Yes, but this is a straw-man argument. The original question had to do with
copying things from companies' web sites. That, it seems to me, would be
copying expression. Whether such copying is implicitly licensed by virtue of
putting the site up in the first place, is another matter, as is whether
taking little snippets would be fair use, or whether a company would ever
care under the circumstances.
Vance
On 1/3/06, Wallace J.McLean <ag737[_at_]freenet.carleton.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Copyright does not protect "information", "derived", "blue" or
> otherwise.
>
> Copyright protects expression. Not mere information.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Graham <mgraham[_at_]marshallip.com>
> Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2006 4:35 pm
> Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: Use of Company Trademark, etc.
>
> > Copyright does protect "derived information" and the manner in which
> > information is presented, though.
>
>
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org>
> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org>
> To resume mail list message delivery from postpone mode, E-mail to <
> CNI-COPYRIGHT-feed[_at_]cni.org>
> Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>
>
> Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <
> https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
>
>
-- Vance R. Koven Boston, MA USA vrkoven[_at_]world.std.comReceived on Wed Jan 04 2006 - 21:40:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT