CNI-COPYRIGHT by thread

SubjectAuthor Date
IMPORTANT: New home at American U. PIJIP for cni-copyright listservJoan K. LippincottFri Feb 23 2007 - 19:00:02 GMT
RE: Copyright protection for geographic codesWilliam T. McGrathWed Feb 21 2007 - 22:00:55 GMT
Copyright protection for geographic codesJoy ButlerTue Feb 20 2007 - 23:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: use of musicVance R. KovenTue Feb 20 2007 - 15:40:30 GMT
PIJIP March EventsSean FlynnTue Feb 20 2007 - 15:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Inquiryjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: InquiryTerry CarrollFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: InquiryEdward BarrowTue Feb 20 2007 - 15:40:30 GMT
Re: Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Edward BarrowFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Steven JamarFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
RE: [Disarmed] Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not? (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: use of musicVance R. KovenFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: use of musicSteven JamarFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Re: use of musicIvan HoffmanFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Inquiry AND Online class projects on commercial siteTheodora MichaelsFri Feb 16 2007 - 18:35:55 GMT
Online class projects on commercial site - fair use or not?Wendy ChristensenFri Feb 16 2007 - 00:10:06 GMT
use of musicSusan PayneFri Feb 16 2007 - 00:10:06 GMT
Re: InquiryAmalyah KeshetThu Feb 15 2007 - 16:50:50 GMT
Re: InquiryMichael SeadleThu Feb 15 2007 - 16:50:50 GMT
Re: InquiryEdward BarrowFri Feb 16 2007 - 00:10:06 GMT
RE: InquiryDailey, David P.Thu Feb 15 2007 - 16:50:50 GMT
InquiryHerring, MarkThu Feb 15 2007 - 04:25:26 GMT
RE: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Raymond DowdMon Feb 12 2007 - 21:34:58 GMT
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and MultimediaEducation fDodi SchultzMon Feb 12 2007 - 21:34:58 GMT
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and MultimediaEducation for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleFri Feb 09 2007 - 22:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleThu Feb 08 2007 - 23:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Rob TiessenFri Feb 09 2007 - 20:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Edward BarrowMon Feb 12 2007 - 21:34:58 GMT
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Rob TiessenWed Feb 07 2007 - 21:15:30 GMT
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Terry CarrollThu Feb 08 2007 - 13:40:31 GMT
New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Jennifer MaydoleWed Feb 07 2007 - 20:40:30 GMT
Re: New Copyright Law: Internet and Multimedia Education for Schools DVD NOW AVAILABLE!Carol SimpsonFri Feb 09 2007 - 20:35:30 GMT
Collectanea!: Collected Perspectives On CopyrightDavid P. DillardMon Feb 05 2007 - 22:15:01 GMT
Re: Source for copyright statistics?David DaileyMon Feb 05 2007 - 19:45:00 GMT
Re: Source for copyright statistics?AlanKabat[_at_]aol.comMon Feb 05 2007 - 19:45:00 GMT
IP Counsel in India (Please reply off list)CMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMon Feb 05 2007 - 19:45:00 GMT
Source for copyright statistics?Joy ButlerFri Feb 02 2007 - 23:30:55 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting Ideas. This sentence is uncopyrightable (period).Brian LucasFri Feb 02 2007 - 17:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting Ideas. This sentence is uncopyrightable (period).David DaileyWed Jan 31 2007 - 22:00:41 GMT
CopyOwner » Right to Rent AudiobooksJohn T. MitchellTue Jan 30 2007 - 22:20:14 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasSteven JamarMon Jan 29 2007 - 22:50:03 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasTerry CarrollTue Jan 30 2007 - 23:43:50 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting Ideasjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comWed Jan 31 2007 - 22:00:41 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasSteven JamarThu Feb 01 2007 - 21:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasTerry CarrollThu Feb 01 2007 - 21:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting Ideasjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Feb 02 2007 - 17:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Protecting IdeasRich StimFri Feb 02 2007 - 23:30:55 GMT
Re: Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"Carol ShepherdMon Jan 29 2007 - 22:50:03 GMT
Re: Archive/Oral History questionCarol ShepherdMon Jan 29 2007 - 22:50:03 GMT
RE: Re: Protecting Ideasakeshet[_at_]imj.org.ilMon Jan 29 2007 - 22:50:03 GMT
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasRoland ColeMon Jan 29 2007 - 22:50:03 GMT
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasLawrence RosenTue Jan 30 2007 - 22:20:14 GMT
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasLawrence RosenWed Jan 31 2007 - 22:00:41 GMT
RE: Re: Protecting IdeasFreya AndersonFri Feb 02 2007 - 17:05:00 GMT
RE: Protecting IdeasMichael GrahamSat Jan 27 2007 - 01:00:00 GMT
Re: Protecting IdeasAlain MinodierSat Jan 27 2007 - 01:00:00 GMT
Protecting IdeasLarry JenksWed Jan 24 2007 - 22:00:30 GMT
SV: Re: Scandinavia and copyright issuesKatarina Renman ClaessonMon Jan 22 2007 - 21:05:46 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerMichael DodsonSat Jan 20 2007 - 14:58:32 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerJohn T. MitchellMon Jan 22 2007 - 21:05:46 GMT
Re: Scandinavia and copyright issuesAnne StevensSat Jan 20 2007 - 14:58:32 GMT
Archive/Oral History questionLaura Young BostSat Jan 20 2007 - 14:58:32 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerRaymond DowdThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerEvan BrownMon Jan 22 2007 - 21:05:46 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark ReinmillerRaymond DowdTue Jan 23 2007 - 16:40:01 GMT
Re: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
RE: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Roland ColeThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
Re: Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Vance R. KovenThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"John T. MitchellWed Jan 17 2007 - 22:55:01 GMT
Re: "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
Copyright Exam Questions [was "State trooper lays claim to software he developed"]Mike OliverWed Jan 17 2007 - 22:55:01 GMT
Yale ISP's Open Standards International Symposium (OSIS)Eddan KatzWed Jan 17 2007 - 22:55:01 GMT
"State trooper lays claim to software he developed"Terry CarrollTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:30 GMT
FW: Re: Copyright of liststritt002Tue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsVance R. KovenTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of lists (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of lists (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of listsWebb, JereTue Jan 16 2007 - 03:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of listsRoland ColeTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of listsRaymond DowdTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarFri Jan 12 2007 - 23:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsEdward BarrowTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarTue Jan 16 2007 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsSteven JamarThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comThu Jan 18 2007 - 23:30:45 GMT
RE: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Jan Carmikle DwyerFri Jan 12 2007 - 23:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Jan 12 2007 - 23:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Anne StevensThu Jan 11 2007 - 23:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Collected essays, subject and copyright (and ethics really)Anne StevensSat Jan 20 2007 - 14:58:32 GMT
RE: Non contracted intelectual property. (UNCLASSIFIED)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Jan 10 2007 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.jrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comTue Jan 09 2007 - 23:35:01 GMT
Re: Copyright of listsRandal NieuwsmaTue Jan 09 2007 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Copyright of listsAndrew SkinnerLopataThu Jan 11 2007 - 23:00:30 GMT
Re: Copyright of listsjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Jan 12 2007 - 23:50:00 GMT
Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Ethan AckermanTue Jan 09 2007 - 21:05:45 GMT
Copyright of listsHGSTue Jan 09 2007 - 21:05:45 GMT
Re: Copyright of listsMark ReinmillerWed Jan 17 2007 - 22:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Steven JamarTue Jan 09 2007 - 21:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Vance R. KovenTue Jan 09 2007 - 21:05:45 GMT
RE: Re: Non contracted intelectual property.Elizabeth T RussellTue Jan 09 2007 - 21:05:45 GMT
Re: Non contracted intelectual property.jrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comMon Jan 08 2007 - 22:05:00 GMT
Non contracted intelectual property.Brian LucasMon Jan 08 2007 - 20:00:15 GMT
Library Related ConferencesMarian DworaczekFri Jan 05 2007 - 14:40:46 GMT
Re: Re: Title 17 updateJanet NepkieWed Jan 03 2007 - 23:55:00 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateVance R. KovenWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
jfnbl@earthlink.com has sent you a file.droploadWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Title 17 updateDodi SchultzWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
RE: Title 17 updateDuhaime, DianeWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateChristopher GwynWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updatewsimmons[_at_]TheWorld.comWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateJohn T. MitchellWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateG Norona JrWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateStephen FishmanWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updatejfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateMichael Landau-GSUWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Re: Title 17 updateJohn LevineWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Title 17 updateJanet NepkieTue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:00 GMT
Happy Public Domain Day!Wallace J.McLeanTue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:00 GMT
RE: Russian artists copyright collective?Robert PanzerThu Dec 28 2006 - 21:40:01 GMT
RE: Russian artists copyright collective?Kevin HawkinsWed Jan 03 2007 - 20:54:59 GMT
Russian artists copyright collective?Amalyah KeshetWed Dec 27 2006 - 21:15:31 GMT
Version 66, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Mon Dec 18 2006 - 22:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: video games -- public performance?John T. MitchellMon Dec 11 2006 - 23:25:45 GMT
Re: Re: video games -- public performance?David DaileyWed Dec 13 2006 - 00:05:30 GMT
Re: Copyright Educational MaterialsRandal NieuwsmaMon Dec 11 2006 - 22:35:31 GMT
RE: video games -- public performance?Judy J. DehleMon Dec 11 2006 - 22:35:31 GMT
video games -- public performance?Laura JewellThu Dec 07 2006 - 17:50:02 GMT
Copyright Educational MaterialsJulie RustadThu Dec 07 2006 - 17:50:02 GMT
Nominations for L. Ray Patterson Copyright AwardJanice PilchSun Dec 03 2006 - 23:25:30 GMT
RE: Re: please help - case law for mult copies?Robert KasunicMon Nov 27 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Distance Education, Intellectual Property, and The TEACH ActDenisTue Nov 21 2006 - 22:09:10 GMT
Re: International Copyright & Disclaimer infoJohn T. MitchellWed Nov 15 2006 - 16:30:00 GMT
RE: International Copyright & Disclaimer infoAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Nov 15 2006 - 16:30:00 GMT
SEC Filings and Company Annual and Quarterly reportsTimothy NichollsWed Nov 15 2006 - 16:30:00 GMT
International Copyright & Disclaimer infoWald, Joanne \(ESC\)Tue Nov 14 2006 - 22:55:31 GMT
Distance Education, Intellectual Property, and The TEACH ActKatherine McDanielTue Nov 14 2006 - 00:10:00 GMT
Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography ChangesCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Nov 03 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorSteven JamarWed Nov 01 2006 - 23:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorVance R. KovenWed Nov 01 2006 - 23:15:01 GMT
RE: Re: Re: fourth fair use factorMichael GrahamWed Nov 01 2006 - 19:28:30 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factor - burden of proofJohn T. MitchellWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
Library Related ConferencesMarian DworaczekWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorEthan AckermanTue Oct 31 2006 - 13:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorVance R. KovenWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorjrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comTue Oct 31 2006 - 13:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorSteven JamarWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: fourth fair use factorAndrew SkinnerLopataWed Nov 01 2006 - 23:15:01 GMT
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRaymond DowdMon Oct 30 2006 - 20:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRoland ColeWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorRaymond DowdWed Nov 01 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
RE: Re: fourth fair use factorJessica R. FriedmanWed Nov 01 2006 - 23:15:01 GMT
RE: fourth fair use factorRoland ColeFri Oct 27 2006 - 21:09:13 GMT
Re: fourth fair use factorjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Oct 27 2006 - 21:09:13 GMT
(no subject)Varvel, VirgilFri Oct 27 2006 - 21:09:13 GMT
RE: (no subject)Kevin GriersonTue Aug 28 2001 - 14:36:47 GMT
RE: (no subject)Cumbow, RobertFri Sep 28 2001 - 00:18:01 GMT
RE: (no subject)Tyler OchoaMon Oct 01 2001 - 21:30:02 GMT
--> Fair Use?MikeWed Oct 03 2001 - 14:01:15 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use?Carl OppedahlWed Feb 07 1996 - 15:37:32 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?Cumbow, RobertThu Oct 04 2001 - 15:46:20 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?MikeFri Oct 05 2001 - 17:24:55 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use?jim brennanTue Oct 09 2001 - 03:16:51 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use?Tyler OchoaThu Oct 04 2001 - 18:07:56 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?MikeFri Oct 05 2001 - 16:07:57 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?Freya AndersonMon Oct 08 2001 - 23:09:18 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use?Nancy WillardTue Oct 09 2001 - 16:28:39 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?MikeWed Oct 10 2001 - 14:18:13 GMT
--> RE: Fair Use?Tyler OchoaTue Oct 09 2001 - 01:04:59 GMT
fourth fair use factorJessica R. FriedmanThu Oct 26 2006 - 20:55:01 GMT
Regarding Copyright ....Srinivas.Manda [laksinu.com]Tue Oct 24 2006 - 20:25:30 GMT
RE: music copyright and fair useMichael GrahamMon Oct 23 2006 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: please help - case law for mult copies?Andrew SkinnerLopataMon Oct 23 2006 - 21:05:00 GMT
music copyright and fair useJud BurkettMon Oct 23 2006 - 19:00:31 GMT
10th Anniversary Version of Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Oct 18 2006 - 20:20:55 GMT
re: please help - case law for mult copies?Belvadi, MelissaWed Oct 18 2006 - 20:20:55 GMT
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitSeso DigitalMon Oct 16 2006 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use,non-profitLaura Young BostMon Oct 16 2006 - 19:05:00 GMT
Re: please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitSteven JamarMon Oct 16 2006 - 19:05:00 GMT
please help: case law re: mult copies classroom use, non-profitBelvadi, MelissaMon Oct 16 2006 - 17:35:30 GMT
RE: Nondramatic music performance: Section 110 (4)Brewer, MichaelWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:40:30 GMT
Re: Question from a StudentJohn ThomsonWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
RE: Re: Question from a StudentJeffrey S. AnkromWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
Logo Usage - Copyrights & TrademarksScott ButcherWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Wed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionKenneth LiuTue Oct 03 2006 - 13:05:01 GMT
Nondramatic music performance: Section 110 (4)Randal NieuwsmaWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
Re: Question from a StudentSteven JamarTue Oct 10 2006 - 23:00:00 GMT
Re: Question from a StudentRaymond DowdWed Oct 11 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
Question from a StudentHalbert, Debora Tue Oct 10 2006 - 22:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionTerry CarrollTue Oct 10 2006 - 01:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWallace J.McLeanTue Oct 10 2006 - 22:40:01 GMT
"Strong Copyright + DRM + Weak Net Neutrality = Digital Dystopia?" PostprintCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tue Oct 10 2006 - 01:20:01 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Fri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Fri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Fri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'License By Default' Will Doom the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickFri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionAndrew SkinnerLopataWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSteven JamarTue Oct 10 2006 - 22:40:01 GMT
IP Conference, October 26-28, at the Cornell Club, New York CitySheldon HalpernWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionJohn T. MitchellWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSteven JamarWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionJohn LevineWed Oct 04 2006 - 21:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Wed Oct 04 2006 - 02:59:11 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without permissionSmith, Robert E.Fri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTue Oct 03 2006 - 13:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRichard WigginsMon Oct 02 2006 - 16:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 04 2006 - 02:59:11 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionAlain MinodierWed Oct 04 2006 - 02:59:11 GMT
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionKenneth LiuMon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Translation copyrightJohn T. MitchellMon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJohn LevineMon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionShawn N. SullivanMon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Mon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:00 GMT
RE: [Maybe Spam] Translation copyrightMichael GrahamFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
RE: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWebb, JereFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionJohn LevineFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRich StimFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionWallace J.McLeanFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionS. Martin KeletiFri Oct 06 2006 - 18:25:07 GMT
Re: Translation copyrightSamuel MurrayFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Translation copyrightjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Translation copyrightSteven JamarFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Re: Translation copyrightVance R. KovenFri Sep 29 2006 - 22:02:16 GMT
Translation copyrightKathy TadlockThu Sep 28 2006 - 21:00:31 GMT
Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionSmith, Robert E.Thu Sep 28 2006 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Using Logos in Wikipedia Articles without pemissionRandal NieuwsmaMon Oct 02 2006 - 15:00:00 GMT
Loss of deposit materials by Copyright OfficeEvan BrownTue Sep 26 2006 - 22:28:31 GMT
Re: Re: Power of Attorney in Employment Agreementjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comTue Sep 26 2006 - 22:28:31 GMT
RE: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementElizabeth T RussellMon Sep 25 2006 - 23:20:45 GMT
RE: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementJulian A. HaffnerTue Sep 26 2006 - 22:28:31 GMT
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMon Sep 25 2006 - 23:20:45 GMT
Re: Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementCarl OppedahlMon Sep 25 2006 - 23:20:45 GMT
Re: Power of Attorney in Employment Agreementjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMon Sep 25 2006 - 23:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMon Sep 25 2006 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Terry CarrollMon Sep 25 2006 - 18:35:31 GMT
Power of Attorney in Employment AgreementHeather VargasMon Sep 25 2006 - 18:35:31 GMT
RE: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Klein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OFri Sep 22 2006 - 21:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesKarl-Erik TallmoFri Sep 22 2006 - 16:05:30 GMT
Re: Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)David DaileyFri Sep 22 2006 - 16:05:30 GMT
RE: Acknowledging SamplesVarvel, VirgilFri Sep 22 2006 - 16:05:30 GMT
Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Terry CarrollThu Sep 21 2006 - 21:47:00 GMT
Re: False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)Karen CoyleFri Sep 22 2006 - 16:05:30 GMT
False and Deceptive Trade Practices (was Acknowledging Samples)John T. MitchellWed Sep 20 2006 - 21:55:01 GMT
Re: Dylan and Timrod and the creative processWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 20 2006 - 18:30:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 20 2006 - 17:05:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarWed Sep 20 2006 - 18:30:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comFri Sep 22 2006 - 16:05:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanFri Sep 22 2006 - 21:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesjfnbl[_at_]earthlink.comMon Sep 25 2006 - 23:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloWed Sep 20 2006 - 17:05:30 GMT
Judge Kozinski to Address Fair UseSean FlynnWed Sep 20 2006 - 17:05:30 GMT
Dylan and Timrod and the creative processSteven JamarWed Sep 20 2006 - 17:05:30 GMT
conference announcementAmalyah KeshetTue Sep 19 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatDavid DaileyMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesWallace J.McLeanMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: FW: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2789Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
FW: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2789Varvel, VirgilFri Sep 15 2006 - 13:30:33 GMT
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Sep 15 2006 - 13:05:30 GMT
RE: Re: Acknowledging samplesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Sep 15 2006 - 13:05:30 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarFri Sep 15 2006 - 13:05:30 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatKarl-Erik TallmoFri Sep 15 2006 - 12:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesVance R. KovenFri Sep 15 2006 - 12:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarTue Sep 19 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarThu Sep 14 2006 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloFri Sep 15 2006 - 12:40:01 GMT
Re: Acknowledging samplesJoseph Pietro RioloFri Sep 15 2006 - 12:40:01 GMT
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarMon Sep 18 2006 - 16:45:30 GMT
Acknowledging samplesVarvel, VirgilThu Sep 14 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Acknowledging samplesSteven JamarTue Sep 19 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Copyright status of AOL search logs?Richard WigginsWed Sep 13 2006 - 21:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Steven JamarTue Sep 12 2006 - 20:55:00 GMT
AW: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Dominik P. RubliTue Sep 12 2006 - 20:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?J. NobleMon Sep 11 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
Re: DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?John T. MitchellMon Sep 11 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatRob TiessenFri Sep 08 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanFri Sep 08 2006 - 20:05:45 GMT
e: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineFri Sep 08 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
DVD: public performance with an audience of only one person?Dominik P. RubliFri Sep 08 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatNicole DavignonThu Sep 07 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Fwd: The WIPO casting treaty -- why decisions about the new technologies are importantJames LoveThu Sep 07 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSeso DigitalWed Sep 06 2006 - 20:15:00 GMT
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatRoland ColeWed Sep 06 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Sep 11 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayTue Sep 05 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatjohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netTue Sep 05 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatCarl OppedahlWed Sep 06 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineWed Sep 06 2006 - 18:05:31 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn T. MitchellWed Sep 06 2006 - 20:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayThu Sep 07 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJ. NobleThu Sep 07 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatMike HoldernessThu Sep 07 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanTue Sep 12 2006 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWed Sep 13 2006 - 21:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatWallace J.McLeanThu Sep 14 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatAlain MinodierTue Sep 05 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarFri Sep 08 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarThu Sep 14 2006 - 21:25:01 GMT
Online copyright courseslesley[_at_]copyrightlaws.comTue Sep 05 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 05 2006 - 15:45:30 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWed Sep 06 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatJohn LevineWed Sep 06 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Scanning books into electronic formatSteven JamarWed Sep 06 2006 - 18:05:31 GMT
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksJoseph Pietro RioloFri Sep 01 2006 - 18:55:30 GMT
Autumn 2006 Online Workshops from the Center for Intellectual PropertyJack BoeveFri Sep 01 2006 - 18:55:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Sep 01 2006 - 18:55:30 GMT
Judge Kozinski Sept. 21, 2006 WCL-Finnegan, Henderson Disginuished Lecture on Intellectual PropertyJoshua SarnoffThu Aug 31 2006 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongTerry CarrollThu Aug 31 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongDavid P. DillardTue Sep 05 2006 - 15:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThu Aug 31 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThu Aug 31 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleThu Aug 31 2006 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarFri Sep 01 2006 - 18:55:30 GMT
Re: Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementSteven JamarWed Aug 30 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
Re: Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongSteven JamarWed Aug 30 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
40 to testify at USPTO on WIPO broadcast/netcasting treaty on September 5, 2006James LoveWed Aug 30 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE : Re: Derivative InquiryI.R.MaturanaWed Aug 30 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Scanning books into electronic formatSamuel MurrayWed Aug 30 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekWed Aug 30 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Fwd: Public Domain Copy of a Performance of the ABC's SongMarcia KeyserWed Aug 30 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryJason sheperdTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarTue Aug 29 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementSteven JamarTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementJoseph Pietro RioloThu Aug 31 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Odd (and misleading) copyright statementDodi SchultzTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJ. NobleTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryJohn T. MitchellTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryBarbara RuhmannTue Aug 29 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative InquiryDavid DaileyWed Aug 30 2006 - 18:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksAlain MinodierTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAlain MinodierTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative InquiryAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAngela MottMon Aug 28 2006 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
RE: Odd (and misleading) copyright statementKlein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OTue Aug 29 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanMon Aug 28 2006 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanMon Aug 28 2006 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksSamuel MurrayTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: Filming of sculpturesMichael GrahamMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Odd (and misleading) copyright statementBrewer, MichaelMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesSteven JamarMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesJ. NobleMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesSteven JamarMon Aug 28 2006 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Filming of sculpturesJ. NobleTue Aug 29 2006 - 15:45:31 GMT
Re: Derivative InquirySamuel MurrayMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Derivative InquirySteven JamarMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Derivative InquiryJohn T. MitchellMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Derivative InquiryTerry CarrollMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksSamuel MurrayMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
Re: Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksTerry CarrollMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
RE: Derivative InquiryAngela MottMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
RE: Derivative InquiryDenis N. MagnussonMon Aug 28 2006 - 19:55:45 GMT
RE: Filming of sculpturesBob PanzerThu Aug 24 2006 - 22:25:01 GMT
Abolishing perpetual copyright in unpublished worksWallace J.McLeanThu Aug 24 2006 - 22:25:01 GMT
Derivative InquiryJason sheperdThu Aug 24 2006 - 22:25:01 GMT
Re: Derivative InquiryJan Carmikle DwyerTue Aug 29 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Filming of sculpturesKathy TadlockWed Aug 23 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
2006-2007 IPA Online Workshop Series from the CIP -- Corrected URLsJack BoeveThu Aug 17 2006 - 21:04:31 GMT
Demetriades v KaufmannacohenThu Aug 17 2006 - 21:04:31 GMT
London Conference: Connecting Culture and CommerceAmalyah KeshetThu Aug 17 2006 - 03:57:31 GMT
RE: Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActJeffrey S. AnkromThu Aug 10 2006 - 20:20:01 GMT
RE: Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActBrewer, MichaelThu Aug 10 2006 - 20:20:01 GMT
Of an avian flu pandemic and the TEACH ActJan Carmikle DwyerThu Aug 10 2006 - 15:35:45 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objectors File Motion to Strike 'Corrected' Briefs; 'Miscarriage of Justice' FearedIrvin MuchnickThu Aug 03 2006 - 21:50:51 GMT
Version 63, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tue Aug 01 2006 - 20:55:30 GMT
Copyright news from ALA (and a request for help)M. Claire StewartMon Jul 24 2006 - 22:40:31 GMT
RE: Fair use?Elizabeth Townsend GardMon Jul 24 2006 - 18:10:30 GMT
Re: Pre-electronic publicationsSteven JamarMon Jul 24 2006 - 16:30:46 GMT
RE: Pre-electronic publicationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Jul 24 2006 - 16:30:46 GMT
RE: Pre-electronic publicationsDailey, David P.Mon Jul 24 2006 - 16:30:46 GMT
Fair use?Michele AppletonMon Jul 24 2006 - 16:30:46 GMT
Pre-electronic publicationsMarcia KeyserFri Jul 21 2006 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: RE : Terminology issues IIIJohn P. McNeillFri Jul 21 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jul 21 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: RE : Terminology issues IIICNI CGP List ManagerFri Jul 21 2006 - 15:43:26 GMT
RE : Terminology issues IIII.R.MaturanaThu Jul 20 2006 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesAndrew SkinnerLopataThu Jul 20 2006 - 22:24:59 GMT
Re: Re: Editing out offensive language from moviesJohn T. MitchellFri Jul 21 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Fair use in a small hospital settingPaulaWed Jul 19 2006 - 20:50:45 GMT
RE: Clean Flicks and derivative worksAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jul 14 2006 - 01:25:00 GMT
Re: Clean Flicks and derivative worksJohn MitchellFri Jul 14 2006 - 01:25:00 GMT
Clean Flicks and derivative worksKevin L SmithThu Jul 13 2006 - 16:35:33 GMT
RE: Editing out offensive language from moviesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Jul 12 2006 - 15:15:44 GMT
Copyright PolicyEric Von VorysWed Jul 12 2006 - 05:10:48 GMT
Editing out offensive language from moviesSteven JamarWed Jul 12 2006 - 05:10:48 GMT
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingKAPLAN, MenachemWed Jul 05 2006 - 07:32:22 GMT
RE: duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatRehbach, JeffThu Jun 29 2006 - 00:24:58 GMT
RE: Re: Briefs for SaleDoug IsenbergWed Jun 28 2006 - 05:46:31 GMT
RE: Re: Briefs for SaleJohn P. McNeillThu Jun 29 2006 - 00:24:58 GMT
duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatG Norona JrTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:01:21 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:01:21 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleSteven JamarThu Jun 29 2006 - 00:24:58 GMT
duplicating obsolete VHS tapes to DVD formatG Norona JrTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Briefs for SaleJ. NobleMon Jun 26 2006 - 20:45:46 GMT
RE: Briefs for SaleAngela MottMon Jun 26 2006 - 20:45:46 GMT
Briefs for SaleNick ZalesFri Jun 23 2006 - 21:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleNick ZalesTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs for SaleNick ZalesTue Jun 27 2006 - 21:01:21 GMT
RE: Re: Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?Roland ColeThu Jun 22 2006 - 22:26:18 GMT
Re: Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsJ. NobleThu Jun 22 2006 - 19:20:46 GMT
Re: Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?S. Martin KeletiThu Jun 22 2006 - 16:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsSteven JamarWed Jun 21 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWed Jun 21 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWed Jun 21 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Terminology issues IIKaren CoyleWed Jun 21 2006 - 19:15:31 GMT
Re: Music CDs and "listening program"John T. MitchellWed Jun 21 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Music CDs and "listening program"Chad CWed Jun 21 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: arbitrating license agreementsVance R. KovenWed Jun 21 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Terminology issues IIIGregory AharonianWed Jun 21 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: arbitrating license agreements - verging OTEthan AckermanWed Jun 21 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: arbitrating license agreementsSteven JamarWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Terminology issues ISamuel MurrayWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Terminology issues IISamuel MurrayWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Terminology issues IIISamuel MurrayWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Permission needed to use student responses in test manual?Jeannie RennieWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Claim LimitMcMullen, AnthonyWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
Music CDs and "listening program"Maureen McCloskeyWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Claims Info ManipulationIrvin MuchnickWed Jun 21 2006 - 02:05:45 GMT
arbitrating license agreementsJ. NobleMon Jun 19 2006 - 19:55:46 GMT
Re: Re: Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareJohn T. MitchellThu Jun 15 2006 - 22:45:30 GMT
RE: Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareAngela MottThu Jun 15 2006 - 22:00:01 GMT
James Boyle in FT on WIPO Treaty: Constitutional circumventionJames LoveTue Jun 13 2006 - 21:45:56 GMT
The Journal of World Intellectual PropertyJoan K. LippincottMon Jun 12 2006 - 17:30:01 GMT
Developing a Copyright PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisFri Jun 09 2006 - 17:20:00 GMT
dLIST Information Sciences Digital Archive Announces New Editorsmarija dalbelloFri Jun 09 2006 - 17:20:00 GMT
Institute for Computer Policy and Law (ICPL), June 27-30Peter HirtleWed Jun 07 2006 - 21:50:00 GMT
Library Copyright Program at ALA Annual ConferenceJanice PilchTue Jun 06 2006 - 22:45:01 GMT
Join the Live Webcast for "Copyright at a Crossroads"Jack BoeveTue Jun 06 2006 - 18:50:00 GMT
Creating tutorials for copyrighted softwareChad CFri Jun 02 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
RE: The erroneous publisher copyright registrationAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed May 31 2006 - 19:20:31 GMT
The erroneous publisher copyright registrationDodi SchultzWed May 31 2006 - 19:20:31 GMT
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proJan Carmikle DwyerWed May 31 2006 - 16:40:00 GMT
The erroneous publisher copyright registrationCarol BusbyWed May 31 2006 - 16:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingMike HoldernessWed May 31 2006 - 16:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingMike HoldernessMon Jun 05 2006 - 19:05:00 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingDodi SchultzTue May 30 2006 - 15:30:01 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely assertingDodi SchultzWed May 31 2006 - 19:20:31 GMT
Music Copyright Infringement by RestaurantsChris GuastelleTue May 30 2006 - 15:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue May 30 2006 - 15:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue May 30 2006 - 18:05:45 GMT
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proBrewer, MichaelTue May 30 2006 - 15:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proKlein, Bonnie CIV DTIC OTue May 30 2006 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightRichard WigginsMon May 29 2006 - 16:35:01 GMT
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzMon May 29 2006 - 16:35:01 GMT
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzTue May 30 2006 - 15:30:01 GMT
Re: Defunct publisher had grabbed copyrightDodi SchultzWed May 31 2006 - 16:40:00 GMT
RE: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proLarry StellerMon May 29 2006 - 16:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionAmalyah KeshetMon May 29 2006 - 16:35:01 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proAmalyah KeshetMon May 29 2006 - 16:35:01 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionJ. NobleSat May 27 2006 - 04:30:01 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightCarol BusbySat May 27 2006 - 04:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightJohn T. MitchellFri May 26 2006 - 21:10:00 GMT
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright proDodi SchultzFri May 26 2006 - 16:10:50 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyrightDodi SchultzFri May 26 2006 - 16:10:50 GMT
Re: Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionJohn T. MitchellThu May 25 2006 - 21:40:45 GMT
Question on liability for falsely asserting copyright protectionBrewer, MichaelThu May 25 2006 - 19:15:46 GMT
Re: FAQ on Rights in the Works of JoyceBernard KatzThu May 25 2006 - 16:20:30 GMT
FAQ on Rights in the Works of JoyceKaren CoyleWed May 24 2006 - 21:00:45 GMT
Recent U.S. Appeals Court Cases on Fair UseCory HojkaMon May 22 2006 - 22:45:01 GMT
Re: WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)Denis Borges BarbosaFri May 19 2006 - 04:50:00 GMT
RE: Creative Commons - "Non-Commercial" use?Lawrence RosenFri May 19 2006 - 04:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright free images-clipartjohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netWed May 17 2006 - 22:05:01 GMT
Re: Copyright free images-clipartSteven JamarWed May 17 2006 - 15:15:15 GMT
Re: Copyright free images-clipartDavid DaileyWed May 17 2006 - 15:15:15 GMT
Creative Commons - "Non-Commercial" use?Davidson, Matthew T.Wed May 17 2006 - 15:15:15 GMT
Copyright free images-clipartLarry StellerTue May 16 2006 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorMike HoldernessMon May 15 2006 - 20:30:00 GMT
Last Chance for Early Registration DiscountJack BoeveMon May 15 2006 - 20:30:00 GMT
Update on Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Jon NoringSat May 13 2006 - 04:40:01 GMT
RE: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorKAPLAN, MenachemSat May 13 2006 - 04:40:01 GMT
Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorJ. NobleSat May 13 2006 - 04:40:01 GMT
Re: Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorSteven JamarSat May 13 2006 - 04:40:01 GMT
INTERNET: LAW LEGAL POLITICAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ISSUES: ICANN Board Votes Against .XXX Sponsored Top-Level Domain AgreementDavid P. DillardSat May 13 2006 - 04:40:01 GMT
Work done "in course of employment" - by a minorMike HoldernessThu May 11 2006 - 22:55:55 GMT
Has the USG been candid about the status of the broadcasters/webcasters treaty?James LoveWed May 10 2006 - 23:15:00 GMT
RE: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn P. McNeillWed May 10 2006 - 21:35:56 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserTue May 09 2006 - 22:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn LevineWed May 10 2006 - 21:35:56 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThu May 11 2006 - 17:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThu May 11 2006 - 17:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn ThomsonThu May 11 2006 - 17:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserThu May 11 2006 - 22:55:55 GMT
RE: "60 Minutes" use of film clipJohn P. McNeillTue May 09 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Printing educator books for Art CampSteven JamarTue May 09 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
RE: Printing educator books for Art CampJan Carmikle DwyerTue May 09 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
"60 Minutes" use of film clipJanna GlasserMon May 08 2006 - 22:30:00 GMT
Printing educator books for Art Campmiki higuchiMon May 08 2006 - 22:30:00 GMT
New at FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Regarding Lawrence Lessig, Tasini Campaign Contributor'Irvin MuchnickMon May 08 2006 - 19:15:01 GMT
WIPO discussions on xCasting Treaty, notes from ThursdayJames LoveFri May 05 2006 - 20:15:00 GMT
RE: WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)Alain MinodierFri May 05 2006 - 20:15:00 GMT
WIPO carves up the Internet (and the broadcast spectrum)James LoveThu May 04 2006 - 17:55:01 GMT
Intellectual Property Symposium -- Early Registration Deadline May 19!Jack BoeveWed May 03 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
International Sound recording issueRich FrankelWed May 03 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Steven JamarTue May 02 2006 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleWed May 03 2006 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Steven JamarWed May 03 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleThu May 04 2006 - 17:55:01 GMT
COPYRIGHT LAWS : LIBRARY: COLLECTIONS : LIBRARIES: ELECTRONIC DIGITIZATION PROJECTS: Homes for Copyright OrphansDavid P. DillardTue May 02 2006 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueTue May 02 2006 - 18:30:00 GMT
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueWed May 03 2006 - 15:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueThu May 04 2006 - 17:55:01 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekTue May 02 2006 - 18:30:00 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksMike PhillipsMon May 01 2006 - 22:15:15 GMT
Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleMon May 01 2006 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Copright on a music transcriptionJ. NobleMon May 01 2006 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDavid PostMon May 01 2006 - 16:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDavid PostWed May 03 2006 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandMon May 01 2006 - 16:55:45 GMT
Copright on a music transcriptionRichard FitzHughMon May 01 2006 - 16:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandFri Apr 28 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksVance R. KovenFri Apr 28 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandFri Apr 28 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
Version 62, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
RE: Copyright Vs TrademarksMichael GrahamFri Apr 28 2006 - 01:25:01 GMT
Responsibility for an insert...Jim DonohueFri Apr 28 2006 - 01:25:01 GMT
Re: Responsibility for an insert...J. NobleMon May 08 2006 - 19:15:01 GMT
Copyright Vs TrademarksDancelandThu Apr 27 2006 - 22:26:30 GMT
Re: : Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoAmalyah KeshetThu Apr 27 2006 - 22:26:30 GMT
ReferralAndrew SkinnerLopataWed Apr 26 2006 - 22:59:50 GMT
Re: SV: Re: TV ads break copyright lawMike HoldernessWed Apr 26 2006 - 17:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on aMike HoldernessWed Apr 26 2006 - 17:25:31 GMT
Canned rhythms etcMike HoldernessWed Apr 26 2006 - 17:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoVance R. KovenWed Apr 26 2006 - 17:25:31 GMT
Re: Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoSamuel MurrayTue Apr 25 2006 - 19:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteOnur PolatTue Apr 25 2006 - 17:55:00 GMT
Artists Rights Society Asks Google to Remove LogoDoug IsenbergTue Apr 25 2006 - 17:55:00 GMT
SV: Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawJan RosenTue Apr 25 2006 - 17:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web sitetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auMon Apr 24 2006 - 20:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Apr 24 2006 - 20:15:30 GMT
Re: Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteSteven JamarMon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Rich StimMon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Web site CopyingJohn T. MitchellMon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoMon Apr 24 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Richard WigginsMon Apr 24 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?James BrennanMon Apr 24 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Publishing song titles and artist names on a commercial web siteOnur PolatMon Apr 24 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Michael GrahamSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
RE: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Terry CarrollSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Howard SchulzeMon Apr 24 2006 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Are patent drawings public domain?David DaileyMon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
RE: Are patent drawings public domain?Jeffrey S. AnkromSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
SV: Re: TV ads break copyright lawJan RosenSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
Web site CopyingMike PhillipsSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
Re: "Superman" Termination rulings?DancelandSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Carl OppedahlThu Apr 20 2006 - 22:40:32 GMT
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?S. Martin KeletiSat Apr 22 2006 - 00:15:01 GMT
Re: Are patent drawings public domain?Steven JamarMon Apr 24 2006 - 19:25:01 GMT
"Superman" Termination rulings?Terry CarrollThu Apr 20 2006 - 21:55:02 GMT
Are patent drawings public domain?Richards, EdThu Apr 20 2006 - 21:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: TV ads break copyright lawAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusJ. NobleTue Apr 18 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawMike HoldernessTue Apr 18 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoTue Apr 18 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoThu Apr 20 2006 - 21:55:02 GMT
Corporate Copyright PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisTue Apr 18 2006 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleMon Apr 17 2006 - 16:10:00 GMT
Re: TV ads break copyright lawJohn T. MitchellMon Apr 17 2006 - 16:10:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Apr 14 2006 - 22:15:02 GMT
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Steven JamarFri Apr 14 2006 - 22:15:02 GMT
TV ads break copyright lawKarl-Erik TallmoFri Apr 14 2006 - 22:15:02 GMT
RE: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusLawrence RosenThu Apr 13 2006 - 21:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: IETF/source code copyright statusLawrence RosenMon Apr 17 2006 - 16:10:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Wallace J.McLeanThu Apr 13 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:56 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleFri Apr 14 2006 - 14:50:31 GMT
[CNI- (C)] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
re: IETF/source code copyright statusGregory AharonianThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJoseph Pietro RioloThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsKaren CoyleWed Apr 12 2006 - 22:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsSamuel MurrayThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJohn LevineFri Apr 14 2006 - 14:50:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsHoward SchulzeFri Apr 14 2006 - 14:50:31 GMT
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleWed Apr 12 2006 - 22:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenWed Apr 12 2006 - 22:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleWed Apr 12 2006 - 22:00:31 GMT
RE: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn P. McNeillTue Apr 11 2006 - 22:45:01 GMT
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Vance R. KovenTue Apr 11 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)J. NobleTue Apr 11 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Jon NoringTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)Steven JamarTue Apr 11 2006 - 22:45:01 GMT
Craig Parks review of Canadian copyright collectivesWallace J.McLeanTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn T. MitchellTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJ. NobleTue Apr 11 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJohn T. MitchellWed Apr 12 2006 - 22:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJ. NobleThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
Copyright at a Crossroads -- Register Today for This 3-Day SymposiumJack BoeveTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersMike HoldernessTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersSteven JamarTue Apr 11 2006 - 16:00:31 GMT
Re: Copyright and production of simplified readersJ. NobleTue Apr 11 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsRichard WigginsMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementTerry CarrollMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
Re: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementSteven JamarMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
Copyright and production of simplified readersBenedetta BassettiMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Jan VelteropMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
NFL Football League Bans Sideline Photography by Local Television StationsDavid P. DillardMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
smithsonian/showtime dealJ. NobleMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsKaren CoyleSat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJoseph Pietro RioloSat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Re: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsLawrence RosenMon Apr 10 2006 - 19:50:45 GMT
RE: Copyright status of early Internet RFCsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Sat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Re: Infringements per yearDavid DaileySat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Re: Infringements per yearJ. NobleTue Apr 11 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: Infringements per yearDavid PostWed Apr 19 2006 - 16:20:30 GMT
abandonment of copyright [was] Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?David DaileySat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
"Holy Blood Holy Grail" / "Da Vinci Code" opinionTerry CarrollSat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Statute of limitations on copyright infringementJoseph Pietro RioloSat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
RE: Statute of limitations on copyright infringementVarvel, VirgilThu Apr 13 2006 - 18:45:45 GMT
RE: Advice sought for display of images on museum websiteAlain MinodierFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Infringements per yearVarvel, VirgilFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: problems with Berne Convention languageGregory AharonianFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Copyright status of early Internet RFCsJohn LevineFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: problems with Berne Convention languageVance R. KovenThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
Advice sought for display of images on museum websiteReal, WillThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: National Law Journal -- 'Copyright Bomb Quietly Ticking'Irvin MuchnickThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Jan VelteropThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Apr 04 2006 - 03:30:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Apr 04 2006 - 03:30:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Vance R. KovenThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarMon Apr 03 2006 - 19:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Wallace J.McLeanTue Apr 04 2006 - 03:30:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarThu Apr 06 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
re: problems with Berne Convention languageGregory AharonianMon Apr 03 2006 - 19:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Karl-Erik TallmoMon Apr 03 2006 - 19:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloSat Apr 01 2006 - 04:30:03 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Joseph Pietro RioloSat Apr 08 2006 - 03:55:01 GMT
Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Vance R. KovenFri Mar 31 2006 - 16:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Samuel MurrayFri Apr 07 2006 - 01:00:01 GMT
Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Steven JamarFri Mar 31 2006 - 00:00:45 GMT
Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Samuel MurrayThu Mar 30 2006 - 22:59:59 GMT
Re: Berne Convention -- copyright or author-right?Terry CarrollSat Apr 01 2006 - 04:30:03 GMT
Re: Re: International protection for non USA authorsTerry CarrollMon Mar 27 2006 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: International protection for non USA authorsDancelandMon Mar 27 2006 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: International protection for non USA authorsJoseph Pietro RioloMon Mar 27 2006 - 16:50:44 GMT
Re: International protection for non USA authorsJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 28 2006 - 20:45:55 GMT
International protection for non USA authorsDancelandFri Mar 24 2006 - 16:55:30 GMT
Job at University of Michigan LibraryMaria BonnThu Mar 23 2006 - 23:30:31 GMT
Re: 50/50 book ownership disputejohnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netTue Mar 21 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
Re: 50/50 book ownership disputeS. Martin KeletiTue Mar 21 2006 - 23:10:00 GMT
RE: 50/50 book ownership disputeLawrence RosenTue Mar 21 2006 - 20:00:01 GMT
RE: 50/50 book ownership disputeKAPLAN, MenachemTue Mar 21 2006 - 21:55:00 GMT
50/50 book ownership disputeDavid EckardtTue Mar 21 2006 - 16:45:01 GMT
Free Copyright Permissions from Major PublishersMike ODonnellThu Mar 16 2006 - 19:35:15 GMT
Re: Fair use of eBay?J. NobleWed Mar 15 2006 - 23:15:01 GMT
[Net-Gold] Online Disputes Expose Publishers' Copyright VulnerabilityDavid P. DillardTue Mar 14 2006 - 21:00:30 GMT
CPTech on Evaluation of EU Database DirectiveJames LoveMon Mar 13 2006 - 22:10:00 GMT
Fair use of eBay?Bruce RuskMon Mar 13 2006 - 18:40:31 GMT
Access to Knowledge conference, April 21-23Yale Information Society ProjectFri Mar 10 2006 - 21:30:00 GMT
"in this binding" case?Wallace J.McLeanFri Mar 10 2006 - 21:30:00 GMT
RE: classroom use of feature length filmGibbons, LlewFri Mar 10 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: classroom use of feature length filmChad CFri Mar 10 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: classroom use of feature length filmSamuel MurrayFri Mar 10 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: classroom use of feature length filmS. Martin KeletiFri Mar 10 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: classroom use of feature length filmRob TiessenFri Mar 10 2006 - 17:35:00 GMT
classroom use of feature length filmMcMullen, AnthonyThu Mar 09 2006 - 23:00:56 GMT
Re: classroom use of feature length filmBernard KatzMon Mar 13 2006 - 18:40:31 GMT
RE: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?GROVES PeterWed Mar 08 2006 - 21:55:30 GMT
Re: Re: Canadian Unlocateable Owner clauseWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 08 2006 - 00:15:30 GMT
Re: Canadian Unlocateable Owner clauseBernard KatzTue Mar 07 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
Work for hire and public domain please helpDancelandMon Mar 06 2006 - 16:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanMon Mar 06 2006 - 16:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanMon Mar 06 2006 - 16:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Mike HoldernessTue Mar 07 2006 - 21:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandWed Mar 08 2006 - 00:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandWed Mar 08 2006 - 00:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Wallace J.McLeanWed Mar 08 2006 - 00:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandThu Mar 09 2006 - 23:00:56 GMT
SLS Conference: Cultural Environmentalism at 10Jennifer JenkinsMon Mar 06 2006 - 16:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: Fair useJohn T. MitchellMon Mar 06 2006 - 16:35:50 GMT
RE: rights for defunct newspaper?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Mar 03 2006 - 18:40:55 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Fair useAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Mar 03 2006 - 18:40:55 GMT
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Rob TiessenFri Mar 03 2006 - 18:40:55 GMT
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?DancelandFri Mar 03 2006 - 18:40:55 GMT
Re: rights for defunct newspaper?Bernard KatzFri Mar 03 2006 - 18:40:55 GMT
RE: Re: Fair useHoward ZaharoffFri Mar 03 2006 - 01:50:00 GMT
rights for defunct newspaper?Millward, Debbie (VAN_Exchange)Fri Mar 03 2006 - 01:50:00 GMT
Symposium: Copyright at a CrossroadsJack BoeveWed Mar 01 2006 - 22:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: Notice on unpublished excerptJ. NobleTue Feb 28 2006 - 20:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Copyright NewsLesley Ellen HarrisTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
RE: Notice on unpublished excerptJohn P. McNeillMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
RE: Notice on unpublished excerptElizabeth Townsend GardMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptJ. NobleMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptSteven JamarMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Fair useChad CMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
RE: Fair useAngela MottMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
RE: Fair useElizabeth Townsend GardMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Fair useSteven JamarMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:02 GMT
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Re: Fair useSamuel MurrayTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzMon Feb 27 2006 - 17:30:00 GMT
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Re: Notice on unpublished excerptDodi SchultzTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Fair useBernie CampbellMon Feb 27 2006 - 17:30:00 GMT
Re: Fair useIvan HoffmanFri Dec 13 1996 - 12:27:26 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Terry CarrollFri Feb 24 2006 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?John LevineMon Feb 27 2006 - 17:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Terry CarrollMon Feb 27 2006 - 17:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?J. NobleMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?David DaileyMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?Michael JungFri Feb 24 2006 - 22:10:01 GMT
RE: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?John P. McNeillMon Feb 27 2006 - 23:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?James BrennanFri Feb 24 2006 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: more trouble with thumbnail images?David DaileyThu Feb 23 2006 - 23:25:30 GMT
RE: Re: song lyrics, quotations and arttja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auThu Feb 23 2006 - 23:25:30 GMT
RE: Re: song lyrics, quotations and arttja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:00 GMT
Fair UseJohn P. McNeillWed Feb 22 2006 - 22:05:01 GMT
RE: Fair UseDouglas Hasty, Interlibrary Loan / (305) 348-2459Thu Aug 08 1996 - 13:21:24 GMT
Re: Fair UseMike HoldernessThu Aug 08 1996 - 16:38:46 GMT
Re: Fair UseMartin PerlbergerThu Aug 08 1996 - 17:13:55 GMT
Re: Fair UseDarren DalglishSat Aug 10 1996 - 11:23:21 GMT
Re: Fair UseMike HoldernessWed Aug 14 1996 - 20:02:46 GMT
Re: Fair UseMark LemleyThu Aug 15 1996 - 22:56:54 GMT
--> Re: Fair UseRon B. ThomsonMon Aug 19 1996 - 13:35:37 GMT
Re: Fair Usewing_m[_at_]southampton-institute.ac.ukMon Aug 19 1996 - 12:12:35 GMT
Re: Fair UseSteve MelamutSun Jun 29 1997 - 13:19:29 GMT
Re: Fair UseMary BarnettTue Jul 01 1997 - 13:25:21 GMT
Re: Fair UseRobert HonanWed Jul 02 1997 - 05:53:25 GMT
Re: Fair UseSMcLaughlin1[_at_]doc.govWed Mar 03 1999 - 16:53:10 GMT
--> Re: Fair UseJohn MullerThu Mar 04 1999 - 18:36:19 GMT
Re: Fair UseTyler OchoaFri May 10 2002 - 17:09:54 GMT
Re: Fair UseALRAGUENEA[_at_]aol.comTue May 14 2002 - 09:14:16 GMT
--> RE: Fair UseDave GreenSun May 19 2002 - 06:36:54 GMT
--> Payment-practices experiencesI.R.MaturanaMon May 20 2002 - 16:29:35 GMT
--> RE: Payment-practices experiencesI.R.MaturanaWed May 22 2002 - 14:29:38 GMT
more trouble with thumbnail images?David BozakWed Feb 22 2006 - 22:05:01 GMT
Version 61, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tue Feb 21 2006 - 22:40:31 GMT
Re: Re: song lyrics, quotations and artAmalyah KeshetMon Feb 20 2006 - 23:15:47 GMT
Re: song lyrics, quotations and artCarol BusbyFri Feb 17 2006 - 18:55:31 GMT
Re: song lyrics, quotations and artBernard KatzFri Feb 24 2006 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Fw: Song Lyrics, quotations, and artVance R. KovenThu Feb 16 2006 - 21:20:30 GMT
Fw: Song Lyrics, quotations, and artAmalyah KeshetThu Feb 16 2006 - 17:10:01 GMT
Re: DMCA Title IIJ. NobleWed Feb 15 2006 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleWed Feb 15 2006 - 16:25:00 GMT
DMCA Title IIElizabeth T RussellTue Feb 14 2006 - 20:55:46 GMT
National Academies on proposed WIPO webcasting treatyManon RessTue Feb 14 2006 - 20:24:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseVance R. KovenTue Feb 14 2006 - 20:24:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarThu Feb 16 2006 - 21:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:05:31 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataMon Feb 13 2006 - 18:05:31 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationHoward SchulzeFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Song LyricsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseBernard KatzThu Feb 09 2006 - 23:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJohn T. MitchellMon Feb 13 2006 - 18:05:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleTue Feb 14 2006 - 17:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseKaren CoyleTue Feb 14 2006 - 20:24:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarTue Feb 14 2006 - 21:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleTue Feb 14 2006 - 23:29:45 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJohn T. MitchellWed Feb 15 2006 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarWed Feb 15 2006 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleThu Feb 16 2006 - 17:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseTerry CarrollThu Feb 16 2006 - 21:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleMon Feb 20 2006 - 23:15:47 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarTue Feb 21 2006 - 22:40:31 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseJ. NobleWed Feb 22 2006 - 22:05:01 GMT
Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comWed Feb 08 2006 - 23:50:45 GMT
Re: Fair Dealing / Fair UseSteven JamarWed Feb 08 2006 - 23:50:45 GMT
Law mentioning public domain softwareJoseph Pietro RioloWed Feb 08 2006 - 18:05:01 GMT
RE: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auWed Feb 08 2006 - 18:05:01 GMT
Fair Dealing / Fair UseBernard KatzWed Feb 08 2006 - 18:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationSteven JamarTue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 10 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTerry CarrollTue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTeresa DulbergTue Feb 07 2006 - 23:10:01 GMT
Song LyricsCarol BusbyTue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsbrussell[_at_]supranet.netTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: painting of a photographtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJohn P. McNeillTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideJ. NobleTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsJoseph Pietro RioloTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
RE: donation to the public domain.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: Software Licensing Agreement - Public Domain dedicationAndrew SkinnerLopataThu Feb 09 2006 - 23:30:00 GMT
Re: Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTerry CarrollMon Feb 06 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing Agr eementMcKie, JohnMon Feb 06 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMon Feb 06 2006 - 21:40:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJohn T. MitchellMon Feb 06 2006 - 21:40:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideTerry CarrollMon Feb 06 2006 - 21:40:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarMon Feb 06 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
Song lyrics used in printed concert programsTeresa DulbergMon Feb 06 2006 - 21:40:41 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 06 2006 - 17:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideJoseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 06 2006 - 17:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarTue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: painting of a photographJoseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 06 2006 - 17:15:01 GMT
RE: painting of a photographAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Feb 03 2006 - 22:55:01 GMT
U.S. Copyright Office's Final Report on Orphan WorksJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 03 2006 - 22:55:01 GMT
painting of a photographMillward, Debbie (VAN_Exchange)Thu Feb 02 2006 - 21:30:32 GMT
KnowRight06 Conference Vienna 16/17. Feb. 2006Peter Paul SintThu Feb 02 2006 - 21:30:32 GMT
Re: Status of the University of California San Diego copyright infringement (e-reserve) caseJoseph Pietro RioloWed Feb 01 2006 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Night LightingSteven JamarTue Jan 31 2006 - 21:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: Night Lightingtja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Jan 31 2006 - 19:20:55 GMT
RE: Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?Roland ColeMon Jan 30 2006 - 23:25:01 GMT
RE: Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?Doug IsenbergTue Jan 31 2006 - 19:20:55 GMT
Re: Night LightingSteven JamarMon Jan 30 2006 - 23:00:01 GMT
Other than an ISP, who is a "service provider" under Section 512 other than an ISP?John T. MitchellMon Jan 30 2006 - 23:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementHoward SchulzeTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJohn T. MitchellTue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
RE: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
RE: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: more than "fair use" needed?John LevineMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Breadth of the DMCA? Publisher decompiling a digital format?John LevineMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Google Cache as Fair UseJoseph Pietro RioloMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Night LightingRobert A. BaronMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
RE: more than "fair use" needed?Neil SmithFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:55:01 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jan 27 2006 - 20:55:01 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementLawrence RosenMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Breadth of the DMCA? Publisher decompiling a digital format?crb4949[_at_]fastmail.fmFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Re: Software Licensing AgreementSteven JamarMon Feb 06 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
Re: Software Licensing AgreementSteven JamarMon Feb 06 2006 - 23:50:02 GMT
Re: Software Licensing AgreementMaureen Cohen HarringtonTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Software Licensing AgreementJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Permission of an Author or Copyright Owner is NOT always requiredRoland ColeFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
more than "fair use" needed?David BozakFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Status of the University of California San Diego copyright infringement (e-reserve) caseCarl JohnsonThu Jan 26 2006 - 23:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Google Cache as Fair UseMaureen Cohen HarringtonThu Jan 26 2006 - 23:30:01 GMT
Re: Software Licensing AgreementJ. NobleThu Jan 26 2006 - 21:35:01 GMT
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guideDoug IsenbergThu Jan 26 2006 - 21:35:01 GMT
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guideRoland ColeFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Distribution of personal study guidetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Deadline for Online Copyright Workshop with Siva VaidhyanathanJack BoeveThu Jan 26 2006 - 21:35:01 GMT
Re: Google Cache as Fair UseDavid BozakThu Jan 26 2006 - 21:35:01 GMT
Re: Google Cache as Fair Usealankabat[_at_]aol.comThu Jan 26 2006 - 21:35:01 GMT
Distribution of personal study guideDodi SchultzThu Jan 26 2006 - 17:40:01 GMT
Google Cache as Fair UseJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jan 26 2006 - 17:40:01 GMT
Software Licensing AgreementFred J. DirkseThu Jan 26 2006 - 17:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Distribution of personal study guideDavid BozakThu Jan 26 2006 - 17:40:01 GMT
RE: Distribution of personal study guideMichael GrahamWed Jan 25 2006 - 23:25:00 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seWed Jan 25 2006 - 20:40:00 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJohn LevineWed Jan 25 2006 - 23:25:00 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideSteven JamarFri Jan 27 2006 - 20:20:00 GMT
Distribution of personal study guideadibble1[_at_]corning-cc.eduWed Jan 25 2006 - 20:30:00 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideJ. NobleMon Jan 30 2006 - 17:00:01 GMT
Re: Distribution of personal study guideBernard KatzTue Feb 07 2006 - 19:20:00 GMT
RE: OSI supported CFP - IJCLP special issue A2K - error correctionRotenberg, BorisTue Jan 24 2006 - 20:05:30 GMT
Academic Integrity Symposium in MarchJanet NepkieMon Jan 23 2006 - 21:50:01 GMT
RE: Re: Air as public spaceElizabeth T RussellFri Jan 20 2006 - 22:25:01 GMT
Re: Air as public spaceSteven JamarFri Jan 20 2006 - 20:25:32 GMT
RE: Is "Air" a Public Space?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Jan 19 2006 - 18:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingTerry CarrollThu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingDavid DaileyThu Jan 19 2006 - 20:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingTerry CarrollThu Jan 19 2006 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingAlain MinodierFri Jan 20 2006 - 20:25:32 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingS. Martin KeletiWed Jan 25 2006 - 20:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingVance R. KovenThu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
Is "Air" a Public Space?Roland ColeThu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
OSI supported CFP - IJCLP special issue A2KRotenberg, BorisThu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: copyrghts in famous paintingAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationScott ButcherWed Jan 18 2006 - 22:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationTrademarksThu Jan 19 2006 - 16:15:30 GMT
RE: copyrghts in famous paintingWebb, JereWed Jan 18 2006 - 22:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationJason sheperdWed Jan 18 2006 - 18:20:41 GMT
RE: Architectural Copyright RegistrationMichael GrahamTue Jan 17 2006 - 21:50:01 GMT
Re: Architectural Copyright RegistrationVance R. KovenTue Jan 17 2006 - 21:50:01 GMT
online copyright coursesAmrithaTue Jan 17 2006 - 21:05:01 GMT
Architectural Copyright RegistrationJason sheperdTue Jan 17 2006 - 21:05:01 GMT
Ball State University Copyright Conference, April 12, 2006Dolak, FritzThu Jan 12 2006 - 22:40:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.Garhart, NateFri Jan 06 2006 - 23:15:46 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandFri Jan 06 2006 - 19:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandMon Jan 09 2006 - 19:15:55 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.Lalpdx1[_at_]aol.comMon Jan 09 2006 - 19:15:55 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandMon Jan 09 2006 - 21:05:44 GMT
Re: HTML document into PDF : legal?John LevineFri Jan 06 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: HTML document into PDF : legal?J. NobleFri Jan 06 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Need expert to determine value of copyrightsTheodora MichaelsFri Jan 06 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Need expert to determine value of copyrightsJ. NobleFri Jan 06 2006 - 17:00:00 GMT
RE: Copyright relating to trademarks.David StewartThu Jan 05 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
HTML document into PDF : legal?Nicole DavignonThu Jan 05 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
Need expert to determine value of copyrightsTheodora MichaelsThu Jan 05 2006 - 23:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanWed Jan 04 2006 - 23:40:00 GMT
TEACH Act and Hybrid LearningLaliberte, Matthew DanaWed Jan 04 2006 - 23:40:00 GMT
Copyright relating to trademarks.DancelandWed Jan 04 2006 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Vance R. KovenWed Jan 04 2006 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanTue Jan 03 2006 - 23:20:31 GMT
RE: Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Michael GrahamTue Jan 03 2006 - 21:35:31 GMT
Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.Wallace J.McLeanTue Jan 03 2006 - 21:20:02 GMT
Jan. 6 Early Registration Deadline for Online WorkshopJack BoeveTue Jan 03 2006 - 21:20:02 GMT
Use of Company Trademark, etc.Mark ReinmillerTue Jan 03 2006 - 20:40:46 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebSmith, Robert E.Tue Dec 27 2005 - 16:35:15 GMT
The Creative Commons Needs Urgent HelpCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Mon Dec 26 2005 - 16:20:56 GMT
Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebEric GoldmanMon Dec 26 2005 - 16:20:56 GMT
RE: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebRoland ColeWed Dec 21 2005 - 20:20:01 GMT
ERCIM News - special European theme - Open AccessStevan HarnadWed Dec 21 2005 - 20:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the Webteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seWed Dec 21 2005 - 20:20:01 GMT
RE: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebDr Jean T. KreamerWed Dec 21 2005 - 00:00:01 GMT
RE: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebWebb, JereWed Dec 21 2005 - 00:00:01 GMT
Re: Linking to Infringing Works on the WebJohn T. MitchellWed Dec 21 2005 - 00:00:01 GMT
Linking to Infringing Works on the WebSmith, Robert E.Tue Dec 20 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
3 April OA Conferences: 2 at Lund and 1 at YaleStevan HarnadMon Dec 19 2005 - 22:20:45 GMT
Hymn appraiser?Welch, John L.Fri Dec 16 2005 - 23:05:16 GMT
Save the Date: Annual Intellectual Property SymposiumJack BoeveTue Dec 13 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Screen CapturesMike PhillipsFri Dec 09 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
CONFERENCE ON THE POLITICS AND IDEOLOGY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYJames LoveFri Dec 09 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Version 60, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Dec 09 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
FYI: RFC / Internet Scope Modifier (refused) (Was: Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaTue Dec 06 2005 - 01:00:01 GMT
Nominations--L. Ray Patterson Copyright AwardJanice PilchTue Dec 06 2005 - 01:00:01 GMT
Re: IP trusts (fwd)Terry CarrollSat Dec 03 2005 - 00:22:11 GMT
Yale ISP A2K Conference -- IJCLP Writing CompetitionRotenberg, BorisThu Dec 01 2005 - 23:40:54 GMT
HuffPo: A UN/WIPO plan to regulate distribution of information on the Internet -- every transmitter to become an ownerJames LoveThu Dec 01 2005 - 23:40:54 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 28 2005 - 22:43:46 GMT
Some advice requested for a minorSteven JamarMon Nov 28 2005 - 16:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleMon Nov 28 2005 - 16:00:01 GMT
Date of copyrightMic PorterMon Nov 28 2005 - 16:00:01 GMT
Re: [CNI-(C) Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleMon Nov 28 2005 - 16:00:01 GMT
Re: Guide juridique CNRSStevan HarnadMon Nov 28 2005 - 16:00:01 GMT
Re: Guide juridique CNRSStevan HarnadTue Nov 29 2005 - 20:25:29 GMT
RE: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterPamela McLeanWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
RE: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterMike ODonnellWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorVance R. KovenWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
At WIPO: Civil Society Coalition (CSC) on Limitations and Exceptions to CopyrightJames LoveWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
At WIPO webcasting debate: Civil Society Coalition Statement to the WIPO SCCR on opposition to the Inclusion of Webcasting/Simulcasting in proposed treaty for the protection of Broadcasting OrganizationsJames LoveWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
CI Statement on Broadcast/Webcast Treaty proposalsJames LoveWed Nov 23 2005 - 20:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleTue Nov 22 2005 - 23:45:00 GMT
Re: When does a summary infringe on copyright?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Nov 22 2005 - 23:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorVance R. KovenTue Nov 22 2005 - 21:15:50 GMT
Re: Short practical articles for copyright newsletterarshi suhailTue Nov 22 2005 - 21:15:50 GMT
When does a summary infringe on copyright?Chad CTue Nov 22 2005 - 21:15:50 GMT
Intellectual Property in Academia Online Workshops--Winter 2006 CoursesJack BoeveTue Nov 22 2005 - 21:15:50 GMT
Re: Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleTue Nov 22 2005 - 00:40:30 GMT
Short practical articles for copyright newsletterLesley Ellen HarrisTue Nov 22 2005 - 00:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Some advice requested for a minorBob PanzerSat Nov 19 2005 - 00:45:30 GMT
RE: Re: Some advice requested for a minorAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:30:30 GMT
Joint statement on broadcasting and cablecasting protectionManon RessFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
RE: Some advice requested for a minorKAPLAN, MenachemFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
RE: Some advice requested for a minorJohn P. McNeillFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
Re: Some advice requested for a minorJohn T. MitchellFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
Re: Some advice requested for a minorJ. NobleFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
Re: Some advice requested for a minorBert KragesFri Nov 18 2005 - 20:15:01 GMT
Some advice requested for a minorMarissaThu Nov 17 2005 - 23:29:00 GMT
Re: Some advice requested for a minorMike BradleyTue Nov 22 2005 - 00:40:30 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Talkin' Appeal FAQIrvin MuchnickThu Nov 17 2005 - 23:29:00 GMT
Re: QuestionJohn LevineWed Nov 16 2005 - 20:40:01 GMT
RE: QuestionMichael GrahamWed Nov 16 2005 - 17:50:55 GMT
RE: QuestionGrierson, KevinWed Nov 16 2005 - 17:50:55 GMT
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Joseph Pietro RioloWed Nov 16 2005 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Klein, BonnieWed Nov 16 2005 - 17:50:55 GMT
QuestionJerilynn DonaldsonWed Nov 16 2005 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: QuestionCharles McGarryTue Sep 09 1997 - 20:08:32 GMT
Re: QuestionDon MayerWed Sep 10 1997 - 01:12:23 GMT
Re: QuestionDoug JohnsonWed Sep 10 1997 - 14:53:58 GMT
Re: Questionbbiplaw[_at_]aol.comMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: QuestionJerilynn DonaldsonThu Nov 17 2005 - 23:29:00 GMT
RE: Re: Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Elizabeth T RussellWed Nov 16 2005 - 00:10:01 GMT
RE: Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:30:00 GMT
Making a ringtone from a recorded version of a fight song?Richard WigginsMon Nov 14 2005 - 22:45:01 GMT
Announcement: Yale ISP "Regulating Search?" Symposium - Dec. 3Eddan KatzThu Nov 10 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 07 2005 - 23:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Freya AndersonWed Nov 09 2005 - 00:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Mike BradleyWed Nov 09 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Karen CoyleMon Nov 07 2005 - 18:25:15 GMT
RE: Re: Case referralMike BradleyThu Nov 03 2005 - 23:00:11 GMT
Jonathan Krim in WP: Weighing Webcasters' Rights to ContentJames LoveThu Nov 03 2005 - 23:00:11 GMT
Re: Case referralJ. NobleWed Nov 02 2005 - 22:10:45 GMT
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)David PostWed Nov 02 2005 - 22:10:45 GMT
Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Karen CoyleTue Nov 01 2005 - 23:25:00 GMT
Re: Interpreting 17, 108 (a)Mike BradleyMon Nov 07 2005 - 23:00:00 GMT
Case referralDan BallardTue Nov 01 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Notice of Appeal Filed October 21Irvin MuchnickTue Nov 01 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: The Google Print Controversy: A BibliographyDavid P. DillardMon Oct 31 2005 - 15:15:00 GMT
Framing Other WebsitesJoy ButlerThu Oct 27 2005 - 21:10:00 GMT
Re: Re: Framing Other WebsitesJohn T. MitchellThu Oct 27 2005 - 21:10:00 GMT
Films on CampusJudy J. DehleThu Oct 27 2005 - 21:10:00 GMT
Re: Framing Other Websitesdavid daileyWed Oct 26 2005 - 22:43:59 GMT
Re: Framing Other WebsitesGPoe[_at_]aol.comThu Oct 27 2005 - 21:10:00 GMT
RE: Framing Other WebsitesMike ODonnellWed Oct 26 2005 - 22:43:59 GMT
RE: Framing Other WebsitesFreya AndersonWed Oct 26 2005 - 22:43:59 GMT
RE: Framing Other WebsitesGrierson, KevinWed Oct 26 2005 - 22:43:59 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Mike OliverWed Oct 26 2005 - 19:55:55 GMT
Framing Other WebsitesGay GilmoreWed Oct 26 2005 - 19:55:55 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Terry CarrollTue Oct 25 2005 - 21:55:45 GMT
Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Klein, BonnieTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Carl OppedahlTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Terry CarrollTue Oct 25 2005 - 21:55:45 GMT
DMCA and the University Campus--10/28 early registration deadline for online workshopJack BoeveTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
RE: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Eric Von VorysTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
RE: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?John P. McNeillTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
Call for Papers: KnowRight 2006 Feb16/17Peter Paul SintTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
Re: Copyright claim after application but before issuance?JFNTue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
The Google Print Controversy: A BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tue Oct 25 2005 - 20:25:55 GMT
Copyright claim after application but before issuance?Lalpdx1[_at_]aol.comMon Oct 24 2005 - 18:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Keith TaberFri Oct 21 2005 - 01:30:00 GMT
RE: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Oct 19 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Joseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 19 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: UK Creative Economy conferenceJoseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Libraries & cartoon charactersJoseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Another Example of How Long Copyright Term Can Harm PublicJoseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Do PrePrints and PostPrints Need a Copyright Licence?Stevan HarnadTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
RE: UK Creative Economy conferencea.wiseSat Oct 15 2005 - 13:00:30 GMT
October 18 DC Bar IP Fall ReceptionJoy ButlerThu Oct 13 2005 - 20:40:00 GMT
17 NGOs, 7 law professors, and 31 musicians and technology experts ask US Congress for formal public comment on proposals at WIPO to create new IP right for broadcasting and webcasting organizationsJames LoveThu Oct 13 2005 - 20:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Vance R. KovenWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?S. Martin KeletiWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Terry CarrollWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineThu Oct 13 2005 - 20:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John LevineMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?JFNMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Mon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Mon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
RE: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Stephen FillerWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?John P. McNeillSat Oct 15 2005 - 13:00:30 GMT
Michelle Childs on UK Creative Economy conferenceJames LoveWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
University of Zurich: 4th Institution with Self-Archiving MandateStevan HarnadWed Oct 12 2005 - 19:45:00 GMT
RE: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?William T. McGrathTue Oct 11 2005 - 18:55:31 GMT
RE: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Grierson, KevinTue Oct 11 2005 - 18:55:31 GMT
Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?JFNTue Oct 11 2005 - 16:15:50 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleyTue Oct 11 2005 - 18:55:31 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleySat Oct 15 2005 - 13:00:30 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Exclusive jurisdiction -- remand or dismiss?Mike BradleyTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - to control nonexclusive rightsJohn T. MitchellTue Oct 11 2005 - 16:15:50 GMT
RE: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Freya AndersonFri Oct 07 2005 - 20:25:15 GMT
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 07 2005 - 20:25:15 GMT
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 07 2005 - 20:25:15 GMT
Re: Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Webb, JereThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
RE: Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Roland ColeThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?GROVES PeterThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Oct 11 2005 - 18:55:31 GMT
RE: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Terry CarrollWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike OliverFri Oct 07 2005 - 20:25:15 GMT
Copyright sessions at Museum Computer Network MCN 2005amalyah keshetWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Library Reserves - particularly Digital Reserves...Christopher GwynWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Rights for TV showsMarcia KeyserWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?JFNTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Howard SchulzeWed Oct 05 2005 - 21:35:55 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Andrew SkinnerLopataThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Robert LabossiereThu Oct 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Janet NepkieFri Oct 07 2005 - 20:25:15 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?John LevineTue Oct 11 2005 - 16:15:50 GMT
Re: Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Terry CarrollTue Oct 18 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Michael TrittipoTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
Libraries & cartoon charactersMary-Carol LindbloomTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?S. Martin KeletiMon Oct 03 2005 - 20:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Authors GuildJoseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
BNetd DecisionJoseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Contrary to Morality - What is that?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 17 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:15 GMT
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:47 GMT
RE: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Oct 03 2005 - 20:45:31 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Grierson, KevinFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:15 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Grierson, KevinFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:15 GMT
Re: Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'teste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:15 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'teste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seFri Sep 30 2005 - 20:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Karen CoyleThu Sep 29 2005 - 22:30:01 GMT
WIPO's war against consumer interestsJames LoveThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Vance R. KovenThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Harvard Business School PublishingAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Harvard Business School PublishingLaliberte, Matthew DanaThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyri ght Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impos e a 'License By Default'Klein, BonnieThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJohn EyeThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingJFNThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Harvard Business School PublishingKaren CoyleThu Sep 29 2005 - 22:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Authors GuildWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 28 2005 - 22:38:51 GMT
Re: Re: Authors GuildWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 28 2005 - 22:38:51 GMT
Re: Re: Authors GuildKeith TaberThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guildteste[_at_]bildombudsmannen.seThu Sep 29 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Harvard Business School PublishingCarol RescoWed Sep 28 2005 - 22:38:51 GMT
Re: Authors GuildMike BradleyWed Sep 28 2005 - 20:45:01 GMT
RE: referral for Florida lawyerNeil SmithTue Sep 27 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Authors GuildJohn LevineTue Sep 27 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
James Boyle in FT on Webcast Treaty: More rights are wrong for webcastersJames LoveTue Sep 27 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
Sign-on letter to Congress: request public consultation on webcasting treatyManon RessTue Sep 27 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'david daileyTue Sep 27 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Karen CoyleWed Sep 28 2005 - 20:45:01 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Wallace J.McLeanMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'John T. MitchellTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
referral for Florida lawyerJFNMon Sep 26 2005 - 21:30:45 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 26 2005 - 20:55:01 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Joseph Pietro RioloMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaFri Sep 23 2005 - 22:10:51 GMT
Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickThu Sep 22 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyMon Oct 03 2005 - 18:50:45 GMT
Re: Authors Guild's Paul Aiken Opposes 'Turning Copyright Law Upside Down' -- Except When the Guild Is Helping Publishers Impose a 'License By Default'Mike BradleyTue Oct 04 2005 - 21:00:31 GMT
RE : Re: Mutal copyright questionI.R.MaturanaWed Sep 21 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
Intellectual Property in Academia--Online Workshops for Autumn 2005Jack BoeveTue Sep 20 2005 - 21:10:31 GMT
Re: Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitJohn T. MitchellMon Sep 19 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Sep 19 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
US Congress asked to intervene in webcasting treaty proposalJames LoveMon Sep 19 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitFreya AndersonFri Sep 16 2005 - 20:20:32 GMT
Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitRoy MurphyFri Sep 16 2005 - 20:20:32 GMT
Re: Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitJohn T. MitchellFri Sep 16 2005 - 20:20:32 GMT
WIPO Webcast Treaty Proposal - CPTech letter to LOC and USPTOJames LoveFri Sep 16 2005 - 20:20:32 GMT
Webcasting Treaty: Notes from Sept 16 meeting at the Library of Congress on the proposed treaty provisions regarding webcastingJames LoveFri Sep 16 2005 - 20:20:32 GMT
Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LitDodi SchultzThu Sep 15 2005 - 17:50:01 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Class' Counsel Exposed (Day 3); UnSettlement Held Hostage (Day 48)Irvin MuchnickThu Sep 15 2005 - 17:50:01 GMT
RE: Re: Mutal copyright questionMichael GrahamThu Sep 15 2005 - 17:50:01 GMT
Selling Books - Using Select Text and Images in Sales LiteratureGarry PrintWed Sep 14 2005 - 21:35:00 GMT
RE: Mutal copyright questionJohn P. McNeillTue Sep 13 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
Re: Mutal copyright questionVance R. KovenTue Sep 13 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
Re: Mutal copyright questionKeith TaberTue Sep 13 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Resource Guide for Last Weekend Before Objection DeadlineIrvin MuchnickMon Sep 12 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Mutal copyright questionFred Dirkse - OIC Group, Inc.Mon Sep 12 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Mutal copyright questionRenee AnthuisTue Sep 13 2005 - 20:55:30 GMT
Re: Re: Communications ProtocolsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Sep 09 2005 - 17:35:45 GMT
Version 59, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Sep 09 2005 - 17:35:45 GMT
Re: Communications Protocolsdavid daileyThu Sep 08 2005 - 19:15:39 GMT
Re: Communications ProtocolsVance R. KovenThu Sep 08 2005 - 18:20:00 GMT
Re: Communications ProtocolsJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 08 2005 - 18:20:00 GMT
V World Congress of Computer Law - Third CallErick Iriarte AhonWed Sep 07 2005 - 20:50:00 GMT
Communications ProtocolsDavid E. HollingsworthWed Sep 07 2005 - 20:50:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Labor Day Message -- UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 39Irvin MuchnickMon Sep 05 2005 - 21:39:59 GMT
RE: electronic reservesTobe LiebertThu Sep 01 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
RE: electronic reservesFreya AndersonMon Sep 05 2005 - 21:39:59 GMT
Re: electronic reservesMarian DworaczekThu Sep 01 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS ALERT: Use Our 'Takedown Forms' to Block Future Use of Your WorksIrvin MuchnickThu Sep 01 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
electronic reservesMatthew PrutsmanThu Sep 01 2005 - 15:00:30 GMT
Copyright Job Description/Salary Info Needed!Suzanne SchelpTue Aug 30 2005 - 20:10:45 GMT
PATNEWS: Movie producers get search warrant for entire city of New DelhiGregory AharonianMon Aug 29 2005 - 20:05:30 GMT
Auto-rhythms on keyboards, etcMike HoldernessMon Aug 29 2005 - 20:05:30 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 32Irvin MuchnickMon Aug 29 2005 - 20:05:30 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: They're Still Hiding the 'License By Default'Irvin MuchnickFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
Assignment at Time of CreationMike PhillipsFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
2005-2006 Intellectual Property in Academia Online Workshop Series (lists)Jack BoeveThu Aug 25 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
RE: Re: Litigation ExceptionAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Aug 24 2005 - 19:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Litigation ExceptionJohn P. McNeillWed Aug 24 2005 - 19:55:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement Held Hostage ... Day 27Irvin MuchnickWed Aug 24 2005 - 19:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Litigation Exceptionroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netTue Aug 23 2005 - 22:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionJFNThu Aug 25 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionTerry CarrollThu Aug 25 2005 - 22:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Litigation Exceptionroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
Re: Re: Litigation ExceptionJFNFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
Re: Litigation ExceptionPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Tue Aug 23 2005 - 19:15:30 GMT
Re: Copyright to Walking Tour ContentKeith TaberMon Aug 22 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Open Letter to Plaintiff E.L. Doctorow -- 'Please Stop This Terrible Settlement'Irvin MuchnickMon Aug 22 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Litigation ExceptionJohn P. McNeillMon Aug 22 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Copyright to Walking Tour ContentScott ButcherMon Aug 22 2005 - 20:30:01 GMT
Open Letter to Research Councils UK: Rebuttal of ALPSP CritiqueStevan HarnadMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJohn T. MitchellFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:22:30 GMT
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJohn T. MitchellFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:23:20 GMT
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTerry CarrollMon Aug 29 2005 - 20:05:30 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSchafer, RichardFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Fri Aug 19 2005 - 22:22:30 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectMichael GrahamFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:22:30 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Fri Aug 19 2005 - 22:23:20 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectMichael GrahamFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:23:20 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectTim Arnold - MooreFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
RE: Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJune PowerFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:15:15 GMT
RE: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisRoland ColeFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
RE: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisGrierson, KevinMon Aug 22 2005 - 20:30:01 GMT
RE: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/Lexisdavid daileyFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:22:30 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNFinke[_at_]nurfc.orgFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:22:30 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:23:20 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNFinke[_at_]nurfc.orgFri Aug 19 2005 - 22:23:20 GMT
Re: Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: NWU, ASJA -- Time For an Exit StrategyIrvin MuchnickFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Using Fonts in Banner ProjectJFNThu Aug 18 2005 - 22:15:01 GMT
Using Fonts in Banner ProjectSmith, Robert E.Thu Aug 18 2005 - 21:00:00 GMT
Re: Briefs On Westlaw/LexisJFNThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:40:51 GMT
"University as author?"Janet NepkieThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:40:51 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonThu Aug 11 2005 - 22:20:29 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Albert HendersonThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Grierson, KevinThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:40:51 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Aug 22 2005 - 20:30:01 GMT
Briefs On Westlaw/LexisNick ZalesThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollWed Aug 17 2005 - 22:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Keith TaberFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWed Aug 17 2005 - 22:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steven JamarThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyMon Aug 22 2005 - 17:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steven JamarMon Aug 22 2005 - 20:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyTue Aug 23 2005 - 19:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarWed Aug 17 2005 - 22:25:31 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Orphan Works @ Berkeley - audio recordChristine L. SundtWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Joseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Joseph Pietro RioloThu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Richard WigginsWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Aug 18 2005 - 19:29:15 GMT
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.JFNWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: QuerySteven JamarTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:40:51 GMT
RE: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceFreya AndersonTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:00:02 GMT
RE: Re: Principles of fair useJohn P. McNeillTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:00:02 GMT
Re: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!hazel4205[_at_]aol.comTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Richard WigginsTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Principles of fair useJoseph Pietro RioloTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Online Copyright and Licensing CoursesAmrithaTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!Fletcher, EricTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!David StewartTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsKeith TaberTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Principles of fair usedavid daileyTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
"Public Performance" Licensing QuestionJohn BLATTNERTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
QueryHeather VargasTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Copyright issues regarding fan computer assistant program for board game.Steve WalmsleyTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!Grierson, KevinMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsVance R. KovenMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
Principles of fair useJohn LevineMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
RE: Re: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS Digest: ASJA Joins Objectors! (Well, Sort Of)Irvin MuchnickMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
Re: ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceJoe EllisonFri Aug 12 2005 - 23:00:01 GMT
Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!hazel4205[_at_]aol.comFri Aug 12 2005 - 23:00:01 GMT
ILL Lending - responsibilities for copyright complianceSheryl A. WilliamsFri Aug 12 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: Kay Murray / Kenneth Feinberg mailbagJFNFri Aug 12 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Kay Murray / Kenneth Feinberg mailbagIrvin MuchnickFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationIrvin MuchnickFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJFNFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationIrvin MuchnickFri Aug 12 2005 - 23:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJFNMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJessica R. FriedmanThu Aug 11 2005 - 20:55:44 GMT
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationJessica R. FriedmanFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Ms. Murray's ReputationMike BradleyFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: When Infringement BeginsKeith TaberThu Aug 11 2005 - 19:20:50 GMT
RE: Ms. Murray's ReputationMike BradleyThu Aug 11 2005 - 19:20:50 GMT
Re: Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorJFNThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
print music derivative rightsJanna GlasserThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Independent Objector Protests 'License by Default'Irvin MuchnickThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsAlainThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: When Infringement BeginsCarol ShepherdFri Aug 12 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorIrvin MuchnickThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
RE: When Infringement BeginsElizabeth T RussellWed Aug 10 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
RE: When Infringement BeginsMike BradleyThu Aug 11 2005 - 19:20:50 GMT
(no subject)Phares, Gloria C. (x2686)Wed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Elizabeth Townsend GardWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Christine L. SundtFri Aug 12 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"John P. McNeillFri Aug 12 2005 - 23:00:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Aug 15 2005 - 22:10:00 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Denis N. MagnussonWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
RE: Re: "University as author?"Denis N. MagnussonFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Peggy HoonWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Ivan HoffmanWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThu Aug 11 2005 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThu Aug 11 2005 - 19:20:50 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Kevin SmithThu Aug 11 2005 - 20:55:44 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollThu Aug 11 2005 - 22:20:29 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarFri Aug 12 2005 - 15:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarFri Aug 12 2005 - 23:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTue Aug 16 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"david daileyWed Aug 17 2005 - 21:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollWed Aug 17 2005 - 22:25:31 GMT
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorRobert LabossiereWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
Open Access WebliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
When Infringement BeginsMike PhillipsWed Aug 10 2005 - 21:50:30 GMT
RE: "University as author?"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Aug 09 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: "University as author?"Roland ColeFri Aug 19 2005 - 19:35:31 GMT
Re: "University as author?"David DaileyTue Aug 09 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Terry CarrollTue Aug 09 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:40:51 GMT
Re: "University as author?"Steven JamarThu Aug 18 2005 - 22:15:01 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Authors Guild Lawyer Exits Via the Revolving DoorIrvin MuchnickTue Aug 09 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingTerry CarrollMon Aug 08 2005 - 22:40:02 GMT
Re: Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingIvan HoffmanMon Aug 08 2005 - 22:40:02 GMT
Copyright transfers and exclusive licenses *really* must be in writingMike OliverMon Aug 08 2005 - 22:15:02 GMT
"University as author?"David BozakMon Aug 08 2005 - 22:15:02 GMT
Copyright pre-registration to require Internet ExplorerCarol ShepherdThu Aug 04 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowKaren CoyleWed Aug 03 2005 - 21:20:50 GMT
Re: Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowDenise Troll CoveyThu Aug 04 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
Reminder: Call for speakers on rights metadata in IRs at ALA 2006Brian SurrattTue Aug 02 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
List of Roundtable Participants -- D.C. and a few brief comments.LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comTue Aug 02 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageIvan HoffmanTue Aug 02 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageVance R. KovenTue Aug 02 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comMon Aug 01 2005 - 22:20:50 GMT
RE: Re: announcing a copyright literature current awareness servicePaul JonesMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objection Deadline ExtendedIrvin MuchnickMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
RE: Public domain in FranceRobert PanzerMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
Re: Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageRobin L. DespainMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
Roundtable on Orphan Works by Copyright Office in Berkeley, CA. tomorrowNeil SmithMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
RE: Re: fees for fair use in booksElizabeth Townsend GardFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
RE: Re: fees for fair use in booksJohn P. McNeillMon Aug 01 2005 - 21:05:30 GMT
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksS. Martin KeletiMon Aug 01 2005 - 22:20:50 GMT
Re: Re: fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereTue Aug 02 2005 - 20:10:30 GMT
Public domain in FranceTammy RavasFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
V World Congress of Computer Law - Second CallErick Iriarte AhonFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
Use of Film Poster with Celebrity ImageDaniel SmithFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
RE: announcing a copyright literature current awareness serviceLorre SmithFri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Weekly Standard Article About the SettlementIrvin MuchnickThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
Re: fees for fair use in booksJohn LevineThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
Re: fees for fair use in booksAlainThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
Re: fees for fair use in booksSteven JamarThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
announcing a copyright literature current awareness serviceTobe LiebertThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
RE: fees for fair use in booksImagesThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
RE: fees for fair use in booksRobert PanzerThu Jul 28 2005 - 21:50:50 GMT
RE: fees for fair use in booksAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jul 29 2005 - 19:55:03 GMT
fees for fair use in booksRobert LabossiereWed Jul 27 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Announcement: "Copyright Future" ForumJon NoringWed Jul 27 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Patents - OddestDuhaime, DianeTue Jul 26 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Welcome to UnSettlement 2.0Irvin MuchnickTue Jul 26 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJune PowerTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJune PowerTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
Re: Patents - OddestCWCHANDLER[_at_]aol.comTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
Re: Patents - OddestKeith TaberTue Jul 26 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
RE: Patents - OddestEric Von VorysTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
RE: Patents - OddestElizabeth T RussellTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
RE: Patents - OddestJohn McNeillTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
RE: Copyright Question -- News Corp and MySpaceJudy J. DehleTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
Re: Patents - OddestJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
Re: Patents - OddestJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jul 26 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
K-12 video production, student performancesGallardo, LisaMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTAndrew SkinnerLopataMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Right to take photos in public spacesRichard WigginsMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Patents - Oddestcharles meyerMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'Sorry, Judge, We'll Have It Next Tuesday'Irvin MuchnickMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Copyright Question -- News Corp and MySpaceChrissy ColemanMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineThu Jul 21 2005 - 21:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTKeith TaberMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Mon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTTheodora MichaelsMon Jul 25 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTWallace J.McLeanTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jul 21 2005 - 21:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineWed Jul 20 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS BULLETIN: Final 'Fairness Hearing' PostponedIrvin MuchnickWed Jul 20 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloWed Jul 20 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsDodi SchultzTue Jul 19 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jul 19 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re:Re:Re:Re: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTJudy J. DehleTue Jul 26 2005 - 05:25:30 GMT
RE: Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesElizabeth T RussellTue Jul 19 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTbankdevineTue Jul 19 2005 - 02:40:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objections Filed -- 'Settlement Presents Collusion on its Face'Irvin MuchnickTue Jul 19 2005 - 02:40:00 GMT
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsAmrithaTue Jul 19 2005 - 02:40:00 GMT
Editorial - Orphan Works and Unlocatable Copyright OwnersAmrithaTue Jul 19 2005 - 02:40:00 GMT
Copyright Advisory Network Scholar ProgramJanice PilchFri Jul 15 2005 - 20:45:51 GMT
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesMike OliverFri Jul 15 2005 - 16:00:50 GMT
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesRobert LabossiereTue Jul 19 2005 - 02:40:00 GMT
Re: Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesS. Martin KeletiThu Jul 21 2005 - 21:45:30 GMT
Re: Recorded music and fair useHenry CarterFri Jul 15 2005 - 16:00:50 GMT
RE: Recorded music and fair useAngela MottFri Jul 15 2005 - 16:00:50 GMT
Announcing: New Open Access Archivangelism BlogStevan HarnadWed Jul 13 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Graphic Art Design Royalty RatesJim GehrkeWed Jul 13 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Recorded music and fair useTammy RavasWed Jul 13 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Grokster damagesJFNWed Jul 13 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
ARL On-line Licensing Workshop--still time to register!Becky AlbitzWed Jul 06 2005 - 21:00:55 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Not Just a Sellout -- A GiveawayIrvin MuchnickTue Jul 05 2005 - 20:05:29 GMT
Re: Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollFri Jul 01 2005 - 20:10:46 GMT
Re: Re: Termination rightJFNFri Jul 01 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Termination rightJFNFri Jul 01 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyright on house plants?James BrennanFri Jul 01 2005 - 20:10:46 GMT
Re: Re: copyright on house plants?Howard SchulzeFri Jul 01 2005 - 20:10:46 GMT
Re: Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollThu Jun 30 2005 - 22:15:01 GMT
Re: Termination rightJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 30 2005 - 21:05:55 GMT
Re: copyright on house plants?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 30 2005 - 21:05:55 GMT
Re: Re: reading a book to classKeith TaberThu Jun 30 2005 - 21:05:55 GMT
RE: copyright on house plants?Duhaime, DianeWed Jun 29 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: copyright on house plants?Robert LabossiereWed Jun 29 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: copyright on house plants?Terry CarrollWed Jun 29 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: copyright on house plants?S. Martin KeletiThu Jun 30 2005 - 21:05:55 GMT
Re: copyright on house plants?amalyah keshetFri Jul 01 2005 - 20:10:46 GMT
copyright on house plants?David DaileyWed Jun 29 2005 - 21:10:00 GMT
RE: Termination rightMichael GrahamWed Jun 29 2005 - 20:30:30 GMT
Re: Termination rightTerry CarrollWed Jun 29 2005 - 20:30:30 GMT
Re: Termination rightJQ JohnsonThu Jun 30 2005 - 21:05:55 GMT
Termination rightElizabeth T RussellWed Jun 29 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Hollywood sign reduxBarbara RuhmannTue Jun 28 2005 - 20:25:01 GMT
Grokster lostJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jun 28 2005 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollMon Jun 27 2005 - 22:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Tue Jun 28 2005 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postJohn T. MitchellTue Jun 28 2005 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollTue Jun 28 2005 - 22:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollTue Jun 28 2005 - 22:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Wed Jun 29 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Hollywood sign reduxamalyah keshetMon Jun 27 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Mon Jun 27 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postTerry CarrollMon Jun 27 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postJohn EyeMon Jun 27 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Indigenous musicPhil LeonardMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Re: Re: Indigenous musicS. Martin KeletiFri Dec 09 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Re: reading a book to classTerry CarrollMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Re: reading a book to classJohn T. MitchellMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: OPEN LETTER TO THE FREELANCE COMMUNITY from attorney Charles ChalmersIrvin MuchnickMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 postPhares, Gloria C. (x2686)Mon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Gamescharles meyerFri Jun 24 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
RE: GamesCumbow, RobertTue Sep 18 2001 - 17:23:50 GMT
Re: GamesJonMEsq[_at_]aol.comMon Oct 15 2001 - 04:01:27 GMT
Re: Indigenous musicEdward BarrowFri Jun 24 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Re: Indigenous musicRobert LabossiereFri Jun 24 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
reading a book to classJohn EyeFri Jun 24 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
RE: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureMike BradleyThu Jun 23 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: Non-negotiated contracts about to get tough global enforcement support in Hague treaty negotiationsJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 23 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
RE: movie poster & book jacket imagesRobin L. DespainThu Jun 23 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasFri Jun 24 2005 - 20:00:32 GMT
Non-negotiated contracts about to get tough global enforcement support in Hague treaty negotiationsJames LoveWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Key Open Access Concepts (fwd)Stevan HarnadWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Why Are 'Associational Plaintiffs' in Bed With LexisNexis?Irvin MuchnickWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Indigenous musicKathy TadlockWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
movie poster & book jacket imagesLaura BakerWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
RE: Being Cut Out of the PictureJune PowerTue Jun 21 2005 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributedarticle?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTue Jun 21 2005 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Canadian copyright bill tabled todayWallace J.McLeanTue Jun 21 2005 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Canadian copyright bill tabled todayJohn T. MitchellTue Jun 21 2005 - 22:10:01 GMT
Being Cut Out of the PictureRobert S. NahasTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Canadian copyright bill tabled todaylesley[_at_]copyrightlaws.comTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Dodi SchultzTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Dodi SchultzWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson/Gale/Information Access CompanyJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson CorporationIrvin MuchnickTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
RE: Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Scott ButcherMon Jun 20 2005 - 20:30:46 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignScott ButcherMon Jun 20 2005 - 20:30:46 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Crimes of Thomson/Gale/Information Access CompanyIrvin MuchnickMon Jun 20 2005 - 19:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?JFNMon Jun 20 2005 - 19:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMon Jun 20 2005 - 19:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?JFNTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?Terry CarrollTue Jun 21 2005 - 22:10:01 GMT
Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Golden Gate Bridge copyright (was: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsNakerite[_at_]aol.comMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignHoward SchulzeTue Jun 21 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.comMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Gamescharles meyerMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignRobert PanzerFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignVance R. KovenFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: GamesJohn LevineFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: GamesRobert LabossiereWed Jun 22 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: GamesRobert LabossiereMon Jun 27 2005 - 17:15:15 GMT
Terms of serviceMJ DevaneyFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollThu Jun 16 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Gamescharles meyerThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignBert KragesThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignSteven JamarThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollThu Jun 16 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJohn LevineFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJohn R LevineMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignJFNMon Jun 20 2005 - 19:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignS. Martin KeletiWed Jun 22 2005 - 22:28:00 GMT
Transcribing Public Domain MaterialsNakerite[_at_]aol.comThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignChristopher A. MohrThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignR.G.McCrackenThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAnne Marie HawkinsThu Jun 16 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignAnne Marie HawkinsFri Jun 17 2005 - 21:53:30 GMT
RE: Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignElizabeth T RussellMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Call for speakers on rights metadata in IRs at ALA 2006Brian SurrattThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: 'We Are Mystified Why the Americans Settled For This'Irvin MuchnickThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: The Brits, Like the Canadians, Get ItIrvin MuchnickWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
RE: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignRobert PanzerWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignTerry CarrollWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood SignLaura Young BostWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetThu Jun 16 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Coipyright in the Hollywood SignR.G.McCrackenWed Jun 15 2005 - 15:05:40 GMT
Re: Coipyright in the Hollywood Signamalyah keshetMon Jun 20 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Gregory AharonianTue Jun 14 2005 - 18:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Jun 14 2005 - 18:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Joseph Pietro RioloWed Jun 15 2005 - 15:05:15 GMT
Version 58, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Mon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Mon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Robert LabossiereMon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Howard SchulzeMon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: game idea = copyright or patent?David DaileyMon Jun 13 2005 - 22:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberMon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?John LevineMon Jun 13 2005 - 22:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
Re: Re: game idea = copyright or patent?Keith TaberWed Jun 15 2005 - 22:05:30 GMT
RE: game idea = copyright or patent?Mike BradleyFri Jun 10 2005 - 19:00:00 GMT
Re: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Placeamalyah keshetFri Jun 10 2005 - 19:00:00 GMT
game idea = copyright or patent?Kathleen WilliamsonFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: UnSettlement's Crack 'Response Team'Irvin MuchnickFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
RE: ghost writingJessica R. FriedmanFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloMon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Ga llery and a Hard PlaceGROVES PeterFri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
ghost writingkathryn geibThu Jun 09 2005 - 22:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Galler y and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Jun 08 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceRobert PanzerWed Jun 08 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceManon RessThu Jun 09 2005 - 22:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceChristine L. SundtThu Jun 09 2005 - 22:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jun 10 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Mon Jun 13 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJFNWed Jun 08 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJoseph Pietro RioloWed Jun 08 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Jun 08 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard Place'Tim Arnold-Moore'Wed Jun 08 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Galler y and a Hard PlaceGROVES PeterWed Jun 08 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceJFNWed Jun 08 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Fwd: [AAUP-R] between the National Portrait Gallery and a Hard PlaceLaura Young BostTue Jun 07 2005 - 21:30:46 GMT
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsJohn LevineMon Jun 06 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsJFNMon Jun 06 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Software Screen ShotsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comTue Jun 07 2005 - 21:30:46 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Official Settlement Site -- A Bad JokeIrvin MuchnickMon Jun 06 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
RE: Software Screen ShotsMike BradleyFri Jun 03 2005 - 21:50:46 GMT
You Can Still Join the Live Webcast for "Pirates, Thieves and Innocents"Jack BoeveFri Jun 03 2005 - 21:50:46 GMT
Re: Re: Export control list?James BrennanThu Jun 02 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Software Screen ShotsLaliberte, Matthew DanaThu Jun 02 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Get your bets down on GroksterJFNThu Jun 02 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
RE: Export control list?Neil A. SmithThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?JFNThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Re: Export control list?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Re: Export control list?Mike OliverThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Re: Export control list?Terry CarrollThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Re: Export control list?Steven JamarThu Jun 02 2005 - 19:45:30 GMT
Export control list?Terry CarrollWed Jun 01 2005 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?JFNWed Jun 01 2005 - 02:45:01 GMT
Looking for Movie/TV Audit ExpertRich StimWed Jun 01 2005 - 02:45:01 GMT
Copyright Office adds RSS Feeds to its Web SitePeter M VankevichWed Jun 01 2005 - 02:45:01 GMT
FREELANCE RIGHTS: Objection Project StartsIrvin MuchnickWed Jun 01 2005 - 02:45:01 GMT
RE: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Sat May 28 2005 - 12:00:30 GMT
Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri May 27 2005 - 15:50:01 GMT
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Jun 01 2005 - 02:45:01 GMT
Re: Liability of Institutional Repository Managers?Charles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Jun 03 2005 - 21:50:46 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: More on the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickMon May 23 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Unmasking the UnSettlementIrvin MuchnickMon May 23 2005 - 17:35:30 GMT
Join the Live Webcast for "Pirates, Thieves and Innocents"Jack BoeveMon May 23 2005 - 17:35:30 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Hearing Next Tuesday; Highlights From Today's Reply BriefIrvin MuchnickFri May 20 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: Stimulating Open DiscussionIrvin MuchnickFri May 20 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesElizabeth T RussellFri May 20 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesDenis N. MagnussonFri May 20 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
RE: Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesDenis N. MagnussonMon May 23 2005 - 17:35:30 GMT
Use of Photographs in Derivative Artwork: Fair Use Question:Daniel SmithFri May 20 2005 - 21:40:30 GMT
Re: Use of Photographs in Derivative Artwork: Fair Use Question:Robert LabossiereTue May 24 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: A Day of Proving Continuing InfringementsIrvin MuchnickThu May 19 2005 - 20:49:59 GMT
RE: Cartoonist - Artist AgreementMike BradleyThu May 19 2005 - 20:49:59 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThu May 19 2005 - 20:49:59 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsJohn T. MitchellWed May 18 2005 - 22:00:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsTerry CarrollThu May 19 2005 - 20:49:59 GMT
RE: Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed May 18 2005 - 22:00:40 GMT
Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rightsEric GoldmanTue May 17 2005 - 22:30:30 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: '$2.5 Billion to $600 Billion'Irvin MuchnickTue May 17 2005 - 22:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"John T. MitchellTue May 17 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
RE: Patel's order & Distribution rightsEthan AckermanTue May 17 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Berne Convention Retroactivity IssueHeather VargasTue May 17 2005 - 21:30:01 GMT
Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesSteven JamarTue May 17 2005 - 18:59:59 GMT
Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesKeith TaberWed May 18 2005 - 22:00:40 GMT
Re: Cartoonist - Artist AgreementIvan HoffmanTue May 17 2005 - 18:59:59 GMT
RE: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Grierson, KevinTue May 17 2005 - 18:59:59 GMT
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"jottaviani[_at_]EdwardsAngell.comTue May 17 2005 - 18:59:59 GMT
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Mike OliverTue May 17 2005 - 18:59:59 GMT
Re: Distribution right vs. "make available for download"JFNWed May 18 2005 - 22:00:41 GMT
FREELANCERIGHTS: A Key Date in Writers' Rights HistoryIrvin MuchnickTue May 17 2005 - 17:30:29 GMT
Distribution right vs. "make available for download"Dan BallardTue May 17 2005 - 17:30:29 GMT
Cartoonist - Artist Agreementcharles meyerTue May 17 2005 - 17:30:29 GMT
Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesMonte HershbergerTue May 17 2005 - 17:30:29 GMT
Re: Selling Photographs of Buildings and LandscapesTyler OchoaThu Apr 12 2001 - 21:34:15 GMT
RE: TM comparison: EU v. USAlvin BorromeoMon May 16 2005 - 21:39:59 GMT
Re: Re: TM comparison: EU v. USKJKJKO[_at_]aol.comMon May 16 2005 - 21:39:59 GMT
Re: TM comparison: EU v. USLee BrettinFri May 13 2005 - 22:15:55 GMT
TM comparison: EU v. USKeith TaberFri May 13 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
'Long-Term Goal: A Real Royalty System' at FREELANCE RIGHTSIrvin MuchnickFri May 13 2005 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: EU directive "use in certain other cases of minor importance"Prof. Dr. Thomas HoerenThu May 12 2005 - 20:35:50 GMT
Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorMeghann MatwichukThu May 12 2005 - 20:35:50 GMT
From Irv Muchnick -- offer to investigate your infringementsIrvin MuchnickThu May 12 2005 - 20:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorSteven JamarWed May 11 2005 - 22:28:00 GMT
Re: high school student with copyright questionJohn LevineWed May 11 2005 - 22:28:00 GMT
EU directive "use in certain other cases of minor importance"Mike HoldernessWed May 11 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
RE: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorTim MarmanWed May 11 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorDenise Troll CoveyWed May 11 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
high school student with copyright questionRosalind TedfordWed May 11 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorVance R. KovenWed May 11 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
RE: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorAngela MottTue May 10 2005 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorJohn T. MitchellTue May 10 2005 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorSteven JamarTue May 10 2005 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 16 2005 - 21:39:59 GMT
Unreferenced Notes from an InstructorMeghann MatwichukTue May 10 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Academic Integrity symposiumJanet NepkieMon May 09 2005 - 22:20:00 GMT
Introducing "Settlement Question of the Week"Irvin MuchnickMon May 09 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
May 16 Deadline for Copyright SymposiumJack BoeveMon May 09 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
RE: Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri May 06 2005 - 20:55:15 GMT
RE: Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Schafer, RichardFri May 06 2005 - 21:10:45 GMT
Appeals court throws out the FCC "Broadcast flag"Terry CarrollFri May 06 2005 - 20:55:15 GMT
Wood Newton - Article I Section 8John T. MitchellThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"amalyah keshetThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Keith TaberThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Joseph Pietro RioloThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"John T. MitchellThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Re: "Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Lee BrettinThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
Launching FREELANCERIGHTS.blogspot.comIrvin MuchnickThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
iCopyright Quick TagMike ODonnellThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
"Intellectual Property in the Information Age..." online June 6-17 from the University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderWed May 04 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
"Bleep: Censoring Hollywood"Terry CarrollWed May 04 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyWed May 04 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyTue May 10 2005 - 20:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnTue May 03 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedTerry CarrollThu May 05 2005 - 22:25:00 GMT
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyMon May 02 2005 - 21:14:52 GMT
DC Bar IP Spring Reception on May 5Joy ButlerMon May 02 2005 - 21:14:52 GMT
Re: 2 - Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnFri Apr 29 2005 - 22:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnFri Apr 29 2005 - 22:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedTerry CarrollMon May 02 2005 - 21:14:52 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedKeith TaberTue May 03 2005 - 21:40:01 GMT
RE: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyFri Apr 29 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
2 - Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedAndrew SkinnerLopataFri Apr 29 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedJohnThu Apr 28 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedyfor author's trespass to create the workJohn T. MitchellThu Apr 28 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
RE: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workMichael GrahamThu Apr 28 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workTheodora MichaelsWed Apr 27 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workWallace J.McLeanWed Apr 27 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workKeith TaberThu Apr 28 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
RE: derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedMike BradleyWed Apr 27 2005 - 20:00:19 GMT
Call for papersHenry CarterWed Apr 27 2005 - 20:00:19 GMT
Judge Asked to Halt Copyright Class Action Settlement ApprovalIrvin MuchnickWed Apr 27 2005 - 20:00:19 GMT
Divestiture of copyright as remedy for author's trespass to create the workTodd OwersWed Apr 27 2005 - 20:00:19 GMT
Re: T-shirts and phrasesSteven JamarTue Apr 26 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
derivative work - rights to publisher and rights reservedAndrew SkinnerLopataTue Apr 26 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Web Blog PolicyKeith TaberTue Apr 26 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005James BrennanMon Apr 25 2005 - 22:15:15 GMT
T-shirts and phrasescarolMon Apr 25 2005 - 22:15:15 GMT
Web Blog PolicyLesley Ellen HarrisMon Apr 25 2005 - 22:15:15 GMT
Perceptions of Copyright Infringement -- A SymposiumJack BoeveMon Apr 25 2005 - 22:15:15 GMT
RE: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsDoug IsenbergFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Re: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsMikus GrinbergsFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Re: Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsJoseph Pietro RioloWed Jul 20 2005 - 21:20:00 GMT
Re: Work Made by Business Owner (for Hire?)GPoe[_at_]aol.comFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Keith TaberFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Terry CarrollWed Apr 27 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
Another Security BreachesJohn McNeillFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Editorial - Copyright Ownership in BlogsAmrithaThu Apr 21 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Terry CarrollThu Apr 21 2005 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005Nick ZalesFri Apr 22 2005 - 20:39:59 GMT
Re: Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionTerry CarrollWed Apr 20 2005 - 23:40:56 GMT
RE: Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionAdam GrossmanWed Apr 20 2005 - 23:40:56 GMT
Re: T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionCarol BusbyWed Apr 20 2005 - 21:40:10 GMT
Work Made by Business Owner (for Hire?)Mike TucciWed Apr 20 2005 - 21:40:10 GMT
Re: Re: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Karen CoyleTue Apr 19 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
Online course on legally using licensed contentLesley Ellen HarrisTue Apr 19 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
T-shirt Print and the blurry line between copyright trademark unfair competitionAdam GrossmanTue Apr 19 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
OT: Number of days left until January 1, 2019Joseph Pietro RioloMon Apr 18 2005 - 20:05:55 GMT
RE: Re: Library or ArchiveAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Apr 18 2005 - 20:05:55 GMT
RE: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Apr 18 2005 - 20:05:55 GMT
RE: LecturesMike BradleyFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: LecturesSteven JamarFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re LecturesGPoe[_at_]aol.comFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Vance R. KovenFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Vance R. KovenFri Apr 15 2005 - 21:20:15 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesVance R. KovenFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
RE: Re: LecturesJim GehrkeThu Apr 14 2005 - 22:35:00 GMT
RE: Re: LecturesPablo PalazziTue Apr 19 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesSheldon HalpernThu Apr 14 2005 - 22:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesPaul BernhardtThu Apr 14 2005 - 22:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesSteven JamarFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesTerry CarrollFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesSteven JamarWed Apr 20 2005 - 21:40:10 GMT
Re: Re: LecturesTerry CarrollWed Apr 20 2005 - 23:40:56 GMT
Re: LecturesRenee AnthuisThu Apr 14 2005 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: LecturesS. Martin KeletiFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: LecturesJohn T. MitchellFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
LecturesGraham HendersonThu Apr 14 2005 - 19:30:30 GMT
ISMIR2005: SUBMISSION EXTENDED TO 25th APRILProf. Geraint A. WigginsThu Apr 14 2005 - 18:00:05 GMT
Re: Library reservesJohn LevineWed Apr 13 2005 - 20:14:59 GMT
RE: Old MacDonald had a copyright?Garhart, NateTue Apr 12 2005 - 22:05:01 GMT
Re: Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Miryam Ehrlich WilliamsonTue Apr 12 2005 - 22:05:01 GMT
Re: Never-Never Land?Keith TaberTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
Old MacDonald had a copyright?Heather VargasTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Owner as author?Grierson, KevinTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Owner as author?Mike BradleyFri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Heather VargasTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Keith TaberWed Apr 13 2005 - 20:14:59 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?JohnWed Apr 13 2005 - 20:14:59 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Steven JamarWed Apr 13 2005 - 20:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Heather VargasThu Apr 14 2005 - 18:00:05 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Steven JamarThu Apr 14 2005 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Owner as author?Keith TaberMon Apr 18 2005 - 20:05:55 GMT
RE: Re: Library reservesSmith, Robert E.Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Library reservesGrierson, KevinTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Library reservesGibbons, LlewWed Apr 13 2005 - 20:55:45 GMT
RE: Re: A little help...Mike BradleyTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLMike BradleyTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Never-Never Land?Mike BradleyTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
RE: Re: Assignment of "Future Works"Burow, Heiko ETue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
Medline abstracts copyrighted or not?Joan .Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohn T. MitchellTue Apr 12 2005 - 20:55:02 GMT
Re: Owner as author?JohnMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Re: Assignment of "Future Works"S. Martin KeletiMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Re: Re: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLJohn T. MitchellMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
RE: Agence France-Presse Sues Google Inc.MinodierMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Comment on the 4 Country Submissions on the WIPO Development Agenda.James LoveMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Re: Re: Library or ArchiveAngie Drobnic HolanMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
RE: Never-Never Land?Duhaime, DianeMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
RE: Library reservesMike BradleyMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
IP Law & Gender Program Friday 4/15 at WCL in Washington DCJoshua SarnoffMon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Agence France-Presse Sues Google Inc.amalyah keshetFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [CNI- (C)] Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Library or ArchiveRichard WigginsFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
help with grays anatomyrosie harrisonFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Library or ArchivePaige_W_Roberts[_at_]SPFLDCOL.EDUFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Library or ArchiveLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Owner as author?Heather VargasFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Assignment of "Future Works"Burow, Heiko EFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Never-Never Land?Mike BradleyFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
RE: WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLMike BradleyFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
FYI DNA as Intellectual PropertyMike BradleyFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Library reservesJohnFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Re: A little help...Robert H. RicknerThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: A little help...David DaileyFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Re: A little help...Edward BarrowFri Apr 08 2005 - 23:20:51 GMT
Re: Re: A little help...rrickn1Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:50:59 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
WIPO: Friends of Development Submission - PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE FOR ALLJames LoveThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
Viewing of NFL or NCAA Football Game at FundraiserJim GehrkeThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
Library or ArchiveLaliberte, Matthew DanaThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
Re: PhD thesis question.Carol BusbyThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
New Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
Re: A little help...Steven JamarWed Apr 06 2005 - 22:15:11 GMT
Re: A little help...AlainThu Apr 07 2005 - 22:00:00 GMT
PhD thesis question.Penfield BooksWed Apr 06 2005 - 22:15:11 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnWed Apr 06 2005 - 22:15:11 GMT
(no subject)colinWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
RE: CNI-COPYRIGHT - Contest rulesDeborah CottonWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
San Francisco Bay Area Program SaturdayNeil A. SmithWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Re: music playlists - now recipesamalyah keshetWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Fair use?colinWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Legal issues in virtual reference online!Betsy AlexanderWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Copyright SymposiumJack BoeveWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Almost Perpetual Copyright On Sound Recordings Before 1972Joseph Pietro RioloWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
A little help...Marsha L. ZavarWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
N.Y. High Court Expands Common Law Copyright Protection for RecordingsJohn McNeillWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
(no subject)Nicholls, TimothyMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
RE: Re:was music playlists, now recipesFreya AndersonMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarFri Apr 01 2005 - 21:25:55 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanFri Apr 01 2005 - 21:45:16 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarFri Apr 01 2005 - 23:10:45 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnFri Apr 01 2005 - 23:10:45 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comFri Apr 01 2005 - 23:10:45 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsSteven JamarMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsWallace J.McLeanMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: music playlistsJohnWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
RE: Re: music playlistsPablo PalazziFri Apr 01 2005 - 19:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereFri Apr 01 2005 - 19:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: music playlistsJohn P. McNeillFri Apr 01 2005 - 23:10:45 GMT
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereMon Apr 04 2005 - 18:14:05 GMT
RE: Re: music playlistsWebb, JereWed Apr 06 2005 - 20:15:31 GMT
RE: music playlistsNeil A. SmithThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Copyright warning noticesroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
improper redaction of personal information in Copyright Office commentsTheodora MichaelsThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsKeith TaberThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsEdward BarrowThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsSteven JamarThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsBenedict O'MahoneyThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: music playlistsLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comThu Mar 31 2005 - 21:05:00 GMT
music playlistsWebb, JereWed Mar 30 2005 - 22:55:47 GMT
FW: Re: Copyright warning noticesRobert PanzerWed Mar 30 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
pro-bono help if possibleHector RojasWed Mar 30 2005 - 21:10:01 GMT
RE: Copyright warning noticesAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Mar 30 2005 - 20:20:00 GMT
RE: Copyright warning noticesRobert PanzerWed Mar 30 2005 - 20:20:00 GMT
Copyright warning noticescolinWed Mar 30 2005 - 17:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsGrierson, KevinSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohnSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:31 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsVance R. KovenFri Mar 25 2005 - 13:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Looking for ...........Laura Young BostFri Mar 25 2005 - 13:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: Looking for ...........Karen CoyleSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:31 GMT
RE: Looking for ...........Mike PhillipsFri Mar 25 2005 - 13:40:01 GMT
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comWed Mar 23 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Steven JamarSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:31 GMT
Re: Looking for ...........Robert H. RicknerWed Mar 23 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Re: Looking for ...........LKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comWed Mar 23 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Re: Looking for ...........John LevineSat Mar 26 2005 - 02:15:56 GMT
Looking for ...........Baldwin, GaraWed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsEdward BarrowWed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsSteven JamarWed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
Re: Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsHoward SchulzeWed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Mar 25 2005 - 13:40:01 GMT
RE: Re: CR in X-ray works- Expressive?Tim Arnold-MooreFri Mar 25 2005 - 13:40:01 GMT
Re: CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsMark DavisonTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Fwd: Bikram goes to the matSteven JamarTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Critique of "Open Source Licensing" book by Larry RosenJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
One-Day Copyright Conference in New York CityJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Symposium--Pirates, Thieves and Innocents: Perceptions of Copyright Infringement in the Digital AgeJack BoeveTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Use of Screen Shots - protection for Visual DisplayRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Mar 21 2005 - 21:45:02 GMT
CR in X-ray works- More of fireworks than opinionsRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Mar 21 2005 - 21:45:02 GMT
Critique of "Open Source Licensing" book by Larry RosenGregory AharonianMon Mar 21 2005 - 21:45:02 GMT
Invitation to Open Access Web CastHollyWillisMon Mar 21 2005 - 16:05:01 GMT
5th Annual Symposium on Intellectual PropertyOlga FrancoisFri Mar 18 2005 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsBenedict O'MahoneyFri Mar 18 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsMike OliverFri Mar 18 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Mar 21 2005 - 21:45:02 GMT
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsJohn LevineTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsDavid DaileyWed Mar 23 2005 - 22:05:00 GMT
Use of Screen Shots in Writing Software ManualsLalpdx1[_at_]aol.comFri Mar 18 2005 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksVance R. KovenFri Mar 18 2005 - 17:40:00 GMT
Copyright AgenciesBraxton, Bennie A.Fri Mar 18 2005 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThu Mar 17 2005 - 22:40:16 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksEdward BarrowFri Mar 18 2005 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanFri Mar 18 2005 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarFri Mar 18 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanFri Mar 18 2005 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksVance R. KovenThu Mar 17 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
RE: Copyright in X-ray worksGROVES PeterWed Mar 16 2005 - 21:35:16 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksBhatt, AnjanaWed Mar 16 2005 - 21:35:16 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksCone, Stella B.Wed Mar 16 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksJuan SaavedraWed Mar 16 2005 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 16 2005 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksDavid BozakThu Mar 17 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comThu Mar 17 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThu Mar 17 2005 - 22:40:16 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarThu Mar 17 2005 - 22:40:16 GMT
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksLKim[_at_]cohenlaw.comTue Mar 15 2005 - 23:25:50 GMT
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksWallace J.McLeanTue Mar 15 2005 - 23:25:50 GMT
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksS. Martin KeletiWed Mar 16 2005 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksSteven JamarWed Mar 16 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Copyright in X-ray worksDavid DaileyThu Mar 17 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Dlib Report on Berlin 3 on Open Access to appear todayStevan HarnadTue Mar 15 2005 - 22:35:45 GMT
Copyright in X-ray worksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiTue Mar 15 2005 - 22:35:45 GMT
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MUSIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (ISMIR) 2005 - 2nd CALL FOR PAPERSProf. Geraint A. WigginsMon Mar 14 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: publishing agentJohn LevineFri Mar 11 2005 - 17:40:16 GMT
Re: Re: publishing agentCopylaw[_at_]aol.comMon Mar 14 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
RE: publishing agentElizabeth T RussellWed Mar 09 2005 - 20:55:45 GMT
publishing agentTrademarksTue Mar 08 2005 - 22:45:31 GMT
Copyright Law and Distance Education in Developing CountriesNorah MugambiMon Mar 07 2005 - 21:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneSteven JamarFri Mar 04 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
E-Letter on Copyright, Licensing and E-Commerce NewsAmrithaFri Mar 04 2005 - 20:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneRobert PanzerFri Mar 04 2005 - 18:35:56 GMT
Open Access BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Mar 04 2005 - 18:35:56 GMT
Protection for quote under copyrightDodi SchultzThu Mar 03 2005 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Protection for quote under copyrightHeather VargasThu Mar 03 2005 - 16:45:30 GMT
Orphan WorksChristine L. SundtThu Mar 03 2005 - 16:45:30 GMT
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightGrierson, KevinWed Mar 02 2005 - 23:04:59 GMT
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightJune PowerWed Mar 02 2005 - 23:04:59 GMT
RE: Protection for quote under copyrightElizabeth T RussellWed Mar 02 2005 - 23:04:59 GMT
Re: Protection for quote under copyrightKenneth L. NgWed Mar 02 2005 - 23:04:59 GMT
Re: Protection for quote under copyrightTerry CarrollThu Mar 03 2005 - 16:45:30 GMT
Protection for quote under copyrightHeather VargasWed Mar 02 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Resources NeededJune PowerTue Mar 01 2005 - 21:40:41 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Resources NeededAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Mar 01 2005 - 21:40:41 GMT
RE: Copyright Resources NeededLorre SmithMon Feb 28 2005 - 22:26:05 GMT
Re: Open Access vs Copyleft?Stevan HarnadFri Feb 25 2005 - 21:10:30 GMT
Statutory damages as applied to file-sharing: unconstitutional?Cam BarkerFri Feb 25 2005 - 21:10:30 GMT
Re: : Enforcement of US Work in ForeignMike HoldernessFri Feb 25 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
Virtual reference online @ University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderFri Feb 25 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
ADA and CopyrightJune PowerThu Feb 24 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneBernard KatzThu Feb 24 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: FraudSteven JamarWed Feb 23 2005 - 22:05:55 GMT
Re: Re: FraudTerry CarrollWed Feb 23 2005 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: FraudKeith TaberThu Feb 24 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Re: FraudKeith TaberThu Feb 24 2005 - 18:35:31 GMT
Re: Music and School Networks/ComputersKeith TaberWed Feb 23 2005 - 22:05:55 GMT
RE: Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneMike TucciWed Feb 23 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
compulsory license requirements/royalty systems outside of the US and CanadaJulie StewartWed Feb 23 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: copyright infringement of silencePaul JonesTue Feb 22 2005 - 22:18:00 GMT
Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneTerry CarrollTue Feb 22 2005 - 22:00:01 GMT
Re: Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneHoward SchulzeWed Feb 23 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyright infringement of silenceTerry CarrollTue Feb 22 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: FraudAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Feb 22 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: FraudGrierson, KevinTue Feb 22 2005 - 22:00:45 GMT
RE: Re: FraudGrierson, KevinTue Feb 22 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT
RE: Re: FraudSchechterlawWed Feb 23 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
RE: Re: FraudJohn MitchellWed Feb 23 2005 - 18:00:00 GMT
Query: Industry Practice regarding use of film clips to illustrate news stories (not reviews)Grierson, KevinTue Feb 22 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
Enforcement of US Work in Foreign Country Under BerneMike TucciTue Feb 22 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: copyright infringement of silenceSchafer, RichardTue Feb 22 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
Upcoming webcast on graphics and fair useJanice PilchTue Feb 22 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
copyright infringement of silenceTheodora MichaelsMon Feb 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
RE: Re: Rights of broadcasters in US and other countriesJavier PerezMon Feb 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: patent marking requirements for softwareKeith TaberMon Feb 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: patent marking requirements for softwareKeith TaberSat Feb 19 2005 - 00:20:00 GMT
Re: FraudKeith TaberSat Feb 19 2005 - 00:20:00 GMT
RE: European Video'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Fri Feb 18 2005 - 19:00:01 GMT
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Karen CoyleThu Feb 17 2005 - 21:00:50 GMT
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Terry CarrollThu Feb 17 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Wallace J.McLeanThu Feb 17 2005 - 22:50:01 GMT
patent marking requirements for softwareTerry CarrollThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
Music and School Networks/ComputersRobert MillerThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
RE: Is (C) a copyright mark?Eric Von VorysThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
FraudNick ZalesThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
Version 57, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Thu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Keith TaberThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
Re: Is (C) a copyright mark?Terry CarrollThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
RE: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsMinodierThu Feb 17 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Abulhasan v. Uniroyal-GoodrichKeith TaberThu Feb 17 2005 - 19:30:29 GMT
Is (C) a copyright mark?John R. LevineWed Feb 16 2005 - 23:35:45 GMT
Copyright Resources NeededMike ODonnellWed Feb 16 2005 - 23:35:45 GMT
Re: Rights of broadcasters in US and other countriesMike HoldernessWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Notice suggestionsKeith TaberWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Notice suggestionsTerry CarrollWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Notice suggestionsKeith TaberWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
European VideoLaliberte, Matthew DanaWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Abulhasan v. Uniroyal-GoodrichTerry CarrollWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: Notice suggestionsLawrence RosenTue Feb 15 2005 - 23:25:00 GMT
Notice suggestionsKeith TaberTue Feb 15 2005 - 22:05:15 GMT
Rights of broadcasters in US and other countries regarding material they transmit but do not createJames LoveMon Feb 14 2005 - 20:25:50 GMT
Dedication to PublicPam ChestekMon Feb 14 2005 - 20:25:50 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright of received correspondenceScott L. BakerFri Feb 11 2005 - 21:45:31 GMT
RE: Fw: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSchafer, RichardFri Feb 11 2005 - 21:45:31 GMT
RE: Copyright of received correspondenceJohn MitchellFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
Fw: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Fri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright of received correspondenceKeith TaberFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
BMI v. Roger Miller Music, Inc.Theodora MichaelsFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWelch, John L.Thu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: BlogsSteven JamarThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWallace J.McLeanThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceJohnThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceS. Martin KeletiFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Copyright of received correspondenceLee TienMon Feb 14 2005 - 20:25:50 GMT
Re: Song Lyrics in Masters ThesisS. Martin KeletiThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
RE: BlogsWelch, John L.Thu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: BlogsWallace J.McLeanThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: BlogsJohnThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureGraham HendersonThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloWed Mar 23 2005 - 17:10:09 GMT
Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightManon RessThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightMarcia KeyserThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefssterlingTue Feb 15 2005 - 22:05:15 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberWed Feb 16 2005 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberSat Feb 19 2005 - 00:20:00 GMT
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureJoseph Pietro RioloThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureEdward BarrowThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Copyright Conference at Ball State UniversityDolak, FritzThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Looking for copy of WIPO comic book on CopyrightWelch, John L.Thu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Copyright of received correspondenceJames LoveThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Re: Berlin-3 Open Access Conference, Southampton, Feb 28 - Mar 1 2005Stevan HarnadThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
BlogsLaliberte, Matthew DanaThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureGraham HendersonWed Feb 09 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
Re: Use of a portion of a painting in a brochureMichael LippertTue Mar 22 2005 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsMike OliverWed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollWed Feb 09 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnTue Feb 08 2005 - 23:15:55 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsRoy MurphyWed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law Centerrrickn1Tue Feb 08 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CentersterlingTue Feb 08 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJoseph Pietro RioloWed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterDaniel BerlinWed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJoseph Pietro RioloThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Re: Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsRoy MurphyTue Feb 08 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
Re: Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollTue Feb 08 2005 - 23:15:55 GMT
Re:  Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comTue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterChristopher A. MohrTue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterJohn McNeillTue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterLawrence RosenTue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterLawrence RosenWed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerRobert PanzerMon Feb 07 2005 - 23:00:03 GMT
RE: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerElizabeth T RussellMon Feb 07 2005 - 23:00:03 GMT
Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterRobert H. RicknerMon Feb 07 2005 - 23:00:03 GMT
Re: Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterMike OliverTue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
Problems with GPL and Copyright & the new Law CenterGregory AharonianMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Fair Use in the Digital Age theatrical screening in DCJohn MitchellMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Song Lyrics in Masters ThesisRosalind TedfordMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSchafer, RichardFri Feb 04 2005 - 18:45:55 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsWergeles, Amy SpanTue Feb 08 2005 - 22:55:00 GMT
FW: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerChristine L. SundtFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSteven JamarFri Feb 04 2005 - 18:45:55 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJoseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Tue Feb 08 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnTue Feb 08 2005 - 23:15:55 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsPam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsTerry CarrollThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThu Feb 10 2005 - 22:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsKeith TaberFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsLaura QuilterFri Feb 11 2005 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerRoland ColeThu Feb 03 2005 - 20:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerHoward SchulzeFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerHoward SchulzeFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerTerry CarrollFri Feb 04 2005 - 18:45:55 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerSteven JamarMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Re: Photo of Historic MarkerTerry CarrollThu Feb 10 2005 - 20:35:00 GMT
Re: Photo of Historic MarkerDavid DaileyThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Photo of Historic Markergteague[_at_]lunet.eduThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Photo of Historic MarkerKeith TaberFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
RE: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsWergeles, Amy SpanThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
RE: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsacohenThu Feb 03 2005 - 20:20:01 GMT
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainJohnThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainSteven JamarThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainKeith TaberFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Movie Rights and the Public DomainJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJohnThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsSteven JamarThu Feb 03 2005 - 19:30:00 GMT
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Copyright Ownership of Legal Briefspamela[_at_]chestek.comThu Feb 03 2005 - 18:00:55 GMT
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsNick ZalesMon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:01 GMT
Re: Copyright Ownership of Legal BriefsNick ZalesThu Feb 10 2005 - 19:10:00 GMT
Photo of Historic MarkerScott ButcherThu Feb 03 2005 - 18:00:55 GMT
Movie Rights and the Public DomainO.PerezThu Feb 03 2005 - 18:00:55 GMT
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentHoward SchulzeThu Feb 03 2005 - 18:00:55 GMT
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentKeith TaberFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: SearchJoseph Pietro RioloThu Feb 03 2005 - 18:00:55 GMT
Re: Re: SearchKeith TaberFri Feb 04 2005 - 16:35:00 GMT
orphan worksCarl OppedahlWed Feb 02 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksKaren CoyleWed Feb 02 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Have idea, need patentGregory AharonianWed Feb 02 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
Re: Fw: Old Time Radio CopyrightJoseph Pietro RioloWed Feb 02 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
"Records, E-Records, E-Government" online @ University of MarylandBetsy AlexanderWed Feb 02 2005 - 18:35:00 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksJohn MitchellTue Feb 01 2005 - 21:40:15 GMT
RE: Re: Have idea, need patentGrierson, KevinTue Feb 01 2005 - 19:00:10 GMT
RE: Re: Have idea, need patentGrierson, KevinTue Feb 01 2005 - 23:50:00 GMT
Re: Have idea, need patentRich StimMon Jan 31 2005 - 21:50:40 GMT
Re: Have idea, need patentKeith TaberTue Feb 01 2005 - 21:40:15 GMT
Re: Have idea, need patentHoward SchulzeTue Feb 01 2005 - 23:50:00 GMT
Have idea, need patentJane BrazealMon Jan 31 2005 - 19:35:30 GMT
Re: Off Topic - Web Site Evaluation - Non Disclosure AgreementKeith TaberMon Jan 31 2005 - 19:35:30 GMT
RE: Fwd: U.S. Copyright Office, NewsNet Issue 246Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkMichael LandauFri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkJohn McNeillFri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkGrierson, KevinFri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkMike ODonnellFri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkJohn McNeillFri Jan 28 2005 - 23:20:00 GMT
Fwd: U.S. Copyright Office, NewsNet Issue 246AlanKabat[_at_]aol.comFri Jan 28 2005 - 18:15:01 GMT
Off Topic - Web Site Evaluation - Non Disclosure AgreementCharles MeyerFri Jan 28 2005 - 18:15:01 GMT
Live music recording pre-sale question...buckoone[_at_]email.comFri Jan 28 2005 - 18:15:01 GMT
Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksSheldon HalpernWed Jan 26 2005 - 21:55:15 GMT
Re: Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksKaren CoyleTue Feb 01 2005 - 19:00:10 GMT
Fair Use Fourth Factor and EbooksSmith, Robert E.Wed Jan 26 2005 - 21:10:40 GMT
Entrepreneur as Trademarkroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netWed Jan 26 2005 - 18:30:15 GMT
RE: Entrepreneur as TrademarkDan BallardFri Jan 28 2005 - 18:15:01 GMT
Re: Entrepreneur as TrademarkDan BallardMon Jan 31 2005 - 19:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fair UseAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Jan 26 2005 - 18:30:15 GMT
RE: Fair UseSchafer, RichardTue Jan 25 2005 - 22:05:15 GMT
RE: Fair UseJohn McNeillWed Jan 26 2005 - 18:30:15 GMT
Fair UseTamara R. ButlerTue Jan 25 2005 - 21:03:30 GMT
Re: Searchlee2001Mon Jan 24 2005 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohnMon Jan 24 2005 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJoseph Pietro RioloTue Feb 01 2005 - 23:50:00 GMT
RE: Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohn MitchellMon Jan 24 2005 - 20:50:00 GMT
Nolo Press BooksNick ZalesMon Jan 24 2005 - 18:40:00 GMT
Opening salvo fired in MGM v GroksterJohn MitchellMon Jan 24 2005 - 18:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof orpublic domainTerry CarrollFri Jan 21 2005 - 23:25:00 GMT
Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof orpublic domainTheodora MichaelsFri Jan 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesMarsha L. ZavarFri Jan 21 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
Use of copyrighted photo as TM specimen--copyright infringement?/apologies for cross-postingGrierson, KevinFri Jan 21 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesNeil A. SmithWed Jan 19 2005 - 18:25:45 GMT
Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesRosalind TedfordWed Jan 19 2005 - 16:40:00 GMT
Re: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesRory PattersonWed Jan 19 2005 - 16:40:00 GMT
RE: Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesMichael GrahamTue Jan 18 2005 - 23:10:05 GMT
TELEVISION: PROGRAMS : INTELLECTUAL: PROPERTY: LAW : HISTORY: UNITED STATES: CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: View of Eye on the Prize a Dimmed VisionDavid P. DillardTue Jan 18 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Copyright ed/Outreach to students on college/university campusesKarle-Zenith, AnneTue Jan 18 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Fw: Old Time Radio CopyrightmshumanTue Jan 18 2005 - 21:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: WallsJohnTue Jan 18 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: WallssterlingTue Feb 22 2005 - 18:40:30 GMT
Examples of Enforcement of Mandatory Deposit RequirementTed HammermanTue Jan 18 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
'Eyes on the Prize' MLK documentaryJames SalsmanTue Jan 18 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: WallsPhil LeonardMon Jan 17 2005 - 21:55:12 GMT
Re: WallsJohnMon Jan 17 2005 - 21:55:12 GMT
Re: Wallsamalyah keshetThu Jan 27 2005 - 21:00:04 GMT
Re: WallsVance R. KovenFri Jan 14 2005 - 20:40:45 GMT
Re: WallsSteven JamarFri Jan 14 2005 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: WallsRobert H. RicknerFri Jan 14 2005 - 22:40:00 GMT
WallsRobert A. BaronFri Jan 14 2005 - 18:25:01 GMT
re: WallsGregory AharonianFri Jan 14 2005 - 20:40:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Roland ColeThu Jan 13 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberThu Jan 13 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinMon Jan 17 2005 - 21:55:12 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jan 18 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainTerry CarrollTue Jan 18 2005 - 16:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberFri Jan 21 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainKeith TaberFri Jan 21 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinFri Jan 21 2005 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainTerry CarrollFri Jan 21 2005 - 21:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainJoseph Pietro RioloTue Feb 01 2005 - 19:00:10 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Richard WigginsThu Jan 13 2005 - 20:45:00 GMT
School archives questionsLisa SandersWed Jan 12 2005 - 20:30:30 GMT
Re: Archival Copy of Out of Print BookCindy.L.Rankin[_at_]aphis.usda.govWed Jan 12 2005 - 20:30:30 GMT
Re: Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainAner GovrinWed Jan 12 2005 - 17:45:46 GMT
Press Release: Berlin-3 Open Access Conference, Southampton, Feb 28 - Mar 1 2005Stevan HarnadWed Jan 12 2005 - 17:45:46 GMT
Archival Copy of Out of Print BookGraham HendersonWed Jan 12 2005 - 17:45:46 GMT
Old Time Radio Show copyright , lack thereof or public domainmshumanMon Jan 10 2005 - 21:45:00 GMT
Re: Public Domain/Copyright Term on the InternetWallace J.McLeanFri Jan 07 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
RE: Public Domain/Copyright Term on the Internetaminodier[_at_]gaod.comFri Jan 07 2005 - 19:50:00 GMT
Public Domain/Copyright Term on the InternetImagesFri Jan 07 2005 - 16:20:04 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThu Jan 06 2005 - 19:15:01 GMT
Virtual Reference on-line workshop-Jan.31Betsy AlexanderThu Jan 06 2005 - 19:15:01 GMT
Re: Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsJohnTue Jan 04 2005 - 20:25:00 GMT
RE: Breed standards for purebred dogsGrierson, KevinMon Jan 03 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: Public Domain Day 2005Terry CarrollMon Jan 03 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsSteven JamarMon Jan 03 2005 - 22:30:00 GMT
Re: Breed standards for purebred dogsJohnTue Jan 04 2005 - 20:25:00 GMT
Public Domain Day 2005Wallace J.McLeanMon Jan 03 2005 - 18:40:29 GMT
Breed standards for purebred dogsCindy CookeMon Jan 03 2005 - 18:40:29 GMT
Music and CopyrightAnthony McCannFri Dec 31 2004 - 22:30:03 GMT
Re: Musings on injunctive relief without liabilitySteven JamarThu Dec 30 2004 - 22:10:16 GMT
Musings on injunctive relief without liabilityJohn MitchellThu Dec 30 2004 - 19:10:14 GMT
RE: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Robert PanzerThu Dec 30 2004 - 19:10:14 GMT
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoTue Dec 28 2004 - 19:05:01 GMT
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Tim Arnold-MooreTue Jan 04 2005 - 20:25:00 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?pamela[_at_]chestek.comTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarWed Dec 29 2004 - 19:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Dec 30 2004 - 19:10:14 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarThu Dec 30 2004 - 22:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Roland ColeWed Jan 12 2005 - 20:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Keith TaberThu Jan 13 2005 - 22:15:00 GMT
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoMon Dec 27 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Alvin BorromeoTue Dec 28 2004 - 19:05:01 GMT
RE: Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Robert PanzerThu Dec 30 2004 - 19:10:14 GMT
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Richard WigginsMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Pam Chestek \(chestek.com\)Mon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Steven JamarMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
INTERNET: SEARCH: GOOGLE: ACS Sues Google Over ScholarDavid P. DillardFri Dec 24 2004 - 22:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloFri Dec 24 2004 - 22:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Christine SundtMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Terry CarrollMon Dec 27 2004 - 21:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarTue Dec 28 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Terry CarrollTue Dec 28 2004 - 19:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloWed Dec 29 2004 - 19:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Steven JamarWed Dec 29 2004 - 22:35:00 GMT
Re: Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Joseph Pietro RioloThu Dec 30 2004 - 19:10:14 GMT
Any friendlier school photographer out there?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Dec 24 2004 - 22:35:30 GMT
Re: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Paul GoughMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
RE: Any friendlier school photographer out there?Don WinterMon Dec 27 2004 - 18:30:00 GMT
Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!James SalsmanWed Dec 22 2004 - 23:15:15 GMT
Re: Coloring Books Copyright question..!Carl OppedahlFri Dec 24 2004 - 22:35:30 GMT
RE: Coloring Books Copyright question..!John MitchellWed Dec 22 2004 - 20:55:00 GMT
Coloring Books Copyright question..!Raza Ahmed SiddiquiWed Dec 22 2004 - 15:40:20 GMT
Trademark attorney feesTerry CarrollMon Dec 20 2004 - 20:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellKeith TaberFri Dec 17 2004 - 23:40:51 GMT
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellJohn LevineMon Dec 20 2004 - 20:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellJames SalsmanFri Dec 17 2004 - 23:40:51 GMT
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellEric GoldmanFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellEric GoldmanFri Dec 17 2004 - 23:40:51 GMT
Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellDavid StewartFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Google -- Copyrighted Works as WellKaren CoyleFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDar Small GilliganThu Dec 16 2004 - 23:25:00 GMT
RE: Re: Lawsuit claiming Software not copyrightable (was Re: On a completely unrelated note)Christopher A. MohrThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellAlvin BorromeoThu Dec 16 2004 - 23:25:00 GMT
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellGrierson, KevinMon Dec 20 2004 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellMinodierTue Dec 21 2004 - 23:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Church RecordingsCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
Re: Misuse of Copyright NoticeKeith TaberThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterSteven JamarWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
RE: Misuse of Copyright NoticeFreya AndersonWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Re: Google -- Copyright Works as WellKaren CoyleWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Re: Free Concerts at a Municipal AirportS. Martin KeletiWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Re: Lawsuit claiming Software not copyrightable (was Re: On a completely unrelated note)Mike OliverWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDodi SchultzWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDodi SchultzThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
Re: On a completely unrelated noteJoseph Pietro RioloWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: On a completely unrelated noteTerry CarrollWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: Copyright expiration for journals?Stevan HarnadWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
GoogleNakerite[_at_]aol.comWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: GoogleDavid P. DillardWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Misuse of Copyright NoticeNakerite[_at_]aol.comTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
Assign or License Copyright to Extracted ChapterDar Small GilliganTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
Version 56, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Tue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
On a completely unrelated noteChristopher A. MohrTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
RE: Re: Legal questionsChristine L. SundtTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Re: Legal questionsSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
RE: Re: Legal questionsGrierson, KevinWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: Re: Legal questionsWallace J.McLeanTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Why design patents ? was: Corporate bullying du jourAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Tue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Web Site a Collective Work?Jessica R. FriedmanTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
Announcement: 3rd Digital Rights Management Conference 2005Stefan BechtoldTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Magic Language -- future rightsJohn P. McNeillThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Legal questionsJohn BridgesThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Legal questionsDavid StewartThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
RE: Legal questionsChristopher A. MohrThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
RE: Legal questionsRobert PanzerThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
RE: Legal questionsSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Web Site a Collective Work?Mike BradleyThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Re: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Thu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsChristopher A. MohrTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
RE: Re: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJohn MitchellFri Dec 17 2004 - 23:40:51 GMT
Legal questionsHector RojasWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Magic Language -- future rightsDavid DaileyWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Union list follow-upJames SalsmanWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
RE: Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeyMelissa Smith LevineSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Sun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike BradleySun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
Re: Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeySteven JamarSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
Re:  Re: Corporate bullying du jourAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Re: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneySun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Copyright Magic LanguageJohn P. McNeillSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Copyright Magic LanguageMike BradleySun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
Ode to the 1909 Act (was: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Fri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
RE: Re: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonThu Dec 09 2004 - 23:20:01 GMT
Copyrights - Charlie Chaplin - Laurel HardeyRaza Ahmed SiddiquiFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
Copyright Magic LanguageMike PhillipsFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
Central Repository (Was Scope Modifiers)Mike BradleyThu Dec 02 2004 - 07:50:01 GMT
Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberThu Dec 02 2004 - 07:50:01 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourRich StimWed Dec 01 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKenneth L. NgThu Dec 02 2004 - 07:50:01 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourJames SalsmanWed Dec 08 2004 - 01:17:31 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourJames SalsmanTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: Corporate bullying du jourKeith TaberThu Dec 16 2004 - 18:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in IntellectualProperty DeclarationsMike ODonnellWed Dec 01 2004 - 20:45:06 GMT
RE: Corporate bullying du jourFreya AndersonWed Dec 01 2004 - 20:45:06 GMT
RE: Corporate bullying du jourJohn MitchellWed Dec 01 2004 - 20:45:06 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Pro perty DeclarationsMelissa Smith LevineTue Nov 30 2004 - 22:33:05 GMT
Corporate bullying du jourTerry CarrollTue Nov 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Critique of APS Critique of NIH ProposalStevan HarnadTue Nov 30 2004 - 21:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Roy MurphyTue Nov 30 2004 - 21:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?sterlingFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarSun Dec 05 2004 - 10:40:02 GMT
CFP: International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 2005Prof. Geraint A. WigginsMon Nov 29 2004 - 19:05:00 GMT
RE: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 29 2004 - 19:05:00 GMT
Kahle v. Ashcroft DismissedJoseph Pietro RioloMon Nov 29 2004 - 19:05:00 GMT
RE: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneySat Nov 27 2004 - 08:35:32 GMT
RE: Who has the right to affix copyrightnotices?MJ DevaneyTue Nov 30 2004 - 22:33:05 GMT
Course Announcement: Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaSat Nov 27 2004 - 08:35:32 GMT
RE: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?MJ DevaneyThu Nov 25 2004 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarThu Nov 25 2004 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarWed Nov 24 2004 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?James SalsmanThu Nov 25 2004 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?Steven JamarSat Nov 27 2004 - 08:35:32 GMT
Re: Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?David DaileyMon Nov 29 2004 - 19:05:00 GMT
Re: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?James SalsmanTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
Copyright / trade mark overlapDavid StewartTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
Re: GPL and the District Court of MunichJoseph Pietro RioloTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
RE: Who has the right to affix copyright notices?John MitchellTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
Who has the right to affix copyright notices?MJ DevaneyMon Nov 22 2004 - 21:30:00 GMT
French copyright duration wartime extension casesSpangler, GlenMon Nov 22 2004 - 21:30:00 GMT
RE: Re: Gallup v KenexaRobert KasunicFri Nov 19 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
RE: Re: Gallup v KenexaMinodierMon Nov 22 2004 - 16:20:50 GMT
IC Mask layout Copyright protectionrob royThu Nov 18 2004 - 21:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKeith TaberThu Nov 18 2004 - 21:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKeith TaberFri Nov 19 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollMon Nov 22 2004 - 16:20:50 GMT
University of Maryland on-line courses in virtual reference and legal issuesBetsy AlexanderThu Nov 18 2004 - 21:30:17 GMT
Re: Intellectual Property Protection ActJames SalsmanTue Nov 16 2004 - 23:20:15 GMT
Updated iCopyright Toolbar AvailableMike ODonnellTue Nov 16 2004 - 22:00:36 GMT
21 Questions on WIPO Broadcast/cablecast/webcast TreatyJames LoveTue Nov 16 2004 - 22:00:36 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaTue Nov 16 2004 - 22:00:36 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellMon Nov 22 2004 - 23:15:00 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellTue Nov 30 2004 - 21:15:00 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Wed Dec 01 2004 - 20:45:06 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsMike ODonnellWed Dec 01 2004 - 20:45:06 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property Declarationstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Dec 14 2004 - 18:30:21 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTim Arnold-MooreFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTim Arnold-MooreFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
Intellectual Property Protection ActDavid DaileyTue Nov 16 2004 - 22:00:36 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarMon Nov 15 2004 - 20:50:50 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollTue Nov 16 2004 - 23:20:15 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsDavid DaileyWed Nov 17 2004 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleMon Nov 22 2004 - 16:20:50 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarMon Nov 22 2004 - 21:30:00 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationssterlingMon Nov 22 2004 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleTue Nov 23 2004 - 20:30:56 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarTue Nov 23 2004 - 21:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsChristopher GwynWed Nov 24 2004 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJames SalsmanWed Nov 24 2004 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleWed Nov 24 2004 - 21:35:16 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsSteven JamarThu Nov 25 2004 - 16:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsKaren CoyleTue Nov 30 2004 - 22:33:05 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJoseph Pietro RioloThu Dec 02 2004 - 07:50:01 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsTerry CarrollTue Dec 14 2004 - 22:10:05 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJoseph Pietro RioloWed Dec 15 2004 - 17:25:10 GMT
Re: Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJeremy G ByrneFri Dec 17 2004 - 16:20:00 GMT
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsJames SalsmanFri Nov 12 2004 - 23:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaArtCop[_at_]aol.comFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaAmy CohenMon Nov 15 2004 - 21:35:11 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaTerry CarrollMon Nov 15 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v Kenexajohn nobleMon Nov 15 2004 - 23:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Tue Nov 16 2004 - 22:00:36 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v Kenexajohn nobleThu Nov 18 2004 - 21:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: Gallup v KenexaCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Fri Nov 19 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsSteven JamarFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaMon Nov 15 2004 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: FYI: RFC / Scope Modifiers in Intellectual Property DeclarationsI.R.MaturanaFri Dec 03 2004 - 19:35:57 GMT
Re: Gallup v KenexaJoseph Pietro RioloFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
Re: Gallup v KenexaTerry CarrollFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
Re: Gallup v KenexaCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMon Nov 15 2004 - 20:50:50 GMT
RE: Gallup v KenexaEric Von VorysFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
French 1997 extension retroactive?Spangler, GlenThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Gallup v KenexaacohenThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Keith TaberThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Edward BarrowThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: French 1997 extension retroactive?Aner GovrinFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
RE: Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsMike BradleyThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsSteven JamarWed Nov 10 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
French 1997 extension retroactive?Spangler, GlenWed Nov 10 2004 - 20:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanWed Nov 10 2004 - 20:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightLinda CrippsWed Nov 10 2004 - 20:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKeith TaberThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:25:14 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKaren CoyleFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:40:30 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightKeith TaberMon Nov 15 2004 - 17:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightJames SalsmanMon Nov 15 2004 - 17:40:00 GMT
Archived Discussion Board PostingsLaliberte, Matthew DanaWed Nov 10 2004 - 20:55:45 GMT
Re: Archived Discussion Board PostingsJQ JohnsonThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:24:59 GMT
Re: Distance Learning and CopyrightSteven JamarTue Nov 09 2004 - 18:25:00 GMT
Re: Fwd: [copyright] Gutenberg project in the newsTerry CarrollTue Nov 09 2004 - 18:25:00 GMT
here it is folks regs to control networks worldwidemeMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
Trump Architect SuitMike PhillipsMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
RE: Free Concerts at a Municipal AirportMike BradleyMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
Fwd: [copyright] Gutenberg project in the newsCarl OppedahlMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
RE: Copyright on interviewsDan BallardFri Nov 05 2004 - 22:50:26 GMT
Free Concerts at a Municipal Airportknasca[_at_]rochester.rr.comFri Nov 05 2004 - 22:50:26 GMT
Re: Copyright on InterviewsPaige_W_Roberts[_at_]SPFLDCOL.EDUThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:40:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsJohn P. McNeillThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:40:00 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsevbThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:55:15 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright on InterviewsJessica R. FriedmanThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:55:15 GMT
[Net-Gold] COUNTRIES: CANADA : COPYRIGHT: ISSUES: Periodical Writers Association of Canada on the New CanWest Freelance ContractDavid P. DillardThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright on InterviewsKathleen WilliamsonThu Nov 04 2004 - 20:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright on Interviewsjohn nobleFri Nov 05 2004 - 22:50:26 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright on InterviewssterlingMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
RE: Copyright on InterviewsJessica R. FriedmanWed Nov 03 2004 - 21:20:05 GMT
Copyright on InterviewsDrRhetoric[_at_]aol.comWed Nov 03 2004 - 21:10:50 GMT
Re: Copyright on Interviewsirm[_at_]in3activa.comMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:04:59 GMT
Re: Re: HypotheticalsterlingMon Nov 01 2004 - 19:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: HypotheticalKeith TaberMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
RE: Re: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieMon Nov 01 2004 - 19:20:45 GMT
RE: Re: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 01 2004 - 19:20:45 GMT
RE: Re: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\)Mon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
RE: Re: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
RE: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Mike BradleyMon Nov 01 2004 - 19:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: Government copyrightWallace J.McLeanFri Oct 29 2004 - 22:15:01 GMT
RE: Government copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Oct 29 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
RE: Government copyrightKlein, BonnieFri Oct 29 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: HypotheticalJames SalsmanFri Oct 29 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Project Gutenberg in U.S. threatened over actions of PG AustraliaJon NoringFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:34:59 GMT
Government copyrightWallace J.McLeanFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:34:59 GMT
Re: Re: Help on contractJane BrazealFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:34:59 GMT
Re: Re: Help on contractKeith TaberFri Oct 29 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
HypotheticalCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:34:59 GMT
Re: HypotheticalBPTFri Jan 26 1996 - 20:19:07 GMT
Re: HypotheticalJUDITHFri Jan 26 1996 - 22:09:10 GMT
Re: Re: Refusal to Register CopyrightKeith TaberFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:34:59 GMT
A parody of "Waiting for Godot" for those without prostatesGregory AharonianThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Help on contractKeith TaberThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Chris SprigmanThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsChristopher A. MohrThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
RE: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsMinodierTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Refusal to Register CopyrightPeter M VankevichThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Vance R. KovenThu Oct 28 2004 - 05:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsWallace J.McLeanThu Oct 28 2004 - 05:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsamalyah keshetMon Nov 01 2004 - 19:20:45 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsWallace J.McLeanMon Nov 01 2004 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardMon Nov 01 2004 - 23:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsDavid DaileyTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKeith TaberTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsTerry CarrollTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
Re: Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKaren CoyleTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:50:30 GMT
Refusal to Register CopyrightBurow, Heiko EThu Oct 28 2004 - 05:20:18 GMT
Breakthrough: Finally, a truly effective IP theft deterrentamalyah keshetThu Oct 28 2004 - 05:20:18 GMT
Help on contractJane BrazealThu Oct 28 2004 - 05:20:18 GMT
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsevbWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsMinodierWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
RE: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsJohn MitchellThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKeith TaberWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsAlfred C. YenWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsSteven JamarWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsAnthony McCannWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsKaren CoyleThu Oct 28 2004 - 22:20:00 GMT
CONFERENCE: COPYRIGHT & PRIVACY: COLLISION OR COEXISTENCE?, JMLS, CHICAGO, NOV. 18, 2004Couchman.Bruce[_at_]ic.gc.caWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Does anyone have access to the recent BPI decision in the U.K.?Chris SprigmanWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Version 55, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
RE: Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseScott L. BakerWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
RE: Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseMike BradleyWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
Sound recording chain of titleScott L. BakerWed Oct 27 2004 - 05:45:00 GMT
I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardTue Oct 26 2004 - 08:05:51 GMT
Re: I-Safe Intellectual property lessonsNancy WillardTue Oct 26 2004 - 08:05:51 GMT
Re: Church RecordingsBrock Shinen, Esq.Sat Oct 23 2004 - 06:50:03 GMT
Re: Church RecordingsS. Martin KeletiWed Dec 15 2004 - 23:05:30 GMT
Call for NominationsLee, DanSat Oct 23 2004 - 06:50:03 GMT
Registration After Movie Release Before DVD/Video ReleaseStephen FillerSat Oct 23 2004 - 06:50:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: archival copies as fair useJoseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Church RecordingsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
RE: archival copies as fair useAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Announcement: 3rd Digital Rights Management Conference 2005Stefan BechtoldFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
archival copies as fair useSteven JamarThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
RE: Intellectual Property Issues in Undergraduate EducationZavar, AlbertThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish serviceproviders?Karen CoyleThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Dawn BilyeuThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
OT Thread HiJack: Stickers on Rented DVDs (Was: Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanishserviceproviders?)Keith TaberWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanishserviceproviders?Wallace J.McLeanWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Conference on Creative Consequences of the Rights Clearance CultureDavid GreenWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Intellectual Property Issues in Undergraduate EducationLinda CrippsWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
RE: Re: Royalty for Free Concertstja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
RE: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJohn MitchellThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Javier PerezTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
music licensing questionDan BallardTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
DC Bar Fall Reception for IP Attorneys - October 21Joy R. ButlerSun Oct 17 2004 - 20:00:52 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free Concertsvrkoven[_at_]world.std.comSun Oct 17 2004 - 20:00:52 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsDaniel RoeSun Oct 17 2004 - 20:00:52 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsyapperSun Oct 17 2004 - 20:01:03 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJavier PerezTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsWallace J.McLeanTue Oct 19 2004 - 06:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJoseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsWallace J.McLeanThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
Re: Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: Royalty for Free ConcertsJavier PerezFri Oct 15 2004 - 01:50:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanFri Oct 15 2004 - 01:50:03 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleSun Oct 17 2004 - 20:00:52 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloWed Oct 20 2004 - 03:30:16 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Karen CoyleThu Oct 21 2004 - 00:28:32 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Wallace J.McLeanFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: Re: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?Wallace J.McLeanFri Oct 22 2004 - 05:49:59 GMT
Re: Peter Pan vs. Mickey MouseCalle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S]Fri Oct 15 2004 - 01:50:03 GMT
Re: Joint Ownership in FranceS. Martin KeletiFri Oct 15 2004 - 01:50:03 GMT
Re: What's the turnaround time on registrations these days?Mike OliverFri Oct 15 2004 - 01:50:03 GMT
What's the turnaround time on registrations these days?Terry CarrollThu Oct 14 2004 - 07:31:02 GMT
Joint Ownership in FranceDenariusDeiThu Oct 14 2004 - 07:31:02 GMT
RE: archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?evbThu Oct 14 2004 - 07:31:02 GMT
Peter Pan vs. Mickey MouseWallace J.McLeanThu Oct 14 2004 - 07:31:02 GMT
Early Registration!: 2004 TEACH Act Online WorkshopOlga FrancoisThu Oct 14 2004 - 07:31:02 GMT
Royalty for Free ConcertsAdriel YapTue Oct 12 2004 - 17:20:00 GMT
archival copies of DVDs via Spanish service providers?James SalsmanTue Oct 12 2004 - 17:20:00 GMT
Re: Form Copyrightable?Ivan HoffmanFri Oct 08 2004 - 18:05:30 GMT
Form Copyrightable?Shawn MoroneyThu Oct 07 2004 - 18:05:30 GMT
Re: Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsTerry CarrollThu Oct 07 2004 - 16:50:00 GMT
RE: Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsMike BradleyThu Oct 07 2004 - 16:50:00 GMT
Question re: recording a security interest in copyrightsKevin GriersonWed Oct 06 2004 - 22:15:15 GMT
Re: Who owns this claim?S. Martin KeletiTue Oct 05 2004 - 20:30:40 GMT
RE: Re: Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Oct 05 2004 - 17:00:15 GMT
Re: IP Research Fellowships at Rutgers University 2005-6Andras NagyMon Oct 04 2004 - 21:55:45 GMT
Re: Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisCarl OppedahlMon Oct 04 2004 - 20:40:50 GMT
IP Research Fellowships at Rutgers University 2005-6davidlgreenMon Oct 04 2004 - 20:40:50 GMT
Re: Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollMon Oct 04 2004 - 19:15:00 GMT
Re: Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollTue Oct 05 2004 - 17:00:15 GMT
Reality Show Treatment/SynopsisCharles MeyerMon Oct 04 2004 - 19:15:00 GMT
WIPO backs Development Agenda, and new approaches to innovation and creativityJames LoveMon Oct 04 2004 - 19:15:00 GMT
Re: Diebold loses DMCA caseWallace J.McLeanFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:45:00 GMT
RE: copyright questionMike BradleyFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
RE: copyright questionRobert PanzerFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
Diebold loses DMCA caseTerry CarrollFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
Re: copyright questionListsFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
Re: copyright questionSteven JamarFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEric GoldmanFri Oct 01 2004 - 17:35:00 GMT
copyright questionAndras NagyFri Oct 01 2004 - 17:35:00 GMT
Re: copyright questionKarjala, DennisTue May 07 1996 - 18:21:00 GMT
Re: copyright questionPaul HealdWed May 08 1996 - 14:43:15 GMT
Re: copyright questionS. Keith GrahamWed May 08 1996 - 14:56:02 GMT
Re: copyright questionNick FinkeThu May 09 1996 - 16:04:16 GMT
re: copyright questionOliver, DerricWed Jun 26 1996 - 18:00:31 GMT
re: copyright questionBill MckennaMon Jul 01 1996 - 13:17:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesIvan HoffmanFri Oct 01 2004 - 15:15:39 GMT
Re: Copyright of Editorial ChangesSteven JamarFri Oct 01 2004 - 15:15:39 GMT
Re: Copyright of Editorial ChangesIvan HoffmanFri Oct 01 2004 - 15:15:39 GMT
Re: California Law on copying "commercial" files?john nobleThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
Re: California Law on copying "commercial" files?john nobleThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
Re: Re: Reproducing Academic Articlesjohn nobleThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
Re: Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEric GoldmanThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
Re: Green, Gold, Elsevier, SpringerStevan HarnadThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
Copyright of Editorial ChangesMike BradleyThu Sep 30 2004 - 22:15:16 GMT
California Law on copying "commercial" files?Karen CoyleThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
RE: Reproducing Academic ArticlesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
RE: Reproducing Academic ArticlesJan VelteropThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesIvan HoffmanThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesEdward BarrowThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesTerry CarrollThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesSteven JamarThu Sep 30 2004 - 17:45:46 GMT
Re: "All rights reserved"Mike HoldernessWed Sep 29 2004 - 22:20:40 GMT
Reproducing Academic ArticlesNakerite[_at_]aol.comWed Sep 29 2004 - 22:20:40 GMT
Re: Reproducing Academic ArticlesTerry CarrollFri Oct 01 2004 - 20:25:45 GMT
Copyright plug-in for IE browser available for testingMike ODonnellWed Sep 29 2004 - 22:20:40 GMT
Who owns this claim?Vance R. KovenWed Sep 29 2004 - 22:20:40 GMT
IP in Academia 2004, Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisTue Sep 28 2004 - 22:15:49 GMT
Re: Idea/expression dichotomySteven JamarMon Sep 27 2004 - 03:45:16 GMT
RV: Moral Rights of Translations in Chinairm[_at_]in3activa.comThu Sep 23 2004 - 15:50:19 GMT
RE: Re: Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsJohn MitchellWed Sep 22 2004 - 21:35:00 GMT
Re: Liability LimitationSteven JamarWed Sep 22 2004 - 21:35:00 GMT
Re: Liability Limitationjohn nobleWed Sep 22 2004 - 21:35:00 GMT
Re: Liability LimitationKevin GriersonWed Sep 22 2004 - 21:35:00 GMT
Celebrity Image, Likeness & Estate LicensingChrisWed Sep 22 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeSteven JamarWed Sep 22 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 22 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeListsThu Sep 23 2004 - 22:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanMon Sep 27 2004 - 03:45:16 GMT
Liability LimitationMike PhillipsWed Sep 22 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Debate over WIPO futureJames LoveWed Sep 22 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & State LawTerry CarrollTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeTerry CarrollTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: All Rights Reserved NoticeWallace J.McLeanTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:45:00 GMT
Re: All Rights Reserved Noticejohn nobleTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:45:00 GMT
All Rights Reserved Noticelinda.pickering[_at_]sealedair.comMon Sep 20 2004 - 21:10:01 GMT
Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & State LawJoy R. ButlerMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Digital copies and section 108Karen CoyleMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsKeith TaberMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Dickens and such (was Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's Novel)Keith TaberMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Digital copies and section 108Keith TaberSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
RE: State-level protections? (was Re: Re: Sound Recordings)Juan Saavedra CASTROSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
Analog Reconversion of DVD materialsRoss, AndrewSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
Re: Re: Sound RecordingsListsSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
Moral Rights of Translations in ChinaKenneth LiuSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
RE: Digital copies and section 108John MitchellSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
RE: Digital copies and section 108Robert KasunicSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
State-level protections? (was Re: Re: Sound Recordings)Jon NoringThu Sep 16 2004 - 01:45:51 GMT
Re: Sound RecordingsVance R. KovenThu Sep 16 2004 - 00:31:15 GMT
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Sep 16 2004 - 00:31:15 GMT
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsCone, Stella B.Sun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
RE: Re: copying for internal patronsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Sep 20 2004 - 21:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionJason SantarcangeloThu Sep 16 2004 - 00:31:15 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionMike OliverThu Sep 16 2004 - 01:45:51 GMT
Digital copies and section 108Karen CoyleThu Sep 16 2004 - 00:31:15 GMT
Re: GPL and the District Court of MunichJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 13 2004 - 21:25:00 GMT
Re: Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Nick ZalesMon Sep 13 2004 - 21:25:00 GMT
Re: Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionKeith TaberMon Sep 13 2004 - 21:25:00 GMT
Sound RecordingsVerena.Haegler[_at_]hoerverlag.deMon Sep 13 2004 - 21:25:00 GMT
Re: Sound Recordingspostd%smtpgate[_at_]law.georgetown.eduFri Mar 17 1995 - 18:52:48 GMT
Re: Sound RecordingsWilliam KeatingSat Mar 18 1995 - 13:52:13 GMT
Re: Sound RecordingsTyler OchoaTue Oct 03 2000 - 17:28:48 GMT
Re: Sound RecordingsStephen FishmanTue Oct 03 2000 - 22:33:02 GMT
RE: Sound RecordingsMichael SeadleThu Oct 05 2000 - 13:15:46 GMT
--> Re: RE: Sound RecordingsTyler OchoaWed Oct 11 2000 - 18:20:32 GMT
Re: Re: copying for internal patronsRoger BroadieMon Sep 13 2004 - 21:25:00 GMT
RE: Re: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"John MitchellFri Sep 10 2004 - 20:55:59 GMT
Copyright --Who Can Bring an Infringement ActionJason SantarcangeloFri Sep 10 2004 - 20:55:59 GMT
Victory for the NIH open access plan in the House (fwd)Stevan HarnadFri Sep 10 2004 - 18:15:50 GMT
Re: Re: German copyright questionMike HoldernessFri Sep 10 2004 - 18:15:50 GMT
RE: Re: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesJohn MitchellFri Sep 10 2004 - 18:15:50 GMT
Re: Re: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesSteven JamarThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
Re: Re: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Joseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Open Access & CNIJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
RE: Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesThomas-Clark, JillWed Sep 08 2004 - 20:04:10 GMT
Re: Re: Defamation - Web LinkDavid DaileyWed Sep 08 2004 - 18:50:01 GMT
RE: [CYBERIA] Sixth Circuit "bright line" for music "sampling"Ethan AckermanWed Sep 08 2004 - 15:30:30 GMT
Re: Defamation - Web LinkMichael LandauWed Sep 08 2004 - 15:30:30 GMT
Defamation - Web LinkCharles MeyerTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Re: German copyright questionThomas HoerenTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Re: German copyright questionCopylaw[_at_]aol.comTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Open Access & CNIKlein, BonnieTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Reminder: Online Copyright CoursesAmrithaTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
German copyright questionCarol BusbyTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
GPL and the District Court of MunichThomas HoerenTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
Re: copying for internal patronsSteven JamarTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
Re: Re: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH) -Gov InfoJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
RE: Re: Skylink decidedAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Sep 03 2004 - 14:50:45 GMT
RE: Re: Skylink decidedMichael GrahamTue Sep 07 2004 - 02:50:01 GMT
RE: copying for internal patronsKlein, BonnieFri Sep 03 2004 - 14:50:45 GMT
Re: Re: Skylink decidedSteven JamarThu Sep 02 2004 - 20:40:46 GMT
Re: Re: Skylink decidedCarl OppedahlFri Sep 03 2004 - 14:50:45 GMT
Re: Re: Skylink decidedSteven JamarTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
copying for internal patronsFreya AndersonThu Sep 02 2004 - 20:40:46 GMT
Re: copying for internal patronsCarol SimpsonTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Re: Skylink decidedVance R. KovenThu Sep 02 2004 - 17:50:51 GMT
Skylink decidedJohn MitchellWed Sep 01 2004 - 20:57:00 GMT
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofKeith TaberTue Aug 31 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofSteven JamarWed Sep 01 2004 - 20:57:00 GMT
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofKeith TaberThu Sep 02 2004 - 17:50:51 GMT
Re: Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofLaura Young BostThu Sep 02 2004 - 17:50:51 GMT
Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarTue Aug 31 2004 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofSteven JamarTue Aug 31 2004 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Creative contract writing, sort ofIvan HoffmanWed Sep 01 2004 - 20:57:00 GMT
RE: Creative contract writing, sort ofAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Aug 31 2004 - 20:25:01 GMT
RE: Creative contract writing, sort ofNeil A. SmithTue Aug 31 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJames and Dorothy BrennanTue Aug 31 2004 - 20:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarTue Aug 31 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarTue Sep 07 2004 - 21:20:40 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsWed Sep 08 2004 - 15:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanWed Sep 08 2004 - 18:50:01 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelVance R. KovenWed Sep 08 2004 - 20:04:10 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 09 2004 - 18:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelVance R. KovenFri Sep 10 2004 - 18:15:50 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsSun Sep 19 2004 - 04:20:03 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelWallace J.McLeanMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelSteven JamarMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:55:00 GMT
Re: Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelListsThu Sep 23 2004 - 22:00:00 GMT
Re: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NoveljnTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
Creative contract writing, sort ofCarol BusbyTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
RE: Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelDeMarte, LukeTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
Re: Re: non-obviousnessGregory AharonianTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
Re: Re: non-obviousnessIvan HoffmanMon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
RE: Re: non-obviousnessAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
RE: Re: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH) -Gov InfoKlein, BonnieMon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Does Shyamalan's The Village Infringe Children's NovelJoy R. ButlerMon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Re: non-obviousnessSteven JamarMon Aug 30 2004 - 16:45:00 GMT
RE: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH)Stevan HarnadMon Aug 30 2004 - 16:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanFri Aug 27 2004 - 20:05:00 GMT
RE: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanMon Aug 30 2004 - 16:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsjrfriedman[_at_]litproplaw.comFri Aug 27 2004 - 14:01:41 GMT
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenFri Aug 27 2004 - 20:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenMon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Music Publisher Settles Copyright Skirmish Over Guthrie Classicamalyah keshetThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
guidelines for table of contents serviceFreya AndersonThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsVance R. KovenThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: Termination of one of two joint authorsIvan HoffmanThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: scenario regarding distance ed.Keith TaberThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
scenario regarding distance ed.John EyeWed Aug 25 2004 - 20:47:45 GMT
Termination of one of two joint authorsJessica R. FriedmanWed Aug 25 2004 - 20:47:45 GMT
Re: Peer-to-Peer VictoryVance R. KovenMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
RE: Peer-to-Peer VictoryJohn MitchellMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Peer-to-Peer VictoryJohn McNeillFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
MGM v Grokster (aug 19 2004 9th cir)Steven JamarFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
Re: problems with pseudonymsKeith TaberFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
problems with pseudonymsJessica R. FriedmanThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Fwd: Interesting case on Book Publishing and injunctionsStephen FishmanWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWed Aug 18 2004 - 21:05:00 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Mic PorterThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Michael GrahamThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?John MitchellFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?'Tim Arnold - Moore'Mon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerTue Aug 24 2004 - 22:35:00 GMT
RE: Re: How about a latent image?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeWed Aug 18 2004 - 19:55:21 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Karl-Erik TallmoWed Aug 18 2004 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Wallace J.McLeanWed Aug 18 2004 - 19:55:21 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarWed Aug 18 2004 - 21:05:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?David TurnerWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 19 2004 - 22:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?colin seegerFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarFri Aug 20 2004 - 14:40:05 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?S. Martin KeletiMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?David E. HollingsworthMon Aug 23 2004 - 19:10:36 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Steven JamarTue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsTue Aug 24 2004 - 15:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberWed Aug 25 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberWed Aug 25 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Roland ColeWed Aug 25 2004 - 20:47:45 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?ListsThu Aug 26 2004 - 14:54:59 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberFri Aug 27 2004 - 14:01:41 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollMon Aug 30 2004 - 16:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberMon Aug 30 2004 - 21:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollTue Aug 31 2004 - 14:55:10 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Keith TaberTue Aug 31 2004 - 21:40:00 GMT
Re: Re: How about a latent image?Terry CarrollWed Sep 01 2004 - 20:57:00 GMT
Interesting case on Book Publishing and injunctionsMike OliverWed Aug 18 2004 - 18:05:00 GMT
RE: How about a latent image?Christopher A. MohrTue Aug 17 2004 - 21:35:40 GMT
RE: How about a latent image?Robert PanzerWed Aug 18 2004 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: "Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extension sought for sound recordings in Europe)Joseph Pietro RioloTue Aug 17 2004 - 20:25:20 GMT
Re: Copyright Question.Joseph Pietro RioloTue Aug 17 2004 - 20:25:20 GMT
How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzTue Aug 17 2004 - 20:25:20 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzWed Aug 18 2004 - 18:05:00 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Theodora MichaelsWed Aug 18 2004 - 19:55:21 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzWed Aug 18 2004 - 22:25:45 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzThu Aug 19 2004 - 19:20:30 GMT
Re: How about a latent image?Dodi SchultzFri Aug 20 2004 - 18:30:01 GMT
Copyright Question.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comMon Aug 16 2004 - 19:59:58 GMT
RE: Re: Changing ISBN NumbersJohn MitchellFri Aug 13 2004 - 20:55:19 GMT
RE: Re: copyright for library reservesSmith, Robert E.Fri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
Re: "Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extensionWallace J.McLeanFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
Re: Re: Changing ISBN NumbersLaura Young BostFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
copyright for library reservesSmith, Robert E.Fri Aug 13 2004 - 15:10:16 GMT
Re: copyright for library reservesCarol SimpsonFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
"Isn't 50 years of copyright enough?" (copyright extension sought for sound recordings in Europe)Jon NoringFri Aug 13 2004 - 15:10:16 GMT
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersNicholas Weir-WilliamsFri Aug 13 2004 - 15:10:16 GMT
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersMike HoldernessFri Aug 13 2004 - 15:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesKeith TaberFri Aug 13 2004 - 15:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesHeather RobertsFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesJoe EllisonFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:03 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for library reservesKeith TaberMon Aug 16 2004 - 15:15:01 GMT
Re: copyright for library reservesMarsha L. ZavarThu Aug 12 2004 - 19:31:59 GMT
Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonThu Aug 12 2004 - 18:05:11 GMT
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonFri Aug 13 2004 - 17:40:02 GMT
Re: Changing ISBN NumbersAlbert HendersonFri Aug 13 2004 - 20:55:19 GMT
copyright for library reservesHeather RobertsThu Aug 12 2004 - 18:05:11 GMT
Re: Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsMason NathanielWed Aug 11 2004 - 18:55:15 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsTroll Company A/SWed Aug 11 2004 - 18:55:15 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and < derivative works >irm[_at_]in3activa.comTue Aug 10 2004 - 20:50:40 GMT
Re: Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsJanice PilchTue Aug 10 2004 - 20:50:40 GMT
Changing ISBN NumbersDodi SchultzTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
RE: joint copyright and infringement claimsJohn MitchellTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
RE: joint copyright and infringement claimsJohn McNeillTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: Changing ISSN NumbersJohn LevineTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: Changing ISSN NumbersNicholas Weir-WilliamsTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsjnTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsTerry CarrollTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: joint copyright and infringement claimsKathleen WilliamsonTue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Terry CarrollMon Aug 09 2004 - 21:05:55 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Troll Company A/STue Aug 10 2004 - 17:00:10 GMT
Changing ISSN Numberselizabeth brodakMon Aug 09 2004 - 21:05:55 GMT
joint copyright and infringement claimsMason NathanielMon Aug 09 2004 - 21:05:55 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaMon Aug 09 2004 - 17:10:10 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaMon Aug 09 2004 - 17:10:10 GMT
patent families with legal statusRolf ClaessenMon Aug 09 2004 - 17:10:10 GMT
Copyright Credits for Soviet Film Frame EnlargementsDaniel SmithMon Aug 09 2004 - 17:10:10 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Terry CarrollFri Aug 06 2004 - 20:37:17 GMT
Course Announcement: Online Copyright CoursesKim NayyerFri Aug 06 2004 - 13:05:39 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright question - eBay ebook?JulieFri Aug 06 2004 - 13:05:39 GMT
RE: Re: Translation and copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Aug 06 2004 - 13:05:39 GMT
Re: Copyright question - eBay ebook?Nicholas Weir-WilliamsThu Aug 05 2004 - 20:43:31 GMT
Re: Fair use guidelines for Universitieslodi3718[_at_]bellsouth.netThu Aug 05 2004 - 20:21:00 GMT
Fair use guidelines for UniversitiesEdward P RichardsThu Aug 05 2004 - 18:03:35 GMT
Re: Re: Translation and copyrightAnne StevensThu Aug 05 2004 - 18:03:35 GMT
Re: Re: Translation and copyrightjnThu Aug 05 2004 - 20:21:05 GMT
Copyright question - eBay ebook?JulieWed Aug 04 2004 - 17:27:31 GMT
RE: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »John MitchellTue Aug 03 2004 - 20:55:00 GMT
RE: Open Source licensing and « derivative works »I.R.MaturanaFri Aug 06 2004 - 13:05:39 GMT
Open Source licensing and « derivative works »Bruno CARBONNIERTue Aug 03 2004 - 16:35:00 GMT
Henry Carey, Letters on International CopyrightWallace J.McLeanMon Aug 02 2004 - 17:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: public performance?John McNeillFri Jul 30 2004 - 20:46:40 GMT
syndication rightsjohn nobleFri Jul 30 2004 - 20:36:18 GMT
Re: Re: public performance?Edward BarrowFri Jul 30 2004 - 20:36:18 GMT
Re: Re: public performance?DenariusDeiMon Aug 02 2004 - 21:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: public performance?Roland ColeTue Aug 03 2004 - 16:35:00 GMT
Re: public performance?Roland ColeFri Jul 30 2004 - 19:49:04 GMT
public performance?JQ JohnsonFri Jul 30 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightFreya AndersonThu Jul 29 2004 - 20:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightJohn P. McNeillFri Jul 30 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
RE: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightChristopher A. MohrMon Aug 02 2004 - 21:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid PostThu Jul 29 2004 - 16:00:21 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightRobert A. BaronThu Jul 29 2004 - 20:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightWallace J.McLeanThu Jul 29 2004 - 20:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid PostFri Jul 30 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightDavid MoserFri Jul 30 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightPaul FaklerMon Aug 02 2004 - 17:35:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightjohn nobleMon Aug 02 2004 - 21:25:30 GMT
Abbey RoadRenee AnthuisWed Jul 28 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkTerry CarrollWed Jul 28 2004 - 15:00:00 GMT
German Copyright QuestionBrian NeginWed Jul 28 2004 - 15:00:00 GMT
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkKeith TaberTue Jul 27 2004 - 18:50:21 GMT
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkTerry CarrollWed Jul 28 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkRichard WigginsTue Jul 27 2004 - 15:45:05 GMT
Re: Re: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkKeith TaberTue Jul 27 2004 - 15:45:05 GMT
Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightamalyahMon Jul 26 2004 - 20:30:45 GMT
Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightamalyah keshetWed Jul 28 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
Re: Bush-Kerry parody & Woody Guthrie copyrightKevin GriersonFri Jul 30 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Re: Software to capture all pages of websiteBob FrasierMon Jul 26 2004 - 20:30:45 GMT
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkFreya AndersonMon Jul 26 2004 - 20:30:45 GMT
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkEric Von VorysTue Jul 27 2004 - 18:50:21 GMT
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkChristopher A. MohrTue Jul 27 2004 - 18:50:21 GMT
Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkRichard WigginsMon Jul 26 2004 - 16:10:35 GMT
RE: Political candidate appropriates Aquafina trademarkFreya AndersonTue Jul 27 2004 - 15:45:05 GMT
Software to capture all pages of websiteRichard WigginsMon Jul 26 2004 - 16:10:35 GMT
Re: Re:  Software to capture all pages of websiteBenedict O'MahoneyFri Jul 23 2004 - 20:03:30 GMT
Re: Software to capture all pages of websiteDavid MoserFri Jul 23 2004 - 20:03:30 GMT
Re:  Software to capture all pages of websiteAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comFri Jul 23 2004 - 14:36:08 GMT
RE: Software to capture all pages of websiteMinodierFri Jul 23 2004 - 14:36:08 GMT
Re: Fair UseRobert A. BaronThu Jul 22 2004 - 21:15:02 GMT
Re: Fair UseSteven JamarTue Jan 25 2005 - 22:05:15 GMT
Re: Fair UseRich StimThu Feb 23 2006 - 23:25:30 GMT
Fair UseJames and Dorothy BrennanThu Jul 22 2004 - 19:00:30 GMT
Software to capture all pages of websiteDoug IsenbergThu Jul 22 2004 - 19:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Insurance (was: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright of reproductions)John MitchellWed Jul 21 2004 - 16:30:30 GMT
The UK Committee Report on OAStevan HarnadWed Jul 21 2004 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofWallace J.McLeanTue Jul 20 2004 - 21:20:51 GMT
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofEdward BarrowWed Jul 21 2004 - 16:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright ofWallace J.McLeanWed Jul 21 2004 - 20:50:10 GMT
Re: Bright Lines in fair use (was: Re: copyright of reproductions)Edward BarrowTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
RE: Re: Copyrights in ReproductionsMinodierTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
Re: Copyrights in ReproductionsChristy HubbardMon Jul 19 2004 - 21:29:00 GMT
Re: Re: Basic copyright questionWallace J.McLeanMon Jul 19 2004 - 19:10:15 GMT
Re: Is a book of old ads fair use?Steven JamarMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationPetteri KorhonenMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
Re: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
RE: Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationGROVES PeterMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: Translation and Basic copyright questionAnne StevensMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:50 GMT
Re: Re: Translation and Basic copyright questionNicholas Weir-WilliamsTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
RE: Re: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:30:57 GMT
RE: Re: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
RE: Basic copyright questionRobert PanzerThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:30:40 GMT
Re: Basic copyright questionKevin GriersonThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:05:10 GMT
Re: Basic copyright questionWallace J.McLeanThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:30:40 GMT
Re: Basic copyright questionSteven JamarThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:30:57 GMT
Archival permissionsDodi SchultzThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Is a book of old ads fair use?John LevineThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Basic copyright questionSergey RThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationMike HoldernessThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationVance R. KovenThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationNicholas Weir-WilliamsThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Re: Swedish Enid Blyton translationTerry CarrollThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Tapes for disabled studentsKathy TadlockWed Jul 14 2004 - 22:55:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Material Breach and copyrightDavid MoserWed Jul 14 2004 - 22:55:41 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Material Breach and copyrightCarol BusbyThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Version 54, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Jul 14 2004 - 21:20:46 GMT
RE: Archival permissionsChristine L. SundtWed Jul 14 2004 - 21:20:30 GMT
Swedish Enid Blyton translationKarl-Erik TallmoWed Jul 14 2004 - 20:40:21 GMT
RE: Re: Material Breach and copyrightHoward ZaharoffWed Jul 14 2004 - 20:40:21 GMT
Archival permissionsDrRhetoric[_at_]aol.comWed Jul 14 2004 - 20:40:21 GMT
Re: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §4 12 v §1203john nobleTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
need IP lawyer referralDavid BozakTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
Re: The Copyright Non-Problem and Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
Re: Material Breach and copyrightDavid MoserTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Mon Jul 12 2004 - 22:20:21 GMT
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
RE: Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Mon Jul 12 2004 - 21:25:32 GMT
Updated copyright duration chartPeter HirtleMon Jul 12 2004 - 21:25:17 GMT
RE: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203Christopher A. MohrMon Jul 12 2004 - 21:11:00 GMT
Re: Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Steven JamarMon Jul 12 2004 - 21:11:00 GMT
Re: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203S. Martin KeletiMon Jul 12 2004 - 20:45:01 GMT
Re: Copyrights and heirsPatsy MussonMon Jul 12 2004 - 20:45:01 GMT
Re: Copyrights and heirsjohn nobleTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
Material Breach and copyrightCarol BusbyMon Jul 12 2004 - 18:00:32 GMT
RE: attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203 - infringement vs. circumventionEthan AckermanMon Jul 12 2004 - 18:00:32 GMT
Re: FW: Gentieu/Getty Litigation Article and InterviewSteven JamarMon Jul 12 2004 - 18:00:32 GMT
Re: FW: statute of limitationsSteven JamarMon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
Deemed duration of Copyright AssignmentRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
attorney's fees: 17 U.S.C §412 v §1203_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
Copyrights and heirsChristi RockwellMon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
FW: Gentieu/Getty Litigation Article and InterviewStephen FillerMon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
FW: Correction of Name_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Fri Jul 09 2004 - 15:06:30 GMT
FW: statute of limitations_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Fri Jul 09 2004 - 15:06:30 GMT
Correction of NameLloyd RichThu Jul 08 2004 - 20:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: Attorney in SpainHeather VargasThu Jul 08 2004 - 13:58:00 GMT
DRM -- Good Bad UglyJohn MitchellThu Jul 08 2004 - 13:58:00 GMT
Re: Attorney in SpainCarol BusbyWed Jul 07 2004 - 19:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentTilyou1[_at_]aol.comWed Jul 07 2004 - 19:30:31 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenThu Jul 08 2004 - 20:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleFri Jul 09 2004 - 15:06:30 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenMon Jul 12 2004 - 16:55:27 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleTue Jul 13 2004 - 18:31:00 GMT
Re: Copyright AssignmentSteven JamarWed Jul 07 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Re: Copyright AssignmentVance R. KovenWed Jul 07 2004 - 19:30:31 GMT
Re: Copyright Assignmentjohn nobleThu Jul 08 2004 - 13:58:00 GMT
Attorney in SpainHeather VargasWed Jul 07 2004 - 17:30:31 GMT
Copyright AssignmentClaireLLaw[_at_]aol.comWed Jul 07 2004 - 15:05:51 GMT
Program/presentation questionsSweethreads[_at_]aol.comThu Jul 01 2004 - 15:30:20 GMT
RE: Re: French copyright lawJavier PerezWed Jun 30 2004 - 18:45:18 GMT
RE: Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Duhaime, DianeTue Jun 29 2004 - 20:28:21 GMT
RE: (INTA-list) Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decides BARBIE Photos are a Parody and Fair UseNeil A. SmithTue Jun 29 2004 - 15:15:13 GMT
Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Pam MacKintoshMon Jun 28 2004 - 20:31:04 GMT
Re: Help with copyright renewal question.Terry CarrollTue Jun 29 2004 - 15:15:13 GMT
Article: Copyright and Licensing Job PositionsKim NayyerMon Jun 28 2004 - 20:31:04 GMT
Help with copyright renewal question.Marsha L. ZavarMon Jun 28 2004 - 19:26:28 GMT
Re: Re: French copyright lawMike HoldernessMon Jun 28 2004 - 18:21:19 GMT
Re: Re: French copyright lawS. Martin KeletiMon Jul 12 2004 - 20:45:01 GMT
Re: Re: French copyright lawWallace J.McLeanMon Jul 12 2004 - 21:11:00 GMT
Re: French copyright lawS. Martin KeletiFri Jun 25 2004 - 15:50:29 GMT
ALA Program Reminder: Copyright Basics for the Digital WorldAndrea AndersonThu Jun 24 2004 - 21:16:14 GMT
Periodicals' online editions & advg: cases?Dodi SchultzThu Jun 24 2004 - 16:25:29 GMT
French copyright lawJanna GlasserThu Jun 24 2004 - 16:25:29 GMT
Re: French copyright lawMarkus JunkerSat Nov 15 1997 - 18:01:17 GMT
Re: French copyright lawGrantham, BillTue Aug 31 1999 - 22:15:20 GMT
Re: French copyright lawPeter GrovesWed Sep 01 1999 - 13:05:07 GMT
--> Professor David VaverNicole TaylorThu Sep 02 1999 - 18:53:11 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverHunger99[_at_]aol.comFri Sep 03 1999 - 11:46:20 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverDavid BasskinTue Sep 07 1999 - 20:10:17 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverBernard KatzTue Sep 07 1999 - 22:08:50 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverPeter GrovesFri Sep 03 1999 - 17:36:10 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverSteve WillsWed Sep 08 1999 - 03:59:09 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverPaul.Tackaberry[_at_]BAKERNET.comTue Sep 07 1999 - 17:44:19 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverTony FogarassyWed Sep 08 1999 - 15:28:38 GMT
--> Re: Professor David Vaverbarry sookmanThu Sep 09 1999 - 00:19:10 GMT
--> Re: Professor David VaverPeter GrovesMon Sep 13 1999 - 21:08:05 GMT
Re: INDUCE ActKeith TaberWed Jun 23 2004 - 15:15:43 GMT
INDUCE ActJavier PerezTue Jun 22 2004 - 15:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright? Mime-Version: 1.0Keith TaberTue Jun 22 2004 - 15:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright? Mime-Version: 1.0RickTue Jun 22 2004 - 19:30:29 GMT
Second Call: IV Congress of Computer LawErick Iriarte AhonTue Jun 22 2004 - 15:00:18 GMT
students taping off airEva RevittMon Jun 21 2004 - 19:00:29 GMT
IP NewsflashRolf ClaessenMon Jun 21 2004 - 15:00:44 GMT
Re: Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright?Kevin GriersonFri Jun 18 2004 - 15:07:14 GMT
Is my artwork infringing on someone's copyright?RickFri Jun 18 2004 - 13:40:44 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterThu Jun 17 2004 - 20:45:30 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterFri Jun 18 2004 - 13:40:44 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use in UK'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:00:44 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use in UK'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:00:44 GMT
RE: Re: Fair Use in UKGROVES PeterMon Jun 21 2004 - 18:05:55 GMT
Re: Re: BloomsdayWallace J.McLeanThu Jun 17 2004 - 20:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKNancy WillardThu Jun 17 2004 - 20:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKEdward BarrowFri Jun 18 2004 - 15:07:14 GMT
Re: Re: Fair Use in UKdavidlgreenTue Jun 22 2004 - 15:00:18 GMT
RE: Fair Use in UKTim Arnold - MooreThu Jun 17 2004 - 15:30:32 GMT
RE: Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumFletcher, EricWed Jun 16 2004 - 20:35:36 GMT
Re: BloomsdayWallace J.McLeanWed Jun 16 2004 - 17:30:20 GMT
Re: BloomsdayKarl-Erik TallmoThu Jun 17 2004 - 15:30:32 GMT
Re: Bloomsdayjohn nobleThu Jun 17 2004 - 15:30:33 GMT
Re: Bloomsdayjohn nobleThu Jun 17 2004 - 21:00:20 GMT
EthicsEmil LevineWed Jun 16 2004 - 16:26:01 GMT
Re: Fair Use in UKMike HoldernessWed Jun 16 2004 - 16:26:01 GMT
Re: Fair Use in UKEdward BarrowThu Jun 17 2004 - 15:30:32 GMT
BloomsdayKarl-Erik TallmoWed Jun 16 2004 - 16:26:01 GMT
RE: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co . Pub ConsortiumSilkett, Jenny C Ms USAWC/LibraryTue Jun 15 2004 - 20:41:30 GMT
Fair Use in UKNancy WillardTue Jun 15 2004 - 20:41:30 GMT
Re: Fair Use in UKDodi SchultzThu Jun 17 2004 - 15:30:32 GMT
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumBarbara RuhmannTue Jun 15 2004 - 20:41:30 GMT
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumhopebTue Jun 15 2004 - 20:41:30 GMT
Re: Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumNicholas Weir-WilliamsWed Jun 16 2004 - 16:26:01 GMT
Contact information needed for publisher Paul & Co. Pub ConsortiumFletcher, EricTue Jun 15 2004 - 19:25:39 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservLaura QuilterThu Jun 10 2004 - 18:45:29 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThu Jun 10 2004 - 18:45:29 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThu Jun 10 2004 - 18:48:14 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineThu Jun 10 2004 - 18:48:45 GMT
Re: Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKeith TaberFri Jun 11 2004 - 13:38:01 GMT
Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKeith TaberThu Jun 10 2004 - 15:20:35 GMT
Use of Copyright material on a limited listservEmil LevineWed Jun 09 2004 - 17:31:30 GMT
Re: Use of Copyright material on a limited listservKevin GriersonThu Jun 10 2004 - 18:45:29 GMT
Re: Re: PermissionsNancy WillardMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:00:10 GMT
copyright of charactersJan VelteropFri Jun 04 2004 - 16:12:30 GMT
Re: Re: Is SayWear violating any laws?Roy MurphyThu Jun 03 2004 - 19:10:30 GMT
Re: Is SayWear violating any laws?johnmcn[_at_]bellsouth.netThu Jun 03 2004 - 15:05:12 GMT
PermissionsTurley, Patrick CWed Jun 02 2004 - 20:49:15 GMT
Re: PermissionsFAC_JCLARK[_at_]VAX1.ACS.JMU.EDUWed Sep 29 1993 - 20:03:16 GMT
Re: PermissionsPaul HealdThu Jan 25 1996 - 18:48:00 GMT
Re: PermissionsMartin PerlbergerFri Jan 26 1996 - 18:56:29 GMT
Re: PermissionsKevin GriersonMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:00:30 GMT
Re: music downloadsKevin GriersonWed Jun 02 2004 - 20:20:14 GMT
music downloadsCarol BusbyWed Jun 02 2004 - 18:40:30 GMT
Is SayWear violating any laws?Shawn HopwoodWed Jun 02 2004 - 18:40:30 GMT
Re: Renewals of Pre-1978 Sound Recording CopyrightsDavid MoserWed Jun 02 2004 - 18:40:30 GMT
Renewals of Pre-1978 Sound Recording CopyrightsJuan SaavedraWed Jun 02 2004 - 15:55:25 GMT
James CooverAnthony McCannTue Jun 01 2004 - 19:30:40 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsKen StuartFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsMinodier AlainTue Jun 01 2004 - 19:30:40 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronThu Jul 15 2004 - 20:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarThu Jul 15 2004 - 21:30:57 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRoy MurphyMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsWallace J.McLeanMon Jul 19 2004 - 19:10:15 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarMon Jul 19 2004 - 19:10:16 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert A. BaronMon Jul 19 2004 - 21:29:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsjohn nobleTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsSteven JamarTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
Re: Re: copyright of reproductionsMike OliverTue Jul 20 2004 - 18:35:56 GMT
Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadWed Jun 16 2004 - 16:26:01 GMT
RE: Re: Transfer of ownershipTim Arnold - MooreFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
RE: Re: Transfer of ownershipTim Arnold - MooreWed Jun 02 2004 - 15:55:25 GMT
Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-ArchivingStevan HarnadFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsDavid CarsonThu May 27 2004 - 13:19:21 GMT
Re: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsKen StuartFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
RE: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed May 26 2004 - 15:32:59 GMT
RE: Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit Requirements_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Thu May 27 2004 - 13:19:21 GMT
Re: Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsKeith TaberWed May 26 2004 - 13:17:50 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsBurow, Heiko ETue May 25 2004 - 19:26:39 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristine L. SundtWed May 26 2004 - 13:17:50 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsBurow, Heiko EWed May 26 2004 - 15:32:59 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert PanzerFri May 28 2004 - 20:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristine L. SundtFri May 28 2004 - 20:35:30 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductions_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Tue Jun 01 2004 - 14:41:18 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductions_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Wed Jun 02 2004 - 15:55:25 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsRobert PanzerMon Jul 19 2004 - 14:35:51 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsChristopher A. MohrTue Jul 20 2004 - 22:20:11 GMT
RE: Re: copyright of reproductionsMinodierThu Jul 22 2004 - 19:00:30 GMT
Unpublished Photographs - Deposit RequirementsLloyd RichTue May 25 2004 - 18:35:50 GMT
Re: Technical Illustrator FeesMike OliverMon May 24 2004 - 16:35:32 GMT
RE: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingJuan Saavedra CASTROMon May 24 2004 - 16:35:32 GMT
FW: Technical Illustrator FeesDuhaime, DianeMon May 24 2004 - 16:35:32 GMT
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingBrock Shinen, Esq.Mon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingPaul FaklerTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingIvan HoffmanTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingIvan HoffmanTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Technical Illustrator FeesCarol BusbyMon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
Re: copyright of reproductionsDavid CarsonMon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
Re: copyright of reproductionsKarl-Erik TallmoTue May 25 2004 - 18:35:50 GMT
RE: Re: Architectural works questionScott ButcherFri May 21 2004 - 13:59:21 GMT
RE: Re: Architectural works questionJohn P. McNeillMon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
RE: Re: Delivery for further distribution = publication_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Fri May 21 2004 - 13:05:13 GMT
Re: Architectural works questionjohn nobleFri May 21 2004 - 13:05:13 GMT
Re: Architectural works questionKeith TaberFri May 21 2004 - 13:05:13 GMT
Re: Status Co-producer of Sound RecordingJuan SaavedraThu May 20 2004 - 18:35:21 GMT
RE: Architectural works questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu May 20 2004 - 18:35:21 GMT
RE: Architectural works questionRobert PanzerFri May 21 2004 - 13:05:13 GMT
Re: Delivery for further distribution = publicationSteven JamarThu May 20 2004 - 14:44:30 GMT
Canada BashingNick ZalesThu May 20 2004 - 14:44:30 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipMike HoldernessThu May 20 2004 - 14:44:30 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipDavid CarsonMon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKathleen WilliamsonMon May 24 2004 - 16:35:32 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowMon May 24 2004 - 16:35:32 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKirk JohnsenTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipSteven JamarTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipDavid CarsonThu May 27 2004 - 13:19:21 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipCarol BusbyThu May 27 2004 - 21:27:46 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipKathleen WilliamsonFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
Re: Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowFri May 28 2004 - 17:30:45 GMT
Architectural works questionHeather VargasThu May 20 2004 - 14:44:30 GMT
Re: Architectural works questionAndrewThu May 20 2004 - 18:35:21 GMT
Re: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsTerry CarrollWed May 19 2004 - 20:00:48 GMT
Re: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsBernard KatzWed May 26 2004 - 13:17:50 GMT
Delivery for further distribution = publication_J_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_k_Wed May 19 2004 - 20:00:48 GMT
Re: Delivery for further distribution = publicationSteven JamarMon May 24 2004 - 13:28:00 GMT
Re: Transfer of ownershipEdward BarrowWed May 19 2004 - 20:00:48 GMT
Nature Web Focus: The Green and the Gold Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Transfer of ownershipCarol BusbyWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Transfer of ownershipKevin GriersonThu May 27 2004 - 19:50:27 GMT
Re: Transfer of ownershipKevin GriersonTue Jun 01 2004 - 14:41:18 GMT
RE: Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implications'Tim Arnold - Moore'Wed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
copyright of reproductionsSarena DeglinWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Lessig gets whacked in ForbesWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Editorial re SCC copyright decision implicationsKim NayyerMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:46 GMT
Lessig gets whacked in Forbesjohn nobleMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:46 GMT
4 Open Access Conferences: Hungary, Germany, France, U.S.A.Stevan HarnadSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
RE: iipsj IP resources pagePaul JonesSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsKeith TaborFri May 14 2004 - 18:05:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowFri May 14 2004 - 18:05:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanFri May 14 2004 - 18:05:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsTerry CarrollSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsKeith TaborMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsMinodier AlainMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsSteven JamarMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsSteven JamarMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsRoy MurphyMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsEdward BarrowMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:58 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsRoy MurphyWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: Re: European CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Re: iipsj IP resources pageKevin GriersonThu May 13 2004 - 20:45:08 GMT
Version 53, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Thu May 13 2004 - 20:45:08 GMT
Re: ArchivesDoug IsenbergThu May 13 2004 - 20:45:08 GMT
Current decisions, notices, press?Rolf ClaessenThu May 13 2004 - 20:45:08 GMT
iipsj IP resources pageSteven JamarWed May 12 2004 - 20:42:00 GMT
On now: webcast of hearing on DMCRA (H.R. 107)M. Claire StewartWed May 12 2004 - 20:42:00 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezWed May 12 2004 - 20:42:00 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezSat May 15 2004 - 02:45:15 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsLawrence RosenMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
RE: Re: European CopyrightsJavier PerezTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
ArchivesJane BrazealMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
Found the archive !Jane BrazealMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
Suggestions neededJane BrazealMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
European CopyrightsJavier PerezThu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloThu May 13 2004 - 20:45:08 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloMon May 17 2004 - 17:25:18 GMT
Re: European CopyrightsJoseph Pietro RioloTue May 25 2004 - 12:47:00 GMT
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Wallace J.McLeanThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Edward BarrowThu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Nicholas Weir-WilliamsThu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
Re: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Wallace J.McLeanFri May 07 2004 - 16:14:51 GMT
Re: summary of copyright term by countryAnne LennoxThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
Libraries, digitization and copyright: queryEli EdwardsThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
charitable fundraising issueRaza Ahmed SiddiquiThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
RE: Re: U.S. vs E.U.Robert PanzerThu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
summary of copyright term by countryTheodora MichaelsWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
Re: summary of copyright term by countryTheodora MichaelsThu May 06 2004 - 19:13:26 GMT
RES: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2286Kika NovaisTue May 04 2004 - 21:30:36 GMT
Early Registration: Copyright SymposiumOlga FrancoisTue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
RE: Re: Life + Years Ule'Tim Arnold - Moore'Mon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
RE: Re: Life + Years UleAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri May 07 2004 - 16:14:51 GMT
Re: Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?ChrisMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
Re: Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?Brock Shinen, Esq.Tue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
RE: Re: compliance procedure?Robert PanzerFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: compliance procedure?David DaileyMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
RE: Re: compliance procedure?Verla PetersonMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
Scanning of articlesCaseyFri Apr 30 2004 - 20:06:58 GMT
Re: compliance procedure?David DaileyFri Apr 30 2004 - 20:06:58 GMT
Re: compliance procedure?Laurie UrquiagaFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
Re: Song SnippetsKeith TaborFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
compliance procedure?Verla PetersonFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
Re: compliance procedure?Laurie UrquiagaWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
RE: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsRobert PanzerFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
Re: Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?Kevin GriersonThu Apr 29 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT
Patent dogsWallace J.McLeanThu Apr 29 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT
Directory of Music & entertainment Lawyers Online?ChrisThu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
Re: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveKeith TaborThu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
Re: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveSandy ShepardFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
Song SnippetsMike PhillipsThu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
Statue of Liberty.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
RE: Re: Deriv Works/Fab FiveSandy ShepardThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
How to trace copyright ownerUrsula Hock-HenschkeThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & MoreBryan TaylorThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMike HoldernessWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsWallace J.McLeanThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
Re: Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMike HoldernessThu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
Re: Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & MoreMike HoldernessWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: Life + Years UleRobert F. BodiWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: Life + Years UleSteven JamarMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Survey -- ThanksHalbert, DeboraWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Song LyricsCarol BusbyWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksSandy ShepardWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerTue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerTue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksRobert PanzerThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
RE: Re: Derivative WorksJavier PerezWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
Public Domain DVDs, CSS, & Moreadmin Wed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsMinodier AlainWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsKirk JohnsenWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsVance R. KovenWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: French Copyright Law & Moral RightsSteven JamarWed Apr 28 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
French Copyright Law & Moral RightsLloyd RichTue Apr 27 2004 - 20:06:06 GMT
Re: Life + Years UleNakerite[_at_]aol.comTue Apr 27 2004 - 17:50:40 GMT
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
No AttachmentNakerite[_at_]aol.comTue Apr 27 2004 - 17:50:40 GMT
Life + Years UleDodi SchultzTue Apr 27 2004 - 15:55:34 GMT
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
Re: Life + Years UleLaurie UrquiagaWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
RE: Re: Pirated CD-Rs on eBayMike PhillipsTue Apr 27 2004 - 15:55:34 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMon Apr 26 2004 - 20:36:00 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealTue Apr 27 2004 - 15:55:34 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksVance R. KovenWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksKeith TaborWed Apr 28 2004 - 21:25:25 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarThu Apr 29 2004 - 15:27:00 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCarol BusbyThu Apr 29 2004 - 19:42:02 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative Worksroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netThu Apr 29 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealFri Apr 30 2004 - 19:31:04 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCarol BusbyFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarFri Apr 30 2004 - 22:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMon May 03 2004 - 19:37:04 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksTerry CarrollTue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksBob WarnerTue May 04 2004 - 16:31:28 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksWallace J.McLeanTue May 04 2004 - 21:30:36 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksUrsula Hock-HenschkeTue May 04 2004 - 21:30:36 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWed May 05 2004 - 20:16:42 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksTerry CarrollThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksWallace J.McLeanThu May 06 2004 - 15:45:40 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksMike HoldernessMon May 10 2004 - 22:55:18 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksEli EdwardsTue May 11 2004 - 17:38:13 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksRobert F. BodiTue May 18 2004 - 16:17:57 GMT
Re: Re: Derivative WorksMike HoldernessWed May 19 2004 - 16:40:12 GMT
RE: Pirated CD-Rs on eBayJohn MitchellMon Apr 26 2004 - 20:36:00 GMT
RE: Unspecified Copyright ClaimsJavier PerezMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Re: Derivative WorksJane BrazealMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Re: Derivative WorksSteven JamarMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Life + Years UleNakerite[_at_]aol.comMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
RE: Derivative WorksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Pirated CD-Rs on eBayMike PhillipsMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Transitory Periods in Copyright LawLuh, PeggyFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:08:41 GMT
Derivative WorksMichael_Becker[_at_]oxy.comFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:08:41 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use & PermissionsRobert A. BaronFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:08:41 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use & PermissionsJohndan Johnson-EilolaFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:40:09 GMT
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightSteven JamarFri Apr 23 2004 - 20:21:39 GMT
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:08:41 GMT
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightKeith TaborMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
Re: Re: New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeMon Apr 26 2004 - 20:36:00 GMT
Re: New and question about copyrightSteven JamarFri Apr 23 2004 - 18:13:52 GMT
RE: Re: Fair use & PermissionsChristine L. SundtFri Apr 23 2004 - 18:13:52 GMT
RE: Re: Fair use & PermissionsJavier PerezMon Apr 26 2004 - 17:00:39 GMT
RE: Tape/CD/DVD TaxJohn MitchellFri Apr 23 2004 - 18:13:52 GMT
RE: New and question about copyrightJohn MitchellFri Apr 23 2004 - 18:13:52 GMT
Unspecified Copyright ClaimsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFri Apr 23 2004 - 18:13:52 GMT
Copyrights in plastic models?Ken StuartFri Apr 23 2004 - 16:27:28 GMT
New and question about copyrightUrsula Hock-HenschkeFri Apr 23 2004 - 16:27:28 GMT
Tape/CD/DVD TaxNick ZalesFri Apr 23 2004 - 16:27:28 GMT
RE: Fair use & PermissionsJohn MitchellFri Apr 23 2004 - 16:27:28 GMT
RE: Re: Survey - registration as pre-req. to suitEthan AckermanThu Apr 22 2004 - 17:05:40 GMT
Fair use & PermissionsMarcia KeyserThu Apr 22 2004 - 17:05:40 GMT
Re: Fair use & PermissionsMary RooklidgeFri Apr 23 2004 - 20:21:39 GMT
Re: Fair use & PermissionsKevin GriersonFri Apr 23 2004 - 22:40:09 GMT
RE: Re: Special CopyrightsGROVES PeterThu Apr 22 2004 - 17:05:40 GMT
Re: Special CopyrightsTerry CarrollWed Apr 21 2004 - 18:40:29 GMT
Re: Special CopyrightsKevin GriersonWed Apr 21 2004 - 18:40:29 GMT
RE: Copyright Survey - Missing question on translationI.R.MaturanaWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Special CopyrightsNakerite[_at_]aol.comWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright Survey - foreign works and non-registered infringement claimsTerry CarrollWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyHalbert, DeboraTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:04:33 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyBradley BrownWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright SurveyAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:05:40 GMT
2004 Annual Copyright Symposium!Olga FrancoisTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:04:33 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:03:11 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:04:33 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyPaul FaklerWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserWed Apr 21 2004 - 18:40:29 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollWed Apr 21 2004 - 18:40:29 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright SurveyTerry CarrollFri Apr 23 2004 - 16:27:28 GMT
Music Rights Administration Opportunity (Short Term)Ted HammermanTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:03:11 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyNick ZalesTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:03:10 GMT
RE: Copyright SurveyGottfried, NannetteMon Apr 19 2004 - 21:00:45 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyDavid MoserMon Apr 19 2004 - 21:00:45 GMT
Re: Copyright Surveywlundstein[_at_]cox.netMon Apr 19 2004 - 21:00:45 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsRobert F. BodiMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
Copyright and application developmentRob FosterMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
Copyright SurveyHalbert, DeboraMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyRenee AnthuisTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:04:33 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyJoseph Pietro RioloWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonWed Apr 21 2004 - 18:40:29 GMT
Re: Copyright SurveyKevin GriersonThu Apr 22 2004 - 17:05:40 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionRobert PanzerFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionRobert PanzerFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionFreya AndersonFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionGROVES PeterMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
RE: Court costs Was:Re: Public Domain questionAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarThu Apr 15 2004 - 12:23:05 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiThu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionJane BrazealThu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionMike HoldernessFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionrpanzer[_at_]vagarights.comFri Apr 16 2004 - 19:35:21 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionTerry CarrollFri Apr 16 2004 - 19:35:21 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionNakerite[_at_]aol.comMon Apr 19 2004 - 21:00:45 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarMon Apr 19 2004 - 21:00:45 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionJane BrazealTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:03:10 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain questionTerry CarrollTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:04:33 GMT
Re: A bit more on the questionaboutMedievalmanuscriptsAndrew DorisioThu Apr 15 2004 - 12:23:05 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionSteven JamarWed Apr 14 2004 - 17:25:57 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionRobert F. BodiWed Apr 14 2004 - 17:25:57 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionWallace J.McLeanWed Apr 14 2004 - 17:25:57 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionDavid DaileyThu Apr 15 2004 - 12:23:05 GMT
The Public-Domain Movie Databaseadmin Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Public Domain questionJane BrazealWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionJoseph Pietro RioloTue Apr 20 2004 - 21:03:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain questionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Apr 21 2004 - 15:20:22 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMinodier AlainTue Apr 13 2004 - 16:15:38 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesSteven JamarTue Apr 13 2004 - 16:26:58 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMike HoldernessWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: Fair use and News articlesMinodier AlainMon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:56 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Fair use and News articlesSteven JamarMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Signatures in other languagesKevin GriersonMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Signatures in other languagesSteven JamarMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalMike HoldernessMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Fair use and News articlesWcjj14[_at_]aol.comMon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
Signatures in other languagesGeorge EdwardMon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsMike BradleyMon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
RE: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:15:38 GMT
RE: Re: Meaning of license phraseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
Re: Meaning of license phraseSheldon HalpernFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Meaning of license phraseSteven JamarFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Meaning of license phraseDavid MoserMon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the questionaboutMedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
RE: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
RE: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsFreya AndersonFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsWallace J.McLeanThu Apr 08 2004 - 22:18:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsWallace J.McLeanMon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:16 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsRobert F. BodiWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsSteven JamarWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsTerry CarrollWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsTerry CarrollThu Apr 15 2004 - 12:23:05 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonThu Apr 08 2004 - 22:18:30 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about MedievalmanuscriptsKevin GriersonThu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMike BradleyThu Apr 08 2004 - 22:18:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsTerry CarrollFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsSteven JamarFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsRobert F. BodiWed Apr 14 2004 - 16:25:30 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsSteven JamarWed Apr 14 2004 - 17:25:57 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMinodier AlainThu Apr 15 2004 - 12:23:05 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsWallace J.McLeanThu Apr 15 2004 - 21:08:22 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsMinodier AlainFri Apr 16 2004 - 13:21:14 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsJeremy G ByrneFri Apr 16 2004 - 19:35:21 GMT
Re: Re: A bit more on the question aboutMedievalmanuscriptsWallace J.McLeanFri Apr 16 2004 - 19:35:21 GMT
Meaning of license phraseCarol BusbyThu Apr 08 2004 - 22:18:30 GMT
Re: Meaning of license phraseKevin GriersonMon Apr 12 2004 - 20:11:41 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsMike BradleyThu Apr 08 2004 - 14:55:12 GMT
RE: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionMark BurnetteWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:47:20 GMT
Re: Colleges, Code and Copyright 2004Minodier AlainWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
A question about medieval manuscripts on microfilmLuis F. RodriguezWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsLuis F. RodriguezWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: A bit more on the question about Medieval manuscriptsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTue Apr 06 2004 - 22:30:14 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTue Apr 06 2004 - 22:30:14 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionKeith TaborWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionDavid PostWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenWed Apr 07 2004 - 19:09:15 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarThu Apr 08 2004 - 14:55:12 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarThu Apr 08 2004 - 14:55:12 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenThu Apr 08 2004 - 14:55:12 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenThu Apr 08 2004 - 22:18:30 GMT
Re: Re: Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarFri Apr 09 2004 - 21:15:19 GMT
Re: Right of publicity and preemptionVance R. KovenTue Apr 06 2004 - 21:27:58 GMT
Re: Right of publicity and preemptionAlanKabat[_at_]aol.comTue Apr 06 2004 - 21:27:58 GMT
Colleges, Code and Copyright 2004Olga FrancoisTue Apr 06 2004 - 21:27:58 GMT
Right of publicity and preemptionSteven JamarTue Apr 06 2004 - 15:40:30 GMT
Re: PermissionsKen StuartMon Apr 05 2004 - 21:20:16 GMT
Re: PermissionsAndrew DorisioMon Apr 05 2004 - 21:20:16 GMT
--> RE: PermissionsLinda HeideMon Apr 05 2004 - 21:20:16 GMT
--> RE: PermissionsJavier PerezThu Jun 03 2004 - 15:05:12 GMT
Re: PermissionsKevin GriersonThu Jun 03 2004 - 15:05:12 GMT
Re: PermissionsKeith TaberMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:05:34 GMT
PermissionsMiller, BarryMon Apr 05 2004 - 17:05:59 GMT
RE: Overseas soldiers using music in power point prese ntationsKlein, BonnieFri Apr 02 2004 - 17:40:45 GMT
Overseas soldiers using music in power point presentationsRenee AnthuisThu Apr 01 2004 - 17:05:12 GMT
Re: Sherlock Holmes as trademark (was re: Mickey Mouse as trademark)Robert E. Jones, IIITue Mar 30 2004 - 17:45:12 GMT
Sherlock Holmes as trademark (was re: Mickey Mouse as trademark)Carl OppedahlMon Mar 29 2004 - 22:00:12 GMT
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkWallace J.McLeanMon Mar 29 2004 - 22:00:12 GMT
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkArtCop[_at_]aol.comMon Mar 29 2004 - 22:00:12 GMT
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkKeith TaborTue Mar 30 2004 - 17:45:12 GMT
Mickey Mouse as trademarkSteven JamarMon Mar 29 2004 - 20:15:17 GMT
Re: Mickey Mouse as trademarkJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 30 2004 - 17:45:12 GMT
Re: New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.Terry CarrollMon Mar 29 2004 - 20:15:17 GMT
Colleges, Code and Copyright, June 10-11, 2004Olga FrancoisMon Mar 29 2004 - 20:15:17 GMT
RE: New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auFri Mar 26 2004 - 16:45:53 GMT
Re: Playing music in reverseDavid MoserThu Mar 25 2004 - 16:30:12 GMT
Re: Playing music in reverseRobert F. BodiThu Mar 25 2004 - 21:15:54 GMT
RE: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanWed Mar 24 2004 - 22:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanThu Mar 25 2004 - 21:15:54 GMT
Re: Re: software: first sale vs licensesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWed Mar 24 2004 - 22:00:30 GMT
Playing music in reverseRich StimWed Mar 24 2004 - 22:00:30 GMT
RE: Re: software: first sale vs licenseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
RE: Re: software: first sale vs licenseAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Mar 25 2004 - 16:30:12 GMT
RE: Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 24 2004 - 22:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdThu Mar 25 2004 - 16:30:12 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyThu Mar 25 2004 - 16:30:12 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiThu Mar 25 2004 - 21:15:54 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksKeith TaborFri Mar 26 2004 - 16:45:53 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdMon Mar 29 2004 - 20:15:17 GMT
Re: Re: Character style guides as derivative worksRobert F. BodiMon Mar 29 2004 - 22:15:30 GMT
Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol BusbyTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Character style guides as derivative worksCarol ShepherdTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Offbeat copyright claimJeremy G ByrneWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
New constitutional challenge to copyright laws -- Kahle v. Ashcroft.Chris SprigmanTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTerry CarrollTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionJuan SaavedraTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Character style guides as derivative worksJessica R. FriedmanMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Copyright Notice translationKraly, TeresaMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: Offbeat copyright claimRobert F. BodiMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: Offbeat copyright claimKathleen WilliamsonMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: Offbeat copyright claimKevin GriersonMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: Offbeat copyright claimJohn LevineTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
RE: Re: first sale - pointers to articlesEthan AckermanMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Offbeat copyright claimTerry CarrollMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Reminder: Digital Licensing OnlineKim NayyerMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
GigaLaw.com Roundtable Discussion: Pop-Up Ads and the LawDoug IsenbergMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionJuan SaavedraMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionKeith TaborMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTerry CarrollMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
copyright author/claimant correctionKathleen WilliamsonFri Mar 19 2004 - 20:35:27 GMT
Re: copyright author/claimant correctionTheodora MichaelsMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
RE: Re: first saleEthan AckermanWed Mar 17 2004 - 22:18:00 GMT
RE: Re: first saleJohn P. McNeillThu Mar 18 2004 - 16:45:24 GMT
RE: Re: first saleJohn MitchellTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
RE: Re: first saleJohn MitchellFri Mar 26 2004 - 16:45:53 GMT
RE: Re: first saleLawrence E. RosenTue Mar 30 2004 - 17:45:12 GMT
RE: Re: first saleAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Apr 01 2004 - 17:05:12 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiWed Mar 17 2004 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRoy MurphyThu Mar 18 2004 - 16:45:24 GMT
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenThu Mar 18 2004 - 22:20:26 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThu Mar 18 2004 - 22:20:26 GMT
Re: Re: first saleMike HoldernessFri Mar 19 2004 - 20:35:27 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiFri Mar 19 2004 - 20:35:27 GMT
Re: Re: first saleKaren CoyleMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: Re: first saleKeith TaborWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: first saleJohn AllisonWed Mar 24 2004 - 22:00:30 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiMon Mar 29 2004 - 20:15:17 GMT
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenTue Mar 30 2004 - 17:45:12 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiTue Mar 30 2004 - 22:20:16 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiTue Mar 30 2004 - 22:20:16 GMT
Re: Re: first saleVance R. KovenWed Mar 31 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: first saleWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 31 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: first saleWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 31 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiWed Mar 31 2004 - 22:15:12 GMT
Re: Re: first saleKeith TaborThu Apr 01 2004 - 17:05:12 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRoy MurphyThu Apr 01 2004 - 17:05:12 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThu Apr 01 2004 - 23:35:29 GMT
Re: Re: first saleRobert F. BodiThu Apr 01 2004 - 23:35:29 GMT
Re: Re: first saleDavid DaileyThu Apr 01 2004 - 23:35:29 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiWed Mar 17 2004 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiThu Mar 18 2004 - 16:45:24 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyFri Mar 19 2004 - 20:35:27 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesTerry CarrollTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiTue Mar 23 2004 - 22:28:29 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRoy MurphyWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiThu Mar 25 2004 - 21:15:54 GMT
Re: Re: Recording for educational purposesWilliam T. McGrathThu Mar 25 2004 - 21:15:54 GMT
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsCarl OppedahlWed Mar 17 2004 - 17:30:59 GMT
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsTerry CarrollWed Mar 17 2004 - 17:30:59 GMT
Re: Value of Registration after 3 monthsRobert F. BodiWed Mar 17 2004 - 20:10:30 GMT
RE: Re: Recording for educational purposesWergeles, Amy SpanWed Mar 17 2004 - 17:30:59 GMT
RE: Re: Recording for educational purposesCone, Stella B.Wed Mar 17 2004 - 20:10:30 GMT
RE: Value of Registration after 3 monthsMichael GrahamWed Mar 17 2004 - 17:30:59 GMT
RE: Value of Registration after 3 monthsWergeles, Amy SpanWed Mar 17 2004 - 17:30:59 GMT
Re: Recording for educational purposesRobert F. BodiWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: Recording for educational purposesjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Update on Golan v. AshcroftJoseph Pietro RioloWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: first saleSteven JamarWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: first saleSteven JamarMon Mar 22 2004 - 16:00:25 GMT
Re: first saleKevin GriersonMon Mar 22 2004 - 20:30:16 GMT
Re: first saleKevin GriersonWed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:30 GMT
Re: first saleKevin GriersonFri Mar 26 2004 - 21:25:20 GMT
RE: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
RE: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellWed Mar 17 2004 - 22:18:00 GMT
Value of Registration after 3 monthsTed HammermanWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesArtCop[_at_]aol.comTue Mar 16 2004 - 22:26:00 GMT
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesRick KosnoakiaWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesJean T. KreamerWed Mar 17 2004 - 16:45:20 GMT
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesWallace J.McLeanWed Mar 17 2004 - 20:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: copyright photographs and art sketchesDavid DaileyTue Mar 23 2004 - 16:05:25 GMT
Recording for educational purposesWergeles, Amy SpanTue Mar 16 2004 - 21:20:20 GMT
RE: copyright photographs and art sketchesElizabeth T. RussellTue Mar 16 2004 - 21:20:20 GMT
copyright photographs and art sketchesRick KosnoakiaTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloFri Mar 19 2004 - 20:35:27 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" Exceptionsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenMon Mar 15 2004 - 21:20:30 GMT
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study andresearch" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenThu Mar 18 2004 - 16:45:24 GMT
RE: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionLawrence E. RosenMon Mar 15 2004 - 21:20:30 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study andresearch" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloMon Mar 15 2004 - 16:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyFri Mar 12 2004 - 16:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiFri Mar 12 2004 - 22:00:33 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" Exceptionsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Mar 15 2004 - 16:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyMon Mar 15 2004 - 16:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiMon Mar 15 2004 - 21:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionDavid TurnerMon Mar 15 2004 - 21:20:30 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRoy MurphyTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionRobert F. BodiTue Mar 16 2004 - 21:20:20 GMT
Re: new patrons from other companiesRoland ColeThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
RE: US Copyright Office pendency?Robert PanzerThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Brock Shinen, Esq.Thu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:15 GMT
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Carl OppedahlThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Benedict O'MahoneyThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Carol BusbyThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
Re: US Copyright Office pendency?Scott KellerThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:16 GMT
Re: Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright"private study andresearch" ExceptionThierry MoreauThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:15 GMT
US Copyright Office pendency?Carl OppedahlThu Mar 11 2004 - 18:35:49 GMT
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteTerry CarrollThu Mar 11 2004 - 18:35:49 GMT
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRobert F. BodiFri Mar 12 2004 - 16:15:30 GMT
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteVance R. KovenFri Mar 12 2004 - 22:00:32 GMT
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteVance R. KovenTue Mar 16 2004 - 21:20:20 GMT
Re: Copyright Clearance CenterBrock Shinen, Esq.Thu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Copyright Clearance CenterPatsy MussonThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyFri Mar 12 2004 - 22:00:33 GMT
RE: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" sitetja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloMon Mar 15 2004 - 16:20:13 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionJoseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 16 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteKeith TaborThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT
RE:Putting Students Creative Work on WebShelly WarwickThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT
new patrons from other companiesDenise HerseyThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT
Conference Announcement: Computers, Freedom & Privacy 2004Laura QuilterWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
RE: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteMike BradleyWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
RE: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteShelly WarwickThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT
Copyright Clearance CenterGolinveaux, JenniferWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRoland ColeWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteDavid BozakWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteRobert F. BodiWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteDan McGuireWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteLuis F. RodriguezWed Mar 10 2004 - 17:25:20 GMT
Re: Putting students' creative work on an "open" siteSteven JamarThu Mar 11 2004 - 23:45:15 GMT
Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Copyright "private study and research" ExceptionThierry MoreauWed Mar 10 2004 - 17:25:20 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzWed Mar 10 2004 - 17:25:20 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzWed Mar 10 2004 - 17:25:20 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
Conference Announcement: FRAMED!! How Law Constructs and Constrains CultureJennifer JenkinsTue Mar 09 2004 - 16:00:37 GMT
Re: Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Roland ColeMon Mar 08 2004 - 21:00:40 GMT
Database Protection, Feist et al. in CanadaBernard KatzMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: Teaching database protectionKeith TaborMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Carol ShepherdMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Unabomber manuscripts opinion - feds own copyrights?Carol ShepherdMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Teaching database protectionSteven JamarFri Mar 05 2004 - 23:15:55 GMT
RE: Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:16:05 GMT
RE: Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputLawrence E. RosenFri Mar 05 2004 - 23:15:38 GMT
Re: Meeting: National Policies on Open Access Provision for University Research OutputStevan HarnadFri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT
RE: Re: H.R. 3261?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261?Karen CoyleThu Mar 04 2004 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Mar 05 2004 - 23:15:38 GMT
Copyright search engineCarol BusbyThu Mar 04 2004 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Steven JamarThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
more on database legislationJQ JohnsonThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure? Coke FormulaAndrewThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Betamax decision was very closeJoseph Pietro RioloThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
HR 3261, Database ProtectionDodi SchultzThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
RE: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Chris MohrWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Terry CarrollWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Keith TaborWed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Malla PollackWed Mar 03 2004 - 22:25:15 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")James and Dorothy BrennanThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Terry CarrollThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Why Lessig feels responsible for the defeat in _Eldred_?Joseph Pietro RioloWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?MinodierTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Keith TaborWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?John AllisonWed Mar 03 2004 - 22:25:15 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Roy MurphyFri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT
Re: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert E. Jones, IIIFri Mar 05 2004 - 21:16:05 GMT
RE: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
RE: Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"John MitchellTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike BradleyMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Robert F. BodiTue Mar 02 2004 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Keith TaborTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
Re: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")David DaileyTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
RE: Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike HoldernessTue Mar 02 2004 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"JQ JohnsonWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Dodi SchultzMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Joseph Pietro RioloTue Mar 09 2004 - 16:00:37 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Joseph Pietro RioloMon Mar 15 2004 - 16:20:13 GMT
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Robert F. BodiMon Mar 01 2004 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Mar 02 2004 - 16:40:45 GMT
Re: Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")James and Dorothy BrennanMon Mar 01 2004 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call themMike HoldernessMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
First Call: IV Congress of Computer LawErick Iriarte AhonMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiMon Mar 01 2004 - 21:30:30 GMT
--> RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Mar 09 2004 - 16:00:37 GMT
--> RE: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike BradleyThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:46 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Mar 09 2004 - 16:00:37 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Bob WarnerWed Mar 10 2004 - 22:25:39 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:45 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Bob WarnerThu Mar 11 2004 - 18:35:49 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiThu Mar 11 2004 - 18:35:49 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Mar 12 2004 - 16:15:30 GMT
Why Database Protection (was: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts")Robert F. BodiMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Trade Secrets Not Secure?Mike BradleyMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Trade Secrets Not Secure?Kevin GriersonWed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Fine! But don't call them "facts"Steven JamarMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Fwd: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Will SimmonsMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Course Announcement: Digital Licensing OnlineKim NayyerFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumDeMarte, LukeThu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumMike BradleyFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
RE: Re: The Grey AlbumAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
Re: the law IS what the law IS.Kevin GriersonThu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT
Re: the law IS what the law IS.Steven JamarThu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT
RE: Re: Decompiler service - Object code IS "protected" by copyright lawEthan AckermanThu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT
Re: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDBrock Shinen, Esq.Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
Re: The Grey AlbumTheodora MichaelsThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
Re: Re: Peter Pan.Ohad MayblumWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Malla PollackWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"David DaileyFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mike HoldernessWed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborWed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Mark DavisonThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborThu Mar 04 2004 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Terry CarrollFri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Mar 05 2004 - 23:15:38 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Keith TaborMon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"Robert F. BodiTue Mar 09 2004 - 21:10:32 GMT
Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDEric Von VorysWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDConlon, JulieThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDJohn MitchellFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDEric Von VorysFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
The Grey AlbumNick ZalesWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: The Grey AlbumTheodora MichaelsFri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT
Re: The law is interpretedRobert F. BodiWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:20 GMT
The law is interpretedHerb ColemanTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT
Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVDBrock Shinen, Esq.Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: 321 StudiosKathleen WilliamsonTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law ISRobert F. BodiTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT
RE: Peter Pan.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts"David DaileyTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiThu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Robert F. BodiMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Keith TaborMon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT
Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Bob WarnerMon Mar 01 2004 - 21:30:30 GMT
Re: the law IS what the law ISSteven JamarTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
RE: 321 StudiosScott WarnerTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
RE: 321 StudiosJohn MitchellTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Gregory AharonianTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: 321 StudiosMaureen Cohen HarringtonTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: 321 StudiosDoug IsenbergTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: 321 StudiosMalla PollackTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.'Timothy Arnold-Moore'Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.John MitchellThu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:44 GMT
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.John MitchellThu Feb 26 2004 - 22:11:05 GMT
RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS.Harold FederowFri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT
321 Studiosjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT
Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Nick ZalesMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?John MitchellMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?John MitchellTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT
Re: brown v boardSteven JamarMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Publishing CatalogBrock Shinen, Esq.Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsMike HoldernessMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRobert F. BodiMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRoy MurphyWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservsRobert F. BodiThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?I.R.MaturanaMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Ethan AckermanTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT
RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?I.R.MaturanaThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
Compilation of video scenes onto DVDConlon, JulieMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
RE: H.R. 3261?Lee, DanFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit?Robert F. BodiTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT
Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screenSteven JamarFri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT
RE: what about this? a lawsuit?meFri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT
H.R. 3261?urbanekFri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT
Re: H.R. 3261?JQ JohnsonThu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT
RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsJohn MitchellFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT
[NetGold] FOLKLORE : ARTICLE : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW: Traditional Knowledge 'In Peril'David P. DillardThu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiThu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT
Registration of an unpublished work created in the 1960sLara PearsonThu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT
RE: Re:legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shotsAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT
Re: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkRobert F. BodiWed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT
RE: Re: Those Email SignaturesHarold FederowWed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT
RE: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkHarold FederowWed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT
Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkKeith TaborTue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT
Sale of Goodwill as Sale of TrademarkNick ZalesTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
RE: Those Email SignaturesJohn MitchellTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risksstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: Those Email SignaturesKeith TaborMon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT
Re: Those Email SignaturesBrock Shinen, Esq.Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT
RE: Legal theory translation help pleasePaula Holm JensenMon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT
CCC transaction reportingLiz DavisMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
Those Email SignaturesMike BradleyMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
Re: Those Email SignaturesSteven JamarTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: Those Email SignaturesKevin GriersonTue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT
RE: Re: Publication through public displayRobert PanzerMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
RE: Re: Publication through public displayChristine L. SundtMon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT
sims copyright issues for artistsSimHippy[_at_]aol.comMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
Re: Questions concerning section 506(c)Kathleen WilliamsonMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
Lawsuit against Austin, TX CopyshopsSmith, Robert E.Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
[NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at RiskDavid P. DillardMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
Legal theory translation help pleaseMike HoldernessMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
RE: owner/authorship problemMike BradleyFri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT
RE: Re: owner/authorship problemMike BradleyFri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT
registering works containing trade secretsBaron, Robert (Phila)Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
owner/authorship probleminfo[_at_]joybutler.comFri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
Re: Publication through public displayVance R. KovenFri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
Re: owner/authorship problemjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comFri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
Re: owner/authorship problemKeith TaborFri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
Questions concerning section 506(c)David DaileyFri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT
Re: Questions concerning section 506(c)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT
owner/authorship problemKathleen WilliamsonThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT
Publication through public displayLara PearsonThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT
owner/authorship problemKathleen WilliamsonThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT
Publication through public displayLara PearsonThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedEdward BarrowThu Feb 12 2004 - 18:55:05 GMT
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguidedsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT
Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguidedsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT
Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedRoy MurphyThu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT
Re: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsWilliam T. McGrathThu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT
Re: Re: Contribution to a collective workVance R. KovenWed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT
It's baaa--aaackWallace J.McLeanWed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT
Editorial re Copyright Collectives and Electronic WorksKim NayyerWed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT
RE: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractSandy ShepardWed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT
[NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and MisguidedDavid P. DillardWed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT
Re: Re: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]David BozakWed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractBrock Shinen, Esq.Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT
Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike HoldernessWed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT
RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission forscreen shots"]ericgoldman[_at_]onebox.comWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]Tim Arnold-MooreWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Contribution to a collective workDodi SchultzTue Feb 10 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Contribution to a collective workMike OliverTue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT
Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike HoldernessTue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT
no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"]David DaileyTue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT
Contribution to a collective workCarol BusbyTue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT
Re: Contribution to a collective workSteven JamarWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: famous person's nameHeather VargasTue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT
Standard Technical MeasuresHeather VargasTue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT
famous person's nameRuth Dukelow/mlcTue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT
RE: famous person's nameSandy ShepardMon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT
Copyright in Multimedia worksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT
Re: famous person's nameVance R. KovenMon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT
Re: famous person's nameElizabeth T. RussellMon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT
RE: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractMike BradleyMon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT
famous person's nameKathleen WilliamsonMon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT
Work-made-for-hire: not labor contractJohn HamptonMon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT
RE: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsJessica R. FriedmanFri Feb 06 2004 - 22:15:02 GMT
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsKeith TaborFri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsWilliam T. McGrathTue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT
Mellon Postdoctoral Research FellowOlga FrancoisThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsEdward BarrowThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJimmy WalesThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsDavid DaileyThu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:27 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiTue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsDavid DaileyTue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiWed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsRobert F. BodiMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT
Re: Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineThu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsChris ReedThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsMike BradleyThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsDuhaime, DianeThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
RE: Re: permission for screen shotsChris MohrFri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT
CALL FOR PAPERS: Deadline: February 9, 2004Olga FrancoisThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsJessica R. FriedmanThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claimsSteven JamarFri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT
Re: permission for screen shotsJohn LevineThu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT
permission for screen shotsJohn EyeWed Feb 04 2004 - 20:10:43 GMT
Re: permission for screen shotsSteven JamarThu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT
Re: permission for screen shotsCarol SimpsonThu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT
Re: permission for screen shotsSteven JamarWed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT
April 5, 2004 - NYC - TACD workshop on Global Access to Essential Learning ToolsJames LoveWed Feb 04 2004 - 16:20:02 GMT
RE: Re: University professors - work for hireTurley, Patrick CTue Feb 03 2004 - 21:45:07 GMT
RE: Re: CA: WMFH=employeeAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT
Re: Re: University professors - work for hireCarol BusbyTue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT
Re: Re: University professors - work for hiresstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:42 GMT
Re: Re: University professors - work for hireNancy WillardWed Feb 11 2004 - 22:20:48 GMT
Section 201 c: any later collective work in the same seriesMike BradleyTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: Termination rights, was Work For Hire AgreementsJohn LevineTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: University professors - work for hireIvan HoffmanMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
Re: University professors - work for hireDavid DaileyTue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike PhillipsMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Sandy ShepardMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike BradleyTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Mike BradleyTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Robert F. BodiMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
Copyright status of previous manuscripts of published workRobert E. Jones, IIIMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements, terminationJohn LevineMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Amicus opportunity for part-time law professorsMalla PollackMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
University professors - work for hireDavid PostMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Re: University professors - work for hireSteven JamarTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: University professors - work for hireJQ JohnsonWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsWilliam T. McGrathFri Jan 30 2004 - 21:35:47 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsWilliam T. McGrathMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire AgreementsDeMarte, LukeFri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned?Jessica R. FriedmanFri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?William T. McGrathFri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Carol BusbyFri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Ivan HoffmanFri Jan 30 2004 - 20:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?John AllisonTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Terry CarrollTue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Ivan HoffmanTue Feb 03 2004 - 17:25:36 GMT
Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned?Kenneth LiuFri Jan 30 2004 - 17:45:02 GMT
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsIvan HoffmanThu Jan 29 2004 - 21:35:14 GMT
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsRoland ColeFri Jan 30 2004 - 17:45:02 GMT
Digital Cultural Institutions Project - Summer 2004 Awards CompetitiondcipThu Jan 29 2004 - 21:35:14 GMT
RE: Work For Hire AgreementsDuhaime, DianeThu Jan 29 2004 - 19:50:02 GMT
RE: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they be signed?Jessica R. FriedmanThu Jan 29 2004 - 19:50:02 GMT
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Nakerite[_at_]aol.comThu Jan 29 2004 - 19:50:02 GMT
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Bob WarnerThu Jan 29 2004 - 19:50:02 GMT
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .John AllisonThu Jan 29 2004 - 21:35:14 GMT
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Bob WarnerFri Jan 30 2004 - 17:45:02 GMT
Re: Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Keith TaborFri Jan 30 2004 - 17:45:03 GMT
Work For Hire AgreementsBrock Shinen, Esq.Thu Jan 29 2004 - 18:20:01 GMT
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsKenneth LiuFri Jan 30 2004 - 21:45:03 GMT
Re: Work For Hire AgreementsKevin GriersonMon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT
Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Keith TaborThu Jan 29 2004 - 18:20:01 GMT
Re: It was bound to happen sometime. . .Roland ColeThu Jan 29 2004 - 18:20:01 GMT
It was bound to happen sometime. . .Kevin GriersonWed Jan 28 2004 - 18:00:19 GMT
Re: Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcop...KJKJKO[_at_]aol.comWed Jan 28 2004 - 14:30:18 GMT
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightCarol BusbyTue Jan 27 2004 - 17:25:26 GMT
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcopyrightKathleen WilliamsonTue Jan 27 2004 - 17:25:26 GMT
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark andcopyrightRoland ColeTue Jan 27 2004 - 17:25:26 GMT
division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightTheodora MichaelsMon Jan 26 2004 - 21:20:42 GMT
Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyrightTheodora MichaelsWed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
New York Times Magazine articleKatzman, Leonard B.Fri Jan 23 2004 - 22:01:17 GMT
Re: Copyright Advice Re WebsiteKevin GriersonFri Jan 23 2004 - 18:10:08 GMT
RE: Copyright Advice Re WebsiteChris MohrFri Jan 23 2004 - 18:10:08 GMT
Ottawa conference: Rethinking CopyrightWallace J.McLeanFri Jan 23 2004 - 18:10:08 GMT
Canadian Copyright Collectives RoundtableWallace J.McLeanFri Jan 23 2004 - 18:10:08 GMT
Copyright Advice Re WebsiteDavid DeutschFri Jan 23 2004 - 16:40:20 GMT
Re: Researching German copyrightVance R. KovenFri Jan 23 2004 - 16:40:20 GMT
RE: Re: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneFri Jan 23 2004 - 16:40:20 GMT
Add Ons versus derivate works - any updates?Roland ColeFri Jan 23 2004 - 16:40:20 GMT
Adaptation by StudentsHerb ColemanThu Jan 22 2004 - 22:15:11 GMT
Re: Re: Researching German copyrightElizabeth T. RussellThu Jan 22 2004 - 22:15:11 GMT
RE: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneThu Jan 22 2004 - 21:35:07 GMT
RE: Researching German copyrightKarle-Zenith, AnneThu Jan 22 2004 - 21:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Jeremy SmithThu Jan 22 2004 - 21:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Jan 23 2004 - 16:40:20 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Keith TaborWed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT
Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiThu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT
Researching German copyrightElizabeth T. RussellThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: Re: Researching German copyrightMike HoldernessTue Jan 27 2004 - 17:25:26 GMT
Re: Adaptation by StudentsIvan HoffmanThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: Adaptation by StudentsMalla PollackThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
RE: Re: Microsoft's name and copyright?tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.auThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter promotionKim NayyerThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Adaptation by StudentsWald, Joanne (ESC)Wed Jan 21 2004 - 21:05:02 GMT
Re: Microsoft's name and copyright?Keith TaborWed Jan 21 2004 - 17:15:19 GMT
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Roland ColeWed Jan 21 2004 - 17:15:19 GMT
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Robert F. BodiThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: Copyright - China, Taiwan, VietnamBob WarnerWed Jan 21 2004 - 17:15:19 GMT
TACD, Feb 4 workshop in Brussels, Copyright in the Digital AgeJames LoveWed Jan 21 2004 - 17:15:19 GMT
Microsoft's name and copyright?David BozakTue Jan 20 2004 - 21:20:13 GMT
canada.com Storydmcguire[_at_]sfu.caTue Jan 20 2004 - 21:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: Innocent InfringementCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTue Jan 20 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Jeremy SmithTue Jan 20 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice?Kevin GriersonThu Jan 22 2004 - 21:35:07 GMT
Jan 23 IP seminar at Queen Mary's in LondonGregory AharonianTue Jan 20 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiTue Jan 20 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: fair use questionRoy MurphyTue Jan 20 2004 - 21:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: Re: fair use questionRobert F. BodiMon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT
Preventing Plagiarism Toolbox: an online workshopOlga FrancoisMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
RE: fair use questionSandy ShepardMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
fair use questionMark RyanFri Jan 16 2004 - 20:21:29 GMT
Re: fair use questionSteven JamarMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:10 GMT
Re: fair use questionSteven JamarThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: Innocent Infringementjnoble[_at_]dgsys.comFri Jan 16 2004 - 20:21:29 GMT
Innocent InfringementHarlan JeffersonThu Jan 15 2004 - 21:20:19 GMT
Re: Innocent InfringementSteven JamarMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:10 GMT
Open Access Does Not require Republishing and Reprinting RightsStevan HarnadThu Jan 15 2004 - 17:15:10 GMT
RE: Re: Game IssuesJessica R. FriedmanWed Jan 14 2004 - 22:15:05 GMT
Re: Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksKeith TaborTue Jan 13 2004 - 21:25:36 GMT
RE: Re: Record LabelSandy ShepardMon Jan 12 2004 - 20:55:07 GMT
Re: Copyright on Game IssueEdward BarrowMon Jan 12 2004 - 20:55:07 GMT
Re: Copyright on Game IssueMike HoldernessTue Jan 13 2004 - 21:25:36 GMT
Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Jan 12 2004 - 20:55:07 GMT
Form SRMike PhillipsMon Jan 12 2004 - 20:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesMarkMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWed Jan 14 2004 - 21:15:14 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollWed Jan 14 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWed Jan 14 2004 - 22:15:05 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollThu Jan 15 2004 - 17:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesMalla PollackThu Jan 15 2004 - 17:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldThu Jan 15 2004 - 21:20:19 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesVance R. KovenThu Jan 15 2004 - 21:20:19 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesMalla PollackFri Jan 16 2004 - 20:21:29 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollFri Jan 16 2004 - 20:21:29 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesVance R. KovenMon Jan 19 2004 - 17:55:11 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesTerry CarrollTue Jan 20 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldTue Jan 20 2004 - 21:20:13 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKeith TaborWed Jan 21 2004 - 17:15:19 GMT
Re: Re: Game IssuesKevin Last Name WithheldWed Jan 21 2004 - 21:05:02 GMT
implied license and Re: Game IssuesDavid DaileyMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Library reproduction of CDROMs included with books - Is this legal?Donald GuyMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Copyright on Game IssueMarkMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Copyright - China, Taiwan, VietnamBob WarnerMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Re: Re: Record LabelHeather VargasMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Re: Re: Record LabelKathleen WilliamsonMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Re: Re: Record LabelNick AlbanoMon Jan 12 2004 - 20:55:07 GMT
Re: Game IssuesKevin GriersonFri Jan 09 2004 - 19:57:09 GMT
RE: Game IssuesFletcher, EricFri Jan 09 2004 - 19:57:09 GMT
RE: Game IssuesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Jan 09 2004 - 19:57:09 GMT
Game IssuesMarkFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
Re: Game IssuesHerb ColemanTue Jan 13 2004 - 21:25:36 GMT
Re: Game IssuesKevin GriersonWed Jan 14 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT
Re: Game IssuesSteven JamarThu Jan 22 2004 - 16:29:59 GMT
Re: (CNI-COPYRIGHT) SCO-IBM-Red Hat-AIX/LINUX litigationEdward BarrowFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
(CNI-COPYRIGHT) SCO-IBM-Red Hat-AIX/LINUX litigationChristopher J. PalermoThu Jan 08 2004 - 21:00:09 GMT
Re: Record LabelIvan HoffmanThu Jan 08 2004 - 21:00:09 GMT
Re: Record LabelCarlos FigueirasFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
Re: Record LabelKathleen WilliamsonFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
Re: Re: law of publicity and works of artRon KingThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:25 GMT
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:25 GMT
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Chris MohrThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:25 GMT
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Jessica R. FriedmanThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
RE: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Robert PanzerThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:25 GMT
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Vance R. KovenThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Terry CarrollThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Stephen FishmanThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Record LabelHeather VargasThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:25 GMT
RE: law of publicity and works of artTrademarksWed Jan 07 2004 - 21:20:08 GMT
Re: law of publicity and works of artVance R. KovenWed Jan 07 2004 - 21:20:08 GMT
Re: law of publicity and works of artKeith TaborWed Jan 07 2004 - 21:20:08 GMT
Re: law of publicity and works of artKevin GriersonWed Jan 07 2004 - 21:20:08 GMT
Yiddish stories published in Poland in 1933 subject to copyright protection in US?Jessica R. FriedmanWed Jan 07 2004 - 21:20:08 GMT
Free AdviceRoland ColeWed Jan 07 2004 - 16:20:31 GMT
Re: Re: family xmas cardKeith TaborWed Jan 07 2004 - 16:20:31 GMT
law of publicity and works of artroncking[_at_]cox.netWed Jan 07 2004 - 16:20:31 GMT
Re: family xmas cardPhil LeonardTue Jan 06 2004 - 21:56:34 GMT
Re: Browse Wrap agreementsKevin GriersonTue Jan 06 2004 - 21:56:34 GMT
Re: Browse Wrap agreementsIvan HoffmanTue Jan 06 2004 - 21:56:34 GMT
Assignment in Advance of WorkRoland ColeTue Jan 06 2004 - 20:00:07 GMT
Browse Wrap agreementsRoland ColeTue Jan 06 2004 - 20:00:07 GMT
family xmas cardBillTue Jan 06 2004 - 18:40:06 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Public Domain Imagessstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Jan 06 2004 - 00:30:10 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain ImagesChris MohrTue Jan 06 2004 - 00:30:10 GMT
RE: Re: Public Domain Imagesirm[_at_]in3activa.comFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
Re: Forum Postings & Derivative WorksMike HoldernessFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
British Library CD "Spoken Word - Writers"amalyah keshetFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloTue Jan 06 2004 - 18:40:06 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesJoseph Pietro RioloMon Jan 12 2004 - 16:00:22 GMT
Happy Public Domain Day!Wallace J.McLeanFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Re: Public Domain imagesSteven JamarWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRoy MurphyWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCopylaw[_at_]aol.comWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesWallace J.McLeanFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTue Jan 06 2004 - 00:30:10 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSTue Jan 06 2004 - 00:30:10 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONTue Jan 06 2004 - 18:40:06 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborTue Jan 06 2004 - 20:00:07 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRoy MurphyWed Jan 07 2004 - 16:20:31 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborFri Jan 09 2004 - 18:20:17 GMT
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decides BARBIE Photos are a Parody and Fair Usepjones[_at_]millerthomson.caWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Carol ShepherdTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
RE: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Chris MohrTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
RE: Public Domain ImagesChris MohrTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Public Domain ImagesDodi SchultzTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain Imagesirm[_at_]in3activa.comTue Jan 06 2004 - 18:40:06 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesKevin GriersonTue Jan 06 2004 - 21:56:34 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesRobert F. BodiTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesNancy WillardTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesNakerite[_at_]aol.comTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain Imagesroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesKeith TaborWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Karsten M. SelfMon Dec 29 2003 - 18:07:03 GMT
Re: TM/SM in non-commercial contexts?Steven JamarWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Public Domain ImagesPPCVIDZ.COM ADMINISTRATIONMon Dec 29 2003 - 18:07:03 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesSteven JamarWed Dec 31 2003 - 15:00:59 GMT
Re: Public Domain ImagesSteven JamarFri Jan 02 2004 - 03:40:03 GMT
Listserv for TM -> LISTSERV *is* a TM!Rich WigginsWed Dec 24 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Re: Listserv for TMKevin GriersonTue Dec 23 2003 - 20:00:04 GMT
Listserv for TMVlPtrsn[_at_]aol.comTue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
RE: Re: Photo booth copyrightsChristine L. SundtMon Dec 22 2003 - 21:45:10 GMT
RE: Re: Photo booth copyrightsWelch, John L.Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsJeff SedlikMon Dec 22 2003 - 21:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRobert E. Jones, IIIMon Dec 22 2003 - 21:45:24 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsBrock Shinen, Esq.Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRich StimTue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsJ_e_f_f__S_e_d_l_i_kWed Dec 24 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsRobert F. BodiTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
Re: Re: Photo booth copyrightsMikus GrinbergsMon Dec 22 2003 - 21:45:10 GMT
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Terry CarrollMon Dec 22 2003 - 20:05:08 GMT
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Keith TaborTue Dec 23 2003 - 20:00:04 GMT
Re: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Robert F. BodiThu Jan 08 2004 - 19:10:26 GMT
Re: Photo booth copyrightsBrock Shinen, Esq.Mon Dec 22 2003 - 20:05:08 GMT
Re: Photo booth copyrightsBernard KatzTue Dec 23 2003 - 20:00:04 GMT
Forum Postings & Derivative WorksPhil GenglerMon Dec 22 2003 - 20:05:08 GMT
re: Predating - Can I get caughtSteven JamarMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Photo booth copyrightsRich StimMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Re: Very humorous storyJoseph Pietro RioloMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Re: Selling outside of the U.S. (original subject line was blank)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Summary of IP aspects of Central American Freee Trade actGregory AharonianFri Dec 19 2003 - 20:25:15 GMT
CALL FOR PAPERS: Colleges, Code and CopyrightOlga FrancoisFri Dec 19 2003 - 20:25:15 GMT
Predating - Can I get caught?Dodi SchultzFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Kevin GriersonFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?ALRAGUENEA[_at_]aol.comMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Kevin GriersonMon Dec 22 2003 - 20:05:08 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Lawrence E. RosenFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Paula Holm JensenFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Chris MohrMon Dec 22 2003 - 20:05:08 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?McNeill, JohnWed Dec 24 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Friedman, Barbara L.Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:40:06 GMT
RE: Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Jan 06 2004 - 21:56:34 GMT
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Dec 18 2003 - 19:45:15 GMT
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Robert PanzerThu Dec 18 2003 - 19:45:15 GMT
RE: Predating - Can I get caught?Fletcher, EricFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThu Dec 18 2003 - 19:45:15 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Brock Shinen, Esq.Thu Dec 18 2003 - 19:45:15 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Keith TaborFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorMon Dec 22 2003 - 16:05:24 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?Juan Saavedra CastroTue Dec 23 2003 - 20:00:04 GMT
Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorThu Dec 18 2003 - 16:10:15 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorFri Dec 19 2003 - 16:10:40 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorTue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Predating - Can I get caught?John VictorTue Dec 23 2003 - 16:45:18 GMT
Re: Very humorous storyKeith TaborMon Dec 15 2003 - 21:35:27 GMT
Re: Very humorous storyKarl-Erik TallmoMon Dec 15 2003 - 21:35:27 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyKeith TaborMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Re: Re: Authorship / Gilberth studiesJohn NobleMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
(no subject)Nakerite[_at_]aol.comMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Very humorous storyJoseph Pietro RioloMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Re: Re: FixationTerry CarrollFri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
Re: Re: FixationJohn NobleMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Version 52, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
RE: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
RE: Authorship / Gilberth studiesAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyPeter HirtleFri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Dec 12 2003 - 15:56:59 GMT
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
RE: Re: FixationAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Dec 18 2003 - 16:10:15 GMT
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyVance R. KovenFri Dec 12 2003 - 15:56:59 GMT
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyTheodore L. AraujoFri Dec 12 2003 - 15:56:59 GMT
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyWilliam T. McGrathFri Dec 12 2003 - 21:43:06 GMT
Re: Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultyWalter L. DuttonMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Copyright Question from a Member of the Brown FacultySadler, ConnieThu Dec 11 2003 - 23:10:19 GMT
RE: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty forGROVES PeterTue Dec 09 2003 - 18:56:31 GMT
Re: Does section 106(a) apply to public domain images?Kevin GriersonMon Dec 08 2003 - 09:35:07 GMT
Re: visual artist rights act and public domain photosVance R KovenMon Dec 08 2003 - 09:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty forMike HoldernessMon Dec 08 2003 - 09:35:07 GMT
Does section 106(a) apply to public domain images?Ron KingSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsStevan HarnadSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
visual artist rights act and public domain photosroncking[_at_]cox.netSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Jon Johansen Retrial Begins in Oslo Appeals CourtTerry CarrollWed Dec 03 2003 - 16:53:34 GMT
Re: Copyright licensing feesCarol BusbyTue Dec 02 2003 - 20:45:05 GMT
Jon Johansen Retrial Begins in Oslo Appeals CourtRobin GrossTue Dec 02 2003 - 16:25:48 GMT
Copyright licensing feesRobert FerrisTue Dec 02 2003 - 16:25:48 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballMiller, BarryMon Dec 01 2003 - 22:15:03 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed Dec 03 2003 - 21:11:48 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballMichael GrahamTue Dec 09 2003 - 03:51:32 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Dec 09 2003 - 03:51:32 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Dec 09 2003 - 18:56:31 GMT
RE: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Fri Dec 12 2003 - 15:56:59 GMT
RE: The Rights of Major League BaseballAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Dec 01 2003 - 20:40:34 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballTerry CarrollMon Dec 01 2003 - 20:40:34 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith TaborTue Dec 02 2003 - 16:25:48 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballChris SprigmanWed Dec 03 2003 - 16:53:34 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostWed Dec 03 2003 - 21:11:48 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleWed Dec 03 2003 - 21:11:48 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballRobert F. BodiSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostMon Dec 08 2003 - 09:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netMon Dec 08 2003 - 09:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleTue Dec 09 2003 - 03:51:32 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballChris SprigmanTue Dec 09 2003 - 18:56:31 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Dec 11 2003 - 23:10:19 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith HandleyThu Dec 11 2003 - 23:10:19 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballJohn NobleThu Dec 11 2003 - 23:10:19 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostThu Dec 11 2003 - 23:10:19 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Re: Re: The Rights of Major League Baseballsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
RE: Copyright title of a work?Michael GrahamMon Dec 01 2003 - 16:35:22 GMT
RE: Copyright title of a work?Robert PanzerTue Dec 02 2003 - 16:26:06 GMT
Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballKeith TaborMon Dec 01 2003 - 16:35:22 GMT
Re: The Rights of Major League BaseballDavid PostTue Dec 02 2003 - 20:45:05 GMT
The Rights of Major League Baseballroberthelmer[_at_]charter.netMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin Miamisstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin Miamisstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Right of publicity a type of Intellectual PropertyALRAGUENEA[_at_]aol.comMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Copyright title of a work?Keith TaborMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Copyright title of a work?Carol BusbyMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Copyright title of a work?Ivan HoffmanMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: Copyright title of a work?Carl OppedahlMon Dec 01 2003 - 01:35:34 GMT
Re: EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA TradeMinisterial Meetingin MiamiFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThu Nov 27 2003 - 04:40:08 GMT
Copyright title of a work?MikhailThu Nov 27 2003 - 04:40:08 GMT
Re: Copyright title of a work?Kevin GriersonTue Dec 02 2003 - 20:45:05 GMT
EXCESSIVE FORCE: IP Justice Report from FTAA Trade Ministerial Meeting in MiamiRobin GrossTue Nov 25 2003 - 19:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikTue Nov 25 2003 - 16:35:05 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographysstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Nov 25 2003 - 16:35:05 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyEdward BarrowTue Nov 25 2003 - 19:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyWilliam T. McGrathTue Nov 25 2003 - 21:01:20 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyKeith TaborThu Nov 27 2003 - 04:40:09 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsTue Dec 02 2003 - 20:45:05 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPatrice LyonsTue Dec 02 2003 - 20:45:05 GMT
Re: Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyRoy MurphyWed Dec 03 2003 - 16:53:44 GMT
[NetGold] TRADEMARKS: CASES: It is Safe to Return to Your New York Hotel Late in the Morning Somewhat Dewey EyedDavid P. DillardTue Nov 25 2003 - 16:35:05 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightltlredwagonMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Copyright vs. contractHerb ColemanMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Re: Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Re: Central versus institutional self-archivingStevan HarnadMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Re: Orphan CopyrightsWallace J.McLeanFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
(no subject)asbfldFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActTerry CarrollFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActJames and Dorothy BrennanFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActPeter M VankevichFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Vessel Hull Design Protection ActJohn NobleMon Nov 24 2003 - 16:35:31 GMT
Orphan CopyrightsCopylaw[_at_]aol.comFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: The Special Case of Law ReviewsStevan HarnadFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: The Special Case of Law ReviewsStevan HarnadFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Vessel Hull Design Protection ActWelch, John L.Fri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: Incidental use of music in filmIvan HoffmanThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksEdward BarrowThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksWallace J.McLeanThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksKaren CoyleThu Nov 20 2003 - 21:11:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksWallace J.McLeanFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsEdward BarrowThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsKevin GriersonThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitsTheodore L. AraujoThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: amusing copyright limitsKeith TaborFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: transferability vs. assignabilityMike OliverThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Educational Use of Consumable MaterialsBradley J BrownThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyPeter M VankevichThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyWilliam T. McGrathMon Nov 24 2003 - 21:00:21 GMT
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikMon Dec 01 2003 - 22:15:03 GMT
Re: Web display and "publication" in photographyRobert F. BodiSat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: property tax?sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: property tax?Keith TaborFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Re: Re: Golan v. Ashcroftsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
RE: Re: Golan v. AshcroftAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: limits on copyright--Orphan worksAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Incidental use of music in filminfo[_at_]joybutler.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
transferability vs. assignabilitymilone[_at_]mindspring.comWed Nov 19 2003 - 21:25:11 GMT
RE: Re: property tax?Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Wed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
Re: Re: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJohn NobleWed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
RE: Re: limits on copyrightLee, DanWed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
RE: Re: limits on copyrightAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Thu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightFreya N AndersonWed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightWallace J.McLeanWed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightTheodore L. AraujoWed Nov 19 2003 - 21:25:11 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeremy G ByrneThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Re: limits on copyrightWill SimmonsTue Nov 25 2003 - 16:35:05 GMT
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"ArtCop[_at_]aol.comWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikWed Nov 19 2003 - 20:45:11 GMT
Re: Re: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikWed Nov 19 2003 - 21:25:11 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTradeMike HoldernessWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyrightprovisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
Re: property tax?Jeff SedlikWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
Re: property tax?Edward BarrowWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
RE: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJavier PerezWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
RE: When is an advertising photograph "Published"Robert PanzerTue Nov 18 2003 - 20:02:42 GMT
property tax?JQ JohnsonTue Nov 18 2003 - 20:02:42 GMT
RE: "natural rights" versus incentiveAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Nov 18 2003 - 20:02:42 GMT
Re: limits on copyrightKeith TaborTue Nov 18 2003 - 20:02:42 GMT
Re: limits on copyrightJeff SedlikWed Nov 19 2003 - 16:10:18 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright: Form, Content, and Prepublication IncarnationsKeith TaborTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
limits on copyrightHerb ColemanTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: limits on copyrightHerb ColemanFri Nov 21 2003 - 17:45:21 GMT
Intellectual Property Licensing in a Loosely Knit Internet OrganisationSimon BrennerTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: film and musicBernard KatzTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: back up videosBernard KatzTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyrightprovisions:FreeTrade ata PriceDenise NicholsonTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at aWallace J.McLeanMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTra de at a PriceGROVES PeterMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Web display and "publication" in photographyJeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Copyright Conundrum #1: Copyright may not be transfered prior to creation of a workJohn NobleMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Copyright Conundrum #3: Are works created by ad photographers derivative?John NobleMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: A Constitutional questionWilliam T. McGrathMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
back up videosHerb ColemanMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: using photographs of musicians for commercial purposesJeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceNancy WillardMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata Pricesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceEdward BarrowTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceKeith TaborTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
film trailer footage/ public domain/ & music synchsKathleen WilliamsonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: film and musicKathleen WilliamsonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Copyright Conundrum #1: Copyright may not be transfered prior to creation of a workJeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Copyright Conundrum #2: Are X-Rays and MRIs copyrightable works?Jeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Copyright Conundrum #3: Are works created by ad photographers derivative?Jeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
When is an advertising photograph "Published"Jeff SedlikMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
(no subject)Ann OkersonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
A Constitutional questionDavid PostMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceDenise NicholsonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions:FreeTrade ata PriceDenise NicholsonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
RE: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Mon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Globe and Mail: Copyright extension deadWallace J.McLeanMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanFri Nov 14 2003 - 22:51:59 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Terry CarrollMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Wallace J.McLeanMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Terry CarrollTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: software hackingKevin GriersonFri Nov 14 2003 - 21:18:44 GMT
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Elizabeth T. RussellFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Kevin GriersonFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceEdward BarrowFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
software hackingGeorgeFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonFri Nov 14 2003 - 22:51:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBernard KatzMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceKeith TaborMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonMon Nov 17 2003 - 21:25:59 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBernard KatzTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceMark DavisonTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceBradley J BrownTue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:45 GMT
Re: Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a Pricesstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 20 2003 - 19:30:30 GMT
RE: Re: Golan v. AshcroftHarold FederowFri Nov 14 2003 - 20:30:08 GMT
Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainKevin GriersonFri Nov 14 2003 - 16:05:28 GMT
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: FreeTrade at a PriceDenise NicholsonFri Nov 14 2003 - 16:05:28 GMT
CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Denise MurrayFri Nov 14 2003 - 16:05:28 GMT
Re: CNI-COPYRIGHT list question.Kevin GriersonMon Nov 17 2003 - 16:12:45 GMT
Re: Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiThu Nov 13 2003 - 21:21:29 GMT
Re: Re: thank you film trailer footage/ public domainMike OliverFri Nov 14 2003 - 22:51:59 GMT
Re: Re: Golan v. Ashcroftsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Nov 13 2003 - 16:55:26 GMT
Re: Re: Golan v. AshcroftRobert F. BodiThu Nov 13 2003 - 21:21:29 GMT
Re: Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: Free Trade at a PriceCalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSThu Nov 13 2003 - 16:55:26 GMT
Re: Re:thank you film trailer footage/ public domainKathleen WilliamsonWed Nov 12 2003 - 21:50:32 GMT
Miami Nov 19 IP Trade Seminar - Negotiating IP Provisions in Free Trade AgreementsJames LoveTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Australia/US/FTA copyright provisions: Free Trade at a PriceJames LoveTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJames LoveTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Re: News coverage of WIPO Broad/Web/Casting TreatyJavier PerezFri Nov 21 2003 - 21:30:23 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownMon Nov 10 2003 - 21:23:23 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownWed Nov 12 2003 - 16:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainBradley J BrownWed Nov 12 2003 - 16:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: film trailer footage/ public domainRobert F. BodiThu Nov 13 2003 - 16:55:26 GMT
Assignment of Copyright in Cinematograph WorksRaza Ahmed SiddiquiMon Nov 10 2003 - 21:23:23 GMT
Re: Re: museums & fair useVance R. KovenMon Nov 10 2003 - 21:23:23 GMT
Re: Re: museums & fair useJohn NobleMon Nov 10 2003 - 21:23:23 GMT
Re: museums & fair useVance R. KovenMon Nov 10 2003 - 20:01:00 GMT
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenMon Nov 10 2003 - 20:01:00 GMT
film trailer footage/ public domainKathleen WilliamsonMon Nov 10 2003 - 16:10:09 GMT
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainKevin GriersonWed Nov 12 2003 - 21:00:07 GMT
Re: film trailer footage/ public domainVance R. KovenWed Nov 12 2003 - 21:00:07 GMT
museums & fair useT CMon Nov 10 2003 - 16:10:09 GMT
RE: Re: unpublished letters in UKGROVES PeterMon Nov 10 2003 - 16:10:09 GMT
RE: Term of Copyright Protection in France in 1900 and in 1950 ??GROVES PeterMon Nov 10 2003 - 16:10:09 GMT
RE: Term of Protection QuestionsRobert PanzerFri Nov 07 2003 - 21:57:31 GMT
Re: Term of Protection QuestionsTerry CarrollFri Nov 07 2003 - 21:57:31 GMT
Term of Protection QuestionsBernard KatzFri Nov 07 2003 - 21:02:57 GMT
Re: unpublished letters in UKLloyd DavidsonFri Nov 07 2003 - 21:02:57 GMT
unpublished letters in UKLaura Young BostFri Nov 07 2003 - 18:12:48 GMT
Term of Copyright Protection in France in 1900 and in 1950 ??Michael LandauFri Nov 07 2003 - 18:12:48 GMT
Plagiarism and Libel: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesStevan HarnadThu Nov 06 2003 - 18:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniJohn AllisonWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:50:26 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniKevin GriersonWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:21:08 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"/TasiniDodi SchultzThu Nov 06 2003 - 18:10:30 GMT
Re: Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONTheodore L. AraujoWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:21:08 GMT
RE: Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONLane SmithWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
FCC Mandates "Broadcast Flag" TechnologyClark, DrewWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
newton v diamond re: steals v. samplesKathleen WilliamsonWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
WIPO SCCR Meeting - day two - more discussion of "casting" treatyJames LoveWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
About Authors Guild...Joseph Pietro RioloWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONTheodore L. AraujoTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:58:34 GMT
Re: INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONKeith TaborWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY QUESTIONLane SmithTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:45:31 GMT
Re: Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingKeith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:45:31 GMT
Re: Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingKathleen WilliamsonWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
Hypothetical/Exploit 40 YO Sound RecordingBradley G. SmithTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:25:54 GMT
Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Update on Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
WIPO deliberations on "casting" treatyJames LoveTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Visual Artists Right Act of 1990 SurveyVARA SurveyTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
RE: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersGROVES PeterTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:03 GMT
Re: "Creative Commons"chodge5[_at_]utk.eduMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:36:02 GMT
Re: "Creative Commons"Michael CarrollTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: "Creative Commons"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseDeMarte, LukeMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:36:02 GMT
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseGROVES PeterTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:03 GMT
RE: Re: Sound Recording LicenseMike PhillipsTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
"Creative Commons"Renee AnthuisMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:10:13 GMT
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRoland ColeMon Nov 03 2003 - 19:55:36 GMT
Re: Sound Recording LicenseIvan HoffmanMon Nov 03 2003 - 19:55:36 GMT
Re: Sound Recording LicenseKathleen WilliamsonMon Nov 03 2003 - 19:55:36 GMT
Project Gramophone: How to Free Older Sound Recordings From the Vaults (article announcement)Jon NoringMon Nov 03 2003 - 15:50:11 GMT
Sound Recording LicenseMike PhillipsMon Nov 03 2003 - 15:50:11 GMT
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRandy NieuwsmaMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:10:13 GMT
Re: Sound Recording LicenseRandy NieuwsmaMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:55:05 GMT
Re: Legal ways around copyright for one's own giveaway textsStevan HarnadFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"--I misreadJohn AllisonThu Oct 30 2003 - 21:26:58 GMT
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersMinodierThu Oct 30 2003 - 21:26:58 GMT
Re: Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's ownsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Oct 30 2003 - 21:26:58 GMT
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and Webcasterstom poeThu Oct 30 2003 - 18:20:20 GMT
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and Webcasterssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Oct 31 2003 - 18:16:18 GMT
Re: Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersElizabeth AdeneySat Dec 06 2003 - 01:45:47 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"tom poeThu Oct 30 2003 - 18:20:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonThu Oct 30 2003 - 18:20:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborThu Oct 30 2003 - 21:26:58 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergFri Oct 31 2003 - 18:16:18 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineFri Oct 31 2003 - 18:16:18 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineFri Oct 31 2003 - 18:16:18 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Nancy WillardFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborMon Nov 03 2003 - 19:55:36 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Tilyou1[_at_]aol.comMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:10:13 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Karen CoyleMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:36:42 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"lq2[_at_]feministsf.orgMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:50:12 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:55:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"David DaileyTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:03 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Freya AndersonTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Freya AndersonTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Lloyd DavidsonTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:45:31 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:21:08 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:21:08 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John AllisonWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:21:08 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:07 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:07 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:07 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:07 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Robert F. BodiTue Nov 11 2003 - 21:12:08 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWed Nov 12 2003 - 16:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Keith TaborWed Nov 12 2003 - 16:20:18 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Mike HoldernessWed Nov 12 2003 - 21:00:07 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"John R. LevineThu Oct 30 2003 - 16:46:06 GMT
Re: Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersMinodierThu Oct 30 2003 - 16:46:06 GMT
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWed Oct 29 2003 - 18:10:29 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzFri Oct 31 2003 - 21:51:20 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzMon Nov 03 2003 - 15:50:11 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Kevin GriersonMon Nov 03 2003 - 21:36:02 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzTue Nov 04 2003 - 21:25:54 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWed Nov 05 2003 - 16:15:24 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWed Nov 05 2003 - 21:50:26 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Dodi SchultzWed Nov 12 2003 - 16:20:18 GMT
Note on the Proposed WIPO Treaty for Broadcasters, Cablecasters and WebcastersJames LoveWed Oct 29 2003 - 18:10:29 GMT
representing independent artiststom poeTue Oct 28 2003 - 21:25:24 GMT
Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Doug IsenbergTue Oct 28 2003 - 21:25:24 GMT
Re: Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book"Ken StuartTue Nov 04 2003 - 17:26:04 GMT
RE: Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewCarl JohnsonMon Oct 27 2003 - 20:24:00 GMT
RE: Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewAgenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD)Tue Oct 28 2003 - 16:05:02 GMT
Draft article on Project Gramophone now online for comment -- please reviewJon NoringMon Oct 27 2003 - 16:10:30 GMT
SHERPA will take over the Romeo Publisher Policy TableStevan HarnadMon Oct 27 2003 - 16:10:30 GMT
Version 51, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Mon Oct 27 2003 - 16:10:30 GMT
RE: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedChris MohrFri Oct 24 2003 - 16:20:26 GMT
Re: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedJeremy SmithThu Oct 23 2003 - 15:21:00 GMT
Exporting CDs to JapanMike PhillipsThu Oct 23 2003 - 15:21:00 GMT
FTAA Treaty Chapter on IP "Threatens Freedom and Free Trade"Robin GrossWed Oct 22 2003 - 15:00:17 GMT
RE: Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD toebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedChris MohrWed Oct 22 2003 - 15:00:17 GMT
Re: Re: poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoTue Oct 21 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoTue Oct 21 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD to ebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedEdward BarrowMon Oct 20 2003 - 18:55:10 GMT
Question regarding applicability of UK's EUCD to ebook format convertor for use by the visually impairedJeremy SmithMon Oct 20 2003 - 15:25:24 GMT
RE: poets and the right to quoteMichael GrahamFri Oct 17 2003 - 16:40:04 GMT
Re: Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performerspao-cni[_at_]ascent.comFri Oct 17 2003 - 16:40:04 GMT
Re: Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersJames and Dorothy BrennanFri Oct 17 2003 - 16:40:04 GMT
ISMIR - FINAL REMINDERSusan Emilie ManusThu Oct 16 2003 - 19:00:06 GMT
poets and the right to quoteKarl-Erik TallmoThu Oct 16 2003 - 19:00:06 GMT
Re: poets and the right to quoteVance R. KovenFri Oct 17 2003 - 16:40:04 GMT
Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersRoy MurphyThu Oct 16 2003 - 19:00:06 GMT
Re: Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersJohn R. LevineFri Oct 17 2003 - 16:40:04 GMT
RE: question regarding the DMCAChelsea WintleWed Oct 15 2003 - 20:11:01 GMT
Response to inquiry about legal recordings for performersinfo[_at_]joybutler.comWed Oct 15 2003 - 20:11:01 GMT
Re: question regarding the DMCAIvan HoffmanWed Oct 15 2003 - 20:11:01 GMT
Re: question regarding the DMCARobert F. BodiWed Oct 15 2003 - 20:11:01 GMT
Re: question regarding the DMCAamalyah keshetFri Oct 17 2003 - 21:40:31 GMT
Legal recordings for performersKeith RutkowskiTue Oct 14 2003 - 21:00:17 GMT
RE: Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAChris MohrTue Oct 14 2003 - 21:00:17 GMT
question regarding the DMCAAmy HowellTue Oct 14 2003 - 21:00:17 GMT
Re: Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCARobert F. BodiTue Oct 14 2003 - 16:18:09 GMT
RE: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAChris MohrFri Oct 10 2003 - 20:02:09 GMT
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCATerry CarrollFri Oct 10 2003 - 20:02:09 GMT
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCAKeith TaborFri Oct 10 2003 - 20:02:09 GMT
Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCATheodora MichaelsFri Oct 10 2003 - 17:17:08 GMT
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCALinda GruberMon Oct 13 2003 - 17:40:21 GMT
Re: Writing "press the shift key" alleged to be violation of DMCALinda GruberThu Oct 16 2003 - 19:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessRobert F. BodiThu Oct 09 2003 - 19:15:40 GMT
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessKeith TaborThu Oct 09 2003 - 20:05:01 GMT
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessRobert F. BodiFri Oct 10 2003 - 17:17:08 GMT
Re: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open Accesssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Oct 13 2003 - 17:40:21 GMT
Berne Convention - time to modify the treaty?Gregory AharonianTue Oct 07 2003 - 19:55:10 GMT
brief amicus curiaeMelissa LomaxTue Oct 07 2003 - 15:47:15 GMT
Re: Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Roy MurphyTue Oct 07 2003 - 15:47:15 GMT
The WIPO Work Program - October 17 meeting in LisbonJames LoveTue Oct 07 2003 - 15:47:15 GMT
Re: Re: Napster: stealing another's vs. giving away one's own Linux vs WMDs?meTue Oct 07 2003 - 15:47:15 GMT
Early Registration!: TEACH Act Online WorkshopOlga FrancoisMon Oct 06 2003 - 20:55:03 GMT
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Terry CarrollMon Oct 06 2003 - 20:55:03 GMT
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Vance R. KovenMon Oct 06 2003 - 20:55:03 GMT
Re: Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.John NobleMon Oct 06 2003 - 20:55:03 GMT
Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Malla PollackMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Fwd: [Fwd: filmwork] from Staffan TesteVance R. KovenMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Visual art vs. computer softwareDaniel C. BoyerMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Statutory copyright review in Canada: new deadlineWallace J.McLeanMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Re: Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104ACalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Tilley v. TJX Companies and Dennis East Intl.Roy MurphyMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?Joseph Pietro RioloFri Oct 03 2003 - 15:05:16 GMT
Re: Can a layperson file brief amicus curiae?S. Martin KeletiMon Jul 12 2004 - 20:45:01 GMT
ISMIR CONFERENCESusan Emilie ManusThu Oct 02 2003 - 17:55:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesOhad MayblumThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
Re: Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesRobert F. BodiThu Oct 02 2003 - 19:46:38 GMT
Re: Re: Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?George EdwardThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
(no subject)éøåï äøù÷åáéõThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesRobert F. BodiWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Copying MP3 files for private purposesMatthias HannichWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. Lowrysstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryEdward BarrowThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryEdward BarrowThu Oct 02 2003 - 19:46:16 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenFri Oct 03 2003 - 15:05:16 GMT
Copying MP3 files for private purposesMeir KogmanWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
OCLC suitDana BostromWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaMike HoldernessWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Re: Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaJohn R. LevineMon Oct 06 2003 - 17:35:06 GMT
Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104AMike HoldernessWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRoy MurphyWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordTue Sep 30 2003 - 20:45:41 GMT
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWed Oct 01 2003 - 20:41:09 GMT
Re: Amicus Brief in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenThu Oct 02 2003 - 17:55:45 GMT
Section 506(c) and badges of fraudDavid DaileyTue Sep 30 2003 - 20:11:49 GMT
Article on Disney's Mickey MouseJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
20th Century Fox sued for "stealing" ideasJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Beyond the Commons UpdateAnthony McCannTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Re: Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?Vance R KovenMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Charles Nesson, keynote speaker at MCN 2003amalyah keshetMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaKeith TaborMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaTerry CarrollMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Hillary Clinton in ChinaCarol BusbyMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kika KikaMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMon Jul 14 2003 - 18:16:33 GMT
--> Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaTue Jul 15 2003 - 16:03:11 GMT
--> Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Jul 21 2003 - 15:03:06 GMT
--> Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberWed Jul 23 2003 - 15:05:36 GMT
--> Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberTue Jul 29 2003 - 19:55:06 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonThu Jul 17 2003 - 16:55:23 GMT
Russian work, American site - Agreement American or Russian?George EdwardMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentRobert F. BodiMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentKeith TaborMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentRobert F. BodiTue Sep 30 2003 - 20:11:49 GMT
Re: Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentKeith TaborWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Hillary Clinton in ChinaMichael CarrollMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Formal negotiations on extending international copyright of older sound recordings? (With Canada of especial interest)Jon NoringMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104ACalle Østergaard - Troll Company ApSSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
RE: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelHarold FederowFri Sep 26 2003 - 18:56:57 GMT
RE: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelS. Martin KeletiMon Jan 09 2006 - 19:15:55 GMT
RE: Re: Catholic copyrights.Lawrence E. RosenFri Sep 26 2003 - 18:56:57 GMT
RE: Re: Catholic copyrights.Lawrence E. RosenMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Mike HoldernessFri Sep 26 2003 - 18:56:57 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Nancy WillardSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Roy MurphySat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Karen ScarrMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Roy MurphyMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Vance R KovenMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: Catholic copyrights.Mike HoldernessWed Oct 01 2003 - 16:15:10 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Anthony McCannFri Sep 26 2003 - 16:27:17 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Anthony McCannFri Sep 26 2003 - 16:27:17 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFri Sep 26 2003 - 18:56:57 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Vance R. KovenMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog Via E-MailCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:55:10 GMT
Catholic copyrights.Nakerite[_at_]aol.comFri Sep 26 2003 - 15:55:10 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Joseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Re: Catholic copyrights.Kevin GriersonWed Oct 01 2003 - 18:35:25 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelDoug IsenbergThu Sep 25 2003 - 20:01:35 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgThu Sep 25 2003 - 20:01:35 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgFri Sep 26 2003 - 18:56:57 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelMalla PollackMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library Hotelsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelTerry CarrollMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Re: Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelMalla PollackTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Chess Vision Trainer and Chess Visualisation TrainingJan MatthiesThu Sep 25 2003 - 18:42:30 GMT
Re: Chess Vision Trainer and Chess Visualisation TrainingJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Jon NoringTue Sep 23 2003 - 20:57:50 GMT
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Edward BarrowTue Sep 23 2003 - 19:50:35 GMT
Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Annas SolisTue Sep 23 2003 - 19:00:25 GMT
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Status of pre-1972 U.S. recordings in other countries?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:12 GMT
OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelFrederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.orgTue Sep 23 2003 - 16:55:10 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 25 2003 - 18:42:30 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelNick ZalesFri Sep 26 2003 - 15:55:10 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloFri Sep 26 2003 - 15:55:10 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: OCLC Suit Against the Library HotelDodi SchultzMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
ISMIR HOTEL REMINDERSusan Emilie ManusMon Sep 22 2003 - 19:55:20 GMT
RE: Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Fletcher, EricMon Sep 22 2003 - 19:55:20 GMT
Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Re: Did Chutney commit copyright infringement?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Re: PDF & BlackboardKeith TaborMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Re: Re: PDF & BlackboardTheodore L. AraujoMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
ISO looking in collecting fees for using standardsJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentGregory AharonianMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Re: Growing global patenting of art and entertainmentJoseph Pietro RioloSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: PDF & BlackboardRobert F. BodiSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
Re: PDF & BlackboardDoug IsenbergSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
RE: PDF & BlackboardShelly WarwickSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
RE: PDF & BlackboardAlexander, BryanSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
RE: PDF & BlackboardKathy TadlockTue Sep 23 2003 - 16:55:10 GMT
Object code as deposit materialLiz ChicknavorianFri Sep 19 2003 - 19:05:35 GMT
Re: Object code as deposit materialKarsten M. SelfThu Sep 25 2003 - 18:42:30 GMT
PDF & BlackboardRobinson, SusanFri Sep 19 2003 - 19:05:35 GMT
Re: PDF & BlackboardMelissa LomaxSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
RE: DMCA analysis of www.novelart.comRobert JenkinsThu Sep 18 2003 - 16:14:21 GMT
DMCA analysis of www.novelart.comBryan TaylorWed Sep 17 2003 - 15:50:00 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenTue Sep 16 2003 - 17:42:25 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryMike OliverTue Sep 16 2003 - 22:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleTue Sep 16 2003 - 22:01:10 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWed Sep 17 2003 - 15:48:21 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleWed Sep 17 2003 - 15:48:21 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryMike OliverWed Sep 17 2003 - 17:41:45 GMT
Re: Re: More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenWed Sep 17 2003 - 17:41:45 GMT
Re: More on Satava v. LowryJohn NobleTue Sep 16 2003 - 15:03:36 GMT
Satava District Court OpinionRalph D. CliffordMon Sep 15 2003 - 20:15:21 GMT
More on Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMon Sep 15 2003 - 20:15:21 GMT
Re: More on Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalasbfldMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalWallace J.McLeanMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
oops -- addendumMichael CarrollMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: copyright of headline redistribution (using RSS)?Doug IsenbergMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc. and deceased presses in generalJohn R. LevineMon Sep 15 2003 - 16:20:06 GMT
copyright of headline redistribution (using RSS)?Gay GilmoreMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Veeck v. SBCCI note resent with html linksVance R. KovenMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open AccessStevan HarnadThu Oct 09 2003 - 15:11:27 GMT
Veeck v. SBCCI note resent with html linksEric WeisbergFri Sep 12 2003 - 22:15:33 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiFri Sep 12 2003 - 20:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Eric WeisbergFri Sep 12 2003 - 20:55:29 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Eric WeisbergFri Sep 12 2003 - 22:15:33 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Bryan TaylorMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiMon Sep 15 2003 - 16:20:06 GMT
Re: Re: copyright for treaties?Robert F. BodiSat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Terry CarrollFri Sep 12 2003 - 19:00:12 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Vance R. KovenFri Sep 12 2003 - 19:00:12 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?David DaileyFri Sep 12 2003 - 19:00:12 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Mike HoldernessFri Sep 12 2003 - 19:00:12 GMT
copyright for treaties?JQ JohnsonFri Sep 12 2003 - 14:36:05 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Kevin GriersonMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
Re: copyright for treaties?Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 22 2003 - 15:20:15 GMT
ISMIR REGISTRATIONSusan Emilie ManusThu Sep 11 2003 - 22:28:10 GMT
Bill C-36 impact reduxWallace J.McLeanThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsVance R. KovenThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsBrock ShinenThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Incorrectly Completed FormsRoland ColeFri Sep 12 2003 - 14:36:05 GMT
Re: Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Wallace J.McLeanThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
Incorrectly Completed FormsMike PhillipsThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyJuan Saavedra CastroThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
Re: Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
RE: broadcasting rights and the little guyMichael GrahamWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyBrock ShinenWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
Re: broadcasting rights and the little guyVance R. KovenWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
TEACH and Digital Fair Use Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Karen CoyleWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
broadcasting rights and the little guyKathleen WilliamsonWed Sep 10 2003 - 18:55:07 GMT
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryLawrence E. RosenTue Sep 09 2003 - 15:41:01 GMT
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerFri Sep 12 2003 - 14:36:05 GMT
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerFri Sep 12 2003 - 22:15:33 GMT
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert PanzerMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
RE: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryMichael GrahamMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiMon Sep 08 2003 - 20:55:23 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiTue Sep 09 2003 - 17:21:00 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryTheodore L. AraujoTue Sep 09 2003 - 17:21:00 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiWed Sep 10 2003 - 22:10:20 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRobert F. BodiThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordThu Sep 11 2003 - 22:28:10 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryBryan TaylorMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryBryan TaylorMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenMon Sep 15 2003 - 20:15:21 GMT
Re: Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRoy MurphySat Sep 20 2003 - 00:58:53 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawltlredwagonMon Sep 08 2003 - 19:25:12 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJohn NobleTue Sep 09 2003 - 15:41:01 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawKeith TaborTue Sep 09 2003 - 19:30:28 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawRobert F. BodiWed Sep 10 2003 - 18:55:07 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawRobert F. BodiThu Sep 11 2003 - 19:10:35 GMT
Re: Hawthorn Books Inc.Safdar JafriMon Sep 08 2003 - 19:25:12 GMT
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJohn NobleMon Sep 08 2003 - 15:48:08 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright QuestionKeith TaborMon Sep 08 2003 - 15:48:08 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright QuestionJohn NobleMon Sep 08 2003 - 15:48:08 GMT
Re: Copyright QuestionKeith TaborMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Copyright law vs. Trademark lawltlredwagonMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJoseph Pietro RioloWed Sep 10 2003 - 15:15:29 GMT
Re: Copyright law vs. Trademark lawJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
new database protection legislationspacific[_at_]earthlink.netMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Hawthorn Books Inc.Desmond GaynorMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
RE: Copyright QuestionChris MohrMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Copyright QuestionEric Von VorysFri Sep 05 2003 - 22:14:40 GMT
Subject Index to Literature on Electronic Sources of InformationMarian DworaczekThu Sep 04 2003 - 15:00:47 GMT
Re: Section 108: Film Archives QueryKeith TaborWed Sep 03 2003 - 20:45:16 GMT
Wikipedia, GNU FDL, and CC Attribution-Share AlikeJimmy WalesWed Sep 03 2003 - 20:45:01 GMT
Section 108: Film Archives QueryDaniel SmithWed Sep 03 2003 - 19:50:15 GMT
RE: Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Lawrence E. RosenWed Sep 03 2003 - 14:59:25 GMT
[NetGold] WRITING AND WRITERS: PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism Advisory ServiceDavid P. DillardWed Sep 03 2003 - 14:59:25 GMT
Version 50, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:59:25 GMT
Re: Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Sep 02 2003 - 18:01:15 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksMike HoldernessTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsKeith TaborTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAssstouden[_at_]thelinks.comTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsIvan HoffmanTue Sep 02 2003 - 18:01:15 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleTue Sep 02 2003 - 18:01:15 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleWed Sep 03 2003 - 19:50:15 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborWed Sep 03 2003 - 20:45:01 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborThu Sep 04 2003 - 20:15:34 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightKeith TaborFri Sep 05 2003 - 20:17:32 GMT
Re: Re: Interview CopyrightJohn NobleFri Sep 05 2003 - 20:17:32 GMT
Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightTyler OchoaMon Nov 25 2002 - 20:06:00 GMT
RE: Interview CopyrightHoward P. ShawThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightMike CarrollFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzWed Sep 03 2003 - 14:59:25 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzThu Sep 04 2003 - 15:00:47 GMT
Re: Interview CopyrightDodi SchultzFri Sep 05 2003 - 17:55:15 GMT
Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMon Sep 08 2003 - 19:25:12 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloWed Sep 10 2003 - 15:15:29 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordWed Sep 10 2003 - 18:55:07 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloThu Sep 11 2003 - 16:01:30 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryVance R. KovenFri Sep 12 2003 - 19:00:12 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryRalph D. CliffordMon Sep 15 2003 - 16:20:06 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 15 2003 - 16:20:06 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryKevin GriersonMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Re: Amicus Support in Satava v. LowryMichael CarrollMon Sep 15 2003 - 18:20:05 GMT
Definitions of "common knowledge" in NDAsJim WitteMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Joseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadWed Sep 03 2003 - 14:59:25 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFri Sep 05 2003 - 17:55:15 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFri Sep 05 2003 - 17:55:15 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadFri Sep 05 2003 - 20:17:32 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Public Access to Science Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)Stevan HarnadWed Jul 28 2004 - 18:25:01 GMT
RE: Help settling a copyright questionChris MohrFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
Re: Re: Music PublishingBrock ShinenFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
Parties equal on terms (was: Digest #2106)I.R.MaturanaFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
RE: Re: Music PublishingRobert PanzerFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksLauren/Paul SlevenFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
Re: Complimentary Copies of TextbooksJohn R. LevineTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Dugie Standeford on new Hague discussions on contract jurisdiction treatyJames LoveFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
Canadian Bill C-36 and public domain status of historic documentsWallace J.McLeanThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
Re: Music PublishingBrock ShinenThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
RE: Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?juan saavedra CASTROThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
RE: Qestions on copyright and IP rights!GROVES PeterThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
RE: Who owns signature guitar licks?GROVES PeterThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Brock ShinenThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Re: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Robert F. BodiMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Brock ShinenThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Rich StimThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Re: Who owns signature guitar licks?Phil LeonardThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Music PublishingRadioEsq[_at_]aol.comThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Re: Re: Which language?pjones[_at_]millerthomson.caThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:11:38 GMT
RE: Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106I.R.MaturanaThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionTerry CarrollThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Who owns signature guitar licks?Mike PhillipsThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
Qestions on copyright and IP rights!Krish ChandraThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
RE: Current status of copyright protection of dataGROVES PeterWed Aug 27 2003 - 19:43:07 GMT
RE: Which language?Maria EliseevaWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:35:10 GMT
Re: (SPAM-05.50) Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
Which language?George EdwardWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
Help settling a copyright questionRobert E. Jones, IIITue Aug 26 2003 - 18:30:11 GMT
Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
Re: Help settling a copyright questionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
Copyright law should be repealed, saith an authorJoseph Pietro RioloTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataBrock ShinenMon Aug 25 2003 - 19:30:04 GMT
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataJames and Dorothy BrennanTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Robert F. BodiMon Aug 25 2003 - 19:30:04 GMT
Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Lauren/Paul SlevenMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Fwd: CNI-COPYRIGHT Digest #2106Kevin GriersonThu Aug 28 2003 - 18:09:32 GMT
Current status of copyright protection of dataJon NoringMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Current status of copyright protection of dataSimon MinahanWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
RE: Digital Licensing Online SeminarKingStacey[_at_]howrey.comFri Aug 22 2003 - 16:17:56 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksBrock ShinenFri Aug 22 2003 - 16:17:56 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiFri Aug 22 2003 - 19:37:24 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksKeith TaborMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiMon Aug 25 2003 - 19:30:04 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksBrock ShinenMon Aug 25 2003 - 19:30:04 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksKeith TaborMon Aug 25 2003 - 20:14:35 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRoy MurphyTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
Re: Re: complementary copies of text booksNakerite[_at_]aol.comTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
WP's Jonathan Krim: The Quiet War Over Open-Source (at WIPO)James LoveFri Aug 22 2003 - 16:17:56 GMT
Re: complementary copies of text booksRobert F. BodiThu Aug 21 2003 - 21:25:22 GMT
IP in Academia 2003, Online WorkshopsOlga FrancoisThu Aug 21 2003 - 21:25:22 GMT
complementary copies of text booksVicky TsaiThu Aug 21 2003 - 18:00:29 GMT
Re: complementary copies of text booksLaurie UrquiagaMon Aug 25 2003 - 19:30:04 GMT
Call for Stories on the Public DomainShelly WarwickThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Call for Stories on the Public DomainShelly WarwickThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFri Aug 22 2003 - 19:37:24 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenTue Aug 26 2003 - 15:28:11 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenWed Aug 27 2003 - 19:43:07 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source Licensingirm[_at_]in3activa.comThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenFri Aug 29 2003 - 19:25:43 GMT
RE: Re: Open Source LicensingI.R.MaturanaMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
RE: [cni] Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Edward BarrowWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
RE: [cni] Re: Open Source LicensingEdward BarrowWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Kathleen WilliamsonWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Robert F. BodiWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverWed Aug 20 2003 - 16:55:10 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBryan TaylorThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBryan TaylorThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverThu Aug 21 2003 - 18:00:29 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingMike OliverFri Aug 22 2003 - 16:17:56 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source LicensingBrock ShinenFri Aug 29 2003 - 15:30:40 GMT
Re: Re: Open Source Licensingsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Jon NoringWed Aug 20 2003 - 16:55:09 GMT
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Donation of copyrighted works (e.g., sound recordings) to public domain possible?Joseph Pietro RioloThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Copyright Term ExpirationBrock ShinenTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
RE: Open Source LicensingLawrence E. RosenTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
RE: Open Source LicensingMichael GrahamTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
RE: [cni] Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Edward BarrowTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
Re: Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An OriginalMike HoldernessTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Copyright Term ExpirationMike PhillipsTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Open Source LicensingMike PhillipsTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Open Source LicensingCrystal OdenkirkThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Open Source LicensingCrystal OdenkirkThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 27 2003 - 15:22:34 GMT
Re: Open Source LicensingJoseph Pietro RioloTue Sep 02 2003 - 15:15:04 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Brock ShinenTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Brock ShinenTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"MinodierTue Aug 19 2003 - 19:20:05 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comWed Aug 20 2003 - 21:45:00 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:40 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Keith TaborThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Aug 21 2003 - 15:40:44 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comThu Aug 21 2003 - 18:00:29 GMT
Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Robert F. BodiTue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT
Re: Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An Original Song TuneBrock ShinenMon Aug 18 2003 - 18:55:04 GMT
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Copyright Remedy Against Distorting An Original Song TuneSafdar JafriMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
EXTENSION - ISMIR EARLY REG.Susan Emilie ManusMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Re: Out of Office AutoRepliesKeith TaborFri Aug 15 2003 - 05:55:54 GMT
Re: Re: MS Access CopyrightBrock ShinenFri Aug 15 2003 - 05:55:54 GMT
Government Intrusion?Lee S. Strickland, J.D., Univ. of MarylandFri Aug 15 2003 - 05:55:54 GMT
Out of Office AutoRepliesDodi SchultzThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
Re: Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
Re: Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessRoland ColeWed Aug 27 2003 - 19:43:07 GMT
ISMIR - EARLY REGISTRATIONSusan Emilie ManusThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
Re: MS Access CopyrightRobert F. BodiThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
Re: MS Access CopyrightKevin GriersonThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
RE: Free Access vs. Open AccessJan VelteropWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesDodi SchultzWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
MS Access CopyrightCarmine PoliandroWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
A Call for Stories in Support of a Robust Public DomainShelly WarwickTue Aug 12 2003 - 04:10:20 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesJohn NobleTue Aug 12 2003 - 04:10:20 GMT
Re: Is Project Gutenberg Australia vulnerable to being shut down? (was Germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone")Roy MurphyTue Aug 12 2003 - 04:10:20 GMT
RE: Re: Literal TranslationsI.R.MaturanaMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Is Project Gutenberg Australia vulnerable to being shut down? (was Germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone")Jon NoringMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
RE: Re: Scanning print articlesRobert PanzerMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionTerry CarrollTue Aug 12 2003 - 04:10:20 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionJoseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionTerry CarrollThu Aug 14 2003 - 05:30:29 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionRobert F. BodiFri Aug 15 2003 - 05:55:54 GMT
Re: Re: SCO Linux questionBryan TaylorMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Delay in CNI-COPYRIGHT List posting for August 11-15, 2003CNI CGP List ManagerMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:54:17 GMT
"Project Gramophone" discussion group started -- do contributeJon NoringMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Derivitive Works in the SCO caseBryan TaylorMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Copyright status of pre-WWII recordings; germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone"Roy MurphyMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessJoseph Pietro RioloWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadMon Dec 15 2003 - 16:37:33 GMT
Re: Free Access vs. Open AccessStevan HarnadTue Dec 30 2003 - 17:26:11 GMT
RE: Literal TranslationsvbelFri Aug 08 2003 - 18:45:38 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOChris MohrFri Aug 08 2003 - 18:10:35 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOvbelFri Aug 08 2003 - 18:45:38 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOvbelFri Aug 08 2003 - 18:45:38 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOlrosen[_at_]rosenlaw.comFri Aug 08 2003 - 19:31:00 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOChris MohrMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
RE: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOGROVES PeterWed Aug 13 2003 - 02:41:34 GMT
Literal TranslationsNakerite[_at_]aol.comFri Aug 08 2003 - 18:10:35 GMT
Re: Literal TranslationsJoseph Pietro RioloMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorFri Aug 08 2003 - 15:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorFri Aug 08 2003 - 19:31:00 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOsstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORoy MurphyMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORobert F. BodiMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCORobert F. BodiMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOTerry CarrollMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Re: Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Bryan TaylorFri Aug 08 2003 - 15:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Jeremy G ByrneFri Aug 08 2003 - 15:35:07 GMT
Re: Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiMon Aug 11 2003 - 17:47:28 GMT
Digital Licensing Online SeminarLesley Ellen HarrisThu Aug 07 2003 - 20:50:12 GMT
Re: Running Software, Copyright, and SCOKevin GriersonThu Aug 07 2003 - 20:50:12 GMT
Re: SCO Linux questionBryan TaylorThu Aug 07 2003 - 20:32:52 GMT
Re: SCO Linux questionRoy MurphyThu Aug 07 2003 - 20:50:12 GMT
Running Software, Copyright, and SCOBryan TaylorThu Aug 07 2003 - 20:32:52 GMT
Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiThu Aug 07 2003 - 19:55:37 GMT
Re: FWD:Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9th Cir.)Robert F. BodiThu Aug 07 2003 - 19:55:37 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticesRobert F. BodiThu Aug 07 2003 - 19:55:37 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticessstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Aug 18 2003 - 14:45:26 GMT
"plaintext email in the great outdoors is not ethical" DEPENDSRoland ColeWed Aug 06 2003 - 20:26:26 GMT
Re: [cni] Re: Silly ConfidentialityNoticesKevin GriersonWed Aug 06 2003 - 20:00:16 GMT
RE: Re: [cni] Re: SillyConfidentialityNoticesvbelWed Aug 06 2003 - 20:00:16 GMT
SCO Linux questionvbelWed Aug 06 2003 - 19:58:50 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Doug IsenbergWed Aug 06 2003 - 18:21:34 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Kathleen WilliamsonWed Aug 06 2003 - 18:21:34 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comMon Aug 18 2003 - 18:55:04 GMT
RE: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesvbelWed Aug 06 2003 - 18:21:34 GMT
Re: Re: Central vs. Distributed ArchivesKeith TaborWed Aug 06 2003 - 18:21:34 GMT
Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsWed Aug 06 2003 - 17:00:05 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Joseph Pietro RioloTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Dodi SchultzTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsTue Aug 19 2003 - 15:55:14 GMT
Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant"Theodora MichaelsWed Aug 20 2003 - 16:55:10 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRobert F. BodiWed Aug 06 2003 - 17:00:05 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoland ColeWed Aug 06 2003 - 20:26:26 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
Re: Re: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoland ColeThu Aug 28 2003 - 15:00:43 GMT
Re: Scanning print articlesPeter HirtleWed Aug 06 2003 - 17:00:05 GMT
Copyright conferenceFerullo, Donna L.Wed Aug 06 2003 - 17:00:05 GMT
RE: [cni] Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesEdward BarrowMon Aug 04 2003 - 19:05:20 GMT
Colleges explore legal Net music setupsM. Claire StewartMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Copyright status of pre-WWII recordings; germ of an idea for a "Project Gramophone"Jon NoringMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Bryan TaylorMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Bryan TaylorMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Roy MurphyMon Aug 11 2003 - 04:43:46 GMT
RE: Re: [cni] Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
RE: Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
RE: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesTurley, Patrick CMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesLars GaardenMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesLars GaardenMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborMon Aug 04 2003 - 19:05:20 GMT
RE: Silly Confidentiality NoticesMcNeill, JohnFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~sstouden[_at_]thelinks.comFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Brock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Keith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
RE: [cni] Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Edward BarrowFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Silly Confidentiality NoticesDodi SchultzFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Silly Confidentiality NoticesBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )Keith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )I.R.MaturanaFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Silly Confidentiality NoticesRoy MurphyFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMcNeill, JohnThu Jul 31 2003 - 15:05:24 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationFletcher, EricThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:45 GMT
RE: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationFletcher, EricFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workDan LesterWed Jul 30 2003 - 21:10:17 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workJeremy G ByrneThu Jul 31 2003 - 15:05:24 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workNancy WillardThu Jul 31 2003 - 15:05:24 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:44 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workJeremy G ByrneFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workRoy MurphyFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workRoy MurphyFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workDan LesterFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNeal PomeaWed Jul 30 2003 - 21:10:17 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenThu Jul 31 2003 - 15:05:24 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:44 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:44 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationTerry CarrollThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationIvan HoffmanThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:45 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 18:19:53 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNancy WillardFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenFri Aug 01 2003 - 19:56:32 GMT
Re: Re: Copyright and Distance EducationKeith TaborMon Aug 04 2003 - 15:00:06 GMT
Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenWed Jul 30 2003 - 18:20:25 GMT
Re: Intent to display a workBrock ShinenWed Jul 30 2003 - 18:20:25 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationNancy WillardWed Jul 30 2003 - 18:20:25 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationIvan HoffmanWed Jul 30 2003 - 18:20:25 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationBrock ShinenWed Jul 30 2003 - 18:20:25 GMT
RE: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Robert PanzerWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Re: Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsBrock ShinenWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Keith TaborWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Intent to display a workDan BallardWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Re: Intent to display a workJonathan M. FeigenbaumThu Jul 31 2003 - 15:05:24 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)I.R.MaturanaFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrThu Sep 04 2003 - 15:00:47 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrMon Sep 08 2003 - 19:25:12 GMT
RE: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Chris MohrTue Sep 16 2003 - 19:34:00 GMT
Copyright and Distance EducationTerry HermanWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationSusan BerginMon Mar 12 2001 - 19:18:31 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMichael CarrollWed Jul 30 2003 - 21:10:17 GMT
Re: Copyright and Distance EducationMichael CarrollFri Aug 01 2003 - 16:10:03 GMT
Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Karen ScarrTue Jul 29 2003 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Kevin GriersonTue Jul 29 2003 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsStephen FishmanTue Jul 29 2003 - 19:55:06 GMT
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsS. Martin KeletiFri Sep 05 2003 - 17:55:15 GMT
1956 UK Copyright StatuteRoland ColeTue Jul 29 2003 - 19:55:06 GMT
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft - EU legislationMike HoldernessTue Jul 29 2003 - 19:55:06 GMT
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft - EU legislationBryan TaylorWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Seeking Copyright Permission Question~~Michael VincentTue Jul 29 2003 - 19:55:06 GMT
Foreign Renewal SystemsBrock ShinenMon Jul 28 2003 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Foreign Renewal SystemsKevin GriersonTue Jul 29 2003 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMon Jul 28 2003 - 17:25:21 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonMon Jul 28 2003 - 19:30:45 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Kevin GriersonTue Jul 29 2003 - 21:05:15 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowWed Jul 30 2003 - 16:02:12 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Edward BarrowThu Jul 31 2003 - 17:45:44 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Aug 25 2003 - 15:15:02 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Theodora MichaelsMon Aug 25 2003 - 20:14:35 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThu Aug 28 2003 - 20:35:14 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 01 2003 - 17:20:12 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberWed Sep 03 2003 - 19:50:15 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThu Sep 04 2003 - 15:00:47 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 08 2003 - 14:49:59 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 08 2003 - 20:55:23 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 15 2003 - 15:11:26 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberSat Sep 27 2003 - 18:27:59 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Sep 29 2003 - 15:10:44 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberMon Sep 29 2003 - 20:01:10 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberTue Sep 30 2003 - 15:51:29 GMT
Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Linda GruberThu Oct 02 2003 - 15:29:58 GMT
REMINDER - ISMIR 2003Susan Emilie ManusFri Jul 25 2003 - 20:50:54 GMT
Re: Re: Building CopyrightTerry CarrollFri Jul 25 2003 - 18:25:04 GMT
Re: Re: Building CopyrightRobert F. BodiMon Jul 28 2003 - 17:25:21 GMT
Re: Re: Building CopyrightCMillard[_at_]oh.hra.comMon Jul 28 2003 - 19:30:45 GMT
RE: Building CopyrightRobert PanzerFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: Building CopyrightJames and Dorothy BrennanFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: Building CopyrightTerry CarrollFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: Building CopyrightRobert F. BodiFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: Building CopyrightBrock ShinenFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: Building CopyrightMatthew KrigbaumFri Jul 25 2003 - 18:25:04 GMT
Re: UDHR Article 27-2 vs US ConstituJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: click through license questionDan LesterFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
Re: click through license questionRobert F. BodiFri Jul 25 2003 - 15:20:02 GMT
click through license questionLloyd ChittendenThu Jul 24 2003 - 21:15:05 GMT
Building Copyrightmilone[_at_]mindspring.comThu Jul 24 2003 - 21:15:05 GMT
Re: Re: Re: Kelly v.Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)Robert F. BodiThu Jul 24 2003 - 18:30:33 GMT
Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)