJohn LevineTuesday, 27 September
James Boyle in FT on Webcast Treaty: More rights are wrong for webcastersJames LoveTuesday, 27 September
Sign-on letter to Congress: request public consultation on webcasting treatyManon RessTuesday, 27 September
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'david daileyTuesday, 27 September
referral for Florida lawyerJFNMonday, 26 September
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 26 September
Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaFriday, 23 September
Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickThursday, 22 September
RE : Re: Mutal copyright questionI.R.MaturanaWednesday, 21 September
Intellectual Property in Academia--Online Workshops for Autumn 2005Jack BoeveTuesday, 20 September
Re: Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitJohn T. MitchellMonday, 19 September
RE: Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 19 September
US Congress asked to intervene in webcasting treaty proposalJames LoveMonday, 19 September
RE: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitFreya AndersonFriday, 16 September
Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitRoy MurphyFriday, 16 September
Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitJohn T. MitchellFriday, 16 September
WIPO Webcast Treaty Proposal - CPTech letter to LOC and USPTOJames LoveFriday, 16 September
Webcasting Treaty: Notes from Sept 16 meeting at the Library of Congress on the proposed treaty provisions regarding webcastingJames LoveFriday, 16 September
Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitDodi SchultzThursday, 15 September
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Class' Counsel Exposed (Day 3); UnSettlement Held Hostage (Day 48)Irvin MuchnickThursday, 15 September
RE: Re: Mutal copyright questionMichael GrahamThursday, 15 September
Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LiteratureGarry PrintWednesday, 14 September
Re: Mutal copyright questionRenee AnthuisTuesday, 13 September
RE: Mutal copyright questionJohn P. McNeillTuesday, 13 September
Re: Mutal copyright questionVance R. KovenTuesday, 13 September
Re: Mutal copyright questionKeith TaberTuesday, 13 September
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Resource Guide for Last Weekend Before Objection DeadlineIrvin MuchnickMonday, 12 September
Mutal copyright questionFred Dirkse - OIC Group, Inc.Monday, 12 September
Re: Re: Communications ProtocolsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 9 September
Version 59, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 9 September
Re: Communications Protocolsdavid daileyThursday, 8 September
Re: Communications ProtocolsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 8 September
Re: Communications ProtocolsVance R. KovenThursday, 8 September
V World Congress of Computer Law - Third CallErick Iriarte AhonWednesday, 7 September
Communications ProtocolsDavid E. HollingsworthWednesday, 7 September
RE: electronic reservesFreya AndersonMonday, 5 September
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Labor Day Message -- UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 39Irvin MuchnickMonday, 5 September
RE: electronic reservesTobe LiebertThursday, 1 September
Re: electronic reservesMarian DworaczekThursday, 1 September
FREELANCE RIGHTS ALERT: Use Our 'Takedown Forms' to Block Future Use of Your WorksIrvin MuchnickThursday, 1 September
electronic reservesMatthew PrutsmanThursday, 1 September
Copyright Job Description/Salary Info Needed!Suzanne SchelpTuesday, 30 August
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollMonday, 29 August
PATNEWS: Movie producers get search warrant for entire city of New DelhiGregory AharonianMonday, 29 August
Auto-rhythms on keyboards, etcMike HoldernessMonday, 29 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 32Irvin MuchnickMonday, 29 August
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionJFNFriday, 26 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJune PowerFriday, 26 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTim Arnold - MooreFriday, 26 August
Re: Re: Litigation Exceptionroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netFriday, 26 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: They're Still Hiding the 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickFriday, 26 August
Assignment at Time of CreationMike PhillipsFriday, 26 August
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionTerry CarrollThursday, 25 August
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionJFNThursday, 25 August
2005-2006 Intellectual Property in Academia Online Workshop Series (lists)Jack BoeveThursday, 25 August
RE: Re: Litigation ExceptionJohn P. McNeillWednesday, 24 August
RE: Re: Litigation ExceptionAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 24 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 27Irvin MuchnickWednesday, 24 August
Re: Re: Litigation Exceptionroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netTuesday, 23 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyTuesday, 23 August
Re: Litigation ExceptionPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Tuesday, 23 August
Re: Copyright to Walking Tour ContentKeith TaberMonday, 22 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Open Letter to Plaintiff E.L. Doctorow -- 'Please Stop This Terrible Settlement'Irvin MuchnickMonday, 22 August
Litigation ExceptionJohn P. McNeillMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steven JamarMonday, 22 August
RE: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisGrierson, KevinMonday, 22 August
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 22 August
Copyright to Walking Tour ContentScott ButcherMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMonday, 22 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMonday, 22 August
Open Letter to Research Councils UK: Rebuttal of ALPSP CritiqueStevan HarnadMonday, 22 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectMichael GrahamFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Friday, 19 August
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJohn T. MitchellFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNFinke[_at_]nurfc.orgFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectMichael GrahamFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Friday, 19 August
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJohn T. MitchellFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNFinke[_at_]nurfc.orgFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Denis N. MagnussonFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSchafer, RichardFriday, 19 August
RE: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisRoland ColeFriday, 19 August
RE: "University as author?"Roland ColeFriday, 19 August
RE: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 19 August
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Keith TaberFriday, 19 August
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/Lexisdavid daileyFriday, 19 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: NWU, ASJA -- Time For an Exit StrategyIrvin MuchnickFriday, 19 August
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThursday, 18 August
Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJFNThursday, 18 August
Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Thursday, 18 August
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Grierson, KevinThursday, 18 August
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThursday, 18 August
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThursday, 18 August
Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNThursday, 18 August
"University as author?"Janet NepkieThursday, 18 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steven JamarThursday, 18 August
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 18 August
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThursday, 18 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThursday, 18 August
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 18 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 18 August
Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNick ZalesThursday, 18 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonThursday, 18 August
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollWednesday, 17 August
Orphan Works @ Berkeley - audio recordChristine L. SundtWednesday, 17 August
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.JFNWednesday, 17 August
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWednesday, 17 August
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Richard WigginsWednesday, 17 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 17 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 17 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 17 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"david daileyWednesday, 17 August
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWednesday, 17 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Denis N. MagnussonWednesday, 17 August
Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTuesday, 16 August
Re: QuerySteven JamarTuesday, 16 August
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTuesday, 16 August
RE: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceFreya AndersonTuesday, 16 August
RE: Re: Principles of fair useJohn P. McNeillTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!hazel4205[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Richard WigginsTuesday, 16 August
RE: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!David StewartTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTuesday, 16 August
Re: Principles of fair useJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 16 August
Online Copyright and Licensing CoursesAmrithaTuesday, 16 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 16 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonTuesday, 16 August
RE: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!Fletcher, EricTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsKeith TaberTuesday, 16 August
Re: Principles of fair usedavid daileyTuesday, 16 August
"Public Performance" Licensing QuestionJohn BLATTNERTuesday, 16 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 16 August
QueryHeather VargasTuesday, 16 August
Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyTuesday, 16 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollMonday, 15 August
RE: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!Grierson, KevinMonday, 15 August
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJFNMonday, 15 August
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsVance R. KovenMonday, 15 August
Principles of fair useJohn LevineMonday, 15 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 15 August
RE: Re: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 15 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonMonday, 15 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS Digest: ASJA Joins Objectors! (Well, Sort Of)Irvin MuchnickMonday, 15 August
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationIrvin MuchnickFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarFriday, 12 August
Re: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceJoe EllisonFriday, 12 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"John P. McNeillFriday, 12 August
Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!hazel4205[_at_]aol.comFriday, 12 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Christine L. SundtFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsCarol ShepherdFriday, 12 August
ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceSheryl A. WilliamsFriday, 12 August
Re: Kay Murray / Kenneth Feinberg mailbagJFNFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarFriday, 12 August
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationMike BradleyFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJFNFriday, 12 August
Kay Murray / Kenneth Feinberg mailbagIrvin MuchnickFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationIrvin MuchnickFriday, 12 August
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJessica R. FriedmanFriday, 12 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollThursday, 11 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonThursday, 11 August
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 11 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThursday, 11 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThursday, 11 August
Re: When Infringement BeginsKeith TaberThursday, 11 August
RE: Ms. Murray's ReputationMike BradleyThursday, 11 August
RE: When Infringement BeginsMike BradleyThursday, 11 August
Re: Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorJFNThursday, 11 August
print music derivative rightsJanna GlasserThursday, 11 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Independent Objector Protests 'License by Default'Irvin MuchnickThursday, 11 August
Re: Re:Copylaw[_at_]aol.comThursday, 11 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThursday, 11 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 11 August
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsAlainThursday, 11 August
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorIrvin MuchnickThursday, 11 August
RE: When Infringement BeginsElizabeth T RussellWednesday, 10 August
RE:Jessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 10 August
(no subject)Phares, Gloria C. (x2686)Wednesday, 10 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Elizabeth Townsend GardWednesday, 10 August
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 10 August
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonWednesday, 10 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Ivan HoffmanWednesday, 10 August
Re: Re: "University as author?"Peggy HoonWednesday, 10 August
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorRobert LabossiereWednesday, 10 August
Open Access WebliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 10 August
When Infringement BeginsMike PhillipsWednesday, 10 August
Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTuesday, 9 August
RE: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 9 August
Re: "University as author?"David DaileyTuesday, 9 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorIrvin MuchnickTuesday, 9 August
Re: Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingIvan HoffmanMonday, 8 August
Re: Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingTerry CarrollMonday, 8 August
Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingMike OliverMonday, 8 August
"University as author?"David BozakMonday, 8 August
Re: Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowDenise Troll CoveyThursday, 4 August
Copyright pre-registration to require Internet ExplorerCarol ShepherdThursday, 4 August
Re: Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowKaren CoyleWednesday, 3 August
Reminder: Call for speakers on rights metadata in IRs at ALA 2006Brian SurrattTuesday, 2 August
List of Roundtable Participants -- D.C. and a few brief comments.LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comTuesday, 2 August
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereTuesday, 2 August
Re: Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageIvan HoffmanTuesday, 2 August
Re: Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageVance R. KovenTuesday, 2 August
Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comMonday, 1 August
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksS. Martin KeletiMonday, 1 August
RE: Re: fees for fair use in booksJohn P. McNeillMonday, 1 August
RE: Re: announcing a copyright literature current awareness servicePaul JonesMonday, 1 August
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objection Deadline ExtendedIrvin MuchnickMonday, 1 August
RE: Public domain in FranceRobert PanzerMonday, 1 August
Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageRobin L. DespainMonday, 1 August
Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowNeil SmithMonday, 1 August
RE: Re: fees for fair use in booksElizabeth Townsend GardFriday, 29 July
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereFriday, 29 July
RE: fees for fair use in booksAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 29 July
Public domain in FranceTammy RavasFriday, 29 July
V World Congress of Computer Law - Second CallErick Iriarte AhonFriday, 29 July
Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageDaniel SmithFriday, 29 July
RE: announcing a copyright literature current awareness serviceLorre SmithFriday, 29 July
Re: fees for fair use in booksSteven JamarThursday, 28 July
RE: fees for fair use in booksRobert PanzerThursday, 28 July
Re: fees for fair use in booksAlainThursday, 28 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Weekly Standard Article About the SettlementIrvin MuchnickThursday, 28 July
Re: fees for fair use in booksJohn LevineThursday, 28 July
announcing a copyright literature current awareness serviceTobe LiebertThursday, 28 July
RE: fees for fair use in booksImagesThursday, 28 July
fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereWednesday, 27 July
Announcement: "Copyright Future" ForumJon NoringWednesday, 27 July
RE: Re: Patents - OddestDuhaime, DianeTuesday, 26 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Welcome to UnSettlement 2.0Irvin MuchnickTuesday, 26 July
Re: Patents - OddestKeith TaberTuesday, 26 July
Re: Patents - OddestJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 26 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 26 July
RE: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJune PowerTuesday, 26 July
RE: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJune PowerTuesday, 26 July
RE: Patents - OddestJohn McNeillTuesday, 26 July
Re: Patents - OddestCWCHANDLER[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 26 July
RE: Patents - OddestElizabeth T RussellTuesday, 26 July
RE: Patents - OddestEric Von VorysTuesday, 26 July
Re:Re:Re:Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJudy J. DehleTuesday, 26 July
RE: Copyright Question -- News Corp and MySpaceJudy J. DehleTuesday, 26 July
Re: Patents - OddestJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 26 July
K-12 video production, student performancesGallardo, LisaMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTTheodora MichaelsMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTAndrew SkinnerLopataMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Monday, 25 July
Right to take photos in public spacesRichard WigginsMonday, 25 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTKeith TaberMonday, 25 July
Patents - Oddestcharles meyerMonday, 25 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Sorry, Judge, We'll Have It Next Tuesday'Irvin MuchnickMonday, 25 July
Copyright Question -- News Corp and MySpaceChrissy ColemanMonday, 25 July
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesS. Martin KeletiThursday, 21 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineThursday, 21 July
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 21 July
Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineWednesday, 20 July
Re: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS BULLETIN: Final 'Fairness Hearing' PostponedIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 20 July
Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 July
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsDodi SchultzTuesday, 19 July
Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 19 July
RE: Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesElizabeth T RussellTuesday, 19 July
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineTuesday, 19 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objections Filed -- 'Settlement Presents Collusion on its Face'Irvin MuchnickTuesday, 19 July
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesRobert LabossiereTuesday, 19 July
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsAmrithaTuesday, 19 July
Editorial - Orphan Works and Unlocatable Copyright OwnersAmrithaTuesday, 19 July
Copyright Advisory Network Scholar ProgramJanice PilchFriday, 15 July
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesMike OliverFriday, 15 July
Re: Recorded music and fair useHenry CarterFriday, 15 July
RE: Recorded music and fair useAngela MottFriday, 15 July
Announcing: New Open Access Archivangelism BlogStevan HarnadWednesday, 13 July
Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesJim GehrkeWednesday, 13 July
Recorded music and fair useTammy RavasWednesday, 13 July
Grokster damagesJFNWednesday, 13 July
ARL On-line Licensing Workshop--still time to register!Becky AlbitzWednesday, 6 July
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Not Just a Sellout -- A GiveawayIrvin MuchnickTuesday, 5 July
Re: Re: Termination rightJFNFriday, 1 July
Re: Re: Termination rightJFNFriday, 1 July
Re: Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollFriday, 1 July
Re: Re: copyright on house plants?James BrennanFriday, 1 July
Re: Re: copyright on house plants?Howard SchulzeFriday, 1 July
Re: copyright on house plants?amalyah keshetFriday, 1 July
Re: Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollThursday, 30 June
Re: copyright on house plants?S. Martin KeletiThursday, 30 June
Re: Termination rightJQ JohnsonThursday, 30 June
Re: Termination rightJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 30 June
Re: copyright on house plants?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 30 June
Re: Re: reading a book to classKeith TaberThursday, 30 June
RE: copyright on house plants?Duhaime, DianeWednesday, 29 June
Re: copyright on house plants?Terry CarrollWednesday, 29 June
Re: copyright on house plants?Robert LabossiereWednesday, 29 June
copyright on house plants?David DaileyWednesday, 29 June
RE: Termination rightMichael GrahamWednesday, 29 June
Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollWednesday, 29 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Wednesday, 29 June
Termination rightElizabeth T RussellWednesday, 29 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollTuesday, 28 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollTuesday, 28 June
Re: Hollywood sign reduxBarbara RuhmannTuesday, 28 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 28 June
Grokster lostJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Tuesday, 28 June
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollMonday, 27 June
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postJohn EyeMonday, 27 June
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollMonday, 27 June
Hollywood sign reduxamalyah keshetMonday, 27 June
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Monday, 27 June
Re: Re: Indigenous musicPhil LeonardMonday, 27 June
Re: reading a book to classJohn T. MitchellMonday, 27 June
Re: reading a book to classTerry CarrollMonday, 27 June
Re: GamesRobert LabossiereMonday, 27 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comMonday, 27 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: OPEN LETTER TO THE FREELANCE COMMUNITY from attorney Charles ChalmersIrvin MuchnickMonday, 27 June
Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postPhares, Gloria C. (x2686)Monday, 27 June
Re: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasFriday, 24 June
Re: Indigenous musicRobert LabossiereFriday, 24 June
Gamescharles meyerFriday, 24 June
Re: Indigenous musicEdward BarrowFriday, 24 June
reading a book to classJohn EyeFriday, 24 June
RE: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureMike BradleyThursday, 23 June
Re: Non-negotiated contracts about to get tough global enforcement support in Hague treaty negotiationsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 23 June
RE: movie poster & book jacket imagesRobin L. DespainThursday, 23 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignS. Martin KeletiWednesday, 22 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Dodi SchultzWednesday, 22 June
Re: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasWednesday, 22 June
Re: GamesRobert LabossiereWednesday, 22 June
Non-negotiated contracts about to get tough global enforcement support in Hague treaty negotiationsJames LoveWednesday, 22 June
Key Open Access Concepts (fwd)Stevan HarnadWednesday, 22 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Why Are 'Associational Plaintiffs' in Bed With LexisNexis?Irvin MuchnickWednesday, 22 June
Indigenous musicKathy TadlockWednesday, 22 June
movie poster & book jacket imagesLaura BakerWednesday, 22 June
Re: Canadian copyright bill tabled todayJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 21 June
RE: Being Cut Out of the PictureJune PowerTuesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributedarticle?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTuesday, 21 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Terry CarrollTuesday, 21 June
Re: Canadian copyright bill tabled todayWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 21 June
Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasTuesday, 21 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comTuesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comTuesday, 21 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?JFNTuesday, 21 June
Canadian copyright bill tabled todaylesley[_at_]copyrightlaws.comTuesday, 21 June
Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Dodi SchultzTuesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignHoward SchulzeTuesday, 21 June
Re: Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 21 June
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson/Gale/Information Access CompanyJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 21 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson CorporationIrvin MuchnickTuesday, 21 June
RE: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Scott ButcherMonday, 20 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignScott ButcherMonday, 20 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMonday, 20 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson/Gale/Information Access CompanyIrvin MuchnickMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMonday, 20 June
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?JFNMonday, 20 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignElizabeth T RussellMonday, 20 June
Golden Gate Bridge copyright (was: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsNakerite[_at_]aol.comMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJohn R LevineMonday, 20 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMonday, 20 June
Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comMonday, 20 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetMonday, 20 June
Gamescharles meyerMonday, 20 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAnne Marie HawkinsFriday, 17 June
RE: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignRobert PanzerFriday, 17 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollFriday, 17 June
Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 17 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNFriday, 17 June
Re: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignVance R. KovenFriday, 17 June
Re: GamesJohn LevineFriday, 17 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJohn LevineFriday, 17 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetFriday, 17 June
Terms of serviceMJ DevaneyFriday, 17 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAnne Marie HawkinsThursday, 16 June
Re: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollThursday, 16 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollThursday, 16 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignSteven JamarThursday, 16 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignBert KragesThursday, 16 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 16 June
Gamescharles meyerThursday, 16 June
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNThursday, 16 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignR.G.McCrackenThursday, 16 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 16 June
Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsNakerite[_at_]aol.comThursday, 16 June
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignChristopher A. MohrThursday, 16 June
Call for speakers on rights metadata in IRs at ALA 2006Brian SurrattThursday, 16 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'We Are Mystified Why the Americans Settled For This'Irvin MuchnickThursday, 16 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetThursday, 16 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignLaura Young BostWednesday, 15 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Brits, Like the Canadians, Get ItIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 15 June
RE: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignRobert PanzerWednesday, 15 June
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollWednesday, 15 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberWednesday, 15 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberWednesday, 15 June
Coipyright in the Hollywood SignR.G.McCrackenWednesday, 15 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 15 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Gregory AharonianTuesday, 14 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 14 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?John LevineMonday, 13 June
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?David DaileyMonday, 13 June
Version 58, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Monday, 13 June
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Howard SchulzeMonday, 13 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Monday, 13 June
RE: Re: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Monday, 13 June
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Robert LabossiereMonday, 13 June
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 13 June
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberMonday, 13 June
RE: game idea = copyright or patent?Mike BradleyFriday, 10 June
Re: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Placeamalyah keshetFriday, 10 June
game idea = copyright or patent?Kathleen WilliamsonFriday, 10 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement's Crack 'Response Team'Irvin MuchnickFriday, 10 June
RE: ghost writingJessica R. FriedmanFriday, 10 June
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 June
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 10 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Ga llery and a Hard PlaceGROVES PeterFriday, 10 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 10 June
ghost writingkathryn geibThursday, 9 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceChristine L. SundtThursday, 9 June
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceManon RessThursday, 9 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Galler y and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 8 June
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceRobert PanzerWednesday, 8 June
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJFNWednesday, 8 June
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Wednesday, 8 June
Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 8 June
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 8 June
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Galler y and a Hard PlaceGROVES PeterWednesday, 8 June
Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJFNWednesday, 8 June
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 7 June
Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceLaura Young BostTuesday, 7 June
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsJFNMonday, 6 June
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsJohn LevineMonday, 6 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Official Settlement Site -- A Bad JokeIrvin MuchnickMonday, 6 June
RE: Software Screen ShotsMike BradleyFriday, 3 June
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 3 June
You Can Still Join the Live Webcast for "Pirates, Thieves and Innocents"Jack BoeveFriday, 3 June
Re: Re: Export control list?James BrennanThursday, 2 June
Software Screen ShotsLaliberte, Matthew DanaThursday, 2 June
Get your bets down on GroksterJFNThursday, 2 June
Re: Export control list?Steven JamarThursday, 2 June
RE: Export control list?Neil A. SmithThursday, 2 June
Re: Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?JFNThursday, 2 June
Re: Export control list?Terry CarrollThursday, 2 June
Re: Export control list?Mike OliverThursday, 2 June
Re: Export control list?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 2 June
Export control list?Terry CarrollWednesday, 1 June
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?JFNWednesday, 1 June
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 1 June
Looking for Movie/TV Audit ExpertRich StimWednesday, 1 June
Copyright Office adds RSS Feeds to its Web SitePeter M VankevichWednesday, 1 June
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objection Project StartsIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 1 June
RE: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Saturday, 28 May
Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 27 May
Re: Use of Photographs in Derivative Artwork: Fair Use Question:Robert LabossiereTuesday, 24 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: More on the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickMonday, 23 May
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesDenis N. MagnussonMonday, 23 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Unmasking the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickMonday, 23 May
Join the Live Webcast for "Pirates, Thieves and Innocents"Jack BoeveMonday, 23 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Hearing Next Tuesday; Highlights From Today's Reply BriefIrvin MuchnickFriday, 20 May
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesDenis N. MagnussonFriday, 20 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Stimulating Open DiscussionIrvin MuchnickFriday, 20 May
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesElizabeth T RussellFriday, 20 May
Use of Photographs in Derivative Artwork: Fair Use Question:Daniel SmithFriday, 20 May
Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsTerry CarrollThursday, 19 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: A Day of Proving Continuing InfringementsIrvin MuchnickThursday, 19 May
RE: Cartoonist - Artist AgreementMike BradleyThursday, 19 May
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThursday, 19 May
Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsJohn T. MitchellWednesday, 18 May
Re: Yoga CopyrightRobert LabossiereWednesday, 18 May
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"JFNWednesday, 18 May
RE: Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 18 May
Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesKeith TaberWednesday, 18 May
Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsEric GoldmanTuesday, 17 May
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: '$2.5 Billion to $600 Billion'Irvin MuchnickTuesday, 17 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Yoga CopyrightS. Martin KeletiTuesday, 17 May
Re: Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"John T. MitchellTuesday, 17 May
RE: Patel's order & Distribution rightsEthan AckermanTuesday, 17 May
Berne Convention Retroactivity IssueHeather VargasTuesday, 17 May
Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesSteven JamarTuesday, 17 May
Re: Cartoonist - Artist AgreementIvan HoffmanTuesday, 17 May
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Mike OliverTuesday, 17 May
RE: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Grierson, KevinTuesday, 17 May
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"jottaviani[_at_]EdwardsAngell.comTuesday, 17 May
FREELANCERIGHTS: A Key Date in Writers' Rights HistoryIrvin MuchnickTuesday, 17 May
Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Dan BallardTuesday, 17 May
Cartoonist - Artist Agreementcharles meyerTuesday, 17 May
Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesMonte HershbergerTuesday, 17 May
RE: TM comparison: EU v. USAlvin BorromeoMonday, 16 May
Re: Re: TM comparison: EU v. USKJKJKO[_at_]aol.comMonday, 16 May
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 16 May
Re: TM comparison: EU v. USLee BrettinFriday, 13 May
TM comparison: EU v. USKeith TaberFriday, 13 May
'Long-Term Goal: A Real Royalty System' at FREELANCE RIGHTSIrvin MuchnickFriday, 13 May
Re: EU directive "use in certain other cases of minor importance"Prof. Dr. Thomas HoerenThursday, 12 May
Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorMeghann MatwichukThursday, 12 May
From Irv Muchnick -- offer to investigate your infringementsIrvin MuchnickThursday, 12 May
Re: Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorSteven JamarWednesday, 11 May
Re: high school student with copyright questionJohn LevineWednesday, 11 May
EU directive "use in certain other cases of minor importance"Mike HoldernessWednesday, 11 May
RE: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorTim MarmanWednesday, 11 May
Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorDenise Troll CoveyWednesday, 11 May
high school student with copyright questionRosalind TedfordWednesday, 11 May
Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorVance R. KovenWednesday, 11 May
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorSteven JamarTuesday, 10 May
RE: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorAngela MottTuesday, 10 May
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 10 May
Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorMeghann MatwichukTuesday, 10 May
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyTuesday, 10 May
Academic Integrity symposiumJanet NepkieMonday, 9 May
Introducing "Settlement Question of the Week"Irvin MuchnickMonday, 9 May
May 16 Deadline for Copyright SymposiumJack BoeveMonday, 9 May
RE: Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Schafer, RichardFriday, 6 May
RE: Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 6 May
Appeals court throws out the FCC "Broadcast flag"Terry CarrollFriday, 6 May
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedTerry CarrollThursday, 5 May
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Lee BrettinThursday, 5 May
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"John T. MitchellThursday, 5 May
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 5 May
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Keith TaberThursday, 5 May
Wood Newton - Article I Section 8John T. MitchellThursday, 5 May
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"amalyah keshetThursday, 5 May
Launching FREELANCERIGHTS.blogspot.comIrvin MuchnickThursday, 5 May
iCopyright Quick TagMike ODonnellThursday, 5 May
"Intellectual Property in the Information Age..." online June 6-17 from the University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderWednesday, 4 May
"Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Terry CarrollWednesday, 4 May
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyWednesday, 4 May
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnTuesday, 3 May
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedKeith TaberTuesday, 3 May
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyMonday, 2 May
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedTerry CarrollMonday, 2 May
DC Bar IP Spring Reception on May 5Joy ButlerMonday, 2 May
Re: 2 - Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnFriday, 29 April
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnFriday, 29 April
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyFriday, 29 April
2 - Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedAndrew SkinnerLopataFriday, 29 April
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnThursday, 28 April
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workKeith TaberThursday, 28 April
Re: Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedyfor author's trespass to create the workJohn T. MitchellThursday, 28 April
RE: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workMichael GrahamThursday, 28 April
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 27 April
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Terry CarrollWednesday, 27 April
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workTheodora MichaelsWednesday, 27 April
RE: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyWednesday, 27 April
Call for papersHenry CarterWednesday, 27 April
Judge Asked to Halt Copyright Class Action Settlement ApprovalIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 27 April
Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workTodd OwersWednesday, 27 April
Re: T-shirts and phrasesSteven JamarTuesday, 26 April
derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedAndrew SkinnerLopataTuesday, 26 April
Re: Web Blog PolicyKeith TaberTuesday, 26 April
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005James BrennanMonday, 25 April
T-shirts and phrasescarolMonday, 25 April
Web Blog PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisMonday, 25 April
Perceptions of Copyright Infringement -- A SymposiumJack BoeveMonday, 25 April
RE: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsDoug IsenbergFriday, 22 April
Re: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsMikus GrinbergsFriday, 22 April
Re: Work Made by Business Owner (for Hire?)GPoe[_at_]aol.comFriday, 22 April
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Nick ZalesFriday, 22 April
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Keith TaberFriday, 22 April
Another Security BreachesJohn McNeillFriday, 22 April
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsAmrithaThursday, 21 April
Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Terry CarrollThursday, 21 April
Re: Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionTerry CarrollWednesday, 20 April
Re: Re: LecturesTerry CarrollWednesday, 20 April
RE: Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionAdam GrossmanWednesday, 20 April
Re: Re: LecturesSteven JamarWednesday, 20 April
Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionCarol BusbyWednesday, 20 April
Work Made by Business Owner (for Hire?)Mike TucciWednesday, 20 April
RE: Re: LecturesPablo PalazziTuesday, 19 April
Re: Re: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Karen CoyleTuesday, 19 April
Online course on legally using licensed contentLesley Ellen HarrisTuesday, 19 April
T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionAdam GrossmanTuesday, 19 April
OT: Number of days left until January 1, 2019Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 18 April
RE: Re: Library or ArchiveAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 18 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Keith TaberMonday, 18 April
RE: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 18 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Vance R. KovenFriday, 15 April
Re: LecturesJohn T. MitchellFriday, 15 April
Re: Re: LecturesTerry CarrollFriday, 15 April
RE: LecturesMike BradleyFriday, 15 April
RE: Re: Owner as author?Mike BradleyFriday, 15 April
Re: LecturesS. Martin KeletiFriday, 15 April
Re: LecturesSteven JamarFriday, 15 April
Re: Re: LecturesSteven JamarFriday, 15 April
Re LecturesGPoe[_at_]aol.comFriday, 15 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Vance R. KovenFriday, 15 April
Re: Re: LecturesVance R. KovenFriday, 15 April
Re: Re: LecturesPaul BernhardtThursday, 14 April
RE: Re: LecturesJim GehrkeThursday, 14 April
Re: Re: LecturesSheldon HalpernThursday, 14 April
Re: LecturesRenee AnthuisThursday, 14 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Steven JamarThursday, 14 April
LecturesGraham HendersonThursday, 14 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Heather VargasThursday, 14 April
ISMIR2005: SUBMISSION EXTENDED TO 25th APRILProf. Geraint A. WigginsThursday, 14 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Steven JamarWednesday, 13 April
RE: Re: Library reservesGibbons, LlewWednesday, 13 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?JohnWednesday, 13 April
Re: Library reservesJohn LevineWednesday, 13 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Keith TaberWednesday, 13 April
RE: Old MacDonald had a copyright?Garhart, NateTuesday, 12 April
Re: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Miryam Ehrlich WilliamsonTuesday, 12 April
Re: Never-Never Land?Keith TaberTuesday, 12 April
Old MacDonald had a copyright?Heather VargasTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: Library reservesGrierson, KevinTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: Owner as author?Grierson, KevinTuesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Owner as author?Heather VargasTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: Library reservesSmith, Robert E.Tuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: A little help...Mike BradleyTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLMike BradleyTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: Never-Never Land?Mike BradleyTuesday, 12 April
RE: Re: Assignment of "Future Works"Burow, Heiko ETuesday, 12 April
Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Joan .Tuesday, 12 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohn T. MitchellTuesday, 12 April
Re: Owner as author?JohnMonday, 11 April
Re: Re: A little help...rrickn1Monday, 11 April
Re: Assignment of "Future Works"S. Martin KeletiMonday, 11 April
Re: Re: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLJohn T. MitchellMonday, 11 April
RE: Agence France-Presse Sues Google Inc.MinodierMonday, 11 April
Comment on the 4 Country Submissions on the WIPO Development Agenda.James LoveMonday, 11 April
Re: Re: Library or ArchiveAngie Drobnic HolanMonday, 11 April
RE: Never-Never Land?Duhaime, DianeMonday, 11 April
RE: Library reservesMike BradleyMonday, 11 April
IP Law & Gender Program Friday 4/15 at WCL in Washington DCJoshua SarnoffMonday, 11 April
Agence France-Presse Sues Google Inc.amalyah keshetFriday, 8 April
Re: Library or ArchiveLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comFriday, 8 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnFriday, 8 April
Re: Re: A little help...Edward BarrowFriday, 8 April
Re: Library or ArchiveRichard WigginsFriday, 8 April
help with grays anatomyrosie harrisonFriday, 8 April
Re: Library or ArchivePaige_W_Roberts[_at_]SPFLDCOL.EDUFriday, 8 April
Owner as author?Heather VargasFriday, 8 April
Assignment of "Future Works"Burow, Heiko EFriday, 8 April
Never-Never Land?Mike BradleyFriday, 8 April
RE: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLMike BradleyFriday, 8 April
Re: Re: A little help...David DaileyFriday, 8 April
FYI DNA as Intellectual PropertyMike BradleyFriday, 8 April
Library reservesJohnFriday, 8 April
Re: Re: A little help...Robert H. RicknerThursday, 7 April
Re: A little help...AlainThursday, 7 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenThursday, 7 April
WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLJames LoveThursday, 7 April
Viewing of NFL or NCAA Football Game at FundraiserJim GehrkeThursday, 7 April
Library or ArchiveLaliberte, Matthew DanaThursday, 7 April
Re: PhD thesis question.Carol BusbyThursday, 7 April
New Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaThursday, 7 April
Re: A little help...Steven JamarWednesday, 6 April
PhD thesis question.Penfield BooksWednesday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnWednesday, 6 April
(no subject)colinWednesday, 6 April
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereWednesday, 6 April
Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenWednesday, 6 April
RE: CNI-COPYRIGHT - Contest rulesDeborah CottonWednesday, 6 April
San Francisco Bay Area Program SaturdayNeil A. SmithWednesday, 6 April
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnWednesday, 6 April
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnWednesday, 6 April
Re: music playlists - now recipesamalyah keshetWednesday, 6 April
Fair use?colinWednesday, 6 April
Legal issues in virtual reference online!Betsy AlexanderWednesday, 6 April
Copyright SymposiumJack BoeveWednesday, 6 April
Almost Perpetual Copyright On Sound Recordings Before 1972Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 6 April
A little help...Marsha L. ZavarWednesday, 6 April
N.Y. High Court Expands Common Law Copyright Protection for RecordingsJohn McNeillWednesday, 6 April
(no subject)Nicholls, TimothyMonday, 4 April
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 4 April
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 4 April
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarMonday, 4 April
RE: Re:was music playlists, now recipesFreya AndersonMonday, 4 April
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereMonday, 4 April
RE: Re: music playlistsJohn P. McNeillFriday, 1 April
Re: Re: music playlistsLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comFriday, 1 April
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnFriday, 1 April
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarFriday, 1 April
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanFriday, 1 April
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarFriday, 1 April
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereFriday, 1 April
RE: Re: music playlistsPablo PalazziFriday, 1 April
Re: music playlistsLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comThursday, 31 March
Re: music playlistsBenedict O'MahoneyThursday, 31 March
RE: music playlistsNeil A. SmithThursday, 31 March
Re: music playlistsSteven JamarThursday, 31 March
Re: Copyright warning noticesroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netThursday, 31 March
Re: music playlistsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comThursday, 31 March
Re: music playlistsEdward BarrowThursday, 31 March
improper redaction of personal information in Copyright Office commentsTheodora MichaelsThursday, 31 March
Re: music playlistsKeith TaberThursday, 31 March
music playlistsWebb, JereWednesday, 30 March
FW: Re: Copyright warning noticesRobert PanzerWednesday, 30 March
pro-bono help if possibleHector RojasWednesday, 30 March
RE: Copyright warning noticesRobert PanzerWednesday, 30 March
RE: Copyright warning noticesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 30 March
Copyright warning noticescolinWednesday, 30 March
Re: Looking for ...........John LevineSaturday, 26 March
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Steven JamarSaturday, 26 March
RE: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsGrierson, KevinSaturday, 26 March
Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenSaturday, 26 March
Re: Re: Looking for ...........Karen CoyleSaturday, 26 March
Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnSaturday, 26 March
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Tim Arnold-MooreFriday, 25 March
Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenFriday, 25 March
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 25 March
Re: Re: Looking for ...........Laura Young BostFriday, 25 March
RE: Looking for ...........Mike PhillipsFriday, 25 March
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comWednesday, 23 March
Re: Looking for ...........LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comWednesday, 23 March
Re: Looking for ...........Robert H. RicknerWednesday, 23 March
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsDavid DaileyWednesday, 23 March
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsHoward SchulzeWednesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 23 March
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsSteven JamarWednesday, 23 March
Looking for ...........Baldwin, GaraWednesday, 23 March
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsEdward BarrowWednesday, 23 March
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 23 March
Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsMark DavisonTuesday, 22 March
Fwd: Bikram goes to the matSteven JamarTuesday, 22 March
Re: Critique of "Open Source Licensing" book by Larry RosenJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 22 March
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohn LevineTuesday, 22 March
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureMichael LippertTuesday, 22 March
One-Day Copyright Conference in New York CityJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 22 March
Symposium--Pirates, Thieves and Innocents: Perceptions of Copyright Infringement in the Digital AgeJack BoeveTuesday, 22 March
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 21 March
Use of Screen Shots - protection for Visual DisplayRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 21 March
CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 21 March
Critique of "Open Source Licensing" book by Larry RosenGregory AharonianMonday, 21 March
Invitation to Open Access Web CastHollyWillisMonday, 21 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanFriday, 18 March
5th Annual Symposium on Intellectual PropertyOlga FrancoisFriday, 18 March
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsMike OliverFriday, 18 March
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsBenedict O'MahoneyFriday, 18 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarFriday, 18 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanFriday, 18 March
Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comFriday, 18 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksVance R. KovenFriday, 18 March
Copyright AgenciesBraxton, Bennie A.Friday, 18 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksEdward BarrowFriday, 18 March
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comThursday, 17 March
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksDavid DaileyThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksVance R. KovenThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksDavid BozakThursday, 17 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 16 March
RE: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksCone, Stella B.Wednesday, 16 March
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarWednesday, 16 March
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksS. Martin KeletiWednesday, 16 March
RE: Copyright in X-ray worksGROVES PeterWednesday, 16 March
RE: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksBhatt, AnjanaWednesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksJuan SaavedraWednesday, 16 March
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 15 March
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comTuesday, 15 March
Dlib Report on Berlin 3 on Open Access to appear todayStevan HarnadTuesday, 15 March
Copyright in X-ray worksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiTuesday, 15 March
Re: Re: publishing agentCopylaw[_at_]aol.comMonday, 14 March
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MUSIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (ISMIR) 2005 - 2nd CALL FOR PAPERSProf. Geraint A. WigginsMonday, 14 March
Re: Re: publishing agentJohn LevineFriday, 11 March
RE: publishing agentElizabeth T RussellWednesday, 9 March
publishing agentTrademarksTuesday, 8 March
Copyright Law and Distance Education in Developing CountriesNorah MugambiMonday, 7 March
Re: Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneSteven JamarFriday, 4 March
E-Letter on Copyright, Licensing and E-Commerce NewsAmrithaFriday, 4 March
RE: Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneRobert PanzerFriday, 4 March
Open Access BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 4 March
Re: Protection for quote under copyrightTerry CarrollThursday, 3 March
Protection for quote under copyrightDodi SchultzThursday, 3 March
Re: Re: Protection for quote under copyrightHeather VargasThursday, 3 March
Orphan WorksChristine L. SundtThursday, 3 March
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightElizabeth T RussellWednesday, 2 March
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightJune PowerWednesday, 2 March
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightGrierson, KevinWednesday, 2 March
Re: Protection for quote under copyrightKenneth L. NgWednesday, 2 March
Protection for quote under copyrightHeather VargasWednesday, 2 March
RE: Re: Copyright Resources NeededAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 1 March
RE: Re: Copyright Resources NeededJune PowerTuesday, 1 March
RE: Copyright Resources NeededLorre SmithMonday, 28 February
Re: Open Access vs Copyleft?Stevan HarnadFriday, 25 February
Statutory damages as applied to file-sharing: unconstitutional?Cam BarkerFriday, 25 February
Re: : Enforcement of US Work in ForeignMike HoldernessFriday, 25 February
Virtual reference online @ University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderFriday, 25 February
ADA and CopyrightJune PowerThursday, 24 February
Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneBernard KatzThursday, 24 February
Re: Re: FraudKeith TaberThursday, 24 February
Re: Re: FraudKeith TaberThursday, 24 February
Re: Re: FraudTerry CarrollWednesday, 23 February
Re: Re: FraudSteven JamarWednesday, 23 February
Re: Music and School Networks/ComputersKeith TaberWednesday, 23 February
Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneHoward SchulzeWednesday, 23 February
RE: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneMike TucciWednesday, 23 February
RE: Re: FraudJohn MitchellWednesday, 23 February
RE: Re: FraudSchechterlawWednesday, 23 February
compulsory license requirements/royalty systems outside of the US and CanadaJulie StewartWednesday, 23 February
RE: Re: copyright infringement of silencePaul JonesTuesday, 22 February
RE: Re: FraudGrierson, KevinTuesday, 22 February
RE: Re: FraudGrierson, KevinTuesday, 22 February
Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneTerry CarrollTuesday, 22 February
Re: Re: copyright infringement of silenceTerry CarrollTuesday, 22 February
RE: Re: FraudAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 22 February
Query: Industry Practice regarding use of film clips to illustrate news stories (not reviews)Grierson, KevinTuesday, 22 February
Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneMike TucciTuesday, 22 February
Re: Re: WallssterlingTuesday, 22 February
RE: copyright infringement of silenceSchafer, RichardTuesday, 22 February
Upcoming webcast on graphics and fair useJanice PilchTuesday, 22 February
copyright infringement of silenceTheodora MichaelsMonday, 21 February
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 21 February
RE: Re: Rights of broadcasters in US and other countriesJavier PerezMonday, 21 February
Re: Re: patent marking requirements for softwareKeith TaberMonday, 21 February
Re: patent marking requirements for softwareKeith TaberSaturday, 19 February
Re: FraudKeith TaberSaturday, 19 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberSaturday, 19 February
RE: European Video'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Friday, 18 February
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Wallace J.McLeanThursday, 17 February
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Terry CarrollThursday, 17 February
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsMinodierThursday, 17 February
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Karen CoyleThursday, 17 February
Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Terry CarrollThursday, 17 February
patent marking requirements for softwareTerry CarrollThursday, 17 February
Music and School Networks/ComputersRobert MillerThursday, 17 February
RE: Is (C) a copyright mark?Eric Von VorysThursday, 17 February
FraudNick ZalesThursday, 17 February
Version 57, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Thursday, 17 February
Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Keith TaberThursday, 17 February
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 17 February
Re: Abulhasan v. Uniroyal-GoodrichKeith TaberThursday, 17 February
Is (C) a copyright mark?John R. LevineWednesday, 16 February
Copyright Resources NeededMike ODonnellWednesday, 16 February
Re: Re: Notice suggestionsTerry CarrollWednesday, 16 February
Re: Rights of broadcasters in US and other countriesMike HoldernessWednesday, 16 February
Re: Re: Notice suggestionsKeith TaberWednesday, 16 February
Re: Notice suggestionsKeith TaberWednesday, 16 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberWednesday, 16 February
European VideoLaliberte, Matthew DanaWednesday, 16 February
Abulhasan v. Uniroyal-GoodrichTerry CarrollWednesday, 16 February
RE: Notice suggestionsLawrence RosenTuesday, 15 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefssterlingTuesday, 15 February
Notice suggestionsKeith TaberTuesday, 15 February
Rights of broadcasters in US and other countries regarding material they transmit but do not createJames LoveMonday, 14 February
Dedication to PublicPam ChestekMonday, 14 February
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceLee TienMonday, 14 February
RE: Re: Copyright of received correspondenceScott L. BakerFriday, 11 February
RE: Fw: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSchafer, RichardFriday, 11 February
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceS. Martin KeletiFriday, 11 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsLaura QuilterFriday, 11 February
RE: Copyright of received correspondenceJohn MitchellFriday, 11 February
Fw: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Friday, 11 February
Re: Re: Copyright of received correspondenceKeith TaberFriday, 11 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberFriday, 11 February
BMI v. Roger Miller Music, Inc.Theodora MichaelsFriday, 11 February
RE: Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWelch, John L.Thursday, 10 February
Re: Re: BlogsSteven JamarThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWallace J.McLeanThursday, 10 February
Re: BlogsJohnThursday, 10 February
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceJohnThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThursday, 10 February
Re: Song Lyrics in Masters ThesisS. Martin KeletiThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollThursday, 10 February
RE: BlogsWelch, John L.Thursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerTerry CarrollThursday, 10 February
Re: BlogsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureGraham HendersonThursday, 10 February
Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightMarcia KeyserThursday, 10 February
Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightManon RessThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThursday, 10 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThursday, 10 February
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsNick ZalesThursday, 10 February
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureEdward BarrowThursday, 10 February
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 10 February
Copyright Conference at Ball State UniversityDolak, FritzThursday, 10 February
Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWelch, John L.Thursday, 10 February
Copyright of received correspondenceJames LoveThursday, 10 February
Re: Berlin-3 Open Access Conference, Southampton, Feb 28 - Mar 1 2005Stevan HarnadThursday, 10 February
BlogsLaliberte, Matthew DanaThursday, 10 February
Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureGraham HendersonWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterDaniel BerlinWednesday, 9 February
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterLawrence RosenWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Wednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsMike OliverWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsRoy MurphyWednesday, 9 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnTuesday, 8 February
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnTuesday, 8 February
Re: Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollTuesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsWergeles, Amy SpanTuesday, 8 February
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CentersterlingTuesday, 8 February
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law Centerrrickn1Tuesday, 8 February
Re: Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsRoy MurphyTuesday, 8 February
Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterMike OliverTuesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterLawrence RosenTuesday, 8 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Tuesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJohn McNeillTuesday, 8 February
Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterChristopher A. MohrTuesday, 8 February
RE: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerElizabeth T RussellMonday, 7 February
RE: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerRobert PanzerMonday, 7 February
Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterRobert H. RicknerMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerSteven JamarMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberMonday, 7 February
Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterGregory AharonianMonday, 7 February
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsNick ZalesMonday, 7 February
Fair Use in the Digital Age theatrical screening in DCJohn MitchellMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Monday, 7 February
Song Lyrics in Masters ThesisRosalind TedfordMonday, 7 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSteven JamarFriday, 4 February
RE: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSchafer, RichardFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerTerry CarrollFriday, 4 February
FW: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerChristine L. SundtFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezFriday, 4 February
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 4 February
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Friday, 4 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Friday, 4 February
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Friday, 4 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerHoward SchulzeFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerHoward SchulzeFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentKeith TaberFriday, 4 February
Re: Photo of Historic MarkerKeith TaberFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: SearchKeith TaberFriday, 4 February
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainKeith TaberFriday, 4 February
Re: Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezFriday, 4 February
RE: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsacohenThursday, 3 February
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerRoland ColeThursday, 3 February
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSteven JamarThursday, 3 February
Re: Photo of Historic Markergteague[_at_]lunet.eduThursday, 3 February
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainSteven JamarThursday, 3 February
Re: Photo of Historic MarkerDavid DaileyThursday, 3 February
RE: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsWergeles, Amy SpanThursday, 3 February
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainJohnThursday, 3 February
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThursday, 3 February
Copyright Ownership of Legal Briefspamela[_at_]chestek.comThursday, 3 February
Photo of Historic MarkerScott ButcherThursday, 3 February
Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezThursday, 3 February
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentHoward SchulzeThursday, 3 February
Re: Re: SearchJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 3 February
orphan worksCarl OppedahlWednesday, 2 February
Re: Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksKaren CoyleWednesday, 2 February
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentGregory AharonianWednesday, 2 February
Re: Fw: Old Time Radio CopyrightJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 2 February
"Records, E-Records, E-Government" online @ University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderWednesday, 2 February
Re: Have idea, need patentHoward SchulzeTuesday, 1 February
RE: Re: Have idea, need patentGrierson, KevinTuesday, 1 February
Re: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 1 February
RE: Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksJohn MitchellTuesday, 1 February
Re: Have idea, need patentKeith TaberTuesday, 1 February
Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksKaren CoyleTuesday, 1 February
RE: Re: Have idea, need patentGrierson, KevinTuesday, 1 February
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 1 February
Re: Have idea, need patentRich StimMonday, 31 January
Have idea, need patentJane BrazealMonday, 31 January
Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkDan BallardMonday, 31 January
Re: Off Topic - Web Site Evaluation - Non Disclosure AgreementKeith TaberMonday, 31 January
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkJohn McNeillFriday, 28 January
RE: Fwd: U.S. Copyright Office, NewsNet Issue 246Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 28 January
Re: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkMichael LandauFriday, 28 January
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkMike ODonnellFriday, 28 January
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkGrierson, KevinFriday, 28 January
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkJohn McNeillFriday, 28 January
Fwd: U.S. Copyright Office, NewsNet Issue 246AlanKabat[_at_]aol.comFriday, 28 January
Off Topic - Web Site Evaluation - Non Disclosure AgreementCharles MeyerFriday, 28 January
Live music recording pre-sale question...buckoone[_at_]email.comFriday, 28 January
RE: Entrepreneur as TrademarkDan BallardFriday, 28 January
Re: Wallsamalyah keshetThursday, 27 January
Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksSheldon HalpernWednesday, 26 January
Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksSmith, Robert E.Wednesday, 26 January
Entrepreneur as Trademarkroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netWednesday, 26 January
RE: Re: Fair UseAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 26 January
RE: Fair UseJohn McNeillWednesday, 26 January
RE: Fair UseSchafer, RichardTuesday, 25 January
Re: Fair UseSteven JamarTuesday, 25 January
Fair UseTamara R. ButlerTuesday, 25 January
Re: Searchlee2001Monday, 24 January
Re: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohnMonday, 24 January
RE: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohn MitchellMonday, 24 January
Nolo Press BooksNick ZalesMonday, 24 January
Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohn MitchellMonday, 24 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof orpublic domainTerry CarrollFriday, 21 January
Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof orpublic domainTheodora MichaelsFriday, 21 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainTerry CarrollFriday, 21 January
Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesMarsha L. ZavarFriday, 21 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinFriday, 21 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberFriday, 21 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberFriday, 21 January
Use of copyrighted photo as TM specimen--copyright infringement?/apologies for cross-postingGrierson, KevinFriday, 21 January
RE: Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesNeil A. SmithWednesday, 19 January
Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesRory PattersonWednesday, 19 January
Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesRosalind TedfordWednesday, 19 January
RE: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesMichael GrahamTuesday, 18 January
TELEVISION: PROGRAMS : INTELLECTUAL: PROPERTY: LAW : HISTORY: UNITED STATES: CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: View of Eye on the Prize a Dimmed VisionDavid P. DillardTuesday, 18 January
Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesKarle-Zenith, AnneTuesday, 18 January
Fw: Old Time Radio CopyrightmshumanTuesday, 18 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainTerry CarrollTuesday, 18 January
Re: Re: WallsJohnTuesday, 18 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 18 January
Examples of Enforcement of Mandatory Deposit RequirementTed HammermanTuesday, 18 January
'Eyes on the Prize' MLK documentaryJames SalsmanTuesday, 18 January
Re: WallsJohnMonday, 17 January
Re: WallsPhil LeonardMonday, 17 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinMonday, 17 January
Re: WallsRobert H. RicknerFriday, 14 January
Re: WallsSteven JamarFriday, 14 January
Re: WallsVance R. KovenFriday, 14 January
re: WallsGregory AharonianFriday, 14 January
WallsRobert A. BaronFriday, 14 January
Re: Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Roland ColeThursday, 13 January
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Keith TaberThursday, 13 January
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberThursday, 13 January
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Richard WigginsThursday, 13 January
School archives questionsLisa SandersWednesday, 12 January
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Roland ColeWednesday, 12 January
Re: Archival Copy of Out of Print BookCindy.L.Rankin[_at_]aphis.usda.govWednesday, 12 January
Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinWednesday, 12 January
Press Release: Berlin-3 Open Access Conference, Southampton, Feb 28 - Mar 1 2005Stevan HarnadWednesday, 12 January
Archival Copy of Out of Print BookGraham HendersonWednesday, 12 January
Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainmshumanMonday, 10 January
Re: Public Domain/Copyright Term on the InternetWallace J.McLeanFriday, 7 January
RE: Public Domain/Copyright Term on the Internetaminodier[_at_]gaod.comFriday, 7 January
Public Domain/Copyright Term on the InternetImagesFriday, 7 January
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThursday, 6 January
Virtual Reference on-line workshop-Jan.31Betsy AlexanderThursday, 6 January
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Tim Arnold-MooreTuesday, 4 January
Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsJohnTuesday, 4 January
Re: Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsJohnTuesday, 4 January
RE: Breed standards for purebred dogsGrierson, KevinMonday, 3 January
Re: Public Domain Day 2005Terry CarrollMonday, 3 January
Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsSteven JamarMonday, 3 January
Public Domain Day 2005Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 3 January
Breed standards for purebred dogsCindy CookeMonday, 3 January
Music and CopyrightAnthony McCannFriday, 31 December
Re: Musings on injunctive relief without liabilitySteven JamarThursday, 30 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarThursday, 30 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 30 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 30 December
Musings on injunctive relief without liabilityJohn MitchellThursday, 30 December
RE: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Robert PanzerThursday, 30 December
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Robert PanzerThursday, 30 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarWednesday, 29 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 29 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarWednesday, 29 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Terry CarrollTuesday, 28 December
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoTuesday, 28 December
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?pamela[_at_]chestek.comTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 28 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Terry CarrollMonday, 27 December
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoMonday, 27 December
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarMonday, 27 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarMonday, 27 December
RE: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Don WinterMonday, 27 December
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Paul GoughMonday, 27 December
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Richard WigginsMonday, 27 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Christine SundtMonday, 27 December
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Monday, 27 December
Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Carl OppedahlFriday, 24 December
INTERNET: SEARCH: GOOGLE: ACS Sues Google Over ScholarDavid P. DillardFriday, 24 December
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 24 December
Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 24 December
Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!James SalsmanWednesday, 22 December
RE: Coloring Books Copyright question..!John MitchellWednesday, 22 December
Coloring Books Copyright question..!Raza Ahmed SiddiquiWednesday, 22 December
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellMinodierTuesday, 21 December
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinMonday, 20 December
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellJohn LevineMonday, 20 December
Trademark attorney feesTerry CarrollMonday, 20 December
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellKeith TaberFriday, 17 December
Re: Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellJames SalsmanFriday, 17 December
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellEric GoldmanFriday, 17 December
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellFriday, 17 December
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellEric GoldmanFriday, 17 December
Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellDavid StewartFriday, 17 December
Re: Re: Google -- Copyrighted Works as WellKaren CoyleFriday, 17 December
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinFriday, 17 December
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJeremy G ByrneFriday, 17 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTim Arnold-MooreFriday, 17 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTim Arnold-MooreFriday, 17 December
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellAlvin BorromeoThursday, 16 December
Re: Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDar Small GilliganThursday, 16 December
Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDodi SchultzThursday, 16 December
RE: Re: Lawsuit claiming Software not copyrightable (was Re: On a completely unrelated note)Christopher A. MohrThursday, 16 December
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinThursday, 16 December
Re: Re: Church RecordingsCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comThursday, 16 December
Re: Misuse of Copyright NoticeKeith TaberThursday, 16 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberThursday, 16 December
Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterSteven JamarWednesday, 15 December
Re: GoogleDavid P. DillardWednesday, 15 December
RE: Misuse of Copyright NoticeFreya AndersonWednesday, 15 December
Re: Church RecordingsS. Martin KeletiWednesday, 15 December
Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellKaren CoyleWednesday, 15 December
Re: Free Concerts at a Municipal AirportS. Martin KeletiWednesday, 15 December
Re: Lawsuit claiming Software not copyrightable (was Re: On a completely unrelated note)Mike OliverWednesday, 15 December
Re: On a completely unrelated noteTerry CarrollWednesday, 15 December
Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDodi SchultzWednesday, 15 December
RE: Re: Legal questionsGrierson, KevinWednesday, 15 December
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 15 December
Re: On a completely unrelated noteJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 15 December
Re: Copyright expiration for journals?Stevan HarnadWednesday, 15 December
GoogleNakerite[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 15 December
RE: Re: Legal questionsSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryTuesday, 14 December
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollTuesday, 14 December
Misuse of Copyright NoticeNakerite[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 14 December
Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDar Small GilliganTuesday, 14 December
Version 56, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tuesday, 14 December
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsChristopher A. MohrTuesday, 14 December
On a completely unrelated noteChristopher A. MohrTuesday, 14 December
RE: Re: Legal questionsChristine L. SundtTuesday, 14 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourJames SalsmanTuesday, 14 December
Re: Re: Legal questionsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 14 December
RE: Why design patents ? was: Corporate bullying du jourAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tuesday, 14 December
RE: Web Site a Collective Work?Jessica R. FriedmanTuesday, 14 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberTuesday, 14 December
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellTuesday, 14 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property Declarationstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 14 December
Announcement: 3rd Digital Rights Management Conference 2005Stefan BechtoldTuesday, 14 December
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThursday, 9 December
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThursday, 9 December
RE: Re: Copyright Magic Language -- future rightsJohn P. McNeillThursday, 9 December
Re: Legal questionsDavid StewartThursday, 9 December
Re: Legal questionsJohn BridgesThursday, 9 December
RE: Legal questionsSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryThursday, 9 December
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thursday, 9 December
RE: Legal questionsRobert PanzerThursday, 9 December
RE: Legal questionsChristopher A. MohrThursday, 9 December
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonThursday, 9 December
Web Site a Collective Work?Mike BradleyThursday, 9 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourJames SalsmanWednesday, 8 December
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollWednesday, 8 December
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollWednesday, 8 December
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellWednesday, 8 December
Legal questionsHector RojasWednesday, 8 December
Re: Re: Copyright Magic Language -- future rightsDavid DaileyWednesday, 8 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberWednesday, 8 December
Re: Union list follow-upJames SalsmanWednesday, 8 December
RE: Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeyMelissa Smith LevineSunday, 5 December
RE: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike BradleySunday, 5 December
RE: Copyright Magic LanguageMike BradleySunday, 5 December
RE: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Sunday, 5 December
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonSunday, 5 December
Re: Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeySteven JamarSunday, 5 December
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarSunday, 5 December
Re:  Re: Corporate bullying du jourAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comSunday, 5 December
RE: Re: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneySunday, 5 December
RE: Copyright Magic LanguageJohn P. McNeillSunday, 5 December
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?sterlingFriday, 3 December
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Friday, 3 December
Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollFriday, 3 December
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonFriday, 3 December
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaFriday, 3 December
Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeyRaza Ahmed SiddiquiFriday, 3 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberFriday, 3 December
Copyright Magic LanguageMike PhillipsFriday, 3 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKenneth L. NgThursday, 2 December
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 2 December
Central Repository (Was Scope Modifiers)Mike BradleyThursday, 2 December
Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberThursday, 2 December
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourRich StimWednesday, 1 December
RE: Corporate bullying du jourJohn MitchellWednesday, 1 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellWednesday, 1 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in IntellectualProperty DeclarationsMike ODonnellWednesday, 1 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wednesday, 1 December
RE: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonWednesday, 1 December
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Pro perty DeclarationsMelissa Smith LevineTuesday, 30 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleTuesday, 30 November
RE: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneyTuesday, 30 November
Corporate bullying du jourTerry CarrollTuesday, 30 November
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellTuesday, 30 November
Critique of APS Critique of NIH ProposalStevan HarnadTuesday, 30 November
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Roy MurphyTuesday, 30 November
CFP: International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 2005Prof. Geraint A. WigginsMonday, 29 November
RE: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 29 November
Kahle v. Ashcroft DismissedJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 November
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?David DaileyMonday, 29 November
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarSaturday, 27 November
RE: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneySaturday, 27 November
Course Announcement: Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaSaturday, 27 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThursday, 25 November
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?James SalsmanThursday, 25 November
RE: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?MJ DevaneyThursday, 25 November
Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarThursday, 25 November
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarWednesday, 24 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleWednesday, 24 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJames SalsmanWednesday, 24 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsChristopher GwynWednesday, 24 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarTuesday, 23 November
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellTuesday, 23 November
Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?James SalsmanTuesday, 23 November
Copyright / trade mark overlapDavid StewartTuesday, 23 November
Re: GPL and the District Court of MunichJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 23 November
RE: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?John MitchellTuesday, 23 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleTuesday, 23 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationssterlingMonday, 22 November
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellMonday, 22 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarMonday, 22 November
Who has the right to affix copyright notices?MJ DevaneyMonday, 22 November
French copyright duration wartime extension casesSpangler, GlenMonday, 22 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleMonday, 22 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollMonday, 22 November
RE: Re: Gallup v KenexaMinodierMonday, 22 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKeith TaberFriday, 19 November
RE: Re: Gallup v KenexaRobert KasunicFriday, 19 November
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Friday, 19 November
IC Mask layout Copyright protectionrob royThursday, 18 November
Re: Re: Gallup v Kenexajohn nobleThursday, 18 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKeith TaberThursday, 18 November
University of Maryland on-line courses in virtual reference and legal issuesBetsy AlexanderThursday, 18 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsDavid DaileyWednesday, 17 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollTuesday, 16 November
Re: Intellectual Property Protection ActJames SalsmanTuesday, 16 November
Updated iCopyright Toolbar AvailableMike ODonnellTuesday, 16 November
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Tuesday, 16 November
21 Questions on WIPO Broadcast/cablecast/webcast TreatyJames LoveTuesday, 16 November
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaTuesday, 16 November
Intellectual Property Protection ActDavid DaileyTuesday, 16 November
Re: Re: Gallup v Kenexajohn nobleMonday, 15 November
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaTerry CarrollMonday, 15 November
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaAmy CohenMonday, 15 November
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarMonday, 15 November
Re: Gallup v KenexaCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMonday, 15 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanMonday, 15 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKeith TaberMonday, 15 November
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaMonday, 15 November
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJames SalsmanFriday, 12 November
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaArtCop[_at_]aol.comFriday, 12 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKaren CoyleFriday, 12 November
Re: Gallup v KenexaTerry CarrollFriday, 12 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanFriday, 12 November
Re: Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsSteven JamarFriday, 12 November
FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaFriday, 12 November
Re: Gallup v KenexaJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 12 November
RE: Gallup v KenexaEric Von VorysFriday, 12 November
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Aner GovrinFriday, 12 November
French 1997 extension retroactive?Spangler, GlenThursday, 11 November
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Edward BarrowThursday, 11 November
Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsJQ JohnsonThursday, 11 November
Gallup v KenexaacohenThursday, 11 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKeith TaberThursday, 11 November
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Keith TaberThursday, 11 November
RE: Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsMike BradleyThursday, 11 November
Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsSteven JamarWednesday, 10 November
French 1997 extension retroactive?Spangler, GlenWednesday, 10 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightLinda CrippsWednesday, 10 November
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanWednesday, 10 November
Archived Discussion Board PostingsLaliberte, Matthew DanaWednesday, 10 November
Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightSteven JamarTuesday, 9 November
Re: Fwd: [copyright] Gutenberg project in the newsTerry CarrollTuesday, 9 November
here it is folks regs to control networks worldwidemeMonday, 8 November
Trump Architect SuitMike PhillipsMonday, 8 November
Re: Copyright on Interviewsirm[_at_]in3activa.comMonday, 8 November
RE: Free Concerts at a Municipal AirportMike BradleyMonday, 8 November
Fwd: [copyright] Gutenberg project in the newsCarl OppedahlMonday, 8 November
Re: Re: Copyright on InterviewssterlingMonday, 8 November
Re: Re: Copyright on Interviewsjohn nobleFriday, 5 November
RE: Copyright on interviewsDan BallardFriday, 5 November
Free Concerts at a Municipal Airportknasca[_at_]rochester.rr.comFriday, 5 November
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 4 November
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsevbThursday, 4 November
Re: Copyright on InterviewsPaige_W_Roberts[_at_]SPFLDCOL.EDUThursday, 4 November
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsJohn P. McNeillThursday, 4 November
[Net-Gold] COUNTRIES: CANADA : COPYRIGHT: ISSUES: Periodical Writers Association of Canada on the New CanWest Freelance ContractDavid P. DillardThursday, 4 November
Re: Re: Copyright on InterviewsKathleen WilliamsonThursday, 4 November
RE: Copyright on InterviewsJessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 3 November
Copyright on InterviewsDrRhetoric[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 3 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKaren CoyleTuesday, 2 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsTerry CarrollTuesday, 2 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKeith TaberTuesday, 2 November
RE: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsMinodierTuesday, 2 November
RE: Re: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieTuesday, 2 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsDavid DaileyTuesday, 2 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMonday, 1 November
RE: Re: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: HypotheticalKeith TaberMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsamalyah keshetMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: HypotheticalsterlingMonday, 1 November
RE: Re: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Monday, 1 November
RE: Re: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieMonday, 1 November
RE: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Mike BradleyMonday, 1 November
Re: Re: Government copyrightWallace J.McLeanFriday, 29 October
RE: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieFriday, 29 October
RE: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 29 October
Re: Re: Help on contractKeith TaberFriday, 29 October
Re: HypotheticalJames SalsmanFriday, 29 October
Project Gutenberg in U.S. threatened over actions of PG AustraliaJon NoringFriday, 29 October
Government copyrightWallace J.McLeanFriday, 29 October
Re: Re: Help on contractJane BrazealFriday, 29 October
HypotheticalCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comFriday, 29 October
Re: Re: Refusal to Register CopyrightKeith TaberFriday, 29 October
A parody of "Waiting for Godot" for those without prostatesGregory AharonianThursday, 28 October
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsJohn MitchellThursday, 28 October
Re: Help on contractKeith TaberThursday, 28 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKaren CoyleThursday, 28 October
Re: Re: Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Chris SprigmanThursday, 28 October
RE: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsChristopher A. MohrThursday, 28 October
Re: Refusal to Register CopyrightPeter M VankevichThursday, 28 October
Re: Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Vance R. KovenThursday, 28 October
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 28 October
Refusal to Register CopyrightBurow, Heiko EThursday, 28 October
Breakthrough: Finally, a truly effective IP theft deterrentamalyah keshetThursday, 28 October
Help on contractJane BrazealThursday, 28 October
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsMinodierWednesday, 27 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsAnthony McCannWednesday, 27 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsSteven JamarWednesday, 27 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsAlfred C. YenWednesday, 27 October
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsevbWednesday, 27 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKeith TaberWednesday, 27 October
CONFERENCE: COPYRIGHT & PRIVACY: COLLISION OR COEXISTENCE?, JMLS, CHICAGO, NOV. 18, 2004Couchman.Bruce[_at_]ic.gc.caWednesday, 27 October
Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Chris SprigmanWednesday, 27 October
Version 55, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 27 October
RE: Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseMike BradleyWednesday, 27 October
RE: Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseScott L. BakerWednesday, 27 October
Sound recording chain of titleScott L. BakerWednesday, 27 October
I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardTuesday, 26 October
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardTuesday, 26 October
Re: Church RecordingsBrock Shinen, Esq.Saturday, 23 October
Call for NominationsLee, DanSaturday, 23 October
Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseStephen FillerSaturday, 23 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 22 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 22 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanFriday, 22 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 22 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 22 October
Re: archival copies as fair useJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 22 October
Church RecordingsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFriday, 22 October
RE: archival copies as fair useAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 22 October
Announcement: 3rd Digital Rights Management Conference 2005Stefan BechtoldFriday, 22 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 22 October
archival copies as fair useSteven JamarThursday, 21 October
RE: Intellectual Property Issues in Undergraduate EducationZavar, AlbertThursday, 21 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 21 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish serviceproviders?Karen CoyleThursday, 21 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleThursday, 21 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Dawn BilyeuThursday, 21 October
RE: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJohn MitchellThursday, 21 October
OT Thread HiJack: Stickers on Rented DVDs (Was: Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanishserviceproviders?)Keith TaberWednesday, 20 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanishserviceproviders?Wallace J.McLeanWednesday, 20 October
Conference on Creative Consequences of the Rights Clearance CultureDavid GreenWednesday, 20 October
Intellectual Property Issues in Undergraduate EducationLinda CrippsWednesday, 20 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 20 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJavier PerezTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Javier PerezTuesday, 19 October
RE: Re: Royalty for Free Concertstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTuesday, 19 October
music licensing questionDan BallardTuesday, 19 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsyapperSunday, 17 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsDaniel RoeSunday, 17 October
DC Bar Fall Reception for IP Attorneys - October 21Joy R. ButlerSunday, 17 October
Re: Re: Royalty for Free Concertsvrkoven[_at_]world.std.comSunday, 17 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleSunday, 17 October
Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJavier PerezFriday, 15 October
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanFriday, 15 October
Re: Peter Pan vs. Mickey MouseCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Friday, 15 October
Re: Joint Ownership in FranceS. Martin KeletiFriday, 15 October
Re: What's the turnaround time on registrations these days?Mike OliverFriday, 15 October
What's the turnaround time on registrations these days?Terry CarrollThursday, 14 October
Joint Ownership in FranceDenariusDeiThursday, 14 October
RE: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?evbThursday, 14 October
Peter Pan vs. Mickey MouseWallace J.McLeanThursday, 14 October
Early Registration!: 2004 TEACH Act Online WorkshopOlga FrancoisThursday, 14 October
Royalty for Free ConcertsAdriel YapTuesday, 12 October
archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTuesday, 12 October
Re: Form Copyrightable?Ivan HoffmanFriday, 8 October
Form Copyrightable?Shawn MoroneyThursday, 7 October
Re: Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsTerry CarrollThursday, 7 October
RE: Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsMike BradleyThursday, 7 October
Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsKevin GriersonWednesday, 6 October
Re: Who owns this claim?S. Martin KeletiTuesday, 5 October
Re: Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollTuesday, 5 October
RE: Re: Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 5 October
Re: IP Research Fellowships at Rutgers University 2005-6Andras NagyMonday, 4 October
Re: Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisCarl OppedahlMonday, 4 October
IP Research Fellowships at Rutgers University 2005-6davidlgreenMonday, 4 October
Re: Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollMonday, 4 October
Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisCharles MeyerMonday, 4 October
WIPO backs Development Agenda, and new approaches to innovation and creativityJames LoveMonday, 4 October
Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseWallace J.McLeanFriday, 1 October
Re: copyright questionSteven JamarFriday, 1 October
RE: copyright questionRobert PanzerFriday, 1 October
RE: copyright questionMike BradleyFriday, 1 October
Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollFriday, 1 October
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesTerry CarrollFriday, 1 October
Re: copyright questionListsFriday, 1 October
Re: Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEric GoldmanFriday, 1 October
copyright questionAndras NagyFriday, 1 October
Re: Copyright of Editorial ChangesIvan HoffmanFriday, 1 October
Re: Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesIvan HoffmanFriday, 1 October
Re: Copyright of Editorial ChangesSteven JamarFriday, 1 October
Re: California Law on copying "commercial" files?john nobleThursday, 30 September
Re: California Law on copying "commercial" files?john nobleThursday, 30 September
Re: Re: Reproducing Academic Articlesjohn nobleThursday, 30 September
Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEric GoldmanThursday, 30 September
Re: Green, Gold, Elsevier, SpringerStevan HarnadThursday, 30 September
Copyright of Editorial ChangesMike BradleyThursday, 30 September
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesSteven JamarThursday, 30 September
California Law on copying "commercial" files?Karen CoyleThursday, 30 September
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesTerry CarrollThursday, 30 September
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEdward BarrowThursday, 30 September
RE: Reproducing Academic ArticlesJan VelteropThursday, 30 September
RE: Reproducing Academic ArticlesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 30 September
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesIvan HoffmanThursday, 30 September
Re: "All rights reserved"Mike HoldernessWednesday, 29 September
Reproducing Academic ArticlesNakerite[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 29 September
Copyright plug-in for IE browser available for testingMike ODonnellWednesday, 29 September
Who owns this claim?Vance R. KovenWednesday, 29 September
IP in Academia 2004, Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisTuesday, 28 September
Re: Idea/expression dichotomySteven JamarMonday, 27 September
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanMonday, 27 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsThursday, 23 September
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeListsThursday, 23 September
RV: Moral Rights of Translations in Chinairm[_at_]in3activa.comThursday, 23 September
Re: Liability LimitationKevin GriersonWednesday, 22 September
RE: Re: Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsJohn MitchellWednesday, 22 September
Re: Liability Limitationjohn nobleWednesday, 22 September
Re: Liability LimitationSteven JamarWednesday, 22 September
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 22 September
Celebrity Image, Likeness & Estate LicensingChrisWednesday, 22 September
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeSteven JamarWednesday, 22 September
Liability LimitationMike PhillipsWednesday, 22 September
Debate over WIPO futureJames LoveWednesday, 22 September
Re: All Rights Reserved Noticejohn nobleTuesday, 21 September
Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 21 September
Re: Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & State LawTerry CarrollTuesday, 21 September
Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeTerry CarrollTuesday, 21 September
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 20 September
All Rights Reserved Noticelinda.pickering[_at_]sealedair.comMonday, 20 September
Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & State LawJoy R. ButlerMonday, 20 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarMonday, 20 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanMonday, 20 September
Re: Re: Digital copies and section 108Karen CoyleMonday, 20 September
Re: Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsKeith TaberMonday, 20 September
Re: Dickens and such (was Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's Novel)Keith TaberMonday, 20 September
RE: Digital copies and section 108Robert KasunicSunday, 19 September
Re: Digital copies and section 108Keith TaberSunday, 19 September
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsCone, Stella B.Sunday, 19 September
RE: State-level protections? (was Re: Re: Sound Recordings)Juan Saavedra CASTROSunday, 19 September
Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsRoss, AndrewSunday, 19 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsSunday, 19 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsSunday, 19 September
Re: Re: Sound RecordingsListsSunday, 19 September
Moral Rights of Translations in ChinaKenneth LiuSunday, 19 September
RE: Digital copies and section 108John MitchellSunday, 19 September
State-level protections? (was Re: Re: Sound Recordings)Jon NoringThursday, 16 September
Re: Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionMike OliverThursday, 16 September
Re: Sound RecordingsVance R. KovenThursday, 16 September
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 16 September
Re: Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionJason SantarcangeloThursday, 16 September
Digital copies and section 108Karen CoyleThursday, 16 September
Re: GPL and the District Court of MunichJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 13 September
Re: Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Nick ZalesMonday, 13 September
Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionKeith TaberMonday, 13 September
Sound RecordingsVerena.Haegler[_at_]hoerverlag.deMonday, 13 September
Re: Re: copying for internal patronsRoger BroadieMonday, 13 September
RE: Re: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"John MitchellFriday, 10 September
Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionJason SantarcangeloFriday, 10 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelVance R. KovenFriday, 10 September
Victory for the NIH open access plan in the House (fwd)Stevan HarnadFriday, 10 September
Re: Re: German copyright questionMike HoldernessFriday, 10 September
RE: Re: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesJohn MitchellFriday, 10 September
Re: Re: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesSteven JamarThursday, 9 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanThursday, 9 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 9 September
Re: Re: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 9 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 9 September
Re: Open Access & CNIJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 9 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelVance R. KovenWednesday, 8 September
RE: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesThomas-Clark, JillWednesday, 8 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 8 September
Re: Re: Defamation - Web LinkDavid DaileyWednesday, 8 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsWednesday, 8 September
RE: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Ethan AckermanWednesday, 8 September
Re: Defamation - Web LinkMichael LandauWednesday, 8 September
Re: copying for internal patronsCarol SimpsonTuesday, 7 September
Defamation - Web LinkCharles MeyerTuesday, 7 September
Re: German copyright questionThomas HoerenTuesday, 7 September
Re: German copyright questionCopylaw[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 7 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarTuesday, 7 September
Re: Re: Skylink decidedSteven JamarTuesday, 7 September
Open Access & CNIKlein, BonnieTuesday, 7 September
Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaTuesday, 7 September
RE: Re: Skylink decidedMichael GrahamTuesday, 7 September
German copyright questionCarol BusbyTuesday, 7 September
GPL and the District Court of MunichThomas HoerenTuesday, 7 September
Re: copying for internal patronsSteven JamarTuesday, 7 September
Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 7 September
Re: Re: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH) -Gov InfoJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 7 September
Re: Re: Skylink decidedCarl OppedahlFriday, 3 September
RE: Re: Skylink decidedAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 3 September
RE: copying for internal patronsKlein, BonnieFriday, 3 September
Re: Re: Skylink decidedSteven JamarThursday, 2 September
copying for internal patronsFreya AndersonThursday, 2 September
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofLaura Young BostThursday, 2 September
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofKeith TaberThursday, 2 September
Re: Skylink decidedVance R. KovenThursday, 2 September
Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofIvan HoffmanWednesday, 1 September
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofSteven JamarWednesday, 1 September
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollWednesday, 1 September
Skylink decidedJohn MitchellWednesday, 1 September
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarTuesday, 31 August
RE: Creative contract writing, sort ofNeil A. SmithTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofKeith TaberTuesday, 31 August
Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarTuesday, 31 August
Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofSteven JamarTuesday, 31 August
RE: Creative contract writing, sort ofAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJames and Dorothy BrennanTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarTuesday, 31 August
Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NoveljnTuesday, 31 August
Creative contract writing, sort ofCarol BusbyTuesday, 31 August
RE: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelDeMarte, LukeTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: non-obviousnessGregory AharonianTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollTuesday, 31 August
Re: Re: non-obviousnessIvan HoffmanMonday, 30 August
RE: Re: non-obviousnessAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 30 August
RE: Re: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH) -Gov InfoKlein, BonnieMonday, 30 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberMonday, 30 August
Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoy R. ButlerMonday, 30 August
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenMonday, 30 August
RE: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanMonday, 30 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollMonday, 30 August
Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarMonday, 30 August
RE: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH)Stevan HarnadMonday, 30 August
RE: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanFriday, 27 August
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenFriday, 27 August
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsjrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comFriday, 27 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFriday, 27 August
Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsIvan HoffmanThursday, 26 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 26 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 26 August
Music Publisher Settles Copyright Skirmish Over Guthrie Classicamalyah keshetThursday, 26 August
guidelines for table of contents serviceFreya AndersonThursday, 26 August
Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenThursday, 26 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 26 August
Re: scenario regarding distance ed.Keith TaberThursday, 26 August
scenario regarding distance ed.John EyeWednesday, 25 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeWednesday, 25 August
Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 25 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberWednesday, 25 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberWednesday, 25 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerTuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTuesday, 24 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarTuesday, 24 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?David E. HollingsworthMonday, 23 August
Re: Peer-to-Peer VictoryVance R. KovenMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?S. Martin KeletiMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMonday, 23 August
RE: Peer-to-Peer VictoryJohn MitchellMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarMonday, 23 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberMonday, 23 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?'Tim Arnold - Moore'Monday, 23 August
Peer-to-Peer VictoryJohn McNeillFriday, 20 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 20 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerFriday, 20 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellFriday, 20 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerFriday, 20 August
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzFriday, 20 August
MGM v Grokster (aug 19 2004 9th cir)Steven JamarFriday, 20 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarFriday, 20 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?colin seegerFriday, 20 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 20 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFriday, 20 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFriday, 20 August
Re: problems with pseudonymsKeith TaberFriday, 20 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrFriday, 20 August
problems with pseudonymsJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 19 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberThursday, 19 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Michael GrahamThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollThursday, 19 August
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzThursday, 19 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Mic PorterThursday, 19 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberThursday, 19 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrThursday, 19 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellWednesday, 18 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellWednesday, 18 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?David TurnerWednesday, 18 August
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzWednesday, 18 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWednesday, 18 August
Re: Fwd: Interesting case on Book Publishing and injunctionsStephen FishmanWednesday, 18 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarWednesday, 18 August
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWednesday, 18 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Wallace J.McLeanWednesday, 18 August
Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeWednesday, 18 August
Re: How about a latent image?Theodora MichaelsWednesday, 18 August
RE: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWednesday, 18 August
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzWednesday, 18 August
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Karl-Erik TallmoWednesday, 18 August
Interesting case on Book Publishing and injunctionsMike OliverWednesday, 18 August
RE: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrTuesday, 17 August
Re: "Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extension sought for sound recordings in Europe)Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 17 August
Re: Copyright Question.Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 17 August
How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzTuesday, 17 August
Copyright Question.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comMonday, 16 August
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesKeith TaberMonday, 16 August
RE: Re: Changing ISBN NumbersJohn MitchellFriday, 13 August
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonFriday, 13 August
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesJoe EllisonFriday, 13 August
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesHeather RobertsFriday, 13 August
RE: Re: copyright for library reservesSmith, Robert E.Friday, 13 August
Re: copyright for library reservesCarol SimpsonFriday, 13 August
Re: "Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extensionWallace J.McLeanFriday, 13 August
Re: Re: Changing ISBN NumbersLaura Young BostFriday, 13 August
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonFriday, 13 August
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersMike HoldernessFriday, 13 August
copyright for library reservesSmith, Robert E.Friday, 13 August
"Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extension sought for sound recordings in Europe)Jon NoringFriday, 13 August
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersNicholas Weir-WilliamsFriday, 13 August
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesKeith TaberFriday, 13 August
Re: copyright for library reservesMarsha L. ZavarThursday, 12 August
Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonThursday, 12 August
copyright for library reservesHeather RobertsThursday, 12 August
Re: Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsMason NathanielWednesday, 11 August
Re: Re: Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsTroll Company A/SWednesday, 11 August
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and < derivative works >irm[_at_]in3activa.comTuesday, 10 August
Re: Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsJanice PilchTuesday, 10 August
RE: joint copyright and infringement claimsJohn McNeillTuesday, 10 August
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsKathleen WilliamsonTuesday, 10 August
Re: Changing ISSN NumbersNicholas Weir-WilliamsTuesday, 10 August
Changing ISBN NumbersDodi SchultzTuesday, 10 August
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsTerry CarrollTuesday, 10 August
RE: joint copyright and infringement claimsJohn MitchellTuesday, 10 August
Re: Changing ISSN NumbersJohn LevineTuesday, 10 August
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Troll Company A/STuesday, 10 August
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsjnTuesday, 10 August
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Terry CarrollMonday, 9 August
Changing ISSN Numberselizabeth brodakMonday, 9 August
joint copyright and infringement claimsMason NathanielMonday, 9 August
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaMonday, 9 August
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaMonday, 9 August
patent families with legal statusRolf ClaessenMonday, 9 August
Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsDaniel SmithMonday, 9 August
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Terry CarrollFriday, 6 August
RE: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaFriday, 6 August
Course Announcement: Online Copyright CoursesKim NayyerFriday, 6 August
Re: Re: Copyright question - eBay ebook?JulieFriday, 6 August
RE: Re: Translation and copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 6 August
Re: Copyright question - eBay ebook?Nicholas Weir-WilliamsThursday, 5 August
Re: Re: Translation and copyrightjnThursday, 5 August
Re: Fair use guidelines for Universitieslodi3718[_at_]bellsouth.netThursday, 5 August
Fair use guidelines for UniversitiesEdward P RichardsThursday, 5 August
Re: Re: Translation and copyrightAnne StevensThursday, 5 August
Copyright question - eBay ebook?JulieWednesday, 4 August
RE: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »John MitchellTuesday, 3 August
Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Bruno CARBONNIERTuesday, 3 August
Re: Re: public performance?Roland ColeTuesday, 3 August
Re: Re: public performance?DenariusDeiMonday, 2 August
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightChristopher A. MohrMonday, 2 August
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightjohn nobleMonday, 2 August
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightPaul FaklerMonday, 2 August
Henry Carey, Letters on International CopyrightWallace J.McLeanMonday, 2 August
RE: Re: public performance?John McNeillFriday, 30 July
syndication rightsjohn nobleFriday, 30 July
Re: Re: public performance?Edward BarrowFriday, 30 July
Re: public performance?Roland ColeFriday, 30 July
Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightKevin GriersonFriday, 30 July
public performance?JQ JohnsonFriday, 30 July
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid MoserFriday, 30 July
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightJohn P. McNeillFriday, 30 July
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid PostFriday, 30 July
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightWallace J.McLeanThursday, 29 July
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightFreya AndersonThursday, 29 July
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightRobert A. BaronThursday, 29 July
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid PostThursday, 29 July
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadWednesday, 28 July
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkTerry CarrollWednesday, 28 July
Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightamalyah keshetWednesday, 28 July
Abbey RoadRenee AnthuisWednesday, 28 July
Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkTerry CarrollWednesday, 28 July
German Copyright QuestionBrian NeginWednesday, 28 July
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkChristopher A. MohrTuesday, 27 July
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkKeith TaberTuesday, 27 July
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkEric Von VorysTuesday, 27 July
Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkRichard WigginsTuesday, 27 July
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkFreya AndersonTuesday, 27 July
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkKeith TaberTuesday, 27 July
Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightamalyahMonday, 26 July
Re: Re: Software to capture all pages of websiteBob FrasierMonday, 26 July
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkFreya AndersonMonday, 26 July
Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkRichard WigginsMonday, 26 July
Software to capture all pages of websiteRichard WigginsMonday, 26 July
Re: Re:  Software to capture all pages of websiteBenedict O'MahoneyFriday, 23 July
Re: Software to capture all pages of websiteDavid MoserFriday, 23 July
Re:  Software to capture all pages of websiteAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comFriday, 23 July
RE: Software to capture all pages of websiteMinodierFriday, 23 July
Re: Fair UseRobert A. BaronThursday, 22 July
Fair UseJames and Dorothy BrennanThursday, 22 July
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsMinodierThursday, 22 July
Software to capture all pages of websiteDoug IsenbergThursday, 22 July
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 21 July
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofEdward BarrowWednesday, 21 July
RE: Re: Insurance (was: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright of reproductions)John MitchellWednesday, 21 July
The UK Committee Report on OAStevan HarnadWednesday, 21 July
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristopher A. MohrTuesday, 20 July
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 20 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsMike OliverTuesday, 20 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarTuesday, 20 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsjohn nobleTuesday, 20 July
Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright of reproductions)Edward BarrowTuesday, 20 July
RE: Re: Copyrights in ReproductionsMinodierTuesday, 20 July
Re: Re: Translation and Basic copyright questionNicholas Weir-WilliamsTuesday, 20 July
Re: Copyrights in ReproductionsChristy HubbardMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: Basic copyright questionWallace J.McLeanMonday, 19 July
Re: Is a book of old ads fair use?Steven JamarMonday, 19 July
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert PanzerMonday, 19 July
RE: Re: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationPetteri KorhonenMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRoy MurphyMonday, 19 July
RE: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationGROVES PeterMonday, 19 July
Re: Re: Translation and Basic copyright questionAnne StevensMonday, 19 July
Re: Basic copyright questionSteven JamarThursday, 15 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarThursday, 15 July
RE: Re: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerThursday, 15 July
Re: Basic copyright questionWallace J.McLeanThursday, 15 July
RE: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerThursday, 15 July
Re: Basic copyright questionKevin GriersonThursday, 15 July
Archival permissionsDodi SchultzThursday, 15 July
Re: Re: Re: Material Breach and copyrightCarol BusbyThursday, 15 July
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronThursday, 15 July
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationTerry CarrollThursday, 15 July
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationNicholas Weir-WilliamsThursday, 15 July
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationVance R. KovenThursday, 15 July
Is a book of old ads fair use?John LevineThursday, 15 July
Basic copyright questionSergey RThursday, 15 July
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationMike HoldernessThursday, 15 July
Tapes for disabled studentsKathy TadlockWednesday, 14 July
Re: Re: Re: Material Breach and copyrightDavid MoserWednesday, 14 July
Version 54, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 14 July
RE: Archival permissionsChristine L. SundtWednesday, 14 July
Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoWednesday, 14 July
RE: Re: Material Breach and copyrightHoward ZaharoffWednesday, 14 July
Archival permissionsDrRhetoric[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 14 July
Re: Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleTuesday, 13 July
Re: Copyrights and heirsjohn nobleTuesday, 13 July
Re: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §4 12 v §1203john nobleTuesday, 13 July
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tuesday, 13 July
need IP lawyer referralDavid BozakTuesday, 13 July
Re: The Copyright Non-Problem and Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadTuesday, 13 July
Re: Material Breach and copyrightDavid MoserTuesday, 13 July
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Monday, 12 July
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Monday, 12 July
Updated copyright duration chartPeter HirtleMonday, 12 July
Re: Re: French copyright lawWallace J.McLeanMonday, 12 July
RE: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203Christopher A. MohrMonday, 12 July
Re: Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Steven JamarMonday, 12 July
Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203S. Martin KeletiMonday, 12 July
Re: Copyrights and heirsPatsy MussonMonday, 12 July
Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?S. Martin KeletiMonday, 12 July
Re: Re: French copyright lawS. Martin KeletiMonday, 12 July
Material Breach and copyrightCarol BusbyMonday, 12 July
RE: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203 - infringement vs. circumventionEthan AckermanMonday, 12 July
Re: FW: Gentieu/Getty Litigation Article and InterviewSteven JamarMonday, 12 July
Re: FW: statute of limitationsSteven JamarMonday, 12 July
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenMonday, 12 July
Deemed duration of Copyright AssignmentRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 12 July
attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Monday, 12 July
Copyrights and heirsChristi RockwellMonday, 12 July
FW: Gentieu/Getty Litigation Article and InterviewStephen FillerMonday, 12 July
Re: Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleFriday, 9 July
FW: Correction of Name_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Friday, 9 July
FW: statute of limitations_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Friday, 9 July
Correction of NameLloyd RichThursday, 8 July
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenThursday, 8 July
Re: Re: Attorney in SpainHeather VargasThursday, 8 July
DRM -- Good Bad UglyJohn MitchellThursday, 8 July
Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleThursday, 8 July
Re: Attorney in SpainCarol BusbyWednesday, 7 July
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentTilyou1[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 7 July
Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenWednesday, 7 July
Re: Copyright AssignmentSteven JamarWednesday, 7 July
Attorney in SpainHeather VargasWednesday, 7 July
Copyright AssignmentClaireLLaw[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 7 July
Program/presentation questionsSweethreads[_at_]aol.comThursday, 1 July
RE: Re: French copyright lawJavier PerezWednesday, 30 June
RE: Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Duhaime, DianeTuesday, 29 June
RE: (INTA-list) Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decides BARBIE Photos are a Parody and Fair UseNeil A. SmithTuesday, 29 June
Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Terry CarrollTuesday, 29 June
Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Pam MacKintoshMonday, 28 June
Article: Copyright and Licensing Job PositionsKim NayyerMonday, 28 June
Help with copyright renewal question.Marsha L. ZavarMonday, 28 June
Re: Re: French copyright lawMike HoldernessMonday, 28 June
Re: French copyright lawS. Martin KeletiFriday, 25 June
ALA Program Reminder: Copyright Basics for the Digital WorldAndrea AndersonThursday, 24 June
Periodicals' online editions & advg: cases?Dodi SchultzThursday, 24 June
French copyright lawJanna GlasserThursday, 24 June
Re: INDUCE ActKeith TaberWednesday, 23 June
Re: Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright? Mime-Version: 1.0RickTuesday, 22 June
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKdavidlgreenTuesday, 22 June
INDUCE ActJavier PerezTuesday, 22 June
Re: Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright? Mime-Version: 1.0Keith TaberTuesday, 22 June
Second Call: IV Congress of Computer LawErick Iriarte AhonTuesday, 22 June
students taping off airEva RevittMonday, 21 June
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterMonday, 21 June
IP NewsflashRolf ClaessenMonday, 21 June
RE: Re: Fair Use in UK'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Monday, 21 June
RE: Re: Fair Use in UK'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Monday, 21 June
Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright?Kevin GriersonFriday, 18 June
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKEdward BarrowFriday, 18 June
Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright?RickFriday, 18 June
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterFriday, 18 June
Re: Bloomsdayjohn nobleThursday, 17 June
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterThursday, 17 June
Re: Re: BloomsdayWallace J.McLeanThursday, 17 June
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKNancy WillardThursday, 17 June
Re: Bloomsdayjohn nobleThursday, 17 June
RE: Fair Use in UKTim Arnold - MooreThursday, 17 June
Re: Fair Use in UKEdward BarrowThursday, 17 June
Re: BloomsdayKarl-Erik TallmoThursday, 17 June
Re: Fair Use in UKDodi SchultzThursday, 17 June
RE: Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumFletcher, EricWednesday, 16 June
Re: BloomsdayWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 16 June
EthicsEmil LevineWednesday, 16 June
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumNicholas Weir-WilliamsWednesday, 16 June
Re: Fair Use in UKMike HoldernessWednesday, 16 June
Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadWednesday, 16 June
BloomsdayKarl-Erik TallmoWednesday, 16 June
RE: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co . Pub ConsortiumSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryTuesday, 15 June
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumhopebTuesday, 15 June
Fair Use in UKNancy WillardTuesday, 15 June
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumBarbara RuhmannTuesday, 15 June
Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumFletcher, EricTuesday, 15 June
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKeith TaberFriday, 11 June
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThursday, 10 June
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThursday, 10 June
Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKevin GriersonThursday, 10 June
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThursday, 10 June
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservLaura QuilterThursday, 10 June
Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKeith TaberThursday, 10 June
Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineWednesday, 9 June
Re: Re: PermissionsNancy WillardMonday, 7 June
Re: PermissionsKevin GriersonMonday, 7 June
Re: PermissionsKeith TaberMonday, 7 June
copyright of charactersJan VelteropFriday, 4 June
Re: Re: Is SayWear violating any laws?Roy MurphyThursday, 3 June
Re: PermissionsKevin GriersonThursday, 3 June
Re: Is SayWear violating any laws?johnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netThursday, 3 June
RE: PermissionsJavier PerezThursday, 3 June
PermissionsTurley, Patrick CWednesday, 2 June
Re: music downloadsKevin GriersonWednesday, 2 June
music downloadsCarol BusbyWednesday, 2 June
Is SayWear violating any laws?Shawn HopwoodWednesday, 2 June
Re: Renewals of Pre-1978 Sound Recording CopyrightsDavid MoserWednesday, 2 June
RE: Re: copyright of reproductions_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Wednesday, 2 June
Renewals of Pre-1978 Sound Recording CopyrightsJuan SaavedraWednesday, 2 June
RE: Re: Transfer of ownershipTim Arnold - MooreWednesday, 2 June
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsMinodier AlainTuesday, 1 June
James CooverAnthony McCannTuesday, 1 June
RE: Re: copyright of reproductions_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tuesday, 1 June
Re: Transfer of ownershipKevin GriersonTuesday, 1 June
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristine L. SundtFriday, 28 May
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert PanzerFriday, 28 May
Re: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsKen StuartFriday, 28 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowFriday, 28 May
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsKen StuartFriday, 28 May
Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadFriday, 28 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKathleen WilliamsonFriday, 28 May
RE: Re: Transfer of ownershipTim Arnold - MooreFriday, 28 May
Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadFriday, 28 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipCarol BusbyThursday, 27 May
Re: Transfer of ownershipKevin GriersonThursday, 27 May
RE: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit Requirements_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Thursday, 27 May
Re: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsDavid CarsonThursday, 27 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipDavid CarsonThursday, 27 May
RE: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 26 May
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsBurow, Heiko EWednesday, 26 May
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristine L. SundtWednesday, 26 May
Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsKeith TaberWednesday, 26 May
Re: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsBernard KatzWednesday, 26 May
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsBurow, Heiko ETuesday, 25 May
Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsLloyd RichTuesday, 25 May
Re: copyright of reproductionsKarl-Erik TallmoTuesday, 25 May
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingIvan HoffmanTuesday, 25 May
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingIvan HoffmanTuesday, 25 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipSteven JamarTuesday, 25 May
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingPaul FaklerTuesday, 25 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKirk JohnsenTuesday, 25 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 25 May
Re: Technical Illustrator FeesMike OliverMonday, 24 May
RE: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingJuan Saavedra CASTROMonday, 24 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowMonday, 24 May
FW: Technical Illustrator FeesDuhaime, DianeMonday, 24 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 24 May
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingBrock Shinen, Esq.Monday, 24 May
Technical Illustrator FeesCarol BusbyMonday, 24 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipDavid CarsonMonday, 24 May
Re: copyright of reproductionsDavid CarsonMonday, 24 May
RE: Re: Architectural works questionJohn P. McNeillMonday, 24 May
Re: Delivery for further distribution = publicationSteven JamarMonday, 24 May
RE: Re: Architectural works questionScott ButcherFriday, 21 May
Re: Architectural works questionKeith TaberFriday, 21 May
RE: Re: Delivery for further distribution = publication_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Friday, 21 May
RE: Architectural works questionRobert PanzerFriday, 21 May
Re: Architectural works questionjohn nobleFriday, 21 May
Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingJuan SaavedraThursday, 20 May
RE: Architectural works questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 20 May
Re: Architectural works questionAndrewThursday, 20 May
Re: Delivery for further distribution = publicationSteven JamarThursday, 20 May
Canada BashingNick ZalesThursday, 20 May
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipMike HoldernessThursday, 20 May
Architectural works questionHeather VargasThursday, 20 May
Re: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsTerry CarrollWednesday, 19 May
Delivery for further distribution = publication_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Wednesday, 19 May
Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowWednesday, 19 May
Nature Web Focus: The Green and the Gold Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadWednesday, 19 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 19 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 19 May
Transfer of ownershipCarol BusbyWednesday, 19 May
RE: Re: Derivative WorksJavier PerezWednesday, 19 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsRoy MurphyWednesday, 19 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksMike HoldernessWednesday, 19 May
RE: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implications'Tim Arnold - Moore'Wednesday, 19 May
copyright of reproductionsSarena DeglinWednesday, 19 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Lessig gets whacked in ForbesWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 18 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiTuesday, 18 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTuesday, 18 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTuesday, 18 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTuesday, 18 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTuesday, 18 May
Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsKim NayyerMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsRoy MurphyMonday, 17 May
Lessig gets whacked in Forbesjohn nobleMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsSteven JamarMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsSteven JamarMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsMinodier AlainMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 May
Re: Questionbbiplaw[_at_]aol.comMonday, 17 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsLawrence RosenMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsKeith TaborMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 17 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanSaturday, 15 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSaturday, 15 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSaturday, 15 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSaturday, 15 May
4 Open Access Conferences: Hungary, Germany, France, U.S.A.Stevan HarnadSaturday, 15 May
RE: iipsj IP resources pagePaul JonesSaturday, 15 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsTerry CarrollSaturday, 15 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanFriday, 14 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowFriday, 14 May
Re: Re: European CopyrightsKeith TaborFriday, 14 May
Re: iipsj IP resources pageKevin GriersonThursday, 13 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 13 May
Version 53, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Thursday, 13 May
Re: ArchivesDoug IsenbergThursday, 13 May
Current decisions, notices, press?Rolf ClaessenThursday, 13 May
iipsj IP resources pageSteven JamarWednesday, 12 May
On now: webcast of hearing on DMCRA (H.R. 107)M. Claire StewartWednesday, 12 May
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezWednesday, 12 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksEli EdwardsTuesday, 11 May
ArchivesJane BrazealMonday, 10 May
Found the archive !Jane BrazealMonday, 10 May
Suggestions neededJane BrazealMonday, 10 May
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekMonday, 10 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksMike HoldernessMonday, 10 May
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 10 May
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 7 May
RE: Re: Life + Years UleAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 7 May
Re: summary of copyright term by countryTheodora MichaelsThursday, 6 May
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Robert PanzerThursday, 6 May
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Nicholas Weir-WilliamsThursday, 6 May
European CopyrightsJavier PerezThursday, 6 May
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 6 May
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Edward BarrowThursday, 6 May
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Wallace J.McLeanThursday, 6 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksWallace J.McLeanThursday, 6 May
Re: summary of copyright term by countryAnne LennoxThursday, 6 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksTerry CarrollThursday, 6 May
Libraries, digitization and copyright: queryEli EdwardsThursday, 6 May
charitable fundraising issueRaza Ahmed SiddiquiThursday, 6 May
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerThursday, 6 May
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerWednesday, 5 May
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaWednesday, 5 May
Re: compliance procedure?Laurie UrquiagaWednesday, 5 May
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaWednesday, 5 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWednesday, 5 May
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 5 May
summary of copyright term by countryTheodora MichaelsWednesday, 5 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksUrsula Hock-HenschkeTuesday, 4 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksWallace J.McLeanTuesday, 4 May
RES: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2286Kika NovaisTuesday, 4 May
Re: Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?Brock Shinen, Esq.Tuesday, 4 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksBob WarnerTuesday, 4 May
Early Registration: Copyright SymposiumOlga FrancoisTuesday, 4 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksTerry CarrollTuesday, 4 May
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerTuesday, 4 May
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerTuesday, 4 May
RE: Re: compliance procedure?Verla PetersonMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Life + Years UleSteven JamarMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealMonday, 3 May
RE: Re: Life + Years Ule'Tim Arnold - Moore'Monday, 3 May
Re: Re: compliance procedure?David DaileyMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?ChrisMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiMonday, 3 May
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarFriday, 30 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarFriday, 30 April
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerFriday, 30 April
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaFriday, 30 April
RE: Re: compliance procedure?Robert PanzerFriday, 30 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCarol BusbyFriday, 30 April
Re: compliance procedure?Laurie UrquiagaFriday, 30 April
Scanning of articlesCaseyFriday, 30 April
Re: compliance procedure?David DaileyFriday, 30 April
Re: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveSandy ShepardFriday, 30 April
Re: Song SnippetsKeith TaborFriday, 30 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealFriday, 30 April
compliance procedure?Verla PetersonFriday, 30 April
RE: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsRobert PanzerFriday, 30 April
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerFriday, 30 April
Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?Kevin GriersonThursday, 29 April
Patent dogsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: Derivative Worksroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netThursday, 29 April
Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?ChrisThursday, 29 April
RE: Re: Derivative WorksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 29 April
Re: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveKeith TaborThursday, 29 April
Song SnippetsMike PhillipsThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCarol BusbyThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMike HoldernessThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 29 April
Statue of Liberty.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarThursday, 29 April
RE: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveSandy ShepardThursday, 29 April
How to trace copyright ownerUrsula Hock-HenschkeThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & MoreBryan TaylorThursday, 29 April
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMike HoldernessWednesday, 28 April
Re: Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & MoreMike HoldernessWednesday, 28 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksKeith TaborWednesday, 28 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiWednesday, 28 April
Re: Re: Life + Years UleRobert F. BodiWednesday, 28 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksVance R. KovenWednesday, 28 April
RE: Re: Copyright Survey -- ThanksHalbert, DeboraWednesday, 28 April
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsSteven JamarWednesday, 28 April
Song LyricsCarol BusbyWednesday, 28 April
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsVance R. KovenWednesday, 28 April
RE: Re: Derivative WorksSandy ShepardWednesday, 28 April
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsKirk JohnsenWednesday, 28 April
Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & Moreadmin Wednesday, 28 April
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMinodier AlainWednesday, 28 April
French Copyright Law & Moral RightsLloyd RichTuesday, 27 April
Re: Life + Years UleNakerite[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 27 April
No AttachmentNakerite[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 27 April
Life + Years UleDodi SchultzTuesday, 27 April
RE: Re: Pirated CD-Rs on eBayMike PhillipsTuesday, 27 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealTuesday, 27 April
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMonday, 26 April
RE: Pirated CD-Rs on eBayJohn MitchellMonday, 26 April
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeMonday, 26 April
Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMonday, 26 April
RE: Unspecified Copyright ClaimsJavier PerezMonday, 26 April
RE: Re: Fair use & PermissionsJavier PerezMonday, 26 April
Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealMonday, 26 April
Life + Years UleNakerite[_at_]aol.comMonday, 26 April
RE: Derivative WorksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 26 April
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightKeith TaborMonday, 26 April
Pirated CD-Rs on eBayMike PhillipsMonday, 26 April
Re: Re: Fair use & PermissionsJohndan Johnson-EilolaFriday, 23 April
Re: Fair use & PermissionsKevin GriersonFriday, 23 April
Transitory Periods in Copyright LawLuh, PeggyFriday, 23 April
Derivative WorksMichael_Becker[_at_]oxy.comFriday, 23 April
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeFriday, 23 April
Re: Re: Fair use & PermissionsRobert A. BaronFriday, 23 April
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightSteven JamarFriday, 23 April
Re: Fair use & PermissionsMary RooklidgeFriday, 23 April
Re: New and question about copyrightSteven JamarFriday, 23 April
RE: Re: Fair use & PermissionsChristine L. SundtFriday, 23 April
RE: Tape/CD/DVD TaxJohn MitchellFriday, 23 April
RE: New and question about copyrightJohn MitchellFriday, 23 April
Unspecified Copyright ClaimsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFriday, 23 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollFriday, 23 April
Copyrights in plastic models?Ken StuartFriday, 23 April
New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeFriday, 23 April
Tape/CD/DVD TaxNick ZalesFriday, 23 April
RE: Fair use & PermissionsJohn MitchellFriday, 23 April
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonThursday, 22 April
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 22 April
RE: Re: Survey - registration as pre-req. to suitEthan AckermanThursday, 22 April
Fair use & PermissionsMarcia KeyserThursday, 22 April
RE: Re: Special CopyrightsGROVES PeterThursday, 22 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollWednesday, 21 April
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonWednesday, 21 April
Re: Special CopyrightsKevin GriersonWednesday, 21 April
Re: Special CopyrightsTerry CarrollWednesday, 21 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserWednesday, 21 April
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyBradley BrownWednesday, 21 April
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonWednesday, 21 April
RE: Copyright Survey - Missing question on translationI.R.MaturanaWednesday, 21 April
Special CopyrightsNakerite[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 21 April
RE: Re: Copyright Survey - foreign works and non-registered infringement claimsTerry CarrollWednesday, 21 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserWednesday, 21 April
Re: Public Domain questionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 21 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyPaul FaklerWednesday, 21 April
Re: Copyright SurveyJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 21 April
Re: Copyright SurveyRenee AnthuisTuesday, 20 April
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyHalbert, DeboraTuesday, 20 April
2004 Annual Copyright Symposium!Olga FrancoisTuesday, 20 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserTuesday, 20 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionTerry CarrollTuesday, 20 April
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollTuesday, 20 April
Re: Public Domain questionJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 20 April
Music Rights Administration Opportunity (Short Term)Ted HammermanTuesday, 20 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionJane BrazealTuesday, 20 April
Re: Copyright SurveyNick ZalesTuesday, 20 April
Re: Copyright Surveywlundstein[_at_]cox.netMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarMonday, 19 April
RE: Copyright SurveyGottfried, NannetteMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionNakerite[_at_]aol.comMonday, 19 April
Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsRobert F. BodiMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMinodier AlainMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiMonday, 19 April
Copyright and application developmentRob FosterMonday, 19 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 19 April
Copyright SurveyHalbert, DeboraMonday, 19 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionGROVES PeterMonday, 19 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionTerry CarrollFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsWallace J.McLeanFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsJeremy G ByrneFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionrpanzer[_at_]vagarights.comFriday, 16 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionFreya AndersonFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarFriday, 16 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionRobert PanzerFriday, 16 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionRobert PanzerFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMinodier AlainFriday, 16 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionMike HoldernessFriday, 16 April
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonThursday, 15 April
RE: Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 15 April
RE: Court costs Was:Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 15 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 15 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionJane BrazealThursday, 15 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiThursday, 15 April
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarThursday, 15 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsTerry CarrollThursday, 15 April
Re: Public Domain questionDavid DaileyThursday, 15 April
Re: A bit more on the questionaboutMedievalmanuscriptsAndrew DorisioThursday, 15 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMinodier AlainThursday, 15 April
Re: Public Domain questionWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 14 April
Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsSteven JamarWednesday, 14 April
Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsTerry CarrollWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 14 April
The Public-Domain Movie Databaseadmin Wednesday, 14 April
Public Domain questionJane BrazealWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMike HoldernessWednesday, 14 April
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesSteven JamarTuesday, 13 April
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMinodier AlainTuesday, 13 April
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 13 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMonday, 12 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarMonday, 12 April
Re: Signatures in other languagesSteven JamarMonday, 12 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarMonday, 12 April
Re: Fair use and News articlesSteven JamarMonday, 12 April
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 12 April
Re: Signatures in other languagesKevin GriersonMonday, 12 April
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonMonday, 12 April
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonMonday, 12 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalMike HoldernessMonday, 12 April
Re: Meaning of license phraseKevin GriersonMonday, 12 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsWallace J.McLeanMonday, 12 April
Fair use and News articlesWcjj14[_at_]aol.comMonday, 12 April
Signatures in other languagesGeorge EdwardMonday, 12 April
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsMike BradleyMonday, 12 April
Re: Meaning of license phraseDavid MoserMonday, 12 April
RE: Re: Meaning of license phraseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 12 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarFriday, 9 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsSteven JamarFriday, 9 April
Re: Meaning of license phraseSteven JamarFriday, 9 April
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 9 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsTerry CarrollFriday, 9 April
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 9 April
Re: Meaning of license phraseSheldon HalpernFriday, 9 April
RE: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsFreya AndersonFriday, 9 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the questionaboutMedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonFriday, 9 April
RE: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 9 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 8 April
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonThursday, 8 April
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMike BradleyThursday, 8 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenThursday, 8 April
Meaning of license phraseCarol BusbyThursday, 8 April
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsMike BradleyThursday, 8 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenThursday, 8 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarThursday, 8 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarThursday, 8 April
RE: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionMark BurnetteWednesday, 7 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenWednesday, 7 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionDavid PostWednesday, 7 April
Re: Colleges, Code and Copyright 2004Minodier AlainWednesday, 7 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionKeith TaborWednesday, 7 April
A question about medieval manuscripts on microfilmLuis F. RodriguezWednesday, 7 April
A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsLuis F. RodriguezWednesday, 7 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTuesday, 6 April
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTuesday, 6 April
Re: Right of publicity and preemptionAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 6 April
Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenTuesday, 6 April
Colleges, Code and Copyright 2004Olga FrancoisTuesday, 6 April
Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTuesday, 6 April
RE: PermissionsLinda HeideMonday, 5 April
Re: PermissionsAndrew DorisioMonday, 5 April
Re: PermissionsKen StuartMonday, 5 April
PermissionsMiller, BarryMonday, 5 April
RE: Overseas soldiers using music in power point prese ntationsKlein, BonnieFriday, 2 April
Re: Re: first saleDavid DaileyThursday, 1 April
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThursday, 1 April
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThursday, 1 April
Re: Re: first saleRoy MurphyThursday, 1 April
RE: Re: first saleAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 1 April
Re: Re: first saleKeith TaborThursday, 1 April
Overseas soldiers using music in power point presentationsRenee AnthuisThursday, 1 April
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiWednesday, 31 March
Re: Re: first saleWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 31 March
Re: Re: first saleWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 31 March
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenWednesday, 31 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiTuesday, 30 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiTuesday, 30 March
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenTuesday, 30 March
RE: Re: first saleLawrence E. RosenTuesday, 30 March
Re: Sherlock Holmes as trademark (was re: Mickey Mouse as trademark)Robert E. Jones, IIITuesday, 30 March
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 30 March
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkKeith TaborTuesday, 30 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiMonday, 29 March
Sherlock Holmes as trademark (was re: Mickey Mouse as trademark)Carl OppedahlMonday, 29 March
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkArtCop[_at_]aol.comMonday, 29 March
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkWallace J.McLeanMonday, 29 March
Mickey Mouse as trademarkSteven JamarMonday, 29 March
Re: New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.Terry CarrollMonday, 29 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdMonday, 29 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiMonday, 29 March
Colleges, Code and Copyright, June 10-11, 2004Olga FrancoisMonday, 29 March
Re: first saleKevin GriersonFriday, 26 March
RE: New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auFriday, 26 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksKeith TaborFriday, 26 March
RE: Re: first saleJohn MitchellFriday, 26 March
RE: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 25 March
Re: Playing music in reverseRobert F. BodiThursday, 25 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiThursday, 25 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesWilliam T. McGrathThursday, 25 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiThursday, 25 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyThursday, 25 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdThursday, 25 March
RE: Re: software: first sale vs licenseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 25 March
Re: Playing music in reverseDavid MoserThursday, 25 March
RE: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: software: first sale vs licensesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: first saleJohn AllisonWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 24 March
Playing music in reverseRich StimWednesday, 24 March
Re: first saleKevin GriersonWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimJeremy G ByrneWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdWednesday, 24 March
Re: Re: first saleKeith TaborWednesday, 24 March
RE: Re: software: first sale vs licenseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 24 March
Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdTuesday, 23 March
RE: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesTerry CarrollTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionJuan SaavedraTuesday, 23 March
RE: Re: first saleJohn MitchellTuesday, 23 March
Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTerry CarrollTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesDavid DaileyTuesday, 23 March
New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.Chris SprigmanTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonTuesday, 23 March
Re: Offbeat copyright claimJohn LevineTuesday, 23 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyTuesday, 23 March
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTheodora MichaelsMonday, 22 March
Re: Offbeat copyright claimKevin GriersonMonday, 22 March
Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanMonday, 22 March
Re: Offbeat copyright claimKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 22 March
Copyright Notice translationKraly, TeresaMonday, 22 March
Re: first saleKevin GriersonMonday, 22 March
Re: Offbeat copyright claimRobert F. BodiMonday, 22 March
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenMonday, 22 March
RE: Re: first sale - pointers to articlesEthan AckermanMonday, 22 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiMonday, 22 March
Re: Re: first saleKaren CoyleMonday, 22 March
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTerry CarrollMonday, 22 March
Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollMonday, 22 March
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKeith TaborMonday, 22 March
Re: first saleSteven JamarMonday, 22 March
Reminder: Digital Licensing OnlineKim NayyerMonday, 22 March
GigaLaw.com Roundtable Discussion: Pop-Up Ads and the LawDoug IsenbergMonday, 22 March
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionJuan SaavedraMonday, 22 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiFriday, 19 March
Re: Re: first saleMike HoldernessFriday, 19 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 19 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyFriday, 19 March
copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonFriday, 19 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThursday, 18 March
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenThursday, 18 March
RE: Re: first saleJohn P. McNeillThursday, 18 March
Re: Re: first saleRoy MurphyThursday, 18 March
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenThursday, 18 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiThursday, 18 March
RE: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellWednesday, 17 March
RE: Re: first saleEthan AckermanWednesday, 17 March
RE: Re: Recording for educational purposesCone, Stella B.Wednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 17 March
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiWednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiWednesday, 17 March
RE: Value of Registration after 3 monthsWergeles, Amy SpanWednesday, 17 March
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsTerry CarrollWednesday, 17 March
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsCarl OppedahlWednesday, 17 March
RE: Re: Recording for educational purposesWergeles, Amy SpanWednesday, 17 March
RE: Value of Registration after 3 monthsMichael GrahamWednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesJean T. KreamerWednesday, 17 March
Re: Recording for educational purposesjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comWednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesRick KosnoakiaWednesday, 17 March
Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiWednesday, 17 March
Update on Golan v. AshcroftJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 17 March
Re: first saleSteven JamarWednesday, 17 March
RE: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellWednesday, 17 March
Value of Registration after 3 monthsTed HammermanWednesday, 17 March
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesArtCop[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 16 March
Recording for educational purposesWergeles, Amy SpanTuesday, 16 March
RE: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteVance R. KovenTuesday, 16 March
copyright photographs and art sketchesRick KosnoakiaTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiTuesday, 16 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 16 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 16 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 16 March
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" sitetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" Exceptionsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyTuesday, 16 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionDavid TurnerMonday, 15 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiMonday, 15 March
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenMonday, 15 March
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenMonday, 15 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyMonday, 15 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 15 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" Exceptionsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 15 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 15 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 15 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiFriday, 12 March
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyFriday, 12 March
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteVance R. KovenFriday, 12 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyFriday, 12 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 12 March
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRobert F. BodiFriday, 12 March
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Scott KellerThursday, 11 March
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Carol BusbyThursday, 11 March
Re: new patrons from other companiesRoland ColeThursday, 11 March
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Benedict O'MahoneyThursday, 11 March
RE: US Copyright Office pendency?Robert PanzerThursday, 11 March
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Carl OppedahlThursday, 11 March
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Brock Shinen, Esq.Thursday, 11 March
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study andresearch" ExceptionThierry MoreauThursday, 11 March
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteSteven JamarThursday, 11 March
US Copyright Office pendency?Carl OppedahlThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteTerry CarrollThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Bob WarnerThursday, 11 March
Re: Copyright Clearance CenterPatsy MussonThursday, 11 March
Re: Copyright Clearance CenterBrock Shinen, Esq.Thursday, 11 March
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike BradleyThursday, 11 March
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyThursday, 11 March
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 11 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteKeith TaborThursday, 11 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 11 March
RE:Putting Students Creative Work on WebShelly WarwickThursday, 11 March
new patrons from other companiesDenise HerseyThursday, 11 March
RE: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteShelly WarwickThursday, 11 March
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteDan McGuireWednesday, 10 March
Conference Announcement: Computers, Freedom & Privacy 2004Laura QuilterWednesday, 10 March
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRobert F. BodiWednesday, 10 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Bob WarnerWednesday, 10 March
RE: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyWednesday, 10 March
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteDavid BozakWednesday, 10 March
Copyright Clearance CenterGolinveaux, JenniferWednesday, 10 March
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRoland ColeWednesday, 10 March
Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteLuis F. RodriguezWednesday, 10 March
Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionThierry MoreauWednesday, 10 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 10 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 10 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 9 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 9 March
Conference Announcement: FRAMED!! How Law Constructs and Constrains CultureJennifer JenkinsTuesday, 9 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 9 March
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 9 March
Re: Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Roland ColeMonday, 8 March
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike BradleyMonday, 8 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzMonday, 8 March
Database Protection, Feist et al. in CanadaBernard KatzMonday, 8 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborMonday, 8 March
Re: Re: Teaching database protectionKeith TaborMonday, 8 March
Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Carol ShepherdMonday, 8 March
Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Carol ShepherdMonday, 8 March
Re: Teaching database protectionSteven JamarFriday, 5 March
RE: Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputLawrence E. RosenFriday, 5 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 5 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 5 March
RE: Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 5 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert E. Jones, IIIFriday, 5 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Terry CarrollFriday, 5 March
Re: The Grey AlbumTheodora MichaelsFriday, 5 March
Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputStevan HarnadFriday, 5 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Roy MurphyFriday, 5 March
RE: Re: H.R. 3261?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 5 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261?Karen CoyleThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborThursday, 4 March
Copyright search engineCarol BusbyThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mark DavisonThursday, 4 March
Re: H.R. 3261?JQ JohnsonThursday, 4 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Steven JamarThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiThursday, 4 March
more on database legislationJQ JohnsonThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Terry CarrollThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")James and Dorothy BrennanThursday, 4 March
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure? Coke FormulaAndrewThursday, 4 March
Betamax decision was very closeJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 4 March
HR 3261, Database ProtectionDodi SchultzThursday, 4 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?John AllisonWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Malla PollackWednesday, 3 March
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Kevin GriersonWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Keith TaborWednesday, 3 March
RE: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Chris MohrWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Terry CarrollWednesday, 3 March
Why Lessig feels responsible for the defeat in _Eldred_?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 3 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"JQ JohnsonWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike HoldernessWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Keith TaborWednesday, 3 March
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?MinodierTuesday, 2 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")David DaileyTuesday, 2 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborTuesday, 2 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Keith TaborTuesday, 2 March
RE: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyTuesday, 2 March
RE: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyTuesday, 2 March
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"John MitchellTuesday, 2 March
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Robert F. BodiTuesday, 2 March
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 2 March
RE: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 2 March
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike HoldernessTuesday, 2 March
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 March
Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")James and Dorothy BrennanMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call themMike HoldernessMonday, 1 March
First Call: IV Congress of Computer LawErick Iriarte AhonMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 March
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 March
Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 March
Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyMonday, 1 March
Re: Fine! But don't call them "facts"Steven JamarMonday, 1 March
Fwd: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Will SimmonsMonday, 1 March
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDEric Von VorysFriday, 27 February
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 27 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"David DaileyFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerFriday, 27 February
Course Announcement: Digital Licensing OnlineKim NayyerFriday, 27 February
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Harold FederowFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborFriday, 27 February
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumMike BradleyFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborFriday, 27 February
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDJohn MitchellFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 27 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFriday, 27 February
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.John MitchellThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.John MitchellThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumDeMarte, LukeThursday, 26 February
Re: the law IS what the law IS.Steven JamarThursday, 26 February
Re: the law IS what the law IS.Kevin GriersonThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: Decompiler service - Object code IS "protected" by copyright lawEthan AckermanThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDBrock Shinen, Esq.Thursday, 26 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRobert F. BodiThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDConlon, JulieThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Thursday, 26 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineThursday, 26 February
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?I.R.MaturanaThursday, 26 February
Re: The Grey AlbumTheodora MichaelsThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerThursday, 26 February
Re: Re: Peter Pan.Ohad MayblumWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Malla PollackWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Keith TaborWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRoy MurphyWednesday, 25 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 25 February
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDEric Von VorysWednesday, 25 February
The Grey AlbumNick ZalesWednesday, 25 February
Re: The law is interpretedRobert F. BodiWednesday, 25 February
The law is interpretedHerb ColemanTuesday, 24 February
Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDBrock Shinen, Esq.Tuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: 321 StudiosKathleen WilliamsonTuesday, 24 February
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Ethan AckermanTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law ISRobert F. BodiTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiTuesday, 24 February
RE: Peter Pan.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 24 February
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"David DaileyTuesday, 24 February
Re: 321 StudiosMalla PollackTuesday, 24 February
RE: 321 StudiosJohn MitchellTuesday, 24 February
RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?John MitchellTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiTuesday, 24 February
Re: the law IS what the law ISSteven JamarTuesday, 24 February
RE: 321 StudiosScott WarnerTuesday, 24 February
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Gregory AharonianTuesday, 24 February
Re: 321 StudiosDoug IsenbergTuesday, 24 February
Re: 321 StudiosMaureen Cohen HarringtonTuesday, 24 February
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 24 February
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 23 February
321 Studiosjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRobert F. BodiMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiMonday, 23 February
Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Nick ZalesMonday, 23 February
RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?John MitchellMonday, 23 February
Re: brown v boardSteven JamarMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 23 February
Publishing CatalogBrock Shinen, Esq.Monday, 23 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsMike HoldernessMonday, 23 February
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?I.R.MaturanaMonday, 23 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineMonday, 23 February
Compilation of video scenes onto DVDConlon, JulieMonday, 23 February
RE: H.R. 3261?Lee, DanFriday, 20 February
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsJohn MitchellFriday, 20 February
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiFriday, 20 February
Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screenSteven JamarFriday, 20 February
RE: what about this? a lawsuit?meFriday, 20 February
H.R. 3261?urbanekFriday, 20 February
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 19 February
[NetGold] FOLKLORE : ARTICLE : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW: Traditional Knowledge 'In Peril'David P. DillardThursday, 19 February
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiThursday, 19 February
Registration of an unpublished work created in the 1960sLara PearsonThursday, 19 February
RE: Re:legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 18 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 18 February
Re: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkRobert F. BodiWednesday, 18 February
RE: Re: Those Email SignaturesHarold FederowWednesday, 18 February
RE: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkHarold FederowWednesday, 18 February
Re: permission for screen shotsSteven JamarWednesday, 18 February
Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkKeith TaborTuesday, 17 February
Re: Those Email SignaturesKevin GriersonTuesday, 17 February
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 17 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsDavid DaileyTuesday, 17 February
Re: Those Email SignaturesSteven JamarTuesday, 17 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTuesday, 17 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTuesday, 17 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTuesday, 17 February
Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkNick ZalesTuesday, 17 February
RE: Those Email SignaturesJohn MitchellTuesday, 17 February
Re: [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risksstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 17 February
Re: Those Email SignaturesBrock Shinen, Esq.Monday, 16 February
Re: Those Email SignaturesKeith TaborMonday, 16 February
RE: Legal theory translation help pleasePaula Holm JensenMonday, 16 February
RE: Re: Publication through public displayChristine L. SundtMonday, 16 February
CCC transaction reportingLiz DavisMonday, 16 February
Those Email SignaturesMike BradleyMonday, 16 February
RE: Re: Publication through public displayRobert PanzerMonday, 16 February
sims copyright issues for artistsSimHippy[_at_]aol.comMonday, 16 February
Re: Questions concerning section 506(c)Kathleen WilliamsonMonday, 16 February
Re: Questions concerning section 506(c)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 16 February
Lawsuit against Austin, TX CopyshopsSmith, Robert E.Monday, 16 February
[NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at RiskDavid P. DillardMonday, 16 February
Legal theory translation help pleaseMike HoldernessMonday, 16 February
RE: owner/authorship problemMike BradleyFriday, 13 February
RE: Re: owner/authorship problemMike BradleyFriday, 13 February
registering works containing trade secretsBaron, Robert (Phila)Friday, 13 February
Re: owner/authorship problemKeith TaborFriday, 13 February
owner/authorship probleminfo[_at_]joybutler.comFriday, 13 February
Re: Publication through public displayVance R. KovenFriday, 13 February
Re: owner/authorship problemjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comFriday, 13 February
Questions concerning section 506(c)David DaileyFriday, 13 February
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguidedsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 12 February
owner/authorship problemKathleen WilliamsonThursday, 12 February
Publication through public displayLara PearsonThursday, 12 February
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguidedsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 12 February
owner/authorship problemKathleen WilliamsonThursday, 12 February
Publication through public displayLara PearsonThursday, 12 February
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedEdward BarrowThursday, 12 February
Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedRoy MurphyThursday, 12 February
Re: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsWilliam T. McGrathThursday, 12 February
Re: Re: University professors - work for hireNancy WillardWednesday, 11 February
Re: Re: Contribution to a collective workVance R. KovenWednesday, 11 February
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike HoldernessWednesday, 11 February
It's baaa--aaackWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 11 February
Editorial re Copyright Collectives and Electronic WorksKim NayyerWednesday, 11 February
RE: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractSandy ShepardWednesday, 11 February
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractBrock Shinen, Esq.Wednesday, 11 February
[NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedDavid P. DillardWednesday, 11 February
Re: Re: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]David BozakWednesday, 11 February
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWednesday, 11 February
RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission forscreen shots"]ericgoldman[_at_]onebox.comWednesday, 11 February
RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]Tim Arnold-MooreWednesday, 11 February
Re: University professors - work for hireJQ JohnsonWednesday, 11 February
Re: Contribution to a collective workSteven JamarWednesday, 11 February
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightTheodora MichaelsWednesday, 11 February
Contribution to a collective workDodi SchultzTuesday, 10 February
Re: Contribution to a collective workMike OliverTuesday, 10 February
Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike HoldernessTuesday, 10 February
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsWilliam T. McGrathTuesday, 10 February
no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]David DaileyTuesday, 10 February
Contribution to a collective workCarol BusbyTuesday, 10 February
Re: Re: famous person's nameHeather VargasTuesday, 10 February
Standard Technical MeasuresHeather VargasTuesday, 10 February
famous person's nameRuth Dukelow/mlcTuesday, 10 February
Re: famous person's nameElizabeth T. RussellMonday, 9 February
RE: famous person's nameSandy ShepardMonday, 9 February
Copyright in Multimedia worksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 9 February
Re: famous person's nameVance R. KovenMonday, 9 February
RE: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike BradleyMonday, 9 February
famous person's nameKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 9 February
Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractJohn HamptonMonday, 9 February
RE: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsJessica R. FriedmanFriday, 6 February
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsChris MohrFriday, 6 February
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsKeith TaborFriday, 6 February
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsSteven JamarFriday, 6 February
Re: Re: University professors - work for hiresstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 5 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsDavid DaileyThursday, 5 February
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsDuhaime, DianeThursday, 5 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJimmy WalesThursday, 5 February
Re: permission for screen shotsCarol SimpsonThursday, 5 February
Mellon Postdoctoral Research FellowOlga FrancoisThursday, 5 February
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsEdward BarrowThursday, 5 February
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsMike BradleyThursday, 5 February
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsChris ReedThursday, 5 February
CALL FOR PAPERS: Deadline: February 9, 2004Olga FrancoisThursday, 5 February
doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsJessica R. FriedmanThursday, 5 February
Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineThursday, 5 February
Re: permission for screen shotsSteven JamarThursday, 5 February
permission for screen shotsJohn EyeWednesday, 4 February
April 5, 2004 - NYC - TACD workshop on Global Access to Essential Learning ToolsJames LoveWednesday, 4 February
RE: Re: University professors - work for hireTurley, Patrick CTuesday, 3 February
Re: University professors - work for hireDavid DaileyTuesday, 3 February
RE: Re: CA: WMFH=employeeAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: University professors - work for hireCarol BusbyTuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Ivan HoffmanTuesday, 3 February
Re: University professors - work for hireSteven JamarTuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollTuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollTuesday, 3 February
Section 201 c: any later collective work in the same seriesMike BradleyTuesday, 3 February
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike BradleyTuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?John AllisonTuesday, 3 February
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike BradleyTuesday, 3 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTuesday, 3 February
Re: Termination rights, was Work For Hire AgreementsJohn LevineTuesday, 3 February
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Sandy ShepardMonday, 2 February
Re: University professors - work for hireIvan HoffmanMonday, 2 February
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike PhillipsMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Robert F. BodiMonday, 2 February
Copyright status of previous manuscripts of published workRobert E. Jones, IIIMonday, 2 February
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsKevin GriersonMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsWilliam T. McGrathMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements, terminationJohn LevineMonday, 2 February
Amicus opportunity for part-time law professorsMalla PollackMonday, 2 February
University professors - work for hireDavid PostMonday, 2 February
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSMonday, 2 February
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsKenneth LiuFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsWilliam T. McGrathFriday, 30 January
RE: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsDeMarte, LukeFriday, 30 January
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Jessica R. FriedmanFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Ivan HoffmanFriday, 30 January
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 30 January
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Carol BusbyFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?William T. McGrathFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Keith TaborFriday, 30 January
Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Kenneth LiuFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Bob WarnerFriday, 30 January
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsRoland ColeFriday, 30 January
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .John AllisonThursday, 29 January
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsIvan HoffmanThursday, 29 January
Digital Cultural Institutions Project - Summer 2004 Awards CompetitiondcipThursday, 29 January
RE: Work For Hire AgreementsDuhaime, DianeThursday, 29 January
RE: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they be signed?Jessica R. FriedmanThursday, 29 January
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Bob WarnerThursday, 29 January
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Nakerite[_at_]aol.comThursday, 29 January
Work For Hire AgreementsBrock Shinen, Esq.Thursday, 29 January
Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Roland ColeThursday, 29 January
Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Keith TaborThursday, 29 January
It was bound to happen sometime. . .Kevin GriersonWednesday, 28 January
Re: Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcop...KJKJKO[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 28 January
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightCarol BusbyTuesday, 27 January
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcopyrightRoland ColeTuesday, 27 January
Re: Re: Researching German copyrightMike HoldernessTuesday, 27 January
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcopyrightKathleen WilliamsonTuesday, 27 January
division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightTheodora MichaelsMonday, 26 January
New York Times Magazine articleKatzman, Leonard B.Friday, 23 January
Re: Copyright Advice Re WebsiteKevin GriersonFriday, 23 January
RE: Copyright Advice Re WebsiteChris MohrFriday, 23 January
Ottawa conference: Rethinking CopyrightWallace J.McLeanFriday, 23 January
Canadian Copyright Collectives RoundtableWallace J.McLeanFriday, 23 January
Copyright Advice Re WebsiteDavid DeutschFriday, 23 January
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 23 January
Re: Researching German copyrightVance R. KovenFriday, 23 January
RE: Re: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneFriday, 23 January
Add Ons versus derivate works - any updates?Roland ColeFriday, 23 January
Adaptation by StudentsHerb ColemanThursday, 22 January
Re: Re: Researching German copyrightElizabeth T. RussellThursday, 22 January
RE: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneThursday, 22 January
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Kevin GriersonThursday, 22 January
RE: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneThursday, 22 January
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Jeremy SmithThursday, 22 January
Re: Adaptation by StudentsMalla PollackThursday, 22 January
Researching German copyrightElizabeth T. RussellThursday, 22 January
Re: Adaptation by StudentsIvan HoffmanThursday, 22 January
Re: fair use questionSteven JamarThursday, 22 January
Re: Game IssuesSteven JamarThursday, 22 January
RE: Re: Microsoft's name and copyright?tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auThursday, 22 January
Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter promotionKim NayyerThursday, 22 January
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiThursday, 22 January
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiThursday, 22 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWednesday, 21 January
Adaptation by StudentsWald, Joanne (ESC)Wednesday, 21 January
Re: Microsoft's name and copyright?Keith TaborWednesday, 21 January
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Roland ColeWednesday, 21 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKeith TaborWednesday, 21 January
Re: Copyright - China, Taiwan, VietnamBob WarnerWednesday, 21 January
TACD, Feb 4 workshop in Brussels, Copyright in the Digital AgeJames LoveWednesday, 21 January
Microsoft's name and copyright?David BozakTuesday, 20 January
Re: Re: fair use questionRoy MurphyTuesday, 20 January
canada.com Storydmcguire[_at_]sfu.caTuesday, 20 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldTuesday, 20 January
Re: Re: Innocent InfringementCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTuesday, 20 January
Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Jeremy SmithTuesday, 20 January
Jan 23 IP seminar at Queen Mary's in LondonGregory AharonianTuesday, 20 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollTuesday, 20 January
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiTuesday, 20 January
Preventing Plagiarism Toolbox: an online workshopOlga FrancoisMonday, 19 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesVance R. KovenMonday, 19 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldMonday, 19 January
RE: fair use questionSandy ShepardMonday, 19 January
Re: fair use questionSteven JamarMonday, 19 January
Re: Innocent InfringementSteven JamarMonday, 19 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollFriday, 16 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesMalla PollackFriday, 16 January
fair use questionMark RyanFriday, 16 January
Re: Innocent Infringementjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comFriday, 16 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesVance R. KovenThursday, 15 January
Innocent InfringementHarlan JeffersonThursday, 15 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldThursday, 15 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesMalla PollackThursday, 15 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollThursday, 15 January
Open Access Does Not require Republishing and Reprinting RightsStevan HarnadThursday, 15 January
RE: Re: Game IssuesJessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 14 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWednesday, 14 January
Re: Game IssuesKevin GriersonWednesday, 14 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollWednesday, 14 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWednesday, 14 January
Re: Game IssuesHerb ColemanTuesday, 13 January
Re: Copyright on Game IssueMike HoldernessTuesday, 13 January
Re: Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksKeith TaborTuesday, 13 January
RE: Re: Record LabelSandy ShepardMonday, 12 January
Re: Re: Record LabelNick AlbanoMonday, 12 January
Re: Copyright on Game IssueEdward BarrowMonday, 12 January
Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 12 January
Form SRMike PhillipsMonday, 12 January
Re: Re: Record LabelKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 12 January
Re: Re: Game IssuesMarkMonday, 12 January
implied license and Re: Game IssuesDavid DaileyMonday, 12 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 12 January
Library reproduction of CDROMs included with books - Is this legal?Donald GuyMonday, 12 January
Copyright on Game IssueMarkMonday, 12 January
Copyright - China, Taiwan, VietnamBob WarnerMonday, 12 January
Re: Re: Record LabelHeather VargasMonday, 12 January
Re: Game IssuesKevin GriersonFriday, 9 January
RE: Game IssuesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 9 January
RE: Game IssuesFletcher, EricFriday, 9 January
Re: Record LabelKathleen WilliamsonFriday, 9 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborFriday, 9 January
Game IssuesMarkFriday, 9 January
Re: (CNI-COPYRIGHT) SCO-IBM-Red Hat-AIX/LINUX litigationEdward BarrowFriday, 9 January
RE: Re: Public Domain Imagesirm[_at_]in3activa.comFriday, 9 January
Re: Record LabelCarlos FigueirasFriday, 9 January
(CNI-COPYRIGHT) SCO-IBM-Red Hat-AIX/LINUX litigationChristopher J. PalermoThursday, 8 January
Re: Record LabelIvan HoffmanThursday, 8 January
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Stephen FishmanThursday, 8 January
Re: Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThursday, 8 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThursday, 8 January
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThursday, 8 January
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Robert F. BodiThursday, 8 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThursday, 8 January
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Vance R. KovenThursday, 8 January
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Robert PanzerThursday, 8 January
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Jessica R. FriedmanThursday, 8 January
Re: Re: law of publicity and works of artRon KingThursday, 8 January
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Chris MohrThursday, 8 January
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThursday, 8 January
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThursday, 8 January
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSThursday, 8 January
Record LabelHeather VargasThursday, 8 January
Re: law of publicity and works of artKevin GriersonWednesday, 7 January
RE: law of publicity and works of artTrademarksWednesday, 7 January
Re: law of publicity and works of artKeith TaborWednesday, 7 January
Re: law of publicity and works of artVance R. KovenWednesday, 7 January
Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Jessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 7 January
Free AdviceRoland ColeWednesday, 7 January
Re: Re: family xmas cardKeith TaborWednesday, 7 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRoy MurphyWednesday, 7 January
law of publicity and works of artroncking[_at_]cox.netWednesday, 7 January
Re: family xmas cardPhil LeonardTuesday, 6 January
Re: Public Domain ImagesKevin GriersonTuesday, 6 January
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 6 January
Re: Browse Wrap agreementsIvan HoffmanTuesday, 6 January
Re: Browse Wrap agreementsKevin GriersonTuesday, 6 January
Assignment in Advance of WorkRoland ColeTuesday, 6 January
Browse Wrap agreementsRoland ColeTuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborTuesday, 6 January
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Friedman, Barbara L.Tuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONTuesday, 6 January
family xmas cardBillTuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 6 January
Re: Public Domain Imagesirm[_at_]in3activa.comTuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTuesday, 6 January
Re: Re: Re: Public Domain Imagessstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 6 January
RE: Re: Public Domain ImagesChris MohrTuesday, 6 January
Re: Forum Postings & Derivative WorksMike HoldernessFriday, 2 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborFriday, 2 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesWallace J.McLeanFriday, 2 January
British Library CD "Spoken Word - Writers"amalyah keshetFriday, 2 January
Re: Public Domain ImagesSteven JamarFriday, 2 January
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 2 January
Happy Public Domain Day!Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 2 January
Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborWednesday, 31 December
Re: Public Domain imagesSteven JamarWednesday, 31 December
Re: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Steven JamarWednesday, 31 December
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONWednesday, 31 December
Re: Public Domain ImagesSteven JamarWednesday, 31 December
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCopylaw[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 31 December
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRoy MurphyWednesday, 31 December
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decides BARBIE Photos are a Parody and Fair Usepjones[_at_]millerthomson.caWednesday, 31 December
Re: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Carol ShepherdTuesday, 30 December
RE: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Chris MohrTuesday, 30 December
RE: Public Domain ImagesChris MohrTuesday, 30 December
Re: Public Domain Imagesroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netTuesday, 30 December
Re: Public Domain ImagesNakerite[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 30 December
Re: Public Domain ImagesNancy WillardTuesday, 30 December
Public Domain ImagesDodi SchultzTuesday, 30 December
Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborTuesday, 30 December
Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiTuesday, 30 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRobert F. BodiTuesday, 30 December
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadTuesday, 30 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 30 December
TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Karsten M. SelfMonday, 29 December
Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONMonday, 29 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsJ_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_kWednesday, 24 December
Listserv for TM -> LISTSERV *is* a TM!Rich WigginsWednesday, 24 December
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?McNeill, JohnWednesday, 24 December
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Keith TaborTuesday, 23 December
Re: Photo booth copyrightsBernard KatzTuesday, 23 December
Re: Listserv for TMKevin GriersonTuesday, 23 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Juan Saavedra CastroTuesday, 23 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRich StimTuesday, 23 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsBrock Shinen, Esq.Tuesday, 23 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorTuesday, 23 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorTuesday, 23 December
Listserv for TMVlPtrsn[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 23 December
RE: Re: Photo booth copyrightsWelch, John L.Tuesday, 23 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRobert E. Jones, IIIMonday, 22 December
RE: Re: Photo booth copyrightsChristine L. SundtMonday, 22 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsJeff SedlikMonday, 22 December
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsMikus GrinbergsMonday, 22 December
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Chris MohrMonday, 22 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Kevin GriersonMonday, 22 December
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Terry CarrollMonday, 22 December
Re: Photo booth copyrightsBrock Shinen, Esq.Monday, 22 December
Forum Postings & Derivative WorksPhil GenglerMonday, 22 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorMonday, 22 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?ALRAGUENEA[_at_]aol.comMonday, 22 December
re: Predating - Can I get caughtSteven JamarMonday, 22 December
Photo booth copyrightsRich StimMonday, 22 December
Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's ownStevan HarnadMonday, 22 December
Re: Very humorous storyJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 December
Re: Selling outside of the U.S. (original subject line was blank)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 December
Summary of IP aspects of Central American Freee Trade actGregory AharonianFriday, 19 December
CALL FOR PAPERS: Colleges, Code and CopyrightOlga FrancoisFriday, 19 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Kevin GriersonFriday, 19 December
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Paula Holm JensenFriday, 19 December
Predating - Can I get caught?Dodi SchultzFriday, 19 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorFriday, 19 December
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Fletcher, EricFriday, 19 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Keith TaborFriday, 19 December
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Lawrence E. RosenFriday, 19 December
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Robert PanzerThursday, 18 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Brock Shinen, Esq.Thursday, 18 December
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 18 December
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThursday, 18 December
Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorThursday, 18 December
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 18 December
Re: Very humorous storyKarl-Erik TallmoMonday, 15 December
Re: Very humorous storyKeith TaborMonday, 15 December
Re: Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyKeith TaborMonday, 15 December
Re: Re: Authorship / Gilberth studiesJohn NobleMonday, 15 December
Re: Re: FixationJohn NobleMonday, 15 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 15 December
(no subject)Nakerite[_at_]aol.comMonday, 15 December
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyWalter L. DuttonMonday, 15 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 15 December
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadMonday, 15 December
Very humorous storyJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 15 December
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 15 December
Re: Re: FixationTerry CarrollFriday, 12 December
Version 52, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 12 December
RE: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 12 December
RE: Authorship / Gilberth studiesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 12 December
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyWilliam T. McGrathFriday, 12 December
Re: Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyPeter HirtleFriday, 12 December
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyTheodore L. AraujoFriday, 12 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 12 December
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Friday, 12 December
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyVance R. KovenFriday, 12 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostThursday, 11 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleThursday, 11 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith HandleyThursday, 11 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 11 December
Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultySadler, ConnieThursday, 11 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballChris SprigmanTuesday, 9 December
RE: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty forGROVES PeterTuesday, 9 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 9 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 9 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleTuesday, 9 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballMichael GrahamTuesday, 9 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netMonday, 8 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostMonday, 8 December
Re: Does section 106(a) apply to public domain images?Kevin GriersonMonday, 8 December
Re: visual artist rights act and public domain photosVance R KovenMonday, 8 December
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty forMike HoldernessMonday, 8 December
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyRobert F. BodiSaturday, 6 December
Does section 106(a) apply to public domain images?Ron KingSaturday, 6 December
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersElizabeth AdeneySaturday, 6 December
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadSaturday, 6 December
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadSaturday, 6 December
visual artist rights act and public domain photosroncking[_at_]cox.netSaturday, 6 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballRobert F. BodiSaturday, 6 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 3 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleWednesday, 3 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostWednesday, 3 December
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyRoy MurphyWednesday, 3 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballChris SprigmanWednesday, 3 December
Re: Jon Johansen Retrial Begins in Oslo Appeals CourtTerry CarrollWednesday, 3 December
Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostTuesday, 2 December
Re: Copyright licensing feesCarol BusbyTuesday, 2 December
Re: Copyright title of a work?Kevin GriersonTuesday, 2 December
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsTuesday, 2 December
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsTuesday, 2 December
RE: Copyright title of a work?Robert PanzerTuesday, 2 December
Jon Johansen Retrial Begins in Oslo Appeals CourtRobin GrossTuesday, 2 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith TaborTuesday, 2 December
Copyright licensing feesRobert FerrisTuesday, 2 December
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballMiller, BarryMonday, 1 December
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikMonday, 1 December
RE: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 1 December
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballTerry CarrollMonday, 1 December
RE: Copyright title of a work?Michael GrahamMonday, 1 December
Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith TaborMonday, 1 December
Re: Copyright title of a work?Carl OppedahlMonday, 1 December
Re: Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin Miamisstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 1 December
Re: Copyright title of a work?Ivan HoffmanMonday, 1 December
The Rights of Major League Baseballroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netMonday, 1 December
Re: Copyright title of a work?Carol BusbyMonday, 1 December
Re: Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin Miamisstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 1 December
Right of publicity a type of Intellectual PropertyALRAGUENEA[_at_]aol.comMonday, 1 December
Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsMonday, 1 December
Re: Copyright title of a work?Keith TaborMonday, 1 December
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyKeith TaborThursday, 27 November
Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin MiamiFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThursday, 27 November
Copyright title of a work?MikhailThursday, 27 November
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyWilliam T. McGrathTuesday, 25 November
EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA Trade Ministerial Meeting in MiamiRobin GrossTuesday, 25 November
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyEdward BarrowTuesday, 25 November
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographysstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 25 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightWill SimmonsTuesday, 25 November
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikTuesday, 25 November
[NetGold] TRADEMARKS: CASES: It is Safe to Return to Your New York Hotel Late in the Morning Somewhat Dewey EyedDavid P. DillardTuesday, 25 November
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyWilliam T. McGrathMonday, 24 November
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActJohn NobleMonday, 24 November
Re: Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMonday, 24 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightltlredwagonMonday, 24 November
Copyright vs. contractHerb ColemanMonday, 24 November
Re: Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMonday, 24 November
Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMonday, 24 November
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActPeter M VankevichFriday, 21 November
Re: Orphan CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanFriday, 21 November
(no subject)asbfldFriday, 21 November
Re: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJavier PerezFriday, 21 November
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActJames and Dorothy BrennanFriday, 21 November
Re: The Special Case of Law ReviewsStevan HarnadFriday, 21 November
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActTerry CarrollFriday, 21 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikFriday, 21 November
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksWallace J.McLeanFriday, 21 November
Orphan CopyrightsCopylaw[_at_]aol.comFriday, 21 November
Re: limits on copyrightHerb ColemanFriday, 21 November
Re: Re: property tax?Keith TaborFriday, 21 November
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitsKeith TaborFriday, 21 November
Re: The Special Case of Law ReviewsStevan HarnadFriday, 21 November
Vessel Hull Design Protection ActWelch, John L.Friday, 21 November
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksKaren CoyleThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitsTheodore L. AraujoThursday, 20 November
Re: Incidental use of music in filmIvan HoffmanThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksWallace J.McLeanThursday, 20 November
Re: Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsKevin GriersonThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksEdward BarrowThursday, 20 November
Re: Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsEdward BarrowThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a Pricesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
RE: Re: limits on copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThursday, 20 November
RE: Re: Golan v. AshcroftAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
Re: transferability vs. assignabilityMike OliverThursday, 20 November
Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsBradley J BrownThursday, 20 November
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPeter M VankevichThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: property tax?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: Golan v. Ashcroftsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeremy G ByrneThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 20 November
RE: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thursday, 20 November
Incidental use of music in filminfo[_at_]joybutler.comThursday, 20 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightTheodore L. AraujoWednesday, 19 November
transferability vs. assignabilitymilone[_at_]mindspring.comWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightWallace J.McLeanWednesday, 19 November
Re: Golan v. AshcroftKevin GriersonWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikWednesday, 19 November
RE: Re: property tax?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJohn NobleWednesday, 19 November
RE: Re: limits on copyrightLee, DanWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: limits on copyrightFreya N AndersonWednesday, 19 November
Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"ArtCop[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 19 November
Re: property tax?Edward BarrowWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTradeMike HoldernessWednesday, 19 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyrightprovisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowWednesday, 19 November
Re: property tax?Jeff SedlikWednesday, 19 November
RE: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJavier PerezWednesday, 19 November
Re: Golan v. AshcroftJavier PerezWednesday, 19 November
RE: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Robert PanzerTuesday, 18 November
property tax?JQ JohnsonTuesday, 18 November
RE: "natural rights" versus incentiveAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 18 November
Re: limits on copyrightKeith TaborTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsKeith TaborTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceKeith TaborTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonTuesday, 18 November
limits on copyrightHerb ColemanTuesday, 18 November
Intellectual Property Licensing in a Loosely Knit Internet OrganisationSimon BrennerTuesday, 18 November
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Terry CarrollTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: film and musicBernard KatzTuesday, 18 November
Re: back up videosBernard KatzTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBernard KatzTuesday, 18 November
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyrightprovisions:FreeTrade ata PriceDenise NicholsonTuesday, 18 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at aWallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 November
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTra de at a PriceGROVES PeterMonday, 17 November
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 17 November
Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowMonday, 17 November
Re: Copyright Conundrum #1: Copyright may not be transfered prior to creation of a workJohn NobleMonday, 17 November
Re: Copyright Conundrum #3: Are works created by ad photographers derivative?John NobleMonday, 17 November
Re: A Constitutional questionWilliam T. McGrathMonday, 17 November
back up videosHerb ColemanMonday, 17 November
Re: using photographs of musicians for commercial purposesJeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata Pricesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 17 November
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceNancy WillardMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceKeith TaborMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Terry CarrollMonday, 17 November
film trailer footage/ public domain/ & music synchsKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 17 November
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Kevin GriersonMonday, 17 November
Re: film and musicKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBernard KatzMonday, 17 November
Copyright Conundrum #1: Copyright may not be transfered prior to creation of a workJeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
Copyright Conundrum #2: Are X-Rays and MRIs copyrightable works?Jeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
Copyright Conundrum #3: Are works created by ad photographers derivative?Jeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikMonday, 17 November
(no subject)Ann OkersonMonday, 17 November
A Constitutional questionDavid PostMonday, 17 November
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceDenise NicholsonMonday, 17 November
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceDenise NicholsonMonday, 17 November
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Monday, 17 November
Globe and Mail: Copyright extension deadWallace J.McLeanMonday, 17 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonFriday, 14 November
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanFriday, 14 November
Re: Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainMike OliverFriday, 14 November
Re: software hackingKevin GriersonFriday, 14 November
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Kevin GriersonFriday, 14 November
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Elizabeth T. RussellFriday, 14 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceEdward BarrowFriday, 14 November
software hackingGeorgeFriday, 14 November
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSFriday, 14 November
RE: Re: Golan v. AshcroftHarold FederowFriday, 14 November
Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainKevin GriersonFriday, 14 November
Re: Golan v. AshcroftKevin GriersonFriday, 14 November
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceDenise NicholsonFriday, 14 November
CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Denise MurrayFriday, 14 November
Re: Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiThursday, 13 November
Re: Re: Golan v. AshcroftRobert F. BodiThursday, 13 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiThursday, 13 November
Re: Re: Golan v. Ashcroftsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 13 November
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: Free Trade at a PriceCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSThursday, 13 November
Re: Re:thank you film trailer footage/ public domainKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Mike HoldernessWednesday, 12 November
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenWednesday, 12 November
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainKevin GriersonWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownWednesday, 12 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWednesday, 12 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenTuesday, 11 November
Miami Nov 19 IP Trade Seminar - Negotiating IP Provisions in Free Trade AgreementsJames LoveTuesday, 11 November
Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: Free Trade at a PriceJames LoveTuesday, 11 November
News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJames LoveTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergTuesday, 11 November
Re: Golan v. AshcroftMichael R. KlipperTuesday, 11 November
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownMonday, 10 November
Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 10 November
Re: Re: museums & fair useJohn NobleMonday, 10 November
Re: Re: museums & fair useVance R. KovenMonday, 10 November
Re: museums & fair useVance R. KovenMonday, 10 November
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenMonday, 10 November
film trailer footage/ public domainKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 10 November
museums & fair useT CMonday, 10 November
RE: Re: unpublished letters in UKGROVES PeterMonday, 10 November
RE: Term of Copyright Protection in France in 1900 and in 1950 ??GROVES PeterMonday, 10 November
RE: Term of Protection QuestionsRobert PanzerFriday, 7 November
Re: Term of Protection QuestionsTerry CarrollFriday, 7 November
Term of Protection QuestionsBernard KatzFriday, 7 November
Re: unpublished letters in UKLloyd DavidsonFriday, 7 November
unpublished letters in UKLaura Young BostFriday, 7 November
Term of Copyright Protection in France in 1900 and in 1950 ??Michael LandauFriday, 7 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniDodi SchultzThursday, 6 November
Plagiarism and Libel: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesStevan HarnadThursday, 6 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniJohn AllisonWednesday, 5 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 5 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniKevin GriersonWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONTheodore L. AraujoWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWednesday, 5 November
Re: Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWednesday, 5 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWednesday, 5 November
RE: Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONLane SmithWednesday, 5 November
FCC Mandates "Broadcast Flag" TechnologyClark, DrewWednesday, 5 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 5 November
newton v diamond re: steals v. samplesKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 5 November
WIPO SCCR Meeting - day two - more discussion of "casting" treatyJames LoveWednesday, 5 November
About Authors Guild...Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 5 November
Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONKeith TaborWednesday, 5 November
Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONTheodore L. AraujoTuesday, 4 November
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONLane SmithTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Re: Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingKeith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonTuesday, 4 November
Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingBradley G. SmithTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTuesday, 4 November
Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Lloyd DavidsonTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTuesday, 4 November
Update on Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 4 November
Re: "Creative Commons"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTuesday, 4 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Ken StuartTuesday, 4 November
Re: "Creative Commons"Michael CarrollTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Freya AndersonTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Freya AndersonTuesday, 4 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTuesday, 4 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTuesday, 4 November
WIPO deliberations on "casting" treatyJames LoveTuesday, 4 November
Visual Artists Right Act of 1990 SurveyVARA SurveyTuesday, 4 November
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseMike PhillipsTuesday, 4 November
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseGROVES PeterTuesday, 4 November
RE: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersGROVES PeterTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"David DaileyTuesday, 4 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMonday, 3 November
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRandy NieuwsmaMonday, 3 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"lq2[_at_]feministsf.orgMonday, 3 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Karen CoyleMonday, 3 November
Re: "Creative Commons"chodge5[_at_]utk.eduMonday, 3 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Kevin GriersonMonday, 3 November
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseDeMarte, LukeMonday, 3 November
"Creative Commons"Renee AnthuisMonday, 3 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Tilyou1[_at_]aol.comMonday, 3 November
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRandy NieuwsmaMonday, 3 November
Re: Sound Recording LicenseKathleen WilliamsonMonday, 3 November
Re: Sound Recording LicenseIvan HoffmanMonday, 3 November
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborMonday, 3 November
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRoland ColeMonday, 3 November
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzMonday, 3 November
Project Gramophone: How to Free Older Sound Recordings From the Vaults (article announcement)Jon NoringMonday, 3 November
Sound Recording LicenseMike PhillipsMonday, 3 November
Re: Legal ways around copyright for one's own giveaway textsStevan HarnadFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Nancy WillardFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFriday, 31 October
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and Webcasterssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineFriday, 31 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergFriday, 31 October
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"--I misreadJohn AllisonThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersMinodierThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's ownsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and Webcasterstom poeThursday, 30 October
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"tom poeThursday, 30 October
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineThursday, 30 October
Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersMinodierThursday, 30 October
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWednesday, 29 October
Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersJames LoveWednesday, 29 October
representing independent artiststom poeTuesday, 28 October
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergTuesday, 28 October
RE: Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tuesday, 28 October
Re: Evolving Publisher Copyright Policies On Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadTuesday, 28 October
Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's ownStevan HarnadTuesday, 28 October
RE: Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewCarl JohnsonMonday, 27 October
Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewJon NoringMonday, 27 October
SHERPA will take over the Romeo Publisher Policy TableStevan HarnadMonday, 27 October
Version 51, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Monday, 27 October
RE: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedChris MohrFriday, 24 October
Re: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedJeremy SmithThursday, 23 October
Exporting CDs to JapanMike PhillipsThursday, 23 October
FTAA Treaty Chapter on IP "Threatens Freedom and Free Trade"Robin GrossWednesday, 22 October
RE: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedChris MohrWednesday, 22 October
Re: Re: poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoTuesday, 21 October
Re: Re: poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoTuesday, 21 October
Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD to ebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedEdward BarrowMonday, 20 October
Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD to ebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedJeremy SmithMonday, 20 October
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 20 October
Re: question regarding the DMCAamalyah keshetFriday, 17 October
RE: poets and the right to quoteMichael GrahamFriday, 17 October
Re: poets and the right to quoteVance R. KovenFriday, 17 October
Re: Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersJames and Dorothy BrennanFriday, 17 October
Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersJohn R. LevineFriday, 17 October
Re: Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performerspao-cni[_at_]ascent.comFriday, 17 October
ISMIR - FINAL REMINDERSusan Emilie ManusThursday, 16 October
poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoThursday, 16 October
Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersRoy MurphyThursday, 16 October
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCALinda GruberThursday, 16 October
RE: question regarding the DMCAChelsea WintleWednesday, 15 October
Re: question regarding the DMCARobert F. BodiWednesday, 15 October
Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersinfo[_at_]joybutler.comWednesday, 15 October
Re: question regarding the DMCAIvan HoffmanWednesday, 15 October
Legal recordings for performersKeith RutkowskiTuesday, 14 October
RE: Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAChris MohrTuesday, 14 October
question regarding the DMCAAmy HowellTuesday, 14 October
Re: Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCARobert F. BodiTuesday, 14 October
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyTuesday, 14 October
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCALinda GruberMonday, 13 October
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open Accesssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 13 October
RE: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAChris MohrFriday, 10 October
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAKeith TaborFriday, 10 October
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCATerry CarrollFriday, 10 October
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessRobert F. BodiFriday, 10 October
Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCATheodora MichaelsFriday, 10 October
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessKeith TaborThursday, 9 October
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessRobert F. BodiThursday, 9 October
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 9 October
Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadThursday, 9 October
Berne Convention - time to modify the treaty?Gregory AharonianTuesday, 7 October
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 7 October
brief amicus curiaeMelissa LomaxTuesday, 7 October
Re: Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Roy MurphyTuesday, 7 October
The WIPO Work Program - October 17 meeting in LisbonJames LoveTuesday, 7 October
Re: Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's own Linux vs WMDs?meTuesday, 7 October
Early Registration!: TEACH Act Online WorkshopOlga FrancoisMonday, 6 October
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.John NobleMonday, 6 October
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyMonday, 6 October
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Vance R. KovenMonday, 6 October
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Terry CarrollMonday, 6 October
Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Malla PollackMonday, 6 October
Fwd: [Fwd: filmwork] from Staffan TesteVance R. KovenMonday, 6 October
Re: Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaJohn R. LevineMonday, 6 October
Visual art vs. computer softwareDaniel C. BoyerMonday, 6 October
Statutory copyright review in Canada: new deadlineWallace J.McLeanMonday, 6 October
Re: Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104ACalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSMonday, 6 October
Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Roy MurphyMonday, 6 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenFriday, 3 October
Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Joseph Pietro RioloFriday, 3 October
Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's ownStevan HarnadFriday, 3 October
Re: Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesRobert F. BodiThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryEdward BarrowThursday, 2 October
ISMIR CONFERENCESusan Emilie ManusThursday, 2 October
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesOhad MayblumThursday, 2 October
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryEdward BarrowThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. Lowrysstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 2 October
Re: Re: Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?George EdwardThursday, 2 October
(no subject)éøåï äøù÷åáéõThursday, 2 October
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWednesday, 1 October
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWednesday, 1 October
Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesMatthias HannichWednesday, 1 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWednesday, 1 October
Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesRobert F. BodiWednesday, 1 October
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiWednesday, 1 October
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonWednesday, 1 October
Copying MP3 files for private purposesMeir KogmanWednesday, 1 October
OCLC suitDana BostromWednesday, 1 October
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentKeith TaborWednesday, 1 October
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Mike HoldernessWednesday, 1 October
Re: Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaMike HoldernessWednesday, 1 October
Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104AMike HoldernessWednesday, 1 October
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRoy MurphyWednesday, 1 October
Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentRobert F. BodiTuesday, 30 September
Section 506(c) and badges of fraudDavid DaileyTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelMalla PollackTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyTuesday, 30 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyTuesday, 30 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTuesday, 30 September
Article on Disney's Mickey MouseJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 30 September
20th Century Fox sued for "stealing" ideasJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 30 September
Beyond the Commons UpdateAnthony McCannTuesday, 30 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Vance R KovenMonday, 29 September
Re: Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?Vance R KovenMonday, 29 September
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaCarol BusbyMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 29 September
Charles Nesson, keynote speaker at MCN 2003amalyah keshetMonday, 29 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 29 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Roy MurphyMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelTerry CarrollMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library Hotelsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentKeith TaborMonday, 29 September
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaTerry CarrollMonday, 29 September
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaKeith TaborMonday, 29 September
Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kika KikaMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelMalla PollackMonday, 29 September
Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?George EdwardMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentRobert F. BodiMonday, 29 September
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Vance R. KovenMonday, 29 September
Hillary Clinton in ChinaMichael CarrollMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Karen ScarrMonday, 29 September
Formal negotiations on extending international copyright of older sound recordings? (With Canada of especial interest)Jon NoringMonday, 29 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMonday, 29 September
RE: Re: Catholic copyrights.Lawrence E. RosenMonday, 29 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelDodi SchultzMonday, 29 September
Re: Chess Vision Trainer and Chess Visualisation TrainingJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 29 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonMonday, 29 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonSaturday, 27 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Roy MurphySaturday, 27 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Nancy WillardSaturday, 27 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comSaturday, 27 September
CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104ACalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSSaturday, 27 September
Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentJoseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 27 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloSaturday, 27 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberSaturday, 27 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberSaturday, 27 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFriday, 26 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFriday, 26 September
RE: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelHarold FederowFriday, 26 September
RE: Re: Catholic copyrights.Lawrence E. RosenFriday, 26 September
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Mike HoldernessFriday, 26 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyFriday, 26 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Anthony McCannFriday, 26 September
Re: Catholic copyrights.Anthony McCannFriday, 26 September
Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog Via E-MailCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 26 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 26 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelNick ZalesFriday, 26 September
Catholic copyrights.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comFriday, 26 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThursday, 25 September
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelDoug IsenbergThursday, 25 September
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 25 September
Re: Object code as deposit materialKarsten M. SelfThursday, 25 September
Chess Vision Trainer and Chess Visualisation TrainingJan MatthiesThursday, 25 September
Re: Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Jon NoringTuesday, 23 September
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Edward BarrowTuesday, 23 September
Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Annas SolisTuesday, 23 September
OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTuesday, 23 September
RE: PDF & BlackboardKathy TadlockTuesday, 23 September
ISMIR HOTEL REMINDERSusan Emilie ManusMonday, 22 September
RE: Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Fletcher, EricMonday, 22 September
Re: Re: PDF & BlackboardTheodore L. AraujoMonday, 22 September
Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 September
Re: Re: PDF & BlackboardKeith TaborMonday, 22 September
ISO looking in collecting fees for using standardsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 September
Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentGregory AharonianMonday, 22 September
Re: More on Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 22 September
RE: PDF & BlackboardAlexander, BryanSaturday, 20 September
Re: PDF & BlackboardDoug IsenbergSaturday, 20 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiSaturday, 20 September
Re: PDF & BlackboardRobert F. BodiSaturday, 20 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRoy MurphySaturday, 20 September
Re: PDF & BlackboardMelissa LomaxSaturday, 20 September
RE: PDF & BlackboardShelly WarwickSaturday, 20 September
Object code as deposit materialLiz ChicknavorianFriday, 19 September
PDF & BlackboardRobinson, SusanFriday, 19 September
RE: DMCA analysis of www.novelart.comRobert JenkinsThursday, 18 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWednesday, 17 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryMike OliverWednesday, 17 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 17 September
DMCA analysis of www.novelart.comBryan TaylorWednesday, 17 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleWednesday, 17 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWednesday, 17 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleTuesday, 16 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryMike OliverTuesday, 16 September
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrTuesday, 16 September
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenTuesday, 16 September
Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleTuesday, 16 September
Satava District Court OpinionRalph D. CliffordMonday, 15 September
More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalWallace J.McLeanMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 15 September
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryMichael GrahamMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalasbfldMonday, 15 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryMichael CarrollMonday, 15 September
oops -- addendumMichael CarrollMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMonday, 15 September
Re: copyright of headline redistribution (using RSS)?Doug IsenbergMonday, 15 September
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerMonday, 15 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryKevin GriersonMonday, 15 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Kevin GriersonMonday, 15 September
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalJohn R. LevineMonday, 15 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 15 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 15 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 15 September
copyright of headline redistribution (using RSS)?Gay GilmoreMonday, 15 September
Re: Veeck v. SBCCI note resent with html linksVance R. KovenMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMonday, 15 September
Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Bryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryBryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryBryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 15 September
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerFriday, 12 September
Veeck v. SBCCI note resent with html linksEric WeisbergFriday, 12 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Eric WeisbergFriday, 12 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Eric WeisbergFriday, 12 September
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiFriday, 12 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Mike HoldernessFriday, 12 September
Re: copyright for treaties?David DaileyFriday, 12 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Vance R. KovenFriday, 12 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenFriday, 12 September
Re: copyright for treaties?Terry CarrollFriday, 12 September
copyright for treaties?JQ JohnsonFriday, 12 September
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerFriday, 12 September
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsRoland ColeFriday, 12 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordThursday, 11 September
ISMIR REGISTRATIONSusan Emilie ManusThursday, 11 September
Bill C-36 impact reduxWallace J.McLeanThursday, 11 September
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 11 September
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsBrock ShinenThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 11 September
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsVance R. KovenThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawRobert F. BodiThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonThursday, 11 September
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Wallace J.McLeanThursday, 11 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 11 September
Incorrectly Completed FormsMike PhillipsThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyJuan Saavedra CastroThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 11 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 11 September
RE: broadcasting rights and the little guyMichael GrahamWednesday, 10 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiWednesday, 10 September
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyVance R. KovenWednesday, 10 September
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 10 September
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyBrock ShinenWednesday, 10 September
TEACH and Digital Fair Use Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisWednesday, 10 September
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Karen CoyleWednesday, 10 September
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawRobert F. BodiWednesday, 10 September
broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 10 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWednesday, 10 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 10 September
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 10 September
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawKeith TaborTuesday, 9 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryTheodore L. AraujoTuesday, 9 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiTuesday, 9 September
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryLawrence E. RosenTuesday, 9 September
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJohn NobleTuesday, 9 September
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiMonday, 8 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 8 September
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawltlredwagonMonday, 8 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMonday, 8 September
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Safdar JafriMonday, 8 September
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrMonday, 8 September
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJohn NobleMonday, 8 September
Re: Re: Copyright QuestionJohn NobleMonday, 8 September
Re: Re: Copyright QuestionKeith TaborMonday, 8 September
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrMonday, 8 September
Re: Copyright QuestionKeith TaborMonday, 8 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyMonday, 8 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 8 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 8 September
Copyright law vs. Trademark lawltlredwagonMonday, 8 September
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 8 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 8 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 8 September
new database protection legislationspacific[_at_]earthlink.netMonday, 8 September
Hawthorn Books Inc.Desmond GaynorMonday, 8 September
RE: Copyright QuestionChris MohrMonday, 8 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 5 September
Copyright QuestionEric Von VorysFriday, 5 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFriday, 5 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleFriday, 5 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborFriday, 5 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFriday, 5 September
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzFriday, 5 September
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsS. Martin KeletiFriday, 5 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFriday, 5 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborThursday, 4 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 4 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 4 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThursday, 4 September
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzThursday, 4 September
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThursday, 4 September
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrThursday, 4 September
Re: Section 108: Film Archives QueryKeith TaborWednesday, 3 September
Wikipedia, GNU FDL, and CC Attribution-Share AlikeJimmy WalesWednesday, 3 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborWednesday, 3 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleWednesday, 3 September
Section 108: Film Archives QueryDaniel SmithWednesday, 3 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberWednesday, 3 September
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzWednesday, 3 September
RE: Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Lawrence E. RosenWednesday, 3 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadWednesday, 3 September
[NetGold] WRITING AND WRITERS: PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism Advisory ServiceDavid P. DillardWednesday, 3 September
Version 50, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 3 September
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsIvan HoffmanTuesday, 2 September
Re: Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 2 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleTuesday, 2 September
Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleTuesday, 2 September
Re: Interview CopyrightJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 2 September
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 2 September
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzTuesday, 2 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 2 September
Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksJohn R. LevineTuesday, 2 September
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 2 September
Re: Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksMike HoldernessTuesday, 2 September
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsKeith TaborTuesday, 2 September
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadTuesday, 2 September
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleMonday, 1 September
Re: Re: Open Source Licensingsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 1 September
Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzMonday, 1 September
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaMonday, 1 September
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 1 September
Re: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Robert F. BodiMonday, 1 September
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMonday, 1 September
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 1 September
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 1 September
Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMonday, 1 September
Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsJim WitteMonday, 1 September
Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadMonday, 1 September
RE: Help settling a copyright questionChris MohrFriday, 29 August
Re: Interview CopyrightMike CarrollFriday, 29 August
Re: Re: Music PublishingBrock ShinenFriday, 29 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFriday, 29 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFriday, 29 August
Parties equal on terms (was: Digest #2106)I.R.MaturanaFriday, 29 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBrock ShinenFriday, 29 August
RE: Re: Music PublishingRobert PanzerFriday, 29 August
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzFriday, 29 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaFriday, 29 August
Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksLauren/Paul SlevenFriday, 29 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 29 August
Dugie Standeford on new Hague discussions on contract jurisdiction treatyJames LoveFriday, 29 August
Canadian Bill C-36 and public domain status of historic documentsWallace J.McLeanThursday, 28 August
Re: Music PublishingBrock ShinenThursday, 28 August
RE: Interview CopyrightHoward P. ShawThursday, 28 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenThursday, 28 August
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThursday, 28 August
RE: Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?juan saavedra CASTROThursday, 28 August
RE: Qestions on copyright and IP rights!GROVES PeterThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 28 August
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Phil LeonardThursday, 28 August
RE: Who owns signature guitar licks?GROVES PeterThursday, 28 August
Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Kevin GriersonThursday, 28 August
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Rich StimThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Brock ShinenThursday, 28 August
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Brock ShinenThursday, 28 August
Music PublishingRadioEsq[_at_]aol.comThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Which language?pjones[_at_]millerthomson.caThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoland ColeThursday, 28 August
RE: Re: Open Source Licensingirm[_at_]in3activa.comThursday, 28 August
RE: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106I.R.MaturanaThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionTerry CarrollThursday, 28 August
Who owns signature guitar licks?Mike PhillipsThursday, 28 August
Qestions on copyright and IP rights!Krish ChandraThursday, 28 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiWednesday, 27 August
RE: Current status of copyright protection of dataGROVES PeterWednesday, 27 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessRoland ColeWednesday, 27 August
RE: Which language?Maria EliseevaWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 27 August
Re: (SPAM-05.50) Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyWednesday, 27 August
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 27 August
Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 27 August
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataSimon MinahanWednesday, 27 August
Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 27 August
Which language?George EdwardWednesday, 27 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 26 August
Help settling a copyright questionRobert E. Jones, IIITuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksNakerite[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiTuesday, 26 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyTuesday, 26 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRoy MurphyTuesday, 26 August
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataJames and Dorothy BrennanTuesday, 26 August
Copyright law should be repealed, saith an authorJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 26 August
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Theodora MichaelsMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksKeith TaborMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborMonday, 25 August
Re: complementary copies of text booksLaurie UrquiagaMonday, 25 August
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataBrock ShinenMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksBrock ShinenMonday, 25 August
Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Robert F. BodiMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 25 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksKeith TaborMonday, 25 August
Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Lauren/Paul SlevenMonday, 25 August
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 25 August
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 25 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 25 August
Current status of copyright protection of dataJon NoringMonday, 25 August
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 25 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFriday, 22 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiFriday, 22 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiFriday, 22 August
RE: Digital Licensing Online SeminarKingStacey[_at_]howrey.comFriday, 22 August
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksBrock ShinenFriday, 22 August
WP's Jonathan Krim: The Quiet War Over Open-Source (at WIPO)James LoveFriday, 22 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverFriday, 22 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 22 August
Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
IP in Academia 2003, Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 21 August
complementary copies of text booksVicky TsaiThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverThursday, 21 August
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBryan TaylorThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 21 August
Call for Stories on the Public DomainShelly WarwickThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Open Source LicensingCrystal OdenkirkThursday, 21 August
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBryan TaylorThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 21 August
Call for Stories on the Public DomainShelly WarwickThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThursday, 21 August
Re: Open Source LicensingCrystal OdenkirkThursday, 21 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 20 August
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenWednesday, 20 August
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Robert F. BodiWednesday, 20 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyWednesday, 20 August
RE: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Edward BarrowWednesday, 20 August
RE: [cni] Re: Open Source LicensingEdward BarrowWednesday, 20 August
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Kathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 20 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 20 August
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverWednesday, 20 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsWednesday, 20 August
Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Jon NoringWednesday, 20 August
RE: Open Source LicensingMichael GrahamTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"MinodierTuesday, 19 August
Re: Copyright Term ExpirationBrock ShinenTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Brock ShinenTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborTuesday, 19 August
RE: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenTuesday, 19 August
RE: [cni] Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Edward BarrowTuesday, 19 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsTuesday, 19 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Dodi SchultzTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Brock ShinenTuesday, 19 August
Re: Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An OriginalMike HoldernessTuesday, 19 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 19 August
Copyright Term ExpirationMike PhillipsTuesday, 19 August
Open Source LicensingMike PhillipsTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborTuesday, 19 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 18 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 18 August
Re: Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An Original Song TuneBrock ShinenMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticessstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 18 August
Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An Original Song TuneSafdar JafriMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionBryan TaylorMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMonday, 18 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMonday, 18 August
EXTENSION - ISMIR EARLY REG.Susan Emilie ManusMonday, 18 August
Re: Out of Office AutoRepliesKeith TaborFriday, 15 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiFriday, 15 August
Re: Re: MS Access CopyrightBrock ShinenFriday, 15 August
Government Intrusion?Lee S. Strickland, J.D., Univ. of MarylandFriday, 15 August
Out of Office AutoRepliesDodi SchultzThursday, 14 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionTerry CarrollThursday, 14 August
Re: Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadThursday, 14 August
Re: MS Access CopyrightKevin GriersonThursday, 14 August
ISMIR - EARLY REGISTRATIONSusan Emilie ManusThursday, 14 August
Re: MS Access CopyrightRobert F. BodiThursday, 14 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOGROVES PeterWednesday, 13 August
RE: Free Access vs. Open AccessJan VelteropWednesday, 13 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 13 August
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 13 August
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadWednesday, 13 August
Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesDodi SchultzWednesday, 13 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiWednesday, 13 August
MS Access CopyrightCarmine PoliandroWednesday, 13 August
A Call for Stories in Support of a Robust Public DomainShelly WarwickTuesday, 12 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesJohn NobleTuesday, 12 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionTerry CarrollTuesday, 12 August
Re: Is Project Gutenberg Australia vulnerable to being shut down? (was Germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone")Roy MurphyTuesday, 12 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOTerry CarrollMonday, 11 August
RE: Re: Literal TranslationsI.R.MaturanaMonday, 11 August
Is Project Gutenberg Australia vulnerable to being shut down? (was Germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone")Jon NoringMonday, 11 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOChris MohrMonday, 11 August
RE: Re: Scanning print articlesRobert PanzerMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORobert F. BodiMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORobert F. BodiMonday, 11 August
Delay in CNI-COPYRIGHT List posting for August 11-15, 2003CNI CGP List ManagerMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORoy MurphyMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Roy MurphyMonday, 11 August
"Project Gramophone" discussion group started -- do contributeJon NoringMonday, 11 August
Derivitive Works in the SCO caseBryan TaylorMonday, 11 August
Re: Literal TranslationsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 11 August
Re: Copyright status of pre-WWII recordings; germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone"Roy MurphyMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyMonday, 11 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 11 August
Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadMonday, 11 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOlrosen[_at_]rosenlaw.comFriday, 8 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorFriday, 8 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOvbelFriday, 8 August
RE: Literal TranslationsvbelFriday, 8 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOvbelFriday, 8 August
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOChris MohrFriday, 8 August
Literal TranslationsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFriday, 8 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)I.R.MaturanaFriday, 8 August
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Jeremy G ByrneFriday, 8 August
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorFriday, 8 August
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 8 August
Re: SCO Linux questionRoy MurphyThursday, 7 August
Digital Licensing Online SeminarLesley Ellen HarrisThursday, 7 August
Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOKevin GriersonThursday, 7 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Jeremy G ByrneThursday, 7 August
Re: SCO Linux questionBryan TaylorThursday, 7 August
Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorThursday, 7 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 7 August
Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 7 August
Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 7 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticesRobert F. BodiThursday, 7 August
"plaintext email in the great outdoors is not ethical" DEPENDSRoland ColeWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoland ColeWednesday, 6 August
Re: [cni] Re: Silly ConfidentialityNoticesKevin GriersonWednesday, 6 August
RE: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticesvbelWednesday, 6 August
SCO Linux questionvbelWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborWednesday, 6 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Kathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 6 August
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Doug IsenbergWednesday, 6 August
RE: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesvbelWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesKeith TaborWednesday, 6 August
Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRobert F. BodiWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiWednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiWednesday, 6 August
Re: Scanning print articlesPeter HirtleWednesday, 6 August
Re: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesStevan HarnadWednesday, 6 August
Copyright conferenceFerullo, Donna L.Wednesday, 6 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborTuesday, 5 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyTuesday, 5 August
RE: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesEdward BarrowMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Daniel BerlinMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborMonday, 4 August
Colleges explore legal Net music setupsM. Claire StewartMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborMonday, 4 August
Copyright status of pre-WWII recordings; germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone"Jon NoringMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Bryan TaylorMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Bryan TaylorMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesLars GaardenMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesLars GaardenMonday, 4 August
RE: Re: [cni] Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaMonday, 4 August
RE: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaMonday, 4 August
RE: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesTurley, Patrick CMonday, 4 August
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Keith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Brock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNancy WillardFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 1 August
RE: Silly Confidentiality NoticesMcNeill, JohnFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 1 August
Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationFletcher, EricFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
RE: [cni] Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Edward BarrowFriday, 1 August
Silly Confidentiality NoticesDodi SchultzFriday, 1 August
Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Keith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workDan LesterFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFriday, 1 August
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMichael CarrollFriday, 1 August
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaFriday, 1 August
Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workRoy MurphyFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workRoy MurphyFriday, 1 August
Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Intent to display a workJeremy G ByrneFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 1 August
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationIvan HoffmanThursday, 31 July
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationFletcher, EricThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationTerry CarrollThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborThursday, 31 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenThursday, 31 July
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMcNeill, JohnThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Intent to display a workNancy WillardThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Intent to display a workJeremy G ByrneThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Daniel BerlinThursday, 31 July
Re: Intent to display a workJonathan M. FeigenbaumThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 31 July
Re: Re: Intent to display a workDan LesterWednesday, 30 July
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMichael CarrollWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNeal PomeaWednesday, 30 July
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenWednesday, 30 July
Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenWednesday, 30 July
Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenWednesday, 30 July
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationIvan HoffmanWednesday, 30 July
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNancy WillardWednesday, 30 July
RE: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Robert PanzerWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsBrock ShinenWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborWednesday, 30 July
Intent to display a workDan BallardWednesday, 30 July
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaWednesday, 30 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowWednesday, 30 July
Copyright and Distance EducationTerry HermanWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft - EU legislationBryan TaylorWednesday, 30 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 30 July
Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Kevin GriersonTuesday, 29 July
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsKevin GriersonTuesday, 29 July
Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Karen ScarrTuesday, 29 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: copying CDsM. Claire StewartTuesday, 29 July
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsStephen FishmanTuesday, 29 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberTuesday, 29 July
1956 UK Copyright StatuteRoland ColeTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft - EU legislationMike HoldernessTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Jeremy G ByrneTuesday, 29 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyTuesday, 29 July
Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Michael VincentTuesday, 29 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Building CopyrightCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMonday, 28 July
Foreign Renewal SystemsBrock ShinenMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborMonday, 28 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Building CopyrightRobert F. BodiMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Daniel BerlinMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: copying CDsKeith TaborMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 28 July
Re: Re: copying CDsDan LesterFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsDan LesterFriday, 25 July
REMINDER - ISMIR 2003Susan Emilie ManusFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsM. Claire StewartFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: Building CopyrightTerry CarrollFriday, 25 July
Re: Building CopyrightMatthew KrigbaumFriday, 25 July
Re: copying CDsKevin GriersonFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsPatricia ROSHAVENFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsPatricia ROSHAVENFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsPatricia ROSHAVENFriday, 25 July
RE: Building CopyrightRobert PanzerFriday, 25 July
Re: Building CopyrightBrock ShinenFriday, 25 July
Re: Building CopyrightRobert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsRobert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsRobert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsRobert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: click through license questionRobert F. BodiFriday, 25 July
Re: Building CopyrightTerry CarrollFriday, 25 July
Re: Building CopyrightJames and Dorothy BrennanFriday, 25 July
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US ConstituJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: copying CDsPeggy HoonFriday, 25 July
Re: click through license questionDan LesterFriday, 25 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborFriday, 25 July
click through license questionLloyd ChittendenThursday, 24 July
Re: copying CDsJeff WhiteThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsM. Claire StewartThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsBrock ShinenThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsBrock ShinenThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinionfrom 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Phil GenglerThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsDan LesterThursday, 24 July
Building Copyrightmilone[_at_]mindspring.comThursday, 24 July
Re: copying CDsRobert F. BodiThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsPatricia ROSHAVENThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsRobert F. BodiThursday, 24 July
RE: [cni] Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: copying CDsFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith HandleyThursday, 24 July
Deep Linking Held Lawful in GermanySullivan, Shawn (CIMMYT)Thursday, 24 July
Re: [cni] Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US ConstituDodi SchultzThursday, 24 July
Re: copying CDsBrock ShinenThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)meThursday, 24 July
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 24 July
Re: Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 24 July
RE: [cni] saving the netEdward BarrowThursday, 24 July
David Vivas on "Regional and Bilateral Agreements and a TRIPS plus world: the case of the FTAA"James LoveThursday, 24 July
saving the netHarry WillemsWednesday, 23 July
German Deep Linkingroberthelmer[_at_]earthlink.netWednesday, 23 July
Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinionfrom 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonWednesday, 23 July
Re: copying CDsKevin GriersonWednesday, 23 July
RE: [cni] Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Edward BarrowWednesday, 23 July
Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 23 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsDan LesterWednesday, 23 July
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 23 July
copying CDsPatricia ROSHAVENWednesday, 23 July
RE: [cni] Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Edward BarrowWednesday, 23 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsRoland ColeWednesday, 23 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberWednesday, 23 July
MIT responds to RIAA subpoenaM. Claire StewartWednesday, 23 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 22 July
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Timothy PhillipsTuesday, 22 July
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Joseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 22 July
RE: [cni] Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowTuesday, 22 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsDan LesterTuesday, 22 July
RE: Re: More about fair use and ArribaMcNeill, JohnMonday, 21 July
Thumbnails as Fair UseRoland ColeMonday, 21 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 21 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba SoftJohn KellyMonday, 21 July
Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorMonday, 21 July
Re: More about fair use and ArribaKevin GriersonMonday, 21 July
RE: Re:GROVES PeterMonday, 21 July
Linking, Framing, East Coast Code, West Coast CodeRoland ColeMonday, 21 July
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborMonday, 21 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMonday, 21 July
UDHR Article 27-2 vs US Constitution Article I Sec 8Javier PerezMonday, 21 July
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaMonday, 21 July
Re: More about fair use and Arribaroberthelmer[_at_]earthlink.netMonday, 21 July
Re: Re:Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSMonday, 21 July
Re: [cni] Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonFriday, 18 July
Slight (But IMHO important) quibble about fair useRoland ColeFriday, 18 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinionfrom 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonFriday, 18 July
RE: Re: Copyright infringement?Greg ErkinsFriday, 18 July
Re: Re: Copyright infringement?Brock ShinenFriday, 18 July
RE: [cni] Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowFriday, 18 July
RE:GROVES PeterFriday, 18 July
Re: Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 18 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorFriday, 18 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)John KellyThursday, 17 July
Re: Pre-1910 German paintingStephen FishmanThursday, 17 July
RE: Re: Copyright infringement?Greg ErkinsThursday, 17 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonThursday, 17 July
Re: Re: Copyright infringement?meThursday, 17 July
Fwd: AAAS Handbook on IP and Traditional KnowledgeMichael CarrollThursday, 17 July
(no subject)B.AttwellThursday, 17 July
RE: Re: Copyright infringement?Jessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 16 July
Re: Pre-1910 German paintingMike HoldernessWednesday, 16 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorWednesday, 16 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborWednesday, 16 July
Pre-1910 German paintingDavid PalleyWednesday, 16 July
dr seuss stuffKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 16 July
RE: Re: Copyright infringement?Greg ErkinsWednesday, 16 July
Re: Re: Copyright infringement?Mike OliverTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Roy MurphyTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsTerry CarrollTuesday, 15 July
RE: Re: Copyright infringement?Jessica R. FriedmanTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborTuesday, 15 July
Re: Copyright implications of scraping phone numbersMike OliverTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Bryan TaylorTuesday, 15 July
RE: Copyright infringement?Harold FederowTuesday, 15 July
Re: Copyright infringement?Kevin GriersonTuesday, 15 July
Re: Copyright infringement?Brock ShinenTuesday, 15 July
RE: Copyright infringement?Lawrence E. RosenTuesday, 15 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaTuesday, 15 July
Copyright implications of scraping phone numbersJohn R. LevineTuesday, 15 July
RE: Re: library reserve questionsEdward BarrowTuesday, 15 July
Re: Copyright infringement?Robert F. BodiTuesday, 15 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsTerry CarrollMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborMonday, 14 July
Copyright infringement?Jessica R. FriedmanMonday, 14 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMonday, 14 July
NEWS: Getting to the Meat of the Spam IssueDavid P. DillardMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: library reserve questionsRobert F. BodiMonday, 14 July
Re: library reserve questionsFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Keith HandleyMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 14 July
Jack Valenti: MPAA/MPA wants mass-market license terms to be strickly enforced in Hague Convention on JurisdictionJames LoveMonday, 14 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Roy MurphyMonday, 14 July
RE: special population servicesCone, Stella B.Friday, 11 July
library reserve questionsLloyd ChittendenFriday, 11 July
Re: special population servicesBrock ShinenFriday, 11 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Kevin GriersonFriday, 11 July
Re: Re: Trademark/copyright cross-overKeith TaborFriday, 11 July
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)I.R.MaturanaFriday, 11 July
A question regarding Copyright issues as they relate to a company's web picturesMyLastCallFriday, 11 July
special population servicesYuliya LefFriday, 11 July
About copyright humorMarcia KeyserFriday, 11 July
Re: Trademark/copyright cross-overJohn AllisonThursday, 10 July
Trademark/copyright cross-overDodi SchultzThursday, 10 July
Re: Trademark/copyright cross-oversstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 10 July
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorThursday, 10 July
Nature: Drive for patent-free innovation gathers pace - Kamil Idris is being asked to assess the merits of an open approach to intellectual propertyJames LoveThursday, 10 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Kevin GriersonWednesday, 9 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Kenneth KaufmanWednesday, 9 July
RE: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Jessica R. FriedmanWednesday, 9 July
Re: Copyright Humor?Philip Anthony SmithWednesday, 9 July
RE: Copyright Humor?Dave GreenWednesday, 9 July
Re: Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 9 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Lee S. Strickland, J.D., Univ. of MarylandWednesday, 9 July
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Roy MurphyWednesday, 9 July
Trademark/copyright cross-overBrock ShinenWednesday, 9 July
Re: Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Keith TaborWednesday, 9 July
Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Doug IsenbergWednesday, 9 July
Copyright Humor?Marcia KeyserWednesday, 9 July
Daily WhirlRobert HelmerMonday, 7 July
Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?John KellyMonday, 7 July
WIPO DG asked to convene meeting on open and collaborative projects to create public goodsJames LoveMonday, 7 July
Re: Sabo billKevin GriersonFriday, 4 July
Re: Re: Sabo billKeith TaborFriday, 4 July
Re: U.S. Government IP and Federal Institutional RepositoriesJames and Dorothy BrennanFriday, 4 July
Re: AttributionDodi SchultzFriday, 4 July
Re: Re: AttributionMike HoldernessFriday, 4 July
Re: Sabo billDavid TurnerThursday, 3 July
Re: Re: Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Keith TaborThursday, 3 July
Re: AttributionJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 3 July
U.S. Government IP and Federal Institutional RepositoriesKlein, BonnieThursday, 3 July
Re: Public Domain Enhancement ActKevin GriersonTuesday, 1 July
RE: Winnie-the-Pooh termination case?Jessica R. FriedmanTuesday, 1 July
Re: AttributionDodi SchultzTuesday, 1 July
Why Copyright is Incompatible with the Future, Reason #271Jeremy G ByrneTuesday, 1 July
Re: Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?John KellyTuesday, 1 July
Sabo billJan VelteropTuesday, 1 July
Re: Public Domain Enhancement ActTerry CarrollMonday, 30 June
Re: Public Domain Enhancement ActRoy MurphyMonday, 30 June
Re: Re: AttributionKeith TaborMonday, 30 June
Winnie-the-Pooh termination case?Terry CarrollMonday, 30 June
RE: Public Domain Enhancement ActI.R.MaturanaMonday, 30 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 30 June
Re: AttributionJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 30 June
Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Dan LesterMonday, 30 June
RE: Re: AttributionKatharine ColganFriday, 27 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKeith TaborFriday, 27 June
Public Domain Enhancement ActJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 27 June
Update on Veeck v. SBCCIJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 27 June
Re: Re: Leaf ArtKeith TaborThursday, 26 June
Re: Re: Pre-1978 Works which entered a 2nd editionStephen FishmanThursday, 26 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 26 June
Re: Attribution... Patents and IdeasJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 26 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 26 June
Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 26 June
RE: Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?GROVES PeterThursday, 26 June
RE: Leaf ArtScott WarnerWednesday, 25 June
RE: Re: Pre-1978 Works which entered a 2nd editionSmith, RobertWednesday, 25 June
Re: Re: Question about termination of a licenceBryan TaylorWednesday, 25 June
RE: [cni] Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsEdward BarrowWednesday, 25 June
thanks copyright folksKathleen WilliamsonWednesday, 25 June
Re: Leaf ArtRich StimWednesday, 25 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialKeith TaborTuesday, 24 June
Re: Question about termination of a licenceJohn NobleTuesday, 24 June
copyright office blundersKathleen WilliamsonTuesday, 24 June
Re: Pre-1978 Works which entered a 2nd editionStephen FishmanTuesday, 24 June
Leaf ArtKeith TaborTuesday, 24 June
Re: Petition by Baystate Technologies, Inc. DeniedTerry CarrollMonday, 23 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialDodi SchultzMonday, 23 June
Question about termination of a licenceBryan TaylorMonday, 23 June
Re: Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Keith TaborMonday, 23 June
CPTech views on proposed WIPO broadcast/cablecast/webcast treatyJames LoveMonday, 23 June
Pre-1978 Works which entered a 2nd editionSmith, RobertMonday, 23 June
Re: Re: PiracyRob Taylor - tconsult.comSunday, 22 June
Re: Re: PiracyRob Taylor - tconsult.comSunday, 22 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKatharine ColganSunday, 22 June
Re: Temporary FarewellTyler OchoaSunday, 22 June
Re: Attribution... Patents and IdeasAndrewSunday, 22 June
Has J. K. Rowling gone too far?Joseph Pietro RioloSunday, 22 June
Petition by Baystate Technologies, Inc. DeniedJoseph Pietro RioloSunday, 22 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKeith TaborSunday, 22 June
WIPO webcast/broadcast/cablecast treatyJames LoveSunday, 22 June
Beyond the Commons UpdateAnthony McCannSunday, 22 June
Re: Re: PiracyRob Taylor - tconsult.comThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKeith TaborThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKeith TaborThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsGregory AharonianThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: PiracyRob Taylor - tconsult.comThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: PiracyTerry CarrollThursday, 19 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 19 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 19 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 19 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsGregory AharonianWednesday, 18 June
copyright and text corporaDoug CooperWednesday, 18 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 18 June
Re: PiracyRobert F. BodiWednesday, 18 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 18 June
Re: Re: Publicity Rights in Performance IDsVance R. KovenWednesday, 18 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 18 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsChris MohrTuesday, 17 June
Re: Publicity Rights in Performance IDsRich StimTuesday, 17 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKeith TaborTuesday, 17 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKatharine ColganTuesday, 17 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKatharine ColganTuesday, 17 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKatharine ColganTuesday, 17 June
Re: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Robert F. BodiTuesday, 17 June
Re: Publicity and performance IDsDavid FergusonTuesday, 17 June
PiracyRob Taylor - tconsult.comTuesday, 17 June
RE: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Harold FederowMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Keith TaborMonday, 16 June
Re: Public DomainMichael CarrollMonday, 16 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsMichael GrahamMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Dan LesterMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsDavid TurnerMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsRobert F. BodiMonday, 16 June
Publicity Rights in Performance IDsVance R. KovenMonday, 16 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 16 June
Good article on Dastar rulingJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Safdar JafriMonday, 16 June
Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 16 June
Urantia Foundation copyright caseAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 16 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMonday, 16 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsKatharine ColganFriday, 13 June
Re: Re: Public DomainRobert F. BodiFriday, 13 June
Re: Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Robert F. BodiFriday, 13 June
RE: Re: Public DomainKathy TadlockFriday, 13 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsLars GaardenFriday, 13 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 13 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsRobert F. BodiThursday, 12 June
Re: Re: Public DomainNakerite[_at_]aol.comThursday, 12 June
Re: Attribution is not requiredinpublicdomainmaterialsTyler OchoaThursday, 12 June
Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 12 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 12 June
Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 12 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 12 June
Interesting Chart of Public Domain WorksJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 12 June
Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Safdar JafriThursday, 12 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsRobert F. BodiWednesday, 11 June
RE: [cni] Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsEdward BarrowWednesday, 11 June
Re: Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Heather VargasWednesday, 11 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 11 June
Re: Re: Public DomainDan LesterWednesday, 11 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsLars GaardenWednesday, 11 June
Re: Re: Public Domainsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWednesday, 11 June
Another funny episode from FoxtrotJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 11 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsMichael GrahamTuesday, 10 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsRobert A. BaronTuesday, 10 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required inpublicdomainmaterialsJames and Dorothy BrennanTuesday, 10 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required inpublicdomainmaterialsJames and Dorothy BrennanTuesday, 10 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 10 June
Re: Re: Public DomainMike HoldernessTuesday, 10 June
Re: Public DomainTyler OchoaMonday, 9 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsLars GaardenMonday, 9 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required inpublicdomainmaterialsPaul FaklerMonday, 9 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 9 June
Re: Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 9 June
Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 9 June
Re: Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 9 June
RE: Re: Attribution is not required in publicdomainmaterialsMichael GrahamFriday, 6 June
Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (orBuildings)Tyler OchoaFriday, 6 June
Re: Attribution is not required in publicdomainmaterialsTyler OchoaFriday, 6 June
Re: Public DomainTyler OchoaFriday, 6 June
Re: clearing "stills"Tyler OchoaFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Public DomainNakerite[_at_]aol.comFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required inpublicdomainmaterialsShelly WarwickFriday, 6 June
Verizon, ISPs, and higher edAlexander, BryanFriday, 6 June
RE: Use of inanimate object in photo or footageDave GreenFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsVance R. KovenFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in publicdomainmaterialsVance R. KovenFriday, 6 June
Re: Public DomainRobert F. BodiFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required inpublicdomainmaterialsJames and Dorothy BrennanFriday, 6 June
Re: Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 6 June
Re: Public Domain PetitionJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 6 June
Re: Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloFriday, 6 June
Version 49, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Friday, 6 June
Re: Re: True story claim and effectJohn AllisonThursday, 5 June
Re: Attribution is not required in publicdomainmaterialsKevin GriersonThursday, 5 June
Adapting to Copyright Office Registration BacklogTed HammermanThursday, 5 June
Re: Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (or Buildings)Robert F. BodiThursday, 5 June
Public DomainNakerite[_at_]aol.comThursday, 5 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materialsTyler OchoaThursday, 5 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsS. Martin KeletiThursday, 5 June
Status of the Copyright Office backlogPeter M VankevichWednesday, 4 June
Re: Re: True story claim and effectRobert F. BodiWednesday, 4 June
Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: OnlineCopyright Filing)Matthew KrigbaumWednesday, 4 June
Postman always rings twiceraduWednesday, 4 June
Cost of copyright licensing.Frank GavettWednesday, 4 June
Re: Attribution is not required in public domainmaterialsMichael LandauWednesday, 4 June
RE: Range of Dates in Copyright NoticeCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wednesday, 4 June
Public Domain PetitionMichael CarrollWednesday, 4 June
Petition to CongressTyler OchoaWednesday, 4 June
Movies and Photos With Inanimate Objects (or Buildings)JonMEsq[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 4 June
Re: True story claim and effectJohn AllisonMonday, 2 June
RE: True story claim and effectRob KasunicMonday, 2 June
Re: Re: Range of Dates in Copyright NoticeRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 2 June
Re: True story claim and effectRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMonday, 2 June
Re: Range of Dates in Copyright NoticeJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 2 June
RE: Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Mike PhillipsMonday, 2 June
Attribution is not required in public domain materialsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 2 June
ICPL-2003: Computer Policy and LawJoan K. LippincottMonday, 2 June
Re: clearing "stills"Nancy WillardSaturday, 31 May
Re: Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Paul FaklerSaturday, 31 May
True story claim and effectKen StuartSaturday, 31 May
Re: Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Heather VargasThursday, 29 May
Re: June 10th Copyright Economics meeting in WashingtonJames and Dorothy BrennanThursday, 29 May
clearing "stills"Laurie UrquiagaThursday, 29 May
Re: Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Christopher PalermoSunday, 25 May
Re: Treaties not subject to judicial review?Joseph Pietro RioloSunday, 25 May
RE: Re: Treaties not subject to judicial review?Sullivan, Shawn (CIMMYT)Sunday, 25 May
RE: Treaties not subject to judicial review?Harold FederowThursday, 22 May
RE: Treaties not subject to judicial review?Chris MohrThursday, 22 May
Re: Treaties not subject to judicial review?Robert F. BodiThursday, 22 May
Re: Range of Dates in Copyright NoticeKaren ScarrThursday, 22 May
Re: Treaties not subject to judicial review?John NobleThursday, 22 May
Re: Treaties not subject to judicial review?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThursday, 22 May
Re: Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Joseph Pietro RioloThursday, 22 May
Re: June 10th Copyright Economics meeting in WashingtonJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 22 May
Copyright Office backlog (was Re: Online Copyright Filing)Carl OppedahlWednesday, 21 May
Re: Another Comic Strip on CopyrightKeith TaborWednesday, 21 May
Treaties not subject to judicial review?Joseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 21 May
June 10th Copyright Economics meeting in WashingtonGregory AharonianWednesday, 21 May
Range of Dates in Copyright NoticeHoward P. ShawWednesday, 21 May
Re: Online Copyright FilingJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 20 May
Re: vivendi v universalMike HoldernessTuesday, 20 May
Re: Online Copyright FilingTyler OchoaTuesday, 20 May
Re: Re: Online Copyright FilingCarl OppedahlTuesday, 20 May
Re: Online Copyright FilingCarl OppedahlSunday, 18 May
RE: Online Copyright FilingHarold FederowFriday, 16 May
Re: Online Copyright FilingRobert F. BodiFriday, 16 May
Online Copyright FilingMike PhillipsThursday, 15 May
vivendi v universalJohn NobleWednesday, 14 May
Another Comic Strip on CopyrightJoseph Pietro RioloTuesday, 13 May
Table of copyright and patent monetary awards and salesGregory AharonianTuesday, 13 May
Re: Copyright on foreign work (Japan) -- was "postcards"Tyler OchoaFriday, 9 May
patent/trade dress for sculptural method/style?David PalleyFriday, 9 May
Re: Re: Bridgeman v Corel and FeistTesteFriday, 9 May
Re: Bridgeman v Corel and FeistSheldon W. HalpernWednesday, 7 May
Re: Bridgeman v Corel and FeistShelly WarwickWednesday, 7 May
Re: Re: copyright, art and webpage questionShelly WarwickWednesday, 7 May
RE: Copyright on foreign work (Japan) -- was "postcards"Dave GreenWednesday, 7 May
Re: Bridgeman v Corel and FeistRobert F. BodiWednesday, 7 May
Bridgeman v Corel and FeistWendy ChristensenTuesday, 6 May
RE: copyright, art and webpage questionChris MohrTuesday, 6 May
Copyright lien questionKevin GriersonTuesday, 6 May
Copyright on foreign work (Japan) -- was "postcards"David DaileyTuesday, 6 May
Baystate Technologies Petition for Cert.M. PollackTuesday, 6 May
Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionDavid DaileyMonday, 5 May
copyright, art and webpage questionBob ZellerMonday, 5 May
Re: Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionRoy MurphyMonday, 5 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright on Old PostcardsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 5 May
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekMonday, 5 May
Trade Group Copyright of Accounting StandardsT. Michael PoxonMonday, 5 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: online video/law?Robert F. BodiSunday, 4 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionRobert F. BodiSunday, 4 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionRobert F. BodiSunday, 4 May
Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionJoseph Pietro RioloSunday, 4 May
Re: history of innovationDavid FergusonSunday, 4 May
Re: online videoJQ JohnsonSunday, 4 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Mike HoldernessFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright Band nameIvan HoffmanFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright Band nameRobert F. BodiFriday, 2 May
[CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: online videoTyler OchoaFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionRobert F. BodiFriday, 2 May
[CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionTyler OchoaFriday, 2 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright Band namelidenFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright Band nameTyler OchoaFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright on Old PostcardsTyler OchoaFriday, 2 May
Question re Yahoo! CaseTyler OchoaFriday, 2 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: online video/law?Milham, Carol SFriday, 2 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Milham, Carol SFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: online videoPatricia ROSHAVENFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Lars GaardenFriday, 2 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Copyright, art and webpage questionRoy MurphyFriday, 2 May
SPAM . . .Steve TimmerThursday, 1 May
Promotional message from Jeremy BlakeDodi SchultzThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: DRM and output capturinglee.s.strickland[_at_]att.netThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]David DaileyThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: online videoPatricia ROSHAVENThursday, 1 May
[CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Michael CarrollThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright, art and webpage questionRoland ColeThursday, 1 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] CleanflixMaureen HarringtonThursday, 1 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]DeMarte, LukeThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Robert F. BodiThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Copyright, art and webpage questionRobert F. BodiThursday, 1 May
Copyright on Old PostcardsScott ButcherThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]Shelly WarwickThursday, 1 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] online videoKathy TadlockThursday, 1 May
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: E-mailsChris MohrThursday, 1 May
Copyright Band nameCur31133390[_at_]aol.comThursday, 1 May
History of artistic innovation as artistic inventionGregory AharonianThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: E-mailsCNI List ManagerThursday, 1 May
Copyright, art and webpage questionLaura BakerThursday, 1 May
Re: Grokster/Streamcast win motions for summary judgment against recording industryJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 1 May
CleanflixArtCop[_at_]aol.comThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT]John KasdanThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] online videocolin seegerThursday, 1 May
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] DRM and output capturingDavid TurnerThursday, 1 May
online videoPatricia ROSHAVENWednesday, 30 April
DRM and output capturingYedidya (Didi) MelchiorWednesday, 30 April
Feb 12, 2001 (unamended) version of Napster decision?Terry CarrollMonday, 28 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Grokster/Streamcast win motions for summary judgment against recording industryIvan HoffmanMonday, 28 April
Grokster/Streamcast win motions for summary judgment against recording industryLee TienSunday, 27 April
ISMIR 2003 - DEADLINE EXTENDEDSusan Emilie ManusFriday, 25 April
Copyright ConferenceDonna L. FerulloFriday, 25 April
Founders' CopyrightJoseph Pietro RioloThursday, 24 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Vassar College vs. Vassar Nuts???Tyler OchoaWednesday, 23 April
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Public vs. Private (was: Central vs. Dis tributed Archives)Jan VelteropWednesday, 23 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [cni] [CNI-COPYRIGHT] copyright on standardsJohn R. LevineMonday, 21 April
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: copyright on standardsWelch, JohnMonday, 21 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: copyright on standardsJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 21 April
New York City Bar Copyright ForumLauren/Paul SlevenMonday, 21 April
Version 48, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Monday, 21 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Negligence as defense to infringementsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comSaturday, 19 April
Re: Negligence as defense to infringementJonathan M. FeigenbaumSaturday, 19 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Public vs. Private (was: Central vs. Distributed Archives)Robert F. BodiSaturday, 19 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Negligence as defense to infringementTyler OchoaSaturday, 19 April
Re: what do you call this?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFriday, 18 April
RE: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Public vs. Private (was: Central vs. Distrib uted Archives)Jan VelteropFriday, 18 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Negligence as defense to infringementPaul FaklerFriday, 18 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] copyright on standardsRobert F. BodiThursday, 17 April
Re: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesStevan HarnadThursday, 17 April
Negligence as defense to infringementKevin GriersonThursday, 17 April
RE: Negligence as defense to infringementCumbow, Robert C.Thursday, 17 April
RE: [cni] [CNI-COPYRIGHT] copyright on standardsEdward BarrowWednesday, 16 April
RE: [cni] [CNI-COPYRIGHT] copyright on standardsEdward BarrowWednesday, 16 April
FW: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] copyright on standardsKlein, BonnieWednesday, 16 April
Re: copyright on standardsJoseph Pietro RioloWednesday, 16 April
copyright on standardsFreya AndersonWednesday, 16 April
Vassar College vs. Vassar Nuts???Wendy ChristensenWednesday, 16 April
[CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: State Legislation Pending That Will ExceedFederDodi SchultzTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Boycott Copyright Websitesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: State Legislation Pending That Will ExceedFederal Copyright Laws and Endanger ResearchRobert F. BodiTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Boycott Copyright WebsiteFreya AndersonTuesday, 15 April
CLE accredited workshop in developing IP policies for cultural institutionsRina_Pantalony[_at_]pch.gc.caTuesday, 15 April
New on Copyright Colloquium: Furchtgott-Roth, Brendan ScottR. KaplarTuesday, 15 April
Re: "Copymonopoly" instead of copyr* ?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Boycott Copyright WebsiteKeith TaborTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: State Legislation Pending That Will ExceedFederal Copyright Laws and Endanger Researchsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTuesday, 15 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: Yoga CopyrightShelly WarwickMonday, 14 April
Boycott Copyright WebsiteJoseph Pietro RioloMonday, 14 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] "Do not sell to schools "and copyrightKeith TaborMonday, 14 April
Literary agentJessica R. FriedmanSaturday, 12 April
Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] Re: [CNI-COPYRIGHT] "Do not sell to schools"and copyright